Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Tyler Robinson’s Lawyers Seek Camera Ban Ahead of September 1st Hearing (8/26/26)

Transcript

Tyler Robinson’s Lawyers Seek Camera Ban Ahead of September 1st Hearing (8/26/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. Tyler
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Robinson's lawyers have filed a new motion with the court
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: asking the court to ban cameras from the hearing that's
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: scheduled on September 1st. And of course this has to
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: do with the circus that surrounds this trial. And the lawyers,
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: they say that having cameras inside the courtroom could potentially
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: taint the jury and give biased information to the public,
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: considering the nature of the hearing, and that hearsay is allowed.
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: And look, I get it. If I was a lawyer
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: for Tyler Robinson, I'd be trying to get cameras out
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: of the courtroom too. But as a member of the public,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: that's the last thing I want to see. Because if
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: there's no cameras in there, and we can't follow along,
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: then they can claim whatever, right? Oh, Tyler Robinson's getting
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: a raw deal. He's being set up. And if we
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: don't have access to that courtroom, then it certainly breathes
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: life into some of the conspiracies saying that this is
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: a cover-up and that the government doesn't want to be
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: honest with the American people. But this kind of battle
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: in a trial like this is not something that is unique.
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: When it comes to Brian Kohlberger, forget it. The battle
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: to have cameras in the courtroom or take them out,
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: it was massive. It went on for months. And I'm
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: sure that we're going to see the same kind of
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: battles take place here because the sort of interest in
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: this case is pretty overwhelming. And there's going to be
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: a lot of people that, you know, want to watch
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: what's going on. So I have a hard time believing
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: that Judge Graff is going to pull cameras out of
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: the courtroom as far as forever. But maybe for this trial,
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: he might do that considering some of the things that
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: we've seen previously. So today, we have an article from
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: Fox News and the headline, Tyler Robinson's lawyers seek camera
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: ban for September 1st hearing. Say case is not a
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: reality TV show. This article was authored by Michael Ruiz.
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson's attorneys are asking the judge to ban cameras
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: from the courtroom, this time alleging that cameras and streaming
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: of his upcoming September 1st hearing risk turning the case
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: into a reality TV show. Bad news for you guys.
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: It already is. the amount of nonsense that surrounds this
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: case is unbelievable. And people just pop off with all
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: kinds of crazy shit. I mean, look, I'm not opposed
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: to an alternative way of thinking, as you all know.
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: But there has to be some merit. There has to
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: be some meat on that bone. Let's see some evidence. Okay,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: you tell me there's Egyptian planes. Well, let's see some evidence.
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: What were they doing? Who was involved? Where did they go?
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: And if you don't have that kind of evidence, then
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: all you have is speculation. And that's cool. There's a
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: place for that, right? We don't know what happened yet.
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: The idea should be to open every door, shake every bush,
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: and see what comes out. That's what you should be
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: doing during an investigation. But there's some wild shit. And
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: there's some wild conversation. I mean, what's next? It was
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: Bigfoot riding a chupacabra that killed Tyler Robinson? The media
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: presence in the courtroom both distracts and places added pressure
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: on the hearing participants to present for the media, as
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: opposed to focusing on the facts, evidence, and mechanics of
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: the hearing. Robinson's attorneys, Kathy Nestor, Michael Burt, and Richard Novak,
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: and Stacey Visser, wrote in one of two Saturday court filings, Mr.
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: Robinson's case is not and should not be made into
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: a reality TV show. Look, I agree with that. Tyler
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: Robinson deserves a fair shake. He deserves every protection that's
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: provided to him under the Constitution, just like anybody else
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: who's accused of something like this deserves the same. And
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: he's going to get it with as much publicity and
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: as many eyes that are on this case. They would
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: have a very hard time playing games. And if they
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: were playing games with, you know, discovery or anything like that,
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: the defense would already be talking about Brady violations. We
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: haven't heard any of that. The defense is arguing that
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: live streams and other images from the hearing could bias
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: the public against their client by showing evidence that may
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: not be admissible at trial later. And this has been
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: a big point of contention. Why are they talking about hearsay?
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: Why are they talking about things that won't be admitted
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: when it comes to the actual trial? Well, because it's
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: the same thing as a grand jury, right? You know
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: what they say about a grand jury. You can get
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: a conviction of a ham sandwich in a grand jury.
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: And that's because it's pretty much one-way traffic. So the
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: same goes for a prelim hearing in a place like Utah.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: So there's going to be hearsay. There's going to be
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: qualified statements. And remember, it's not just about one bit
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: of evidence or one piece of evidence. It's about the
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: totality of what they've collected. So I think that's an
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: important distinction. And people need to understand that it's not
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: just about one piece of evidence. It never is. It's
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: about the totality of it. And what they do is
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: they use circumstantial evidence to build a base, the foundation.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: And then on top of that foundation comes the stronger evidence.
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: But just about every single investigation starts with circumstantial evidence.
