Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3444 BREAKING: FBI ARRESTING TX DEMS as Bribery Scandal EXPLODES!!!

Transcript

Ep. 3444 BREAKING: FBI ARRESTING TX DEMS as Bribery Scandal EXPLODES!!! · Turley Talks

• 0:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
• 0:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
• 0:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is Turley Talks.
• 0:20
  [SPEAKER_03]: Here's what we're doing.
• 0:23
  [SPEAKER_03]: We have a response out for all of them if there are some in Texas, which I understand that there may be the Texas Department of Public Safety is searching for them.
• 0:33
  [SPEAKER_03]: We'll find them and we'll arrest them and take them to the Texas Capitol.
• 0:37
  [SPEAKER_03]: Those who are out of state think that they are beyond the reach of Texas law enforcement and that they may not be for one when they come back.
• 0:45
  [SPEAKER_03]: They're not going to go to their cozy home.
• 0:47
  [SPEAKER_03]: They will be arrested and taken to the Capitol.
• 0:50
  [SPEAKER_03]: But no this is my understanding that the FBI is going to search for these derelict Texas house members in whatever state they may be in and help identify for them and maybe work with us.
• 1:04
  [SPEAKER_03]: Let's bring them back.
• 1:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's official gang.
• 1:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: The fleeing Texas Democrats are now wanted fugitives on the FBI list.
• 1:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: You cannot make this stuff up.
• 1:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: The FBI is now actively hunting down.
• 1:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Texas Democrats who fled the state.
• 1:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now at the same time, we now have the ultra notorious George Sorosunder investigation for his role in funding these little runaways and a new Democrat bribery scandal is exploding as we speak.
• 1:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: But what we're going to find is that this is about so much more than Texas Democrat desperation.
• 1:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is ultimately about Trump and the Republicans officially and permanently crushing the Democrat party.
• 2:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: That is not hyperbolic.
• 2:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: I am going to show you in this live stream exactly how we are talking about the literal death, the end.
• 2:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: of the oldest political party in American politics.
• 2:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: And it's actually happening right before our very eyes.
• 2:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: I got the stats.
• 2:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is going to absolutely blow your mind.
• 2:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Greetings, everyone.
• 2:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is Livestream Friday.
• 2:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: I am your host, Dr. Steve, your patron professor.
• 2:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: Here to help you make sense.
• 2:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: The madness is the radical left desperately trying to stop
• 2:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: the unstoppable, the inevitable rise of a new conservative age all over the world.
• 2:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: So if you want to front row, see it on how you are changing the world in ways you never even imagine.
• 2:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Make sure to smack that bell and subscribe, but you are not going to want to miss a single episode.
• 2:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: As always, we've got a jam pack show for you today.
• 2:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Our super chats are up so feel free to send in your comments or questions and be my privilege to read them and answer them during this live stream.
• 3:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Also,
• 3:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Do you remember Biden's debate disaster when he blurted out?
• 3:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: We finally beat Medicare.
• 3:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, it's true.
• 3:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: I've strummed said you beat it to death.
• 3:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Medicare touches the lives of millions of Americans, but like just about everything the government touches, it's a mess.
• 3:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: And mistakes can cost you thousands between confusing rules and penalties and thousands of different plans.
• 3:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's no wonder so many people are spending more than what they need to because they're stuck with the wrong plan.
• 3:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why I want to introduce you to a genuinely helpful company called chapter.
• 3:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Chapter gives you personalized Medicare advice and they actually work for you, not the government, not big insurance.
• 3:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: They search every plan available, even those that other agents skip.
• 3:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: And by doing this, they save people an average of eleven hundred dollars per year.
• 3:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: And sometimes more in fact, chapter was able to save one couple.
• 4:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: Joan is wife three thousand dollars every year.
• 4:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Chapter's advice is completely free to my audience.
• 4:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: No fees, no pressure.
• 4:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just honest help.
• 4:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: So if you're already a medicare or about to be, I cannot recommend chapter enough.
• 4:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: Give him a call.
• 4:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: at nine one nine seven two seven one nine zero three to make sure your Medicare works for you.
• 4:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Most people wish they had called them sooner.
• 4:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, that's nine one nine seven two seven one nine zero three.
• 4:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's long been recognized by both ancients and moderns alike.
• 4:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: That once great political movements.
• 4:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: eventually and inevitably fall.
• 4:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: They collapse and deduct.
• 4:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: And what's so interesting is that you can actually see that decline.
• 4:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: You could see the collapse coming from a distance.
• 5:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: So before Alaric and the Visigal sacked Rome back in four, ten AD,
• 5:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: For decades leading up to that, a number of contemporary writers observed that Rome was in the process of self-destruction, basically killing over, degenerating
• 5:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: politically, economically, morally.
• 5:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: St.
• 5:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Augustin wrote his epic work, The City of God, dedicated to precisely that detailing how Rome's fall was inevitable given the societal rock from within or long before Sultan Mech Med of the Ottoman Empire conquered Constantinople in fourteen fifty-three it had already been
• 5:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: In many respects, conquered a century before that by the degenerating forces of political and economic stagnation and decline.
• 5:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: Once great political powers often eventually and inevitably fall.
• 6:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: And you and I are witnessing in real time a contrast
• 6:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: between a new political movement that is rising, that is dawning, that is just beginning to blossom to life.
• 6:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the magma movement.
• 6:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: And one that has reached its end.
• 6:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: One that is all sign show, indeed,
• 6:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: in the process of collapsing.
• 6:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: We are right now, make no mistake.
• 6:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: We are watching the oldest American political party, basically die.
• 7:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's collapsing.
• 7:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's imploding.
• 7:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's collapsing economically.
• 7:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Right.
• 7:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Democrat party right now is basically bankrupt the chief fundraising arm of the Democrat party at blue, which raised tens of billions of dollars for the party.
• 7:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're now on the verge of going completely defunded as it turns out the dozing of USAID cut off the Democrats from their gravy train from the major source of their funding.
• 7:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And as a result, the DNC, again, right now as we speak, is having to go into debt just to keep their lights on.
• 7:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it's not just their financial demise.
• 7:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Democrats are collapsing politically, as well as economically.
• 7:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: So after four years of being led by a dementia-enabled auto-pen,
• 8:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Together with a cackling hyena, who is so politically pathetic, she had to be appointed the candidate since she never won a single presidential primary in her life.
• 8:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: After four years of that, the Democrats suffered their single worst national defeat in modern political history.
• 8:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: They lost the popular vote.
• 8:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: They lost the electoral, but they lost every single swing state.
• 8:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: All seven, not even Obama was able to do that.
• 8:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: They lost the house.
• 8:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: They lost the Senate.
• 8:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: They lost a majority of governorships and state legislatures.
• 8:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: And they are currently polling at their lowest approval level.
• 9:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, that's not hyperbole ever ever since congressional approval rating and party approval rating has been measured.
• 9:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: They are at the lowest.
• 9:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: The latest Quinnipiac poll has a Democrats collapse and it just nineteen percent approval.
• 9:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're stock in an eighty twenty doom loop.
• 9:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: where they're trapped in doubling down on the single most unpopular political issues in the nation with bona fide communists like Mamdonia, New York and the Somali and Socialists in Minneapolis, the new faces of this dying party.
• 9:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they're dying economically, they're dying politically and now, perhaps most dramatically of them all.
• 9:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: They are collapsing demographically.
• 10:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: The rigged population numbers that they've been peddling and the racially segregated, jerry-mandered districts that are both combined to artificially keep the Democrats in federal political power are now coming to a colossal and catastrophic end.
• 10:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: And nowhere is that apocalyptic collapse appearing more than in the great state of Texas.
• 10:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: As you know, over fifty Texas Democrats this week literally ran away.
• 10:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: They ran away.
• 10:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: They fled their state, and they're currently hiding out in Illinois.
• 10:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: in a desperate and unanimously recognized futile effort to stop Republicans from redrawing Texas's congressional map and giving the GOP five more house seats for the twenty twenty six midterms.
• 11:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's a great firewall for Mike Johnson's going to make it very hard for Democrats to win back the house just with what Texas is doing love.
• 11:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Texas legislature wasted no time in issuing arrest warrants for every single one of these runaway Democrats.
• 11:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: And now it is official Texas Center John Corne in just announced that FBI Director Cash Patel has approved federal assistance to track down and arrest these runaway Democrats.
• 11:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Governor Abbott confirmed there is literally a drag net underway saying that Texas and the FBI are together.
• 11:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: tracking down these derelict Democrats, they will be brought directly to the Texas Capitol and each one will be arrested.
• 11:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not a matter of if it's only a matter of when.
• 11:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: So as we speak, these fifty plus Democrats are being literally hunted down by the FBI like fugitives.
• 12:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: So now we have Governor Greg Abbott, we've got to turn General Ken Paxton and now the FBI all making sure
• 12:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: There are very severe consequences for abandoning your democratic duty to Texas voters.
• 12:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, if you think about it, just the irony in all of this is beyond parity.
• 12:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: The very party that brands itself as the protector of democracy with the full green lighting of the legacy media, amplifying and parroting that brand,
• 12:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: That very party, the protectors and guardians of democracy are right now as we speak, deliberately thwarting the democratic process by running away from the very legislature they were elected by the people to serve it.
• 12:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's so pretty, it's so patently, obviously cringe that even Stephen co-bear the king of cringe, then now canceled late night clown, even co-bear this week confronted Illinois Governor Pritzker, who has his own moon orbiting in, that Illinois's the last state in the union that has any leg to stand on when it comes to congressional jerrymandering, in that they are these single most jerrymandered state in the nation.
• 13:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Even co-bar is saying that out loud.
• 13:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, you can't make the stuff up.
• 13:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Nobody is buying this stunt.
• 13:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Even Democrats see it as wreaking of total and complete and pathetic desperation.
• 13:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is an optics nightmare for them.
• 13:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: And now, it gets even worse.
• 13:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yes, whose tentacles have been found to be behind this latest stunt, this latest ridiculous Democrat stunt.
• 14:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Can you say George Sorrows?
• 14:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: I, I guess vampires don't, they don't technically sleep.
• 14:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: Do they?
• 14:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, this guy has his fangs in literally everything.
• 14:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh my heavens, Attorney General Ken Paxon has announced he is launching two separate investigations that are about to blow the scandal wide open.
• 14:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: We talked about the the first one yesterday in our video on the unlays here in Texas.
• 14:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: So he's investigating beta or roach group group called powered by people.
• 14:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Powered by pot I think, but powered by people.
• 14:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's being investigated for what Paxon is calling in the illegal financial influence, scheme to bribe these runaway Democrats.
• 14:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's calling it the Beto bribe.
• 14:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: So Paxon literally is saying he's going after any Democrat coward breaking law by taking a Beto bribe.
• 15:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: But now we just announced that he's launched a second investigation into the George Soros back, Texas majority pack.
• 15:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, good luck on that.
• 15:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: Texas majority pack.
• 15:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: for illegal fundraising and bribery of Texas House members.
• 15:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: So this billionaire foreign puppet master is literally once again funding the destruction of democracy from the shadows.
• 15:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: We talked last week about how sorrows has been exposed as being at the center of the Russian collusion hoats, right?
• 15:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: We now have a smoke and getting it.
• 15:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: And again, the legacy media doesn't give them rent about it.
• 15:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: You notice that?
• 15:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: The legacy media doesn't give a can you imagine like a far right
• 15:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: foreign billionaire, getting involved in some scheme to bring down Obama, they would be fixated over this thing.
• 15:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: But George Soros?
• 15:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: What?
• 15:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: What?
• 15:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's nothing new here.
• 15:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's nothing new to see here.
• 15:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: We now have a smoking gun email from the head of Soros's Open Society Foundation to openly discussing
• 16:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're planned with the then Democrat National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to tie President Trump to Russia in an admitted hoax as a way to distract voters from Hillary Clinton's email service scandal and and even said that the FBI would eventually get involved in it.
• 16:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: So sort this guy, so I mean, Soros literally spins his web into everything completely interfering and attempting to thwart the democratic process at every level.
• 16:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: But this time, Soros really seems to have mess with the wrong crowd.
• 16:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Seems to have stepped in it because now he's about to face law and order Texas style and Texas don't fool around.
