Latest / The Last Observer: Science and Beyond / Beyond DNA: The Search for Alien Biology
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: I want you to just picture something for a second.
- 0:03Speaker 1: If I were to ask you to imagine the absolute,
- 0:06Speaker 1: like the most fundamental ingredients of life, what immediately pops
- 0:10Speaker 1: into your head?
- 0:11Speaker 2: Oh? Well, probably the same thing everyone thinks.
- 0:13Speaker 1: Of, right exactly. Yeah, if you're like most people, you're
- 0:16Speaker 1: probably picturing two things. You're picturing water, so you know,
- 0:21Speaker 1: maybe shimmering blue ocean or just a drop of morning dew, right,
- 0:25Speaker 1: and then a DNA. Yeah, that classic like twisting double
- 0:29Speaker 1: helix we've all seen in every single biology textbook ever. Yeah,
- 0:33Speaker 1: the classic ladder, right, And I mean it makes perfect
- 0:37Speaker 1: sense what you would think of those two things. They
- 0:39Speaker 1: are literally the absolute bedrock of everything alive on this planet. Everything,
- 0:44Speaker 1: literally every single thing, from like the microscopic bacteria clinging
- 0:48Speaker 1: to some superheated deep sea hydrothermal event, you know, all
- 0:52Speaker 1: the way up to a massive blue whale just gliding
- 0:56Speaker 1: through the Pacific. And obviously you and me, we all
- 0:59Speaker 1: share it. Yeah, we all shared this exact same fundamental recipe.
- 1:02Speaker 2: It really is. It's the unifying thread of all known existence.
- 1:07Speaker 2: I mean, you look at the sheer diversity of the
- 1:09Speaker 2: natural world, right, the millions of species, the extreme environments
- 1:13Speaker 2: they somehow survive in the wildly different ways they consume energy.
- 1:17Speaker 2: It's crazy, it is, But all of it ultimately boiled
- 1:21Speaker 2: down to that exact same, elegant but incredibly specific chemical.
- 1:26Speaker 1: Architecture, just water and DNA.
- 1:28Speaker 2: Exactly. You have water acting as the universal solvent, kind
- 1:33Speaker 2: of providing the fluid stage where all the biological action
- 1:36Speaker 2: actually happens. Yeah, and then you have DNA acting as
- 1:39Speaker 2: the script, like the genetic blueprint, dictating exactly what the
- 1:42Speaker 2: molecular actors should do. Right.
- 1:44Speaker 1: And because it's literally everywhere, it feels fixed. It does
- 1:47Speaker 1: like it feels like a fundamental law of physics or something.
- 1:50Speaker 1: But and this is the thing that is exactly the
- 1:52Speaker 1: assumption we're going to completely shatter today. Oh absolutely, because
- 1:56Speaker 1: we're exploring a reality that is, honestly, it's just mind
- 1:59Speaker 1: bending once you start to really sit with it. We're
- 2:01Speaker 1: going to look at the very real, scientifically grounded possibility
- 2:05Speaker 1: that Earth's biology. You know, this DNA and water recicue
- 2:09Speaker 1: we hold so sacred, it might just be one single
- 2:13Speaker 1: version of life.
- 2:14Speaker 2: Yeah. It requires a pretty profound paradigm shiftut because we
- 2:18Speaker 2: are so accustomed to just equating the word life exclusively with.
- 2:22Speaker 1: Earth life, right, Like they're synonyms exactly.
- 2:25Speaker 2: Yeah, But from a strictly scientific, like chepical standpoint, there
- 2:30Speaker 2: is absolutely no universal law that dictates life must be
- 2:35Speaker 2: built this way, no law at all, none. We basically
- 2:38Speaker 2: suffer from this intense observational bias.
- 2:41Speaker 1: So, Okay, the best way I can kind of wrap
- 2:43Speaker 1: my head around this is to think about the device
- 2:45Speaker 1: you're using right now to listen to us. Okay, yeah,
- 2:48Speaker 1: like your smartphone or your laptop. For billions of years
- 2:51Speaker 1: on this planet, we've essentially been assuming that the entire
- 2:54Speaker 1: universe only runs on Earth OS Earth operating system like that, right,
- 2:58Speaker 1: Earth OS, And in this specific so US, the core
- 3:00Speaker 1: programming language is DNA, and the physical environment it needs
- 3:04Speaker 1: to you know, run smoothly is liquid water. We've just
- 3:09Speaker 1: assumed that's the only software and hardware combination that can
- 3:12Speaker 1: possibly boot up and create a living thing. But like,
- 3:15Speaker 1: what if there are entirely different operating systems out there?
- 3:18Speaker 2: Well, there almost certainly are, right, Like what if.
- 3:20Speaker 1: There's a Mac to our PC or something so completely
- 3:23Speaker 1: alien it doesn't even use a recognizable file system at all?
- 3:27Speaker 2: That is fundamentally what we are deconstructing today that fixed formula, right,
- 3:32Speaker 2: because we're going to look at how the cutting edge
- 3:35Speaker 2: field of synthetic biology is proving that alternative genetic codes
- 3:39Speaker 2: aren't just science fiction anymore.