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: Specific to the oral argument on the prelim hearing, the EMC,
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: Electronic Media Coverage, will memorialize and widely disseminate arguments discussing
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: the largely hearsay-based evidentiary presentation made by the state. The
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: lawyer wrote, Such evidence is, by its very nature, insufficiently
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: reliable for admission at trial. Well, that's true, but that
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: doesn't mean it's not important. People need to understand what
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: the circumstantial evidence is and why the government has a
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: case against Tyler Robinson. And the best way to do
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: that is to see them lay out their evidence in
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: live court. Both of the filings also included redacted paragraphs
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: after Robinson's lawyers alleged that additional evidence of bias developing
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: as a result of the widespread publication of his case
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: can be tracked in real time. Well, look, this is
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: one of those cases that elicits a lot of emotion
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: one way or the other. And there's a lot of
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: people that get controlled by their emotions. So there's a
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: lot of people that have inserted themselves into this case
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: that have main character syndrome. Look, it's one thing to
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: cover it and it's a whole ass other thing to
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: think you're a fucking inspector gadget and you're going to
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: blow the doors off the investigation. It's absurd. Honestly, it's absurd. Now,
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: that doesn't mean people commentating on it don't have, you know,
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: good ideas. That doesn't mean they don't have good theories.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: But there's some people that actually think they're a part
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: of the investigation. And I can assure you, they are not.
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: The defense also claimed that witnesses who provided statements that
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: were admitted as reliable hearsay ahead of the week-long July
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: preliminary hearing, experienced harassment by media and interested third parties. Oh,
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: I wonder who they're talking about. I wonder who was
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: harassing people. The same people that are grifting the fuck
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: out of this case. Here's an idea. Talk about it.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: Cover it. Share evidence with your audience. Leave people alone.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: I swear to God, I don't think I've ever seen
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: as much jackassery surrounding a case as we do here.
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: I mean, every time you turn around, there is another
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: theory and another ridiculous narrative that just doesn't fit. Robinson's
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, 31, at a
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: Turning Point USA event in Orem, Utah last year. Kirk
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: was shot and killed while speaking to a crowd of
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: thousands at Utah Valley University on September 10th, 2025. Separately,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: a source close to the Kirk family said Tuesday that
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: Kirk's widow, Erica, and his parents, Rob and Kathy, all
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: planned to attend the September 1st hearing together, as they
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: did during the July hearing. Yo, I'd be there too
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: if it was my family member. Are you crazy right now? What,
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: they shouldn't be there? I know I would be. And look,
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: you can have all the problems in the world with
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: Erica Kirk. And frankly, I find some of the behavior
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: a bit off-putting. But the way people have attacked this woman? Wow.
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: That's a whole ass other level. And I have a
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: funny feeling when all said and done, there's going to
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: be some lawsuits filed. Judge Tony Graff will hear oral
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: arguments from both sides regarding the evidence introduced in July
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: and will decide whether there's enough probable cause to justify
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: sending Robinson to trial on the charges against him. Look,
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: there's no doubt. There's enough evidence. Is that evidence strong
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: enough to convict? We'll have to see. but there's certainly
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: enough evidence to take it to trial. I mean, come on.
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: And I don't think anybody is disputing that. I don't
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: think there's anybody out there that thinks this is not
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: going to trial. Robinson's defense objected to hearsay evidence from
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: the prelim hearing and also opposes the sole aggravating factor
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: in the aggravated murder charge that carries a potential death penalty.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: That Robinson allegedly put other people at great risk of
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: death by shooting Kirk in a crowded place. Like, how
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: do you even dispute that All those people around, you're
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: firing bullets downrange. Yeah, somebody else could have been hurt.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: Seems like a logical step for me. The defense argued
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: that only a single shot was fired from an elevated position.
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: It traveled over the crowd rather than through it and
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: only struck Kirk. Well, that's weird. If it was an
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: exploding microphone or a drone, don't you think his defense
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: would point that out? Hey, look, not only did he
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: not shoot this person, nobody shot anybody. There was no bullet.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: It was an exploding microphone. And I love when people
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: are like, well, they can't present anything at a prelim hearing. Bro,
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: what do you think the whole entire point is? If
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: they have evidence that exonerates their client, oh, they're bringing
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: it to the table. You better believe that. Prosecutors countered
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: that Robinson was a bad shot. One who seldom hit
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: the bullseye and sometimes misses the target completely when practicing
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: shooting with a suspected murder weapon. Well, that certainly is
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: a bit weird. So he misses all the time, but
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: he just happens to be on point when it comes
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: to taking out Charlie Kirk? Look, I'm not saying that
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: there's not weird things that come along with this story.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: There are. And there's a lot of unanswered questions. But
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: for me, the way to get to those answers is
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: to follow the actual evidence. Not what some jerk-off on
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: Twitter says. Robinson, 23, has not yet entered a plea. Well,
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: I don't think there's any doubt that this goes to trial.
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: But as far as the cameras in the courtroom on
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: September 1st, I think that's up for debate. While I
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: think they should be there, we'll have to see what
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: Judge Graff thinks and what he says. Because there's certainly
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: an argument to be made on both sides. And considering
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: that that hearing... is what a week away or so
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: i'm guessing that we'll have a ruling from judge graph
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: sometime in the next few days and when we get
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: that ruling obviously we'll get it added to the catalog
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: all the information that goes with this episode can be
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: found in the description box