• 16:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: But as I just alluded to, these two investigations on Beto and Soros are all part of a massive Democrat bribery scandal that is now exploding as we speak.
• 17:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Here again, is Texas Governor Greg Abbott.
• 17:09
  [SPEAKER_03]: Democrats, they have received money and benefits at their request to support them while they're gone.
• 17:19
  [SPEAKER_03]: It is a direct violation of the Texas Constitution as well as Texas Library laws for them to receive a benefit to skip a vote.
• 17:27
  [SPEAKER_03]: They could be charged with second degree felony for committing bribery in the state of Texas.
• 17:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: So, Governor Abbott has made it absolutely clear here any Texas Democrat accepts money to cover their daily five hundred dollar fines for abandoning their legislative duties will be charged with committing bribery under state law.
• 17:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: If any lawmaker took money to perform or to refuse to perform an act in the legislature, that is officially a felony bribe.
• 17:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: We are now getting word that Senator John Cornan has officially requested FBI Director Cash Patel to not only find and arrest these Democrats, but also investigate them for potential bribery and public corruption offenses.
• 18:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: So not only is the FBI assisting Texas law enforcement and countering and arresting these Democrats, but now they're apparently even assisting the Texas Attorney General in this investigation into freaking bribery.
• 18:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: So this goes way beyond simply skipping legislature here.
• 18:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's all about potentially criminal behavior to obstruct the Democrat process and getting primed to do it.
• 18:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Second degree felony bribery charges.
• 18:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then, of course, every single one of them will be removed from office.
• 18:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: They will be vacated, their seats will be vacated.
• 18:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: And they will face federal prosecution.
• 19:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, you have to let this hit you over fifty lawmakers are now under investigation for what could be the largest legislative corruption scandal and Texas history.
• 19:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: The FBI involvement, this is this, this is escalated far beyond political theater in the serious criminal territory.
• 19:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think they are they are about to learn the lesson of what is it.
• 19:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: What is it?
• 19:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: F a F a F oh, I should know it.
• 19:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, FAFO, right?
• 19:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: F around and find out.
• 19:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And to make matters even worse, as Governor Abbott is seeking to have these Democrats removed from their seats and that they deliberately vacated those seats upon their skipping town and disrupting the Democratic legislative process.
• 19:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Abbott is now going for the jugular.
• 19:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: He is now, get this, this is the latest, this just came literally hours ago.
• 20:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Governor Abbott is now threatening to redistrict eight seats
• 20:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: for the GOP at the Democrat lawmakers do not return to Texas immediately.
• 20:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, forget five seats.
• 20:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Pick up now we're talking eight.
• 20:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want ten.
• 20:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want, I want every Democrat out.
• 20:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: I need, by the way, Abbott isn't alone.
• 20:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Here is Texas State Representative Brian Harrison on doing just this.
• 20:26
  [SPEAKER_02]: We want to week the Democrats are gone.
• 20:28
  [SPEAKER_02]: One more Republican seat gets added to the map.
• 20:30
  [SPEAKER_02]: So they're gone one week instead of our new maps having five more Republican seats.
• 20:35
  [SPEAKER_02]: They're going to have six Democrats gone two weeks.
• 20:38
  [SPEAKER_02]: Well, we went from plus five to plus seven.
• 20:41
  [SPEAKER_02]: It's time to play hardball.
• 20:42
  [SPEAKER_02]: I'm sick of the Democrats fighting harder for the future of Texas than Texas Republicans are.
• 20:47
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's change that.
• 20:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's get this going.
• 20:48
  [SPEAKER_02]: For every week they're gone.
• 20:49
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let's amend the map one more Republican seat.
• 20:52
  [SPEAKER_02]: Let me know what you think.
• 20:53
  [SPEAKER_02]: Talk to y'all soon.
• 20:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: I can tell you exactly what I bet I could speak on behalf of all of us.
• 20:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Sounds great.
• 20:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, just let's just assume they're gone for years.
• 21:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, honestly, honestly, I think we're at a point where the Democrat party is at such political and moral demise that every single red state in the nation should gerrymander every remaining blue seat into oblivion.
• 21:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, we talked about the, I think it was just yesterday.
• 21:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court's already given the green line on that.
• 21:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court settled this debate back in twenty nineteen in a landmark case called Rucho versus common cause.
• 21:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: And Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that partisan Jerry Mandarin is allowed.
• 21:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: It goes, you know, now again, it cannot be racial.
• 21:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: We'll get into that in a moment.
• 21:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Can't be racially specific.
• 21:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: But if the party in power wants to jerry mandor in such a way, so as to guarantee they'll remain in power and perpetuity, that's their deal.
• 21:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: You shouldn't have elected them.
• 21:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: States can draw their districts.
• 21:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: However, they want federal judges cannot stop them.
• 22:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is not a judicial issue.
• 22:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is a legislative and democratic issue.
• 22:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that decision did just give Texas the green light.
• 22:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: It opened the flood gates for every state to redraw their maps.
• 22:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: And guess what?
• 22:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: It looks like Republicans are now finally fighting fire with fire.
• 22:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: More and more red states are openly saying it is time to render the Democrat party the Dodo bird.
• 22:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: In red states it is time to render the Democrat party extinct.
• 22:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And ironically,
• 22:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: It looks like it is indeed the Supreme Court that's about to step in and help those red states do precisely that wait until you see this.
• 22:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: But first gang, if you are just joining us, I'd love to hear a thoughts on all of this.
• 22:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'm sure you got a lot to say.
• 22:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let us know what you think.
• 22:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: You could do in two ways.
• 22:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: You could either send us a super chat or you could just click on that link below and join our courageous patriarch club.
• 23:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're for just one monthly fee.
• 23:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'll feature your comments in our broadcast and you can ask me as many questions as you like.
• 23:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'll be happy to answer them right here right now in this live stream.
• 23:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whatever works for you either throw super chats or through joining our courageous Patriots club.
• 23:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Also, if you're a homeowner like me,
• 23:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: You do need to take a listen to this.
• 23:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: When was the last time you checked on your home title?
• 23:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the legal proof.
• 23:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's the only legal proof as I understood that you own your home.
• 23:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Once the last time you'd love for your like me, the answer is never.
• 23:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the problem is today's AI and cyber world.
• 23:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Scammers is stealing home titles and your equity is the target and the way it works is so sinister criminals forge your signature on one document then they use a fake notary stamp they pay a small fee with your county and boom your home title has been transferred out of your name.
• 23:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Then they take out loans and use your equity or even sell your property.
• 24:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, you won't even know it's happened until months later until you get a collection notice or close or notice.
• 24:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's why you need to just stop what you're doing right now, protect yourself and your loved ones.
• 24:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: and click on the link below and find out today if you've already been a victim.
• 24:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: Use promo code turly talks at home title lock.com to make sure your title is still in your name.
• 24:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: You also get a free title history report plus a free fourteen day trial.
• 24:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're million dollar triple lock protection.
• 24:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's twenty for seven monitoring of your title.
• 24:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Urgent alerts, any changes and a fraud should happen.
• 24:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: They'll spend up to one million dollars.
• 24:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: to fix it.
• 24:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: So go to home title lock.com right now.
• 24:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Don't waste any time.
• 24:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: You can still listen to this live stream.
• 24:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: No problem.
• 24:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just click on the link.
• 24:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: It'll open up in a different window there.
• 24:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Use promo code, totally talks.
• 24:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's all one word.
• 24:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's home title lock.com, promo code, totally talks and secure your home right now today.
• 24:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: All right.
• 25:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: As I'm sure many of you know, Trump posted just the other day on true social that he has instructed the Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new highly accurate census based on modern day facts and importantly using results from the twenty twenty four presidential election.
• 25:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: The kicker in all of this, what has the Democrats absolutely weeping and gnashing their teeth
• 25:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: People, and they should tell you everything, this is what the Democrats weep and Nash their teeth over.
• 25:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: People in our country illegally will not be counted in the census, unlike what happened in twenty-twenty.
• 25:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that is the game changer.
• 25:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: For decades, Democrats have been running the most sophisticated election rigging scheme in American history.
• 26:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: since at least the nineteen eighties.
• 26:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: They deliberately opened our southern border.
• 26:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: They allowed tens of millions of third world invaders into the country, shove them into racially jerry-mandered districts in sanctuary states, then fought tooth and nail to count every single illegal alien in the national census.
• 26:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, why would they do that?
• 26:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: Is it because of democracy?
• 26:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, they can't vote.
• 26:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Why would they do that?
• 26:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're not supposed to be able to vote.
• 26:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Because census data determines how many house seats and electoral college votes each state gets.
• 26:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, we have talked about this at Nauseam on this channel.
• 26:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: What are the key trends that scholars have been quite fixated on over the last two decades is how red states and conservative populations are growing demographically because conservative, particularly conservative religionists are having kids, whereas blue state populations and liberal demographics have been increasingly shrinking because liberals have largely stopped having kids.
• 27:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: and kids born and conservatives, about eighty percent state conserving yet more conservative as they age into adulthood.
• 27:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: So what we've been seeing is red states have I believe somewhere upwards of a thirty percent fertility advantage over and against blue states.
• 27:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Blue states have been shrinking red states have been growing so that by twenty thirty it was estimated.
• 27:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: that the political power would inevitably shift over to red states by virtue of the electoral college and proportionate representation.
• 28:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: So how are blue states going to stave that off?
• 28:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, they opened up the Southern borders, bottom line.
• 28:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why they opened the Southern borders.
• 28:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why Europe is importing northern Africans and Middle Eastern.
• 28:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: By counting illegals here in the states, California, New York, Illinois, they've all been artificially inflating their political power
• 28:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: while real Americans get diluted representation.
• 28:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Stephen Miller explained it perfectly on Hannity the other night.
• 28:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: He said that at least twenty to thirty house Democrats seats would not exist but for illegal aliens being counted in the census and he's right.
• 28:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: Democrats rigged the twenty twenty census by including illegal aliens and they sued Trump when he tried to stop it in his first term.
• 29:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: But of course, Trump isn't just fixing the census.
• 29:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: At the same time, he's overseeing the single most dramatic political redistricting effort in our nation's history.
• 29:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's supporting Texas Republicans or re-drawing the congressional map now to give at least five seats.
• 29:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Hopefully at the end of it, I would love to see eight to ten.
• 29:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just make it really hurt.
• 29:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it's not just Texas now Florida Governor de Santas is following suit.
• 29:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: He is now just said Florida got cheated out of at least one seat in the last census and they're looking to add anywhere from four to five new GOP seats for the midterms.
• 29:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Texas and Florida are not alone.
• 29:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Indiana's in the process of adding two more GOP seats.
• 29:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: It has been confirmed that JD Vance did fly out and met with Indiana Republican officials and they have agreed they're going to redistrict Ohio.
• 29:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: They have to buy law.
• 29:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: They are adding two to three more GOP seats.
• 30:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're by law.
• 30:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're required to redistrict Missouri appears to be adding one Nebraska's looking to be adding one, but it gets worse for the Democrat.
• 30:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not just all of these red states now that are playing hardball ready to win these midterms just by redistricting allocations.
• 30:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now the Supreme Court is about to strike down the VRA.
• 30:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: We reported on this earlier this week, the Voting Rights Act.
• 30:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, it's not the voting right tack per se.
• 30:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's the way it has been exploited by Democrats to gerrymander racially specific districts.
• 30:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: So these are districts that were drawn up using the ridiculous notion of what's called voter dilution that a nineteen eighty six Supreme Court decision accepted.
• 30:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: And it was the Democrat argument that minority populations were being
• 31:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: politically disenfranchised by virtue of too many whites.
• 31:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: And they weren't able to vote for the politicians that they want.
• 31:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they convinced the Supreme Court to allow them to gerrymander districts that were what we call majority minority districts.
• 31:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: So these are districts that were drawn up to intentionally and deliberately exclude whites from the voting district.
• 31:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, again, I know you can't make this stuff.
• 31:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now they will wax eloquent for hours on how that's racial justice and that's social justice and blah, blah, blah, blah.
• 31:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: And they are, well, they're not blind.
• 31:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: They see it.
• 31:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: But of course, they want political power.
• 31:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: And this is their ticket to political power.
• 31:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: But at least they act completely blind to the notion it is just reverse discrimination.
• 31:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just reverse it the other way.