- 3:41Speaker 1: They're real.
- 3:41Speaker 2: They're actively being synthesized in laboratories right now.
- 3:44Speaker 1: That's wild.
- 3:45Speaker 2: And we'll explore the thermodynamic reality of how a solvent
- 3:49Speaker 2: that is entirely toxic to us, like liquid ammonia, might
- 3:53Speaker 2: actually replace water as the perfect foundation for like a
- 3:57Speaker 2: cryogenic biology.
- 3:59Speaker 1: Ammonia just crazy.
- 4:01Speaker 2: Yeah, And then we'll dive into the eerie mechanics of
- 4:04Speaker 2: shadow biospheres.
- 4:05Speaker 1: Oh, shadow biospheres. I love that term.
- 4:07Speaker 2: It's fascinating, the idea that radically different life forms could
- 4:10Speaker 2: be existing right next to us, Yeah, completely undetected by.
- 4:13Speaker 1: Our instruments, invisible to us exactly.
- 4:16Speaker 2: And ultimately we're going to arrive at a concept that
- 4:20Speaker 2: basically redefines everything, the idea that life isn't a specific
- 4:24Speaker 2: chemical formula at all, but rather it's just a pure
- 4:27Speaker 2: pattern of information.
- 4:29Speaker 1: Okay, So let's start with that first big pillar, dismantling
- 4:33Speaker 1: the fixed formula of DNA and water. Yeah, let's do it,
- 4:37Speaker 1: because it's one thing to say there might be other
- 4:39Speaker 1: ways to make life right. But it's another to realize
- 4:42Speaker 1: how deeply our science has been kind of handicapped by
- 4:45Speaker 1: our own biology.
- 4:46Speaker 2: Yeah, astrobiologists and theoretical biologists, they actually refer to this
- 4:50Speaker 2: as the end of one problem, en of one, right,
- 4:54Speaker 2: because in statistics, you know, your sample size is denoted
- 4:58Speaker 2: by the letter N.
- 4:59Speaker 1: Okay.
- 4:59Speaker 2: Sure, But for the study of life in the universe,
- 5:02Speaker 2: our sympathize is exactly one Earth, just Earth. We have
- 5:05Speaker 2: absolutely nothing else to compare it to. Wow, So we
- 5:08Speaker 2: look around. We observe that every single living thing we
- 5:11Speaker 2: have ever sequenced or you know, examined under a microscope
- 5:14Speaker 2: relies on DNA for its genetic code and water as
- 5:17Speaker 2: it's solvent.
- 5:18Speaker 1: Right one hundred percent of the time exactly.
- 5:20Speaker 2: And because it's the only template we have ever known,
- 5:23Speaker 2: we just erroneously elevated to a universal requirement.
- 5:26Speaker 1: We confuse the vehicle with the destination.
- 5:28Speaker 2: Oh, that's a good way to put it.
- 5:30Speaker 1: Yeah, Like the destination is being alive, right, right, replicating, metabolizing,
- 5:35Speaker 1: adapting to an environment. Right, But the vehicle on Earth
- 5:39Speaker 1: just happens to be like a Honda Civic made of carbon,
- 5:43Speaker 1: DNA and water, exactly. Yeah, but there's literally no physical
- 5:48Speaker 1: law saying you can't get to that exact same destination
- 5:52Speaker 1: in a completely different kind of vehicle.
- 5:54Speaker 2: And for decades that idea was purely theoretical.
- 5:57Speaker 1: Just people talking.
- 5:58Speaker 2: Yeah, scientists would just debate alternate native biochemistries, but they
- 6:01Speaker 2: had absolutely no physical proof, right. But that has completely
- 6:06Speaker 2: changed with the advent of synthetic biology. Okay, so what changed, Well,
- 6:10Speaker 2: researchers aren't just looking through microscopes at what already exists anymore.
- 6:14Speaker 2: They are actively playing with the fundamental chemical building blocks
- 6:19Speaker 2: to see what else is actually possible.
- 6:21Speaker 1: They're building it.
- 6:22Speaker 2: They're building it, and they are demonstrating that alternative genetic
- 6:25Speaker 2: systems are fundamentally viable.
- 6:27Speaker 1: Okay, let's get into the weeds on this, because this
- 6:30Speaker 1: is where like the biology textbooks actually get rewritten. Oh completely,
- 6:34Speaker 1: Because DNA is a very specific molecule, right, It has
- 6:37Speaker 1: a sugar phosphate backbone that forms the sides of the ladder,
- 6:41Speaker 1: and it uses four specific chemical bases adenine, cytosine, thymine,
- 6:46Speaker 1: and guanine, ACT and G right, the wrongs of the ladder.
- 6:50Speaker 1: So how exactly are synthetic biologists changing that?
- 6:54Speaker 2: Well, they're attacking it from multiple angles. Actually, one of
- 6:58Speaker 2: the most groundbreaking examples is the creation of something called
- 7:01Speaker 2: hatch emogi.
- 7:02Speaker 1: DNA hatch emoji.