• 31:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Imagine white districts deliberately drawing themselves up so as to exclude non-white.
• 32:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in the process is the nineteen eighties, Democrats drawn up literally dozens upon dozens of racially segregated districts while the Supreme Court is about to shoot that down.
• 32:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is the golden age after all.
• 32:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court is about to, he's, they're about to row the way that thing.
• 32:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: And if you combine Trump's new census excluding illegals, if you combine all the redistricting that's already happening in red states,
• 32:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then you add on top of that the Supreme Court potentially overturning racial jerrymandering gang Democrats stand to lose in all of that upwards of approximately forty two seats in the house of represented are you sitting down maybe I should have told you that told you to sit down before you heard that they are on course to lose
• 33:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: upwards of forty two seats in the house.
• 33:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're talking now new solid red seats in South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Kentucky, Georgia, Tennessee, all of a sudden literally the redistricting floodgates would open up in the Democrats would be permanently swept away at least when it comes to the South and the Midwest.
• 33:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: It would be in terms of the congressional map, it would be solid red with no blue splatches, what is splatches anywhere.
• 33:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Republicans, if that is the case,
• 33:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Because right now with Texas redistricting, the Republicans would be sitting pretty solid, safe seats at twenty seventeen.
• 33:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: They only need to win one more seat among contested seats among the forty plus contested seats.
• 34:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's that.
• 34:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: You just have to win one and you've retained the majority of twenty eighteen.
• 34:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: But with the full redistricting,
• 34:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: with a new census and with the Supreme Court stepping in and reversing VRA.
• 34:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Republicans would be operating with a baseline, a more or less guaranteed baseline of around two hundred and forty seats in perpetuity.
• 34:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Democrats would be permanently locked out of congressional power
• 34:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: for the rest of this effort for generations.
• 34:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: So the Democrats lose forty two seats, what the same time Republicans also gain those seats.
• 34:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: So we're not talking about a, we're not talking about just a forty two point.
• 34:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Martin, we're talking about an eighty four point swing toward Republicans in eighty four seat swing toward Republicans.
• 35:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's an absolute landslide that would give the GOP a super majority, not just for the rest of Trump's presidency, but literally for the rest of the century.
• 35:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is why the Texas Democrats escaped town.
• 35:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's nothing to do with democracy.
• 35:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's nothing to do with authoritarianism.
• 35:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is nothing to do with representation.
• 35:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: The people's been nothing.
• 35:34
  [SPEAKER_01]: They've skipped town because they know the jig that they've been playing for seven decades is up.
• 35:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why they're literally fleeing states to at least halt for as long as they can redistricting votes.
• 36:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're trying to prolong the inevitable because the inevitable involves their literal demise as a viable political party.
• 36:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: We talked about this before.
• 36:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: as I bring this to a close here.
• 36:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it bears repeating, something very important.
• 36:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: You might want to even just do a little, your own little research on it, talk about with friends, families, those who have yet to be convinced of the scent, the rise, the inevitable rise of maga.
• 36:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Sociologists have long studied the characteristics that are exemplative of a dying social movement.
• 36:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: So if we compare those characteristics with what the Democrats are currently experiencing, it's very clear that the days of the oldest American political party are coming to an end.
• 36:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, there's just no way around it.
• 37:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: I know a lot of speakers who don't say that don't say there's, they're always going to find a way.
• 37:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, no, they're always going to find a way when they did not have all of these problems.
• 37:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: Evidenceing themselves when they did not have all of these symptoms Evidenceing themselves all the same time Yes, they were able to come back, but when they when you have all the characteristics of a dying social movement Then you're dying First and foremost dying social movements experience a mass loss in membership
• 37:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: mass loss in membership.
• 37:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: So interest in the movement just simply begins to fade.
• 37:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Bottom line, just ask Stephen Cobert.
• 37:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just ask CNN what happens, right?
• 37:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Or don't lemon what happens when people just lose interest in you.
• 37:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: You see a distinctive demise in association numbers.
• 38:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in the upwards of twenty-five states that track voter registration trends by party, the Democrats are losing in every single one.
• 38:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: Republicans are showing in net gain in voter registration in every single state, half the states in the country, that track voter registration trends by political party.
• 38:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: over the course of the last year.
• 38:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Democrats have been losing voter registration ground to the Republicans in every single swing state and in basically forty eight of fifty states.
• 38:49
  [SPEAKER_01]: There aren't any more voters.
• 38:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know what to say.
• 38:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: You can't be a growing vibrant party.
• 39:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: When your voter base is hemorrhaging, it's gone, whether it was the illegal migrants, whether it was the ballot stuffing, whatever it was, it's just, it's gone, it's not there anymore.
• 39:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: You saw that the Massachusetts governor
• 39:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: border line a literate said because of what Texas is doing we're going to have to jerry mandor here in in Massachusetts as well and then somebody kind of taps on the show and goes um we already did that we're one hundred percent democrat represented.
• 39:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's not a single zero zero Republican representatives coming.
• 39:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: from Massachusetts.
• 39:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: All their districts have already been jerryman.
• 39:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's nothing left.
• 39:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's not much left in California.
• 39:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's not much left in Illinois.
• 39:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's not much left in New York and plus they have to go through redistricting committee and then dependent redistricting committee to do that and that redistricting committee doesn't want to do it.
• 40:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: One of the reasons why those redistricting committees were set up in order to prevent further jerryman.
• 40:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there's just no more votes for them.
• 40:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: But in addition to losing membership, a dying social movement, evidence is a significant reduction in public attention.
• 40:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: So simply put the movement struggle to draw any attention to its cause given the diminished public interest.
• 40:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Nobody cares in the movement anymore.
• 40:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I can't help but think of that these series of just cringe political stunts one after another after another, these public relations and bearishments, that where the Democrats have just become the butt of all jokes, even among their own supporters, these were all just failed desperate attempts to try to get anybody to notice them again.
• 41:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then you combine that with the legacy media's dramatic audience decline and loss of influence of a public perception.
• 41:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: That is an ordinarily contributed to further damaging the Democrats ability to garner any significant attention to themselves.
• 41:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they lose memberships, they lose interest, thirdly dying social movements become bereft of any real leadership.
• 41:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now what we're seeing here, really for the first time in our lifetimes, where there is a total leadership vacuum inside the Democrat party with nobody there to fill it, yet good luck Gavin Newsom, give me a break, nobody's there to fill it.
• 41:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: That is
• 41:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: That is a key characteristic of a dying social movement.
• 42:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: A movement simply cannot survive without viable leadership that galvanizes, organizes, and effectively represents an advances the movement.
• 42:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why they've run out of money.
• 42:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's nobody there to raise money.
• 42:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is widely recognized, even among liberal outlets, the Democrats are completely and totally leaderless.
• 42:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: In fact, Tim Waltz, you know, was relatively recently asked, you know, Kamala's cackles behind this former running mate.
• 42:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: He was asked a point blank on CNN to identify who he thought the leader of the Democratic Party was.
• 42:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And he couldn't name a single what?
• 42:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Do you know what he said?
• 42:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: He said the voters are the leaders.
• 42:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: The voters are the head of the party, which is another way of saying they have no leader.
• 42:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Steven Cobert did that to Kamala.
• 42:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now this was the most embarrassing question that the former official candidate of a presidential nomination could possibly be asked because they are
• 43:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: by default, whether they win or lose, they are by default the leader of the party.
• 43:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Mitt Romney was the leader of the Republican for the interim period after his election loss.
• 43:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Same with John McCain after his election loss, Bob Dole after his election loss.
• 43:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: They are the interim leaders of the party until a new leader appears.
• 43:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: This deposit interim leader was asked, who's the leader?
• 43:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Because everyone knows she's not.
• 43:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Everyone knows those hundred and seven days.
• 43:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're a hundred and seven, twenty four hour disasters.
• 43:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Everyone knows that.
• 43:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: And what did she say?
• 43:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Not only did she say, you know, well, I am, she should have said that.
• 43:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, of course I am.
• 43:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: I was the, I was the Democrat presidential nominee.
• 43:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: I am the leader.
• 43:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whether we win or not, I'm the leader.
• 43:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, what did she say?
• 43:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know.
• 43:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: We have lots of leaders, she said.
• 43:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: to which Kobayah said what usually, you know, a leader is a leader, not leaders, leaders of multiple countries, sure, but a leader of a movement is not many.
• 44:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then finally, dying social movements lose all relevance in terms of viable issues.
• 44:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: the values, the interest, the concerns that the party stands for become peripheral to the values, the concerns, the vast majority of the population.
• 44:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: So this is what we're ultimately referring to when we talk about the AD-twenty doom loop that the Democrats are stuck in.
• 44:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: you know, where they're literally, they're planning their flags in the single most unpopular issues in the country.
• 44:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: And there's really nothing at this point they can do about it.
• 44:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, we've talked about what veteran political analyst Alex Castiano had observed about political movements that are basically in their death throws.
• 45:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: He makes the argument that the Kamala catastrophe was much bigger than just
• 45:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: the end of the campaign or the loss of an election.
• 45:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: He saw the Kamala catastrophe as the mark of the end of the Democrats is a viable political party.
• 45:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I think he's absolutely right.
• 45:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Harris's disastrous campaign that she's then wrote a book about.
• 45:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, just the utter narcissist, I mean, if there was ever evidence that this party is dead, it's that.
• 45:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: He read about a book of hundred seven days of how I lost, how I suffered the worst political defeat of modern political history.
• 45:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Cassiano argues that Harris's disastrous campaign revealed the decaying leprosal of the Democrats, of the Democrat party.
• 46:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: and what they've actually become.
• 46:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's been a student of political campaigns for decades in what Castellanus noted, was that what you see in campaigns that are losing and nearing their end as they often go after, think about this.
• 46:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: So interesting, they often go after their most radical wing.
• 46:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: They go after the most radical things that appealed to their base, their die hard base because they're the only ones who are showing up.
• 46:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're the only ones who are donating money.
• 46:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're the only ones who are involved.
• 46:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: So these campaigns then are done trying to reach out.
• 46:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: They've given up trying to reach the undissended voter or the Milkto supporter of their opponent or the people sitting on the fence.
• 47:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now it's just the most radical red beat for their most rabid supporters to drive a galvanism to get out to vote.
• 47:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in the process, those campaigns just run out of message.
• 47:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: They just run out of script.
• 47:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then they just become who they really are.
• 47:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in this case, with the case of Kackel's Kamala, the Kamala catastrophe, what we saw towards the end was the lifting of that joy joy joy veneer.
• 47:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: They tried to sell us an August this time last year.
• 47:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was the lifting of that joy joy veneer that the legacy media was desperately trying to persuade us on.
• 47:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: And once that veneer was lifted, they just exposed themselves to be who they really were in reality, which was the single most hate-filled miserable psychopathic campaign yet seen.
• 48:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: And what's so key here was that none of that was a straight and intentional strategy, none of it.
• 48:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why the Kamala campaign looks so haphazard and random and so poorly improvised towards the end.
• 48:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: With all those disastrous interviews, the Brett Bear interview where every answer was a tie rate against Trump or the CBS sixty minutes embarrassment with answers.
• 48:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, so cringe they literally had to edit them.
• 48:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: Trump's presidential library is going to be so beautiful that sixty minutes paid for wing tens of millions of dollars that they had to pay for for intentionally interfering in a election.
• 48:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: In the end, the Democrats just simply ran out of message.
• 48:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: And having run out of message, they were just left running on the fumes of what they were running on the fumes of their hate.
• 48:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, as Cass Dionis put it, I loved, he just, he summed it up in a single phrase, you could literally smell the decline.
• 49:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: And he argues, and I agree with him, and I hope I persuaded you on this in today's livestream.
• 49:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: that I don't think we're being overly optimistic here.
• 49:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think this is real serious analysis.
• 49:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: He argues that that decline, that decay, that deep composition that you could smell of the Kamala catastrophe was indeed indicative of the whole of the Democrat party.
• 49:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Kamala was the embodiment of what the Democrat party has become.
• 49:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're doubling down on their most radical wing.
• 49:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the more they doubled down on that radical wing, the more they alienate themselves from the electoral consensus, hence Quinnipiac's nineteen percent approval ring.
• 50:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: The more they doubled down on the radical wing, the more they alienate themselves from the electoral consensus.
• 50:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: So then think it through.
• 50:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: What do these fleeing Texas Democrats truly symbolize?
• 50:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: This fleeing the Texas Democrats from their state legislature is a symbol of the alienation and the exile that the Democrat party as a whole is experiencing increasingly in American politics.
• 50:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: It all turns out to be an indicator that the Democrats may be in a far more dire situation than simply being politically unpopular.
• 50:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: I would argue it is all an indicator that this is nothing less than the beginning of the end of the Democrat party itself.
• 51:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Over to you.
• 51:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: Over to you guys.
• 51:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want to hear what you have to say enough of me chatting and blabbering as Josh assembles your questions.
• 51:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want to give a big shout out to our good friends over at Bean Dream.
• 51:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: If you're having a hard time following a sleep at night and let's face it.
• 51:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Most of us are meet your night in shining armor at least
• 51:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: I told you guys about this.
• 51:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: I've been using beam dream nightly now for months.
• 51:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: I genuinely cannot imagine my nights without it.
• 51:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Before dream, frankly, I just lie awake for hours.
• 51:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think about the future of the news.
• 51:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maybe I'm too excited thinking about the Democrats' eventual demise, but I just can't sleep.
• 51:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: I can't turn my brain off.
• 51:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: But now, a beam dream gang, I fall asleep seriously.
• 51:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: I kid you not, I fall asleep in under thirty minutes.
• 51:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I stay asleep all throughout the night.
• 52:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I wake up without that foggy sluggish feeling.
• 52:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Look at me, I'm, I'm on top of my game, man.
• 52:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: In fact, since I began taking dream consistently, I have noticed a real difference in my focus, my mood, my energy throughout the day.
• 52:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Dream is made with top quality science back ingredients that help you relax and get the deep uninterrupted sleep your body needs.
• 52:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: Seriously, I take it every night to become a like a nightly ritual.
• 52:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: I look forward to each and every day and unlike other sleep aids.
• 52:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, there's no groginess next stage.
• 52:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just clear headed focus energy.
• 52:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: So sleep is something you've been struggling with.
• 52:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: I cannot recommend dream enough and right now to make it even sweeter.
• 52:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: You could save up to thirty-five percent off with my exclusive beam discount.
• 52:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Just click the link below or scan the QR code and use code curly at checkout.
• 52:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Don't settle for restless nights.
• 52:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: Try Dream.
• 52:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: You'll feel the difference.
• 52:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Click on that link below.
• 52:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: Right now.
• 52:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Alright guys, what do we got?
• 52:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want to hear from you.
• 52:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want to hear from you.
• 53:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let me write and dip my notes down so I can write down everything here for you.
• 53:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Done!
• 53:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Do you believe French President Macron is married to a person who is born a man and now identified as a woman.
• 53:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Dude, I have you.
• 53:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, freaking, Candace, what are you doing to us?
• 53:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: I have no idea.
• 53:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: I've never, I've never even given the whole thing a second thought.
• 53:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Matt Crawl is pathetic in and of himself.
• 53:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: He doesn't need something like that to demonstrate what a failure of a human he is.
• 53:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I literally have never looked into it in the least.
• 53:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: And frankly, it doesn't interest me in the least.
• 53:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: But I do think Candace is getting herself in a little heap of trouble there.
• 53:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Melissa, I Dr. Steve, well, he's at it again.
• 53:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Grease Gavin is holding a special welcoming party for the Rogue Texas Democrats here in Sacramento today and to tout his own redistricting plan.
• 53:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: He says is putting on the ballot this November by special election.
• 54:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: What the hell can he really get pass the independent committee set up here or not?
• 54:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: What that will remain to be seen.
• 54:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't think he can, it would require a constitutional amendment.
• 54:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maybe that's what he's trying to get past this November, but it would require a constitutional amendment.
• 54:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: It doesn't, the floodgates are, Texas is just the beginning.
• 54:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: Texas is literally just the beginning.
• 54:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: The floodgates are open between the new census, between the redistricting efforts that are already happening in Florida, Ohio.
• 54:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now we found out in Indiana, Nebraska.
• 54:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then if the Supreme Court looks like it's in the next few months or in the next session, they're going to be overturning the VRA, the voting rights sign.
• 54:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, forget about it.
• 54:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, there's nothing that there again.
• 54:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's no more, they've already jaring and ordered all the districts.
• 54:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's no more seats.
• 54:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Davaro's Trump wants a mid-decade census correct from twenty-twenty by omitting criminal foreign veitors from the population count.
• 55:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: But Trump was blocked by the dominion from getting a citizenship question on the Twinsbury census survey won't they just stop this new Americans only census again?
• 55:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: How likely is it that Trump could get a new census before the Twinsbury selection?
• 55:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: New census new districts drawn from that census seeing tough by Twinsbury sex seems like a long shot to get it all done even by Twinsbury.
• 55:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know about that.
• 55:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: Davos perhaps, but I don't think so.
• 55:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, they're going to go, they're going to hit the Supreme Court from a different angle.
• 55:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: Here, it seems to me, I don't think it was thrown out last time when it's merits.
• 55:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think it was a procedural issue.
• 55:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're going to get around that.
• 55:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: It seems to me.
• 55:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: And we're going to get a census, eventually.
• 55:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, even at the latest, twenty-thirty.
• 55:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: And again, keep in mind, we don't need it for twenty twenty six.
• 55:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: We got the just the redistricting efforts alone that are going to take care of that.
• 55:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the possible overturning of the VRA, but but in the process, the census would just solidify it.
• 56:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: It would make it.
• 56:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: It would do.
• 56:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: It would basically do in one fell swoop as it were what these redistricting efforts and the overturning of the VRA would would accomplish as well.
• 56:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it's a perfect storm.
• 56:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whether it works or not, you've got these two other options that each with their own integrity.
• 56:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: No matter what happens now, I mean the Democrats are just on their heels and they know it.
• 56:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're now they're literally fishing for votes at this point.
• 56:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're just simply doing what they've been doing for decades now.
• 56:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Janet, please check out Promethean Action with Barbara Boy, I know Promethe, the British Channel, right?
• 56:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: They are amazing.
• 56:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thanks for keeping us saying thank you, Jen.
• 56:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you for the Super Chat, right?
• 56:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: Aren't they the two British ladies if I recall?
• 56:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're wonderful.
• 56:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're phenomenal.
• 56:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: I love their coverage, brilliant, sober analytical.
• 57:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yes, big shout out to Promethian action.
• 57:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: If you guys haven't checked them out, great, great channel.
• 57:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Absolutely.
• 57:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you for that, Janet.
• 57:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: I concur a hundred percent great channel.
• 57:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Super sticker.
• 57:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you, Super sticker from Ian.
• 57:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you, and Kenar.
• 57:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you, sir.
• 57:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: Baja Cat, Dr. Steve, should we be concerned about the latest censorship internet ID bill being pushed here to make us like the UK, or do you feel confident the bill will die before the Supreme Court has stepped in?
• 57:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'm very confident the bill does not have a leg to stand on.
• 57:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not going anywhere, even if it were to pass, say,
• 57:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: say they get the house back by just a few seats in twenty twenty six it may pass a democrat house because they they march in lockstep it will never pass a republican uh... send certainly won't pass the filibuster so i don't think you have to worry about it i really don't not at this point if anything changes i will be the first to let you know i will be the canary in the coal mine
• 58:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Benton question number one what is your your informed thoughts job of the hot aka billbar has shown up in a couple of investigation reports as a DC slime creatures always know where he has been because he leaves a slime trail he stated that the only way to get the Potas up president of the United States was to prevent him running in twenty four fours to convict him of recap violations which fat arsefani attempted yeah no he's a scumbag he's a slime he's part of he's part of the I thought he was part of the
• 58:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Northeastern liberal elite, most societies, people don't like this, but it's just there's no way around this, most societies are run by families.
• 58:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Okay, we are tribal by nature, it's just the nature of the human person to gather in families and communities and tribes as it were.
• 58:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then that works as that self-out racially, regionally, religiously, you name it.
• 59:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: And our political elite,
• 59:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: are overwhelmingly dominated by families in the secular Northeast, even the Bush's who established an elite stronghold in Texas are from the Northeast, George Herbert Walker Bush moved down to Texas from the Northeast, their home in Kenny Bunkport, vacation home in Kenny Bunkport.
• 59:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: He moved down there and he married Texas oil with his connections with the CIA and the defense industry.
• 59:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's how you get this whole like car rovalete there, but they're all connected.
• 59:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: They all go to the same, their kids all go to the same, they all graduated from the same prep schools, New England prep schools, Henry Kissinger lived in Kent, can he died in Kent, Connecticut, not far from where I grew up.
• 59:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: So, and I grew up hearing about this at Yale at Harvard,
• 1:00:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: Brown, a Dartmouth, these are, and so Bill Barr is part of that group.
• 1:00:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: If I recall, there was even an interesting connection.
• 1:00:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: If I remember, was it Bill Barr or may have been his father who was the headmaster at the prep school that, if you could believe it that Jeffrey Epstein used to teach him?
• 1:00:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: If I recall, Epstein was a math teacher.
• 1:00:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Epstein has this weird resumes where he was a high school teacher and not becoming a billionaire through Victoria's secret mogul who gave him unprecedented access to his money.
• 1:00:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that's how he ended becoming a billionaire.
• 1:00:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it doesn't make any sense, right?
• 1:00:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: But he was just shows you that he was part
• 1:00:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: he was hobnobbing with these elites.
• 1:00:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: And Bill Barr is a part of that.
• 1:00:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: Trump isn't.
• 1:00:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the strange thing.
• 1:00:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: Trump would write checks to them so forth to keep them, you know, well, Greece, so he can, he could build his Trump enterprises as he fully admitted to.
• 1:01:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: He says, I know how the game is play.
• 1:01:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: I wrote checks to Nancy Pelosi to Hillary Clinton.
• 1:01:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: I wrote checks to everybody because they're all bought.
• 1:01:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: I know they're bought and paid for them, right?
• 1:01:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: So Bill Barr is part of the bought and paid for family elites or elites of families.
• 1:01:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: of aristocrats that run our country, that did run our country until we the people push back with our avenger, Donald Trump, and now J.D.
• 1:01:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Vance, of course, who comes from Appalachia, comes from a completely different background.
• 1:01:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Marco Rubio, too, a lot of them, Kennedy's probably the closest thing to that Robert Kanger, but he's been ostracized.
• 1:01:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: by the elite of his family.
• 1:01:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: So he's he's gone rogue as it were, but he would have been another one of the families.
• 1:01:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: So the Bush is the Rockefellers, the Kennedy's and and the bars, they're all part of it.
• 1:02:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: So yeah, you're you're you're you're smelling the rat big time that you got it.
• 1:02:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Medvedaloka, I've all the Texas Democrats, these are vacated cannab at a point or Republicans to refill them.
• 1:02:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: Good question.
• 1:02:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Good question.
• 1:02:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't, I don't, I understood if they're just, if they're vacated, the quorum shrinks, I may be wrong.
• 1:02:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: I have to check on that.
• 1:02:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: The quorum shrinks so that they can go ahead with legislative agenda.
• 1:02:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: But I'll be very interesting if you can replace them.
• 1:02:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know the answer to that.
• 1:02:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'll hop to look that up for you.
• 1:02:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Very good question.
• 1:02:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Very good question.
• 1:02:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: Rubble guy, great to hear from you, my friend.
• 1:02:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maybe project twenty twenty five.
• 1:02:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: We should be weary of Russell vote.
• 1:02:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Who is the co-author and Trump putting his administration pushing censorship here right now would not hesitate to ban games and animate such etc.
• 1:02:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Trump needs to remove now.
• 1:02:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't, again, I don't know if he can do anything like that.
• 1:02:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: He may be saying stuff like that.
• 1:02:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: I wouldn't worry too much.
• 1:02:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Robo got we got to learn to win.
• 1:03:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: We got to learn what it feels like to win.
• 1:03:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: You're not going to get everybody agreeing with you.
• 1:03:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Everybody's going to have their own stick, but not everyone's going to be able to enforce it.
• 1:03:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's a whole whole different story.
• 1:03:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Russell Vogue can't do anything like that.
• 1:03:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I don't think you have to worry about it.
• 1:03:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: He may be pushing for things like that.
• 1:03:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Good luck of that passing the Senate.
• 1:03:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not going to happen.
• 1:03:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Alan Little, while George E.E.E.E.
• 1:03:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: is under fire, are we going after the kid, Alex, the old Nazi won't live forever and he's been training the kid to take over.
• 1:03:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: After all, whilst would he marry into the Clinton crime family, there you go.
• 1:03:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Again, very wetting in the Hampton's very much part of the Soros elite family.
• 1:03:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Wang, very good, Alan, fits in perfect with what we were just talking about before.
• 1:03:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, George Sorris right now is more the symbol.
• 1:03:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think he's kind of, yeah, he's kind of going the way we all go.
• 1:03:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: The sunset.
• 1:04:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it is Alex as I understand it.
• 1:04:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: George Sorris is the symbol still to this day, but when we're talking, we're taking down Sorris who are investigating Sorris.
• 1:04:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's good to go back to Alex.
• 1:04:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Alex as I understand has full control over the open society foundations and where that money goes.
• 1:04:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Zebra, Dr. Steve, can you define and contrast more relativism against more absolutes and common on the impact each has on societies.
• 1:04:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thanks.
• 1:04:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I mean, just very briefly.
• 1:04:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: So let me reverse it.
• 1:04:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Traditionally speaking, morality was seen to be as seen to be as transcended.
• 1:04:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: So in order for something to be truly right or wrong, it has to be right or wrong irrespective of human opinion.
• 1:04:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: If it's just a matter of human opinion, then nothing is actually right or wrong.
• 1:05:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's just a consensus.
• 1:05:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's agreed to, but tomorrow it could change.
• 1:05:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: For something to be right, there's got to be a rightness to it.
• 1:05:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: In other words, it's always right.
• 1:05:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I'm talking about real major things, like the ten commandments.
• 1:05:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in divine command theory, the notion is that morality is eternal.
• 1:05:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Morality, good, evil, right, or wrong have any eternal transcendent significance to them, that our own
• 1:05:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: instantiation of right and wrong are either consistent reflections of or they deviate from.
• 1:05:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: If they deviate from it, that's called sin, sin is the Greek word as amartia, and it literally means missing the mark.
• 1:05:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: Where is if we're aligned
• 1:05:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: with this eternal vision of morality.
• 1:06:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Then we cultivate what's called wisdom in virtue.
• 1:06:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: And wisdom is understanding the divine economy of goods.
• 1:06:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the divine economy of goods means everything is good as God created it.
• 1:06:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: But not everything is good in the same order same way.
• 1:06:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is what JD Vans got into with ordered loves.
• 1:06:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I like to explain it to my students of old that if you had a baby on a pedestal and a ham sandwich on the pedestal and they both felt the same time and you rushed to save the ham sandwich.
• 1:06:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's bad.
• 1:06:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's evil.
• 1:06:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's wrong.
• 1:06:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Why?
• 1:06:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: Not because ham sandwiches are bad or evil, but because I dislodged my affections, my loves from God's economy of goods, ham sandwiches are good, but babies are really, really good.
• 1:06:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: So you see this in the Genesis one creation narrative.
• 1:06:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: where everything is good, but then you get to day six in the creation of humanity, and then God says, and it was told, and it was very good.
• 1:07:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: He uses the Hebrew word for good twice, told to.
• 1:07:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: It wasn't just good.
• 1:07:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was good, good.
• 1:07:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was really good.
• 1:07:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so we're supposed to align our loves, our dispositions, our inclination with this eternal economy of goods, understanding that economy of goods is wisdom and aligning our loves with that economy of goods is called virtue.
• 1:07:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's your traditional conception of right and wrong.
• 1:07:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the argument is, is that nations
• 1:07:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: that align themselves with this morally order to the world that we didn't invent.
• 1:07:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's part and parcel of the eternal nature of things.
• 1:07:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: All contingent, temporal things in this world, including the universe itself, are ultimately depend on something that is not contingent, that is not dependent, that is absolute necessary and eternal.
• 1:08:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the classical theistic argument.
• 1:08:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: for God, God derived from the old German word, Gaut, which means set apart from all physical contingent degenerating things.
• 1:08:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: The universe itself doesn't have to exist.
• 1:08:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Therefore, the universe is itself dependent on something that is always existed, that is always eternal, because things that are not eternal cannot account for their own existence.
• 1:08:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so even at the universe, we're around for eternity, there's nothing to stop it from disappearing.
• 1:08:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: It could demise.
• 1:08:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: It could fall apart.
• 1:08:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's just physics and physics can unravel.
• 1:08:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there's nothing that makes
• 1:08:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: the universe necessarily exists and therefore it must depend on something other than itself for its existence.
• 1:08:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that other is wholly other.
• 1:08:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is got, it is set apart from all other things in this universe.
• 1:09:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that must by nature be absolute necessary being that is the foundation for all contingent things.
• 1:09:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Morality comes from that necessary being.
• 1:09:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: and to the extent that we align the cosmos with that infinite eternal conception of good and avoid its warnings of evil, the nation's flourish.
• 1:09:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's that's due to ouronomy, twenty-eight, for example.
• 1:09:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that's in, I mean, that's Confucianism, that's Taoism, that's Buddhism, that Hinduism, that Shintoism, that's Islam.
• 1:09:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, you could go all, everyone recognizes that if you don't have what's called cosmic piety, if you don't align your own heart and your society in harmony with the obligations that we have as being creatures in a cosmos, we did not create.
• 1:10:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: If you don't do that, you're in big trouble.
• 1:10:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Your society will inevitably fall.
• 1:10:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: More relativism comes from the rejection that there is a transcendent eternal foundation for this contingent world we're living in.
• 1:10:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Or they will say, we can't know it because they're defining knowledge and a very truncated, very reductions, eighteenth centuries, sort of scientific rationalist way that can account for itself, for example.
• 1:10:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so if there is no transcendent right or wrong, eternal handed down to us in some way, shape or form,
• 1:10:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, from Mount Sinai or through meditation and Buddhist traditions, what have you?
• 1:10:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Even Buddhist traditions, it's a revelation under a tree, interestingly enough, bottom of Buddha becomes the enlightened one.
• 1:10:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there's even just this kind of tree of life, cross like symbols behind it.
• 1:11:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Very, very similar things.
• 1:11:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: If you cut yourself off from that, well, then where are you going to derive your morality from?
• 1:11:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: You're going to make it up.
• 1:11:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: You're going to do it by consensus.
• 1:11:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: You're going to do it by elites, elites hand it down to you.
• 1:11:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: You're going to do it by by mandates from above like what we saw with with COVID.
• 1:11:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: So ironically, you know, moral relativism, just in the end just says, you know, humans, man is the measure of all things.
• 1:11:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Humans come up.
• 1:11:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: with their moral systems.
• 1:11:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then there's infinite ways they can do it.
• 1:11:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're really big on you get to decide what's moral for you.
• 1:11:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: You get to decide your own right and wrong.
• 1:11:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: You get to say, yeah, that's our liberal version.
• 1:11:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: But communism out of very, very different version than that.
• 1:11:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it's the same thing.
• 1:11:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: There is no transcendent morality.
• 1:12:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: We define what morality is.
• 1:12:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: And
• 1:12:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Not only do I think it's tyrannical by its very nature, because inevitably then we're going to, morality is going to be defined by the strongest, so it's might makes right.
• 1:12:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it's also contradictory, because more relativism assumes that it is good for people to come up with their own notion of the good.
• 1:12:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: They assume it is right for people to invent their own notion of right.
• 1:12:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: You see, they're already operating with moral categories.
• 1:12:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: The moral, that's the whole idea of the image of God.
• 1:12:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: And every religion has a kind of image of God notion, not exactly like the Christian one.
• 1:12:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the image of God is this notion that we are receptors, the communicable attributes of God.
• 1:12:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: God is good.
• 1:12:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so there's a notion of good with it.
• 1:13:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: God is moral.
• 1:13:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's a notion of morality within us.
• 1:13:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: God is logical.
• 1:13:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's the rotios.
• 1:13:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's the logos.
• 1:13:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there's a ability of to reason to know him and so forth.
• 1:13:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: Right?
• 1:13:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: God has goals.
• 1:13:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: God has a purpose.
• 1:13:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there's goals and tell us in our lives.
• 1:13:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: And everything that we do that we call moral or not moral is going to be reflection of hearts that already have morality embedded within them.
• 1:13:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: So we don't get to make up morality.
• 1:13:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's already there.
• 1:13:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: We just direct it one way or the other, you say.
• 1:13:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: So we have to assume it's moral to make up our own morality.
• 1:13:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: That we have to assume that we're starting from there.
• 1:13:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: We have to assume it's ethical to be ethical.
• 1:13:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the only way you can actually account for that is if there's a transcendent source that defines us before we define it.
• 1:13:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so now the question is, we have to understand what it is so we can align ourselves with that so we can experience our highest human flourishing.
• 1:13:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: I hope that made sense.
• 1:13:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: So deep stuff, very deep stuff, very cold zebra, very cool question.
• 1:14:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Stuart the Brit, so Lord of Terly, thank you.
• 1:14:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Sir, and thank you for the power and sterling.
• 1:14:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: Is it a word that you're all walking into a one party system?
• 1:14:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Is there another arising there?
• 1:14:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, I didn't know, of course, of course.
• 1:14:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
• 1:14:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so there inevitably there'll be another party coming out.
• 1:14:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: I just don't see how it
• 1:14:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: how it would work any other way in our system.
• 1:14:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's federal like, you know, I mean, we do have areas in our, as I'm sure you have in the UK, we have areas in our nation, particularly cosmopolitan areas that are just run purely by one party.
• 1:14:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Baltimore City doesn't have the single Republican on the City Council.
• 1:14:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's all Democrats.
• 1:14:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: But then what happens, end up getting two factions in the Democrat party?
• 1:15:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: our conceptures are right versus left, right, go back to the French Revolution, where the more the more traditionalists sat on the right side of the assembly and the radicals, the jackments, so forth, sat on the left side, but they were all revolutionaries.
• 1:15:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: So you could have a single party, Republic and Party, but as Elon Musk is showing, they can break off, one wing can break off really easily.
• 1:15:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: And if they feel like there is, there are issues that are not being well represented, and they see a power vacuum, they'll fill it.
• 1:15:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, no question about it.
• 1:15:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: So, and you're seeing it right now with the UK, with the Tories, look like they're going the way the Dodo Bird, since saying I thought it was going to be labor first.
• 1:15:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thought Tories would easily out last labor, but it looks like reform is good across Tories, and then reduced labor.
• 1:15:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: to the margins, the peripheral.
• 1:16:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then we'll just have to see how the two-party system re-arranges itself in the UK.
• 1:16:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: So you've got the opposite.
• 1:16:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: You've got all these parties that are
• 1:16:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: that are coming about.
• 1:16:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Italy seems to be going through that right now, where they're, I mean, they always have a multiple party system, but brothers have Italy seem to be sort of the maga.
• 1:16:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's holding together lega on one side and, uh, uh, forwards a tally on the other.
• 1:16:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then you just have the social democrats and then the rest are very, very poor.
• 1:16:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: What's their name?
• 1:16:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Five star.
• 1:16:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Five star looks like they're pretty poor for all at this point.
• 1:16:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: They did win that twenty eighteen election if our recall parliamentary election went into alliance.
• 1:16:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: got into a coalition with Lega, Mateo Savini, and then that fellow part, and then that gave, the while they gave rise to their technocratic government, and then Georgia Maloney and the brothers literally stormed, and they haven't looked back.
• 1:17:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: They just solidified their power.
• 1:17:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it really does look like they're moving into a kind of two-party system in a sense, multiple parties, but the coalitions are so strong that might as well just be
• 1:17:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: one in predominantly right wing looks like that's what's happening in the UK it will I think happen if we're for if Nigel plays his cards right but again you know there's plenty of disagreement inside reform you know that so inevitably there's always going to be two parties max a million if liberalism is wrong why has it been so strong that's a good question let's say let me give that a little thought here
• 1:17:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: liberalism is so wrong.
• 1:17:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Why?
• 1:17:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, I mean, you can answer that in so many ways, you know?
• 1:17:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let me, let me, I mean, I could say we're all fallen, we're all sinful.
• 1:18:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: We tend to be drawn to the wrong.
• 1:18:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: But let me, let me answer it in a way that I, that tries to be empathetic with with with others with with with with everyone involved include including ourselves because we're all caught up in it in our own way as well.
• 1:18:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, fish never ask how wet the water is, right?
• 1:18:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're all creatures of our environment.
• 1:18:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that includes an ideological environment, a political environment, a civilizational environment in the life.
• 1:18:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: And, you know, the West, the West really did
• 1:18:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: The West blossomed through the medieval period, the Middle Ages, as they're called.
• 1:18:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: The West blossomed some most extraordinary scientific and technological industrial inventions imaginable.
• 1:19:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: The West was, China has
• 1:19:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: has a very well-known field of study trying to understand Chinese scholars.
• 1:19:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Trying to understand what made the West so powerful.
• 1:19:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: How did the West ascend so dramatically into the world?
• 1:19:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Remember, I mean, the UK was the empire where the sun never sat upon.
• 1:19:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, it was everywhere.
• 1:19:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: The most remote Pacific islands.
• 1:19:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: You would see the British flag.
• 1:19:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Right?
• 1:19:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: See the union jacket.
• 1:19:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, just, when did you?
• 1:19:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: How, how was that possible?
• 1:19:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the answer was because really the Western intellectual tradition
• 1:19:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: that always advocated and always gave priority to empirical investigation.
• 1:20:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now there's different theories as to why.
• 1:20:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: We have always been fascinated with inductive reasoning as opposed to deductive top-down route.
• 1:20:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: Inductive starts with the particular.
• 1:20:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: What?
• 1:20:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let's see, let me understand this pen.
• 1:20:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let me put under a microscope and let me see if I can piece together all the things that make up this pen.
• 1:20:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it starts by me reducing it to its smallest
• 1:20:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: bit as it were, and then I draw from there.
• 1:20:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's generally that's the inductive method.
• 1:20:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's from the part to the whole.
• 1:20:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: And one of the theories, because it goes all the way back to John Philoponus in the Byzantine world back in the sixth century, the inductive, officially the inductive method, the scientific method.
• 1:20:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Most
• 1:20:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: Most cultures, most societies were much more married to the deductive method.
• 1:21:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they started with more abstract theological metaphysical principles, philosophical, and worked your way down.
• 1:21:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: How did we in the West start from the most basic element of a thing and work our way out?
• 1:21:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: How did we do that?
• 1:21:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: And because that's what the Scantia is basically, that's what science is.
• 1:21:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's related to the word schism.
• 1:21:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, you're breaking things down to their basic fundamental parts.
• 1:21:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: One of the arguments going back again to John Philoponus is because of the incarnation in our metaphysical thinking.
• 1:21:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: God, infinite eternal being, became math.
• 1:21:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: He became a baby.
• 1:21:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so if you want to know who God truly is, you look at the person, you look at the particular, and then you can draw from that, see encounter the life of Christ, encounter the person of Christ, and then you can draw all of these extraordinary metaphysical reasons.
• 1:22:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: That may be it, it seems to me it makes a lot of sense.
• 1:22:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: But regardless, what that did is it helped to awaken over centuries the scientific revolution of the eighteenth century.
• 1:22:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now there's disc scholars who come out to Iowa's in a revolution for a thousand years.
• 1:22:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, no, I get the optics, the development in optics in the eleven century or astonishing.
• 1:22:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: You see them in stained glass windows and cathedrals that are themselves architectural marvels, physical marvels of the world.
• 1:22:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: especially with the flying buttresses and the appointed arches as opposed to the rounded arches that enabled them to build up into the sky, some hundreds of feet high.
• 1:22:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, no, I agree with that.
• 1:23:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: I agree that technology and science developed over time, but it reached in Apex in the eighteenth century.
• 1:23:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: And it was a century where we felt that
• 1:23:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: We had arrived now at a form of knowledge where we actually didn't need kings.
• 1:23:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: We didn't need princes.
• 1:23:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: We didn't need bishops who supposedly had this supernatural charism that gave them a unique knowledge that we weren't privy to as lay people.
• 1:23:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so this idea of through scientific rationalism, we can actually open up knowledge for everyone.
• 1:23:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that was the precursor for the great Democratic revolutions here in the United States and in France.
• 1:23:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: Great meaning just big, massive.
• 1:23:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: The idea was that we didn't need people with a special esoteric knowledge to rule us anymore.
• 1:24:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: There was a common knowledge.
• 1:24:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: There was a common sense to everyone.
• 1:24:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: That can now be the basis for rule.
• 1:24:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: And now are our rulers who have to rule, and according to the consent of the people, they have to be able to appeal to this common knowledge, as common sense.
• 1:24:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Um, in order to justify their policies in order to justify their rule, they can no longer appeal to God or whatever.
• 1:24:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so this weekend, hence you see the biggest, again, it sounds good, but that became the beginnings of what we call.
• 1:24:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Emancipatory politics, or more commonly, liberalism.
• 1:24:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the idea now is through this form of knowledge that ironically came to us through the church and through centuries of Christian culture.
• 1:24:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: This form of knowledge now is enabled us to liberate ourselves.
• 1:24:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're grown up now as it were.
• 1:25:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're not kids anymore.
• 1:25:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: We can liberate ourselves emancipate ourselves from old traditions and customs
• 1:25:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: that we now see sort of, you know, kind of superstitious, certainly can't be justified scientifically anymore.
• 1:25:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: And they're outdated.
• 1:25:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: And you know what, with science and reason, we're kind of, we're pretty unlimited in what we can do.
• 1:25:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then, if you think it through,
• 1:25:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: we can actually help liberate the world because we look out on the world stage and we see how they're all still kind of trapped in their savage superstitions and knuckle dragon customs and so on.
• 1:25:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: So we can go and sail the world and bring this enlightenment.
• 1:25:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: And by the way, a lot of them were practicing some pretty barbaric practices.
• 1:25:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: We could bring this enlightenment to them, the scientific rationalism.
• 1:25:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: emancipate them from these barbaric practices and realize civilized man internationally, that should be able to create political, economic, and harmony throughout the world, and we can actually fully realize a peaceful coexistence.
• 1:26:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: That was very strong.
• 1:26:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: That was very powerful and it seemed to have ironically a lot of Christian backing behind it because it was derived from a distinctively Christian way of knowing the world.
• 1:26:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so, you know, I give, I give, I want to be empathetic to people who believe, I think we all believed it at some point because it's really wasn't until the early nineties where
• 1:26:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: That metinarrative really did start to falter and fall apart.
• 1:26:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: And ironically, it ended up in two-world wars and, unlike because it wasn't just the West that had its version of a one-size-fits-all, or a better, it wasn't just a single one-size-fits-all political-neconomic system that was derived rationally.
• 1:27:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: There was only one that just came out.
• 1:27:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: There were literally three, right?
• 1:27:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: So Western liberalism, Soviet communism, and Nazi fascism.
• 1:27:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Those were all three worldwide totalitarian as it were.
• 1:27:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Belief systems, rooted in the Enlightenment, rooted in a kind of liberalism and emancipation from what had come beforehand.
• 1:27:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: And they ended up like, you know, Garcantuan's Titans fighting each other.
• 1:27:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then eventually people realized that there was so, there was so much one thing.
• 1:27:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: There was so much missing in that myth, because what I gave you really is a myth also.
• 1:27:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: And one of them is this idea if we don't need myths anymore, we have science.
• 1:27:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, that's a myth.
• 1:27:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there's all these contradictions inherent in it that it just began to collapse under its own weight.
• 1:28:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: But I would argue that it was so strong because it prospered under borrowed capital.
• 1:28:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: That in one sense, it had a right to
• 1:28:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: because that's where it was the progeny of this, you know, of Christendom.
• 1:28:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: But then it tried to completely emancipate itself from Christendom, and that's when, like, you know, scholars like, we talk about, uh, pittorum sorricin, when he talks about the sacred societies branching off into the secular, secular ends up becoming sort of a protocol from its sacred source, but it always, always without fail ends up
• 1:28:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: faultoring and dying precisely very similar to what we were talking about today with the Democrat party because it doesn't have the sacred eternal resources for societal renewal.
• 1:28:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it inevitably falls apart.
• 1:28:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there you go, mate, that's a picture of I think of how it ended up becoming so strong.
• 1:29:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thanks, Maximilian.
• 1:29:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: I always love hearing from you.
• 1:29:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Kevin, the House of Senate, both have closed the session to specific manner of keep President Trump from making importance of doing work while they're on vacation again.
• 1:29:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Is this the right to establish or trying to look like they're working to support President Trump, but actually stabbing us in the backing it.
• 1:29:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: I know I really don't think so I honestly don't.
• 1:29:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think
• 1:29:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Uh, soon, soon it is, again, the Republican Party, I've said it before I'll say it again.
• 1:29:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'll say it like a broken record.
• 1:29:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Republican Party is inherently dysfunctional to dysfunctional party.
• 1:29:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: Like it, love it, leave it, doesn't matter.
• 1:29:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: It matches the way it is.
• 1:29:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: All Democrats want power.
• 1:29:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: All Democrats want more taxes.
• 1:29:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: All Democrats want more regulations.
• 1:29:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: All Democrats want increased government.
• 1:29:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: Half Republic is one of rollback government, the other half wanna grow it.
• 1:29:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: Half wanna cut taxes, the other half wanna raise it, but in a certain way.
• 1:29:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Half wanna cut spending the other half wanna grow spend.
• 1:30:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: They are an inherently dysfunctional party.
• 1:30:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Half wanna bring all our troops home, half wanna want more troops abroad than ever.
• 1:30:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the nature of the Republican party.
• 1:30:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so what Thune has to do is he has to keep all
• 1:30:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: factions happy.
• 1:30:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's what I think is going on.
• 1:30:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not they're not it's not the neocons are necessarily betraying us per se.
• 1:30:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what neocons do by nature.
• 1:30:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: But we need the neocons and by the way, the neocons do tend to come and vote because they know they need power.
• 1:30:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so they tend to vote with us when it counts, but then that means we have to give the neocons what they want when they want it.
• 1:30:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: So right now, they didn't want these these appointments fine.
• 1:30:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: He'll get them eventually.
• 1:30:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: You don't have to worry about that.
• 1:30:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's going to happen.
• 1:30:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: But until then, Thune has to play this balancing act and that I think it's balance.
• 1:30:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not the trail when all said and done.
• 1:31:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: Bantin, what replace a Democrat, party cult would be some other cult, which is more evil than the present one.
• 1:31:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: So my, I have a thesis.
• 1:31:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: I, again,
• 1:31:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: We'll see how it plays out.
• 1:31:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think we're going to see a techno party in a traditionalist party.
• 1:31:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: So the tech, tread alliance that is currently operative in the Republican party.
• 1:31:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think Elon already sort of forecasted that will eventually split because they are, I think, you know, Silicon Valley and social conservatives have a lot of overlap.
• 1:31:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: And MAGA is that point of overlap, but then they also have a lot of disparity as well.
• 1:31:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that disparate tendency will take over once the Democrats are gone.
• 1:31:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: They'll most likely join the Technocratic Party.
• 1:31:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: But right now, the tectocrats are scared to death of the green New Deal.
• 1:31:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're scared to death of the AOCs and the Mamdonis and so forth.
• 1:32:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they're running, they're via like JD bands and Vivek Ramoswami and Peter T. Olon, a balladry, balladry, Sri Navazan, they're running more towards the MAGA, the MAGA train.
• 1:32:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: But if the Democrats demise, I think you'll see the tectrata lines.
• 1:32:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, it's still, ironically, it's still there.
• 1:32:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: The tech-trad dynamic of working together is still there.
• 1:32:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: There'll be the new Uniparty as it were, but they'll form in terms of two different factions.
• 1:32:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's my thesis.
• 1:32:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what I think.
• 1:32:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Franz, good to hear from you, my friend.
• 1:32:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: Good morning, Dr. Steve.
• 1:32:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Is there a distinction between the CBDC or Fedcoin and the stablecoin issued by the US Treasury?
• 1:32:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, it's stable.
• 1:32:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's a good question.
• 1:32:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: I should, oh, I wish I had one of my crypto buddies here.
• 1:33:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Because there is a, there is a US
• 1:33:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: D, there's a US dollar.
• 1:33:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I think so.
• 1:33:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think there's a difference, but I can't articulate it.
• 1:33:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: I wish I could.
• 1:33:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: You're catching me on my on my, some my weakness in crypto terminology.
• 1:33:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: So, you know, if you, if you get a coinbase account,
• 1:33:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: The first thing you buy as if I recall when I first did Coinbase, first thing you buy are USD.
• 1:33:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: So you're you're going to buy a digital token of a US dollar.
• 1:33:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's the exact same thing.
• 1:33:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's it's penny for penny.
• 1:33:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: But then that what that enables you to do is it's basically just translates the dollar into into the cryptos space.
• 1:33:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whereas.
• 1:33:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whereas CBDCs are going to be CBDCs that has a lot more fed control as I understand it and can be used to debank.
• 1:34:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whereas USDs can't control USDs because they're on the blockchain in crypto.
• 1:34:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: And in the current crypto cryptography, yeah, the crypto cosmos, I guess I should call it.
• 1:34:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whereas CBDCs in invent as I understand a whole new cryptocosm,
• 1:34:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: So as to be able to control, that's what China's doing in many respects with their social media firewall.
• 1:34:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: And as I understand it is basically blockchain, the way they're able to control what internet their population has access to is the government has created a blockchain.
• 1:34:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then that blockchain, if you guys know that blockchain works, they're just decentralized computers, but they're spread all over.
• 1:34:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the crypto calls them works only as far as those computers work.
• 1:35:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: So rather than having Google centralized or your computer power under a single massive Walmart size warehouse where they literally have super computers generating all this Google power.
• 1:35:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: The computer power is distributed among multiple computers all around, but it does sort of, it does in a way, it can form a boundary.
• 1:35:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that's what China's done with its internet.
• 1:35:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the Zyner Sand, that's what CBDCs are seeking to do with a crypto token.
• 1:35:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the stablecoin of the US Treasury,
• 1:35:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: as it's issued now belongs to a completely decentralized network that the US Treasury cannot control to be on their control.
• 1:35:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what makes it work.
• 1:35:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I'm assuming that's the difference.
• 1:35:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's not, it's not the token per se.
• 1:36:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is the, it's the platform that it's on.
• 1:36:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what I think, but you might want to double check on that.
• 1:36:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: William Adool, Dr. Dr. Dull, good up to noon, been meaning to raise this question, especially about the Seth Rich episode.
• 1:36:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: You think Waken Leaks and Asange plays a part in a number of conspiracies.
• 1:36:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: The right has theorized about the deep state and all things Obama.
• 1:36:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, yeah.
• 1:36:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, I'm absolutely.
• 1:36:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, Asange, his call to fame in many respects was exposing
• 1:36:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: the duopoly oriented deep state that both parties are part of this.
• 1:36:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then, of course, this goes back to the Bush years, but it implicates Obama, everybody's much, because Obama just, you know, again, it's the same officials, regardless of party.
• 1:36:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's very interesting, because I just, I interviewed Lynn Alden, who's, who's a Bitcoin whiz, just a last week.
• 1:37:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: But she's, she's a macroeconomic expert.
• 1:37:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: And she, she pointed out like if you look at budgetary expenses
• 1:37:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: and income and the like at the US Treasury.
• 1:37:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I ask you, can you pick the Democrat, just look at the data, say from the last seventy years, can you pick the Democrat versus the Republican administration, you couldn't do it?
• 1:37:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: You couldn't do it.
• 1:37:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: If you just looked at the data, the data of expenditures and income of the US Treasury.
• 1:37:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: over the course of say the last seven years.
• 1:37:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I said to you, again, just look at the data.
• 1:37:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Could you show me where a Democratic administration came to an end and a Republican administration began?
• 1:37:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: No years, you can't cheat by looking at the decade markers or anything.
• 1:38:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Could you do it?
• 1:38:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: The answer is no.
• 1:38:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: You can't because there's no conceivable difference between the two.
• 1:38:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's the same administrators, same bureaucrats that are behind the functioning of DC.
• 1:38:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: the functioning of our administrative state and the president we elect really does not, they're, they're impact on that is negligible and I don't necessarily know why, but
• 1:38:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: Anyway, a song helped to reveal that when it came to the surveillance state.
• 1:38:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that, and that the surveillance state operates through secrecy and by shedding light on to it, it can't operate anymore.
• 1:39:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: So that's why they hate him tried to destroy him.
• 1:39:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: So yeah, no, I think I think what's a number of the conspiracies that the right is theorized about the deep state and all things Obama are true.
• 1:39:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maybe not in all the way and all the particulars of the conspiracies, but the general gist of it is yeah, I think it's basically right on and a song helped shine light on that and he paid dearly for it.
• 1:39:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Mark the Rose, but I should have done that with standing ice.
• 1:39:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: Are there any indications out there that law enforcement may ever get direction support toward tough love, more severe harsher interpretation of law that allows the more autonomy in acting in crime, kidnapped a person get shot in the act.
• 1:39:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: No questions asked kind of a castle doctrine for law enforcers.
• 1:39:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: Really need these bad guys to respect law enforcers in America.
• 1:39:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: I know, yes, I'm with you a thousand percent, especially with that.
• 1:39:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: respect element to it.
• 1:40:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, it looks like Trump is taking.
• 1:40:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: He looks like they're starting to militarize DC.
• 1:40:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Keep an eye on that, especially over the next week.
• 1:40:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: We'll be reporting on it.
• 1:40:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: But it does look like national guard is starting to come out in force and DC.
• 1:40:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: I remember when we were there in DC for the inauguration, there were national guard troops on every corner.
• 1:40:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: I never felt so safe in DC.
• 1:40:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: You could literally walk anywhere.
• 1:40:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: There were national guard troops.
• 1:40:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: Not tanks would have this smaller version of tanks would swap, you know, that are just, they were just everywhere parked everywhere.
• 1:40:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: They had,
• 1:40:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: They had their firearms, they were, they were, and they were looking at everyone, you know, and it was like, oh, and you've just felt great.
• 1:40:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, and of course, right next to them are all the cards for the MAGA flag, such you could buy there and all the vendors.
• 1:40:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was just, it was amazing.
• 1:40:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: So,
• 1:40:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, we'll have to see.
• 1:40:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, a big thing of course has been the Soros back DA's, but we're, you know, law enforcement does what they're supposed to do, but then the DA's let them off with a little slap on the wrist, which is, and then turn around and blame the victims.
• 1:41:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: I just think those days are over and we are moving much, much more toward a law enforcement mandate and even sanctuary cities.
• 1:41:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: and far-left cesspools are starting at, I think, beginning to feel the heat on that one from the federal, from possible federal takeover.
• 1:41:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: And we saw it in LA, certainly with the high-sagions.
• 1:41:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Scott, why wasn't the seditious Democrat party banned after the Civil War?
• 1:41:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, that's a good question.
• 1:41:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know.
• 1:41:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Historically, I do not know the reasons why the Democrat party was not banned.
• 1:41:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think it was part, I mean, they tried to reconstruct the Democrat party.
• 1:41:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it was part of its reform was part of reconstruction of the South.
• 1:41:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I think they wanted to return to normalcy as quick as possible if I recall.
• 1:42:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: But I couldn't give you, I couldn't give you definitive answer for that.
• 1:42:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't, that's not my realm of history.
• 1:42:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: Very historical knowledge.
• 1:42:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: Bismo, funnier than during the Reagan years, Buckley and Will led services and during Clinton years, rushed it.
• 1:42:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: Do influencers leave conservatives now?
• 1:42:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: Or are we so multifaceted?
• 1:42:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: We are leader less.
• 1:42:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, that's quite interesting.
• 1:42:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah.
• 1:42:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, so you're talking about sort of, it seems to me sort of our mass communication network.
• 1:42:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: So yeah, back in the day, I could see that William F. Buckley, George Will, were spokesperson, I think, for the party.
• 1:42:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: And whether it's firing line or ABCs this week,
• 1:42:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, you would, or, or, you know, or, or John McLaughlin, the McLaughlin group, Papy Cannon was on there.
• 1:43:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Jack Tramon of the Baltimore Sun, you know, he wasn't conservative, but, you know, just, they had, you always had very faithful conservatives.
• 1:43:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: George Wellturn out to be a clown, but very faithful conservatives in the public square media.
• 1:43:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: well representing conservatives in the public debate, and then helping the shape and form conservative opinion.
• 1:43:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then Rush, no one did it like Rush.
• 1:43:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Nineteen eighty eight, starting in eighty eight, nationally, no one did it like Rush.
• 1:43:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: Rush.
• 1:43:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Rush brought in a whole new medium with them a new medium of communication which is talk radio and then unleashing entirely new industry that's been brilliant.
• 1:43:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's still very very popular today.
• 1:43:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: I do a lot of I used to do I used to do tons of talk radio.
• 1:44:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: I do like I used to do at least like seven eight interviews a week on talk radio back in the day when I was more of a blogger and just at the beginning of my YouTube channel.
• 1:44:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now I mean now I just
• 1:44:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: I just do YouTube because that had rumble and so on because it's just there's I mean I get more views and more audience than than going on unless it's a huge really big like a Charlie Kirk thing or something like that or Glenn Becker or Sean Hannity but but yes so then rushed it it now definitely it's the independent content creators
• 1:44:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: So what made Buckley will and rush similar is they all went through gatekeepers.
• 1:44:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they all went through.
• 1:44:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: the old industrial broadcasting networks as it were.
• 1:44:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whereas what makes us unique is we bypass those gatekeeping networks in a way that email and texting bypass the old post office.
• 1:45:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it's just opened up the possibilities for other voices to come into the mix.
• 1:45:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I would say that it's technically known as the network society.
• 1:45:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is replaced broadcast networks as the principal means of representing conservative thought in the public arena.
• 1:45:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think that's it.
• 1:45:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that's, and that is the leadership today.
• 1:45:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then is there any one?
• 1:45:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: But you know, there's not, I don't see there's, there's not a rush anymore rush.
• 1:45:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Rush was the pinnacle it seemed for me I was I got to meet him once back in ninety six in New York cities just I mean I love the man He he know what they'll never be another rush and and unlike Howard Stern
• 1:45:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, it was a shock shock his own thing, but Howard Stern waned in influence over the years.
• 1:46:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Howard Stern's career went up and then it's it just clearly went down down to to the point where nobody even cared what the man had to say anymore.
• 1:46:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: That never happened with rush.
• 1:46:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: He hit a pinnacle, he hit a summit, a peak, and he stayed there as an entire thirty-year career because he was just so special and so good.
• 1:46:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: So all the rest of us, I think, are just carrying on his legacy and his own, in our own, in our own particular ways, but they'll never be another rush.
• 1:46:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's for sure.
• 1:46:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: Mr. M, after I saw your most recent ground news ad, what's her take on Joe Rogan saying Trump's gaslighting about Epstein and right out, let's not cover again.
• 1:46:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's a good question.
• 1:46:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: That was part of the pushback on Trump in terms of how they originally handled it, the Epstein.
• 1:46:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: list when Pam Bonnie basically said they were shutting down the investigation ha ha they're not and that's the interesting thing about that the turn around.
• 1:47:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: No, I mean he got called out by rogue and he got called out by ban and got called out by row robber Barnes is still pissed off about out at rightly so.
• 1:47:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maybe not quite as as pissed off as he is was kind of obsessed with it, but no, a lot of a lot of there was a lot of push back there.
• 1:47:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: And we covered it, you know, we talked about, I thought it was the biggest on forced error of the Trump administration, both first and second term.
• 1:47:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: And but, you know, it was, I think honestly though, it was more a inter-ex-inter-twitter spat.
• 1:47:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: And for the vast majority of the MAGA base, it didn't matter.
• 1:47:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: They really don't care.
• 1:47:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: They don't give a rip about Epstein.
• 1:47:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: They give a rip about the border.
• 1:48:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: They give a rip about nasty portations.
• 1:48:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: They give a rip about returning manufacturing and industry jobs back at home.
• 1:48:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: They
• 1:48:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: give a rip about energy independence, they give a rip about woken, ending DEI, and crushing the Democrats at every turn, as far as their concern, Trump has delivered on those promises in spades.
• 1:48:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: So they're happy.
• 1:48:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: They don't care, and that's what right-wing media, I think generally focused on.
• 1:48:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I don't think it was a cover-up or anything like that.
• 1:48:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think it was Rogan, definitely being part of a very vocal
• 1:48:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: push back, blow back, among the right, or among at least the dissident media, against Trump's decision to close the Epstein thing down.
• 1:48:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the vast majority of the mega movement, Franklin and Care, and so most of right wing media didn't care either.
• 1:48:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: William, does Japan have any strategy of split their population because they seem to be in the major crisis of no youth replacing the aging
• 1:48:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now not really nothing I know of I mean they're they're giving incentives if I raise my kids in Japan right now I'd probably I wouldn't have any income tax.
• 1:49:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean they they they're giving very generous incentives in Japan but.
• 1:49:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: They don't seem to be working.
• 1:49:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: There are areas in Japan, small areas where there seem to be little tiny micro baby booms.
• 1:49:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: But apart from Japan kind of re embracing its shinto tradition, this is what the Sun Saito Party wants to do.
• 1:49:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's the part that just came in the third place, just out of nowhere.
• 1:49:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: The big, the Trump inspired maga, party, magic, party, make Japan great again.
• 1:49:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: Muneba, make Nepal and great again.
• 1:49:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what they want to see.
• 1:49:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: They want to see a reinvigoration of their shinto traditions.
• 1:49:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: But apart from that, I mean, because the prerequisite it seems to every baby boom is religious renewal.
• 1:50:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: And whenever you have religious renewal, a demographic explosion, a demographic flourishing tends to be the lagging indicator, but an inevitable indicator that comes from that.
• 1:50:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: So Japan's could have to go through that until they do, I don't know what they're going to do.
• 1:50:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: Mark, the Rose, Dr. Drew, what's the latest second amendment related status for CC without permit and reciprocity in all states of no decision yet?
• 1:50:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Will there be one and probable outcome?
• 1:50:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: What is the CC?
• 1:50:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'm not sure, the latest second amendment related status.
• 1:50:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, for concealed carry.
• 1:50:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's just had to come to my head.
• 1:50:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Because without permit and reciprocity in all states, good question.
• 1:51:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: As I, as I understand it, Trump has put second amendment issues on the back burner because just simply because the Supreme Court's been cooperating so much with it.
• 1:51:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, they, they're just
• 1:51:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Second Amendment seems to be so relatively safe with the current makeup Supreme Court.
• 1:51:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: That doesn't make it right or wrong what he's doing per se.
• 1:51:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: I should say that doesn't make it right of what he's doing.
• 1:51:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'm just saying just on turn in terms of the practical triage.
• 1:51:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'd have to get back to you on that.
• 1:51:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: I have to admit I've dropped the gun on concealed carry now for a while.
• 1:51:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: That was a big thing I was focusing on that now.
• 1:51:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: What are we up to?
• 1:51:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Twenty five states at least.
• 1:51:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was half the state's fucking and we're talking
• 1:52:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: over two thousand counties that are second amendment sanctuary counties for sheriffs who are not are not going to prosecute anyone if they if they own a gun that's been banned by their insane left wing state assembly so yeah I'll have to I'll have to catch up with that mark I have not been on the forefront of that
• 1:52:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'll produce thanks for excellent commentary.
• 1:52:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you.
• 1:52:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you for the super chat.
• 1:52:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Very appreciated.
• 1:52:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Rubbo guy, I know I want a lot about, but I rather get the word up because I care for this country and freedom.
• 1:52:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's the more I inform the more people I know and be ready and then we win.
• 1:52:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, no, absolutely.
• 1:52:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: I have no problem.
• 1:52:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: I pull revering is I'm a fan of Paul revering.
• 1:52:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Absolutely.
• 1:52:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: We never want to be caught blindsided.
• 1:52:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Cover Commander, thank you for the super chat.
• 1:53:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: When the brawl and Cincinnati fall under Binance Anti-Linching Act is a Minister of Created, push the false white Supreme Agenda, so Shabani make it federal as a jab to the ironic.
• 1:53:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, yes, very good.
• 1:53:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Hello, hello.
• 1:53:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: Yes, it could.
• 1:53:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: It could be.
• 1:53:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: I mean, I think
• 1:53:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think that attack was shocking to people.
• 1:53:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: People who saw it and a lot of people saw it.
• 1:53:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Obviously went viral.
• 1:53:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Right wing media picked it up big time.
• 1:53:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: Fox picked it up big time.
• 1:53:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: The female victim for getting her name.
• 1:53:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: She's been obviously, she's been on.
• 1:53:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: a number of shows very brave woman that's very hard for her to do knowing she's making herself a target again and that just just everything psychologically tells you don't do that.
• 1:53:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think you've seen Charlie Sheen has come out on the forefront of this.
• 1:53:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: Charlie Sheen is, he followed Benny Johnson.
• 1:54:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: Benny Johnson, they are paying for her, her care.
• 1:54:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: They're making sure she's being taken care of.
• 1:54:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think the male victim as well.
• 1:54:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: And Charlie Sheen came out and followed suit and making sure they have all every financial need, Matt.
• 1:54:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: He was born and raised in Ohio as I understand it.
• 1:54:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: Or lives there now.
• 1:54:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: I forgot what his connection is.
• 1:54:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: But he gave a very beautiful and very passionate public encouragement to both victims, particularly the woman.
• 1:54:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: And we've got your back.
• 1:54:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're going to take care of you.
• 1:54:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I think I think this act awakened a sense of
• 1:54:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: solidarity and serious moral outrage that the kind of racial animosity that has been stoked deliberately by the Democrats, at least since Obama, at a federal level, is poison and we've had enough of it.
• 1:55:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: And we're going to do everything we can to make sure that we push back against that.
• 1:55:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, I think so.
• 1:55:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: I think I think now whether it could be prosecuted, ironically, under an act that's supposed to be relative, you know, anti-white, that would be fascinating.
• 1:55:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know the answer to that.
• 1:55:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: That would be very fascinating.
• 1:55:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: And ironic for sure.
• 1:55:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Davrose, why do you have to text you people around and say, for every week they're gone, one more juicy.
• 1:55:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Why not just max out the map at once, I'm with you.
• 1:55:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well, even consider a halfway maps, they're not the GOP's top advantage.
• 1:55:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Good question.
• 1:55:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: You have to ask them.
• 1:55:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's what I said.
• 1:55:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Davrose, I was like, why even have a blue district, just what get, get Jasmine crockin' and old man, old green with a cane.
• 1:55:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Old man, old green.
• 1:56:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: get rid of get rid of all get rid of all of these nutty democrats they they serve no purpose whatsoever then performance antics performance outrage.
• 1:56:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: All in could be the libertarian party be the one to step in the second party already established some recognizable people already in various offices.
• 1:56:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maybe I'll be on it I just we're not a libertarian nation did we're just not we've never been.
• 1:56:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: Americans like limited government, but we like muscular government.
• 1:56:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: like government doing its job and we like government getting involved when it needs to get involved libertarians are just very ideological they are and again it's a very modern thing it's very it operates with principles that just have no metaphysical grounding anymore in terms of just this one-size-fits-all system so the way heavier malaise been successful with it is he made it a part of Argentinian nationalism same with
• 1:57:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil, tried to make it a part of Brazilian nationalism.
• 1:57:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're going to unleash our economy by cutting off all of this choking, stagnating bureaucracy.
• 1:57:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: So to the extent that dosing things can be considered libertarian, sure, no problem.
• 1:57:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the libertarian party as a whole seems to be an ideological mess to be honest with you.
• 1:57:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: And I don't see it.
• 1:57:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: But could it could?
• 1:57:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: Maximilian, what is an identity and what is its purpose?
• 1:57:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Oh, Maximilian, I got to go quick on this.
• 1:57:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: Technically, identity is positionality.
• 1:57:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: So one's identity is one's position within in relation to others.
• 1:57:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: So I'm a dad.
• 1:57:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: My identity is made up of being a dad, a husband, I'm a YouTuber.
• 1:57:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: I was a professor, right, scholar book writer, cousin, son, brother.
• 1:58:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: So my identity gets derived from my positionality, whether it's familial, relational, professional, you know, financial, economic, right, am I blue collar am I?
• 1:58:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: And my white color, you know, one percent, ninety-nine percent.
• 1:58:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: So your positionality determines your identity.
• 1:58:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Or it helps you to determine your identity.
• 1:58:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then the purpose of identity would be, I mean, it's, it's,
• 1:58:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's manifold, but the idea, as I understand it, is it establishes the inherent relationality of the human person?
• 1:58:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is not good for man to be alone.
• 1:58:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: So our identities define our relationality.
• 1:58:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: And relationality, particularly in the Christian tradition, is at the heart of what it means to be human.
• 1:59:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: So we're not persons apart from our participation with others.
• 1:59:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: So this is where, in the Christian tradition, the Trinity is the, is the, is the paradigmatic foundation for our personhood.
• 1:59:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: So all three persons of the Trinity are infinite eternal expressions of, as of where the one being God or in the more the Eastern Orthodox, the, the, the father, where the son and the Holy Spirit
• 1:59:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Proceed and our begotten and proceed eternally from the father and their personhood is found in their distinct relationships to one another.
• 1:59:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: The father to the son, the son to the spirit, the father spirit to the son and so on.
• 2:00:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: So my humanity is actually defined by virtue of my relationship to the other.
• 2:00:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: And my relationship to the other enables me to give myself to the other.
• 2:00:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: As the Father gives empties himself and fills himself with the Son and the Spirit, the Son empties himself, fills himself with the Father and the Spirit, empties himself and fills himself with the Father and the Son.
• 2:00:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: So personhood, in Trinitarian theology, they use the word persona.
• 2:00:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: personhood is determined by relational relationality and that relationality is the hallmark of one's identity, the father of the sun and the whole experience.
• 2:00:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so I, you and I have identity identities, so it's to enable ourselves to empty ourselves into the lives
• 2:00:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: of others in order to be filled with them, marriage being sort of the ultimate expression of that and the birthing of children being physical manifestation.
• 2:01:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: We are filled with them so as to awaken who are truly meant to be, which is which happens as a result of interaction with others.
• 2:01:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: And then that gets
• 2:01:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: interrupted when our identities try to control and dominate.
• 2:01:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: The difference between love which surrenders and lost which seeks to control.
• 2:01:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: So there you go.
• 2:01:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: There's there's some frames of reference to play around with William.
• 2:01:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: If Mam dummy becomes New York City mayor, well, Trump declare martial law or bring a national guard, especially if NYPD resigned to mass.
• 2:01:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: You have any poll numbers on the New York City mayor and New Jersey governor race.
• 2:01:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you.
• 2:01:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: I haven't been keeping up with New Jersey governor's race.
• 2:01:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: I'm just kind of I'm waiting for for things to get a little bit closer.
• 2:01:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: I guess certainly October will take a very very close look at it.
• 2:01:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: New York City's race looks like McDonald's.
• 2:01:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's got it at this point because because the opposition is split split between Cuomo and Adams and and Swila so yeah at this point it looks like he's gonna it's gonna win and yes and YPD is already said they're gonna they're gonna they're not gonna be listening to a punk punk ass freak like him
• 2:02:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: He's just, again, he's just running for class president promising that promising the world and steal from everybody else, you know, it's just insane.
• 2:02:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: So yeah, we'll see.
• 2:02:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know how Trump will respond.
• 2:02:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: He'll be very upset.
• 2:02:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's for sure.
• 2:02:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: Since that's his native New York.
• 2:02:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: And with that gang, we are done.
• 2:02:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: Another live stream Friday in the books.
• 2:02:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: So it's the weekend.
• 2:02:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: You know, on the weekend, I'm your back porch professor.
• 2:02:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: We're going to still have lots of chats about all kinds of things going on.
• 2:02:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: So keep an eye out for some videos to come out over the course of the weekend.
• 2:02:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: where you and I just make sure you grab whatever you want, nice beer, lemonade, glass of wine, grab a cigar, whatever you like, but come on out to my back porch and we'll chat about all things happening in the rise of a new conservative civilizations age that you made possible back on November the fifth.
• 2:03:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: That's why I love you.
• 2:03:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: God bless you.
• 2:03:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thanks so much for listening this episode at the Turley Talks podcast.
• 2:03:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
• 2:03:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
• 2:03:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.