- 7:03Speaker 2: Yeah, so hachi means eight in Japanese and moji means
- 7:06Speaker 2: letter eight letters exactly. Researchers successfully engineered a synthetic DNA
- 7:11Speaker 2: molecule that uses eight building blocks instead of the standard four. Whoa, yeah,
- 7:16Speaker 2: they get the natural ACT and G, but then they
- 7:18Speaker 2: added four completely synthetic basis named SBP and Z.
- 7:23Speaker 1: And these synthetic bases like, they don't exist anywhere in nature.
- 7:27Speaker 2: Nowhere that we know of. Wow, they were strictly designed
- 7:29Speaker 2: in a lab to form completely unnatural base pairs utilizing
- 7:34Speaker 2: different hydrogen bonding patterns. But here is the critical part.
- 7:38Speaker 2: This eight letter hachimog DNA. It still forms a stable
- 7:43Speaker 2: double helix.
- 7:44Speaker 1: Wait, really, it still twists perfectly.
- 7:46Speaker 2: It still twists. Its thermodynamic properties are entirely stable and predictable.
- 7:51Speaker 2: It can store information, and astonishingly, it can even be
- 7:55Speaker 2: transcribed into RNA by engineered enzymes.
- 7:58Speaker 1: That is insane.
- 8:00Speaker 2: Roofs that the four letter genetic code we have is
- 8:02Speaker 2: not chemically mandated by the universe.
- 8:05Speaker 1: It's just a fluke.
- 8:06Speaker 2: It's just the one that happened to win out in
- 8:07Speaker 2: the primordial soup of early Earth.
- 8:09Speaker 1: Okay, but even with hotch emoji DNA, you are still
- 8:12Speaker 1: using the same basic structure, right, like that sugar phosphate backbone.
- 8:16Speaker 2: That's true.
- 8:17Speaker 1: So what if we strip away even more because I
- 8:19Speaker 1: know researchers are also working on something called x and
- 8:22Speaker 1: as like xeno nucleic acids.
- 8:24Speaker 2: Yes, X andase take the deconstruction a whole step further. Okay,
- 8:27Speaker 2: So instead of just changing the letters like the bases,
- 8:30Speaker 2: they actually change the backbone of the molecule itself.
- 8:33Speaker 1: They swap out the sides of the latter exactly.
- 8:35Speaker 2: And one of the most fascinating examples of this is
- 8:37Speaker 2: p ANDA, which stands for peptide nucleic.
- 8:40Speaker 1: Acid peptide nucleic acid.
- 8:42Speaker 2: Okay, So, in standard DNA, the backbone is made of
- 8:45Speaker 2: deoxydrobose sugars and phosphate groups, right, and those phosphate groups
- 8:50Speaker 2: carry a negative electrical charge. But in p and A,
- 8:54Speaker 2: that entire sugar phosphate backbone is replaced by a peptide backbone,
- 9:00Speaker 2: which is similar to what you find in proteins.
- 9:02Speaker 1: Hang on let me push back on this logically for
- 9:04Speaker 1: a second. Sure, because if you replace the negatively charged
- 9:08Speaker 1: DNA backbone with a peptide backbone, which is neutrally charged, right, right,
- 9:13Speaker 1: wouldn't that fundamentally change how the molecule interacts with its environment?
- 9:18Speaker 2: Oh?
- 9:18Speaker 1: Absolutely, Because in standard DNA, the negative charges on the
- 9:21Speaker 1: two strands they repel each other.
- 9:23Speaker 2: Slightly, right, electrostatic repulsion, right.
- 9:26Speaker 1: And that prevents the molecule from just like collapsing in
- 9:29Speaker 1: on itself, and it helps it unzip during replication. So
- 9:33Speaker 1: without that negative charge, wouldn't a PNA molecule just clump
- 9:37Speaker 1: together into some useless knot?
- 9:39Speaker 2: That is exactly the kind of structural problem that synthetic
- 9:42Speaker 2: biologists have to solve, right, And the reality is actually
- 9:45Speaker 2: pretty counterintuitive. Because PNA lacks that electrostatic repulsion between the strands,
- 9:50Speaker 2: the two strands actually bind to each other much more
- 9:53Speaker 2: tightly and stably than natural DNA.
- 9:55Speaker 1: Oh, so it overcorrects in a way.
- 9:58Speaker 2: Yeah, The binding is incredibly strong, so strong in fact,
- 10:03Speaker 2: that it might actually be too stable for life on Earth.
- 10:05Speaker 2: Too stable, yeah, because Earth life requires DNA to constantly
- 10:09Speaker 2: zip and unzip to read the genetic code and you
- 10:13Speaker 2: repulatory it has to pull apart exactly, and if the
- 10:15Speaker 2: strands are stuck together too tightly, the biological machinery just
- 10:19Speaker 2: can't pry them apart at room temperature.
- 10:21Speaker 1: But wait, that's only a problem if you are trying
- 10:23Speaker 1: to operate at Earth temperatures in liquid water.
- 10:26Speaker 2: Precisely the point ah P and a's extreme stability might
- 10:30Speaker 2: make it a terrible genetic molecule for a warm watery
- 10:32Speaker 2: planet like Earth. But if you take that exact same
- 10:36Speaker 2: molecule and place it in an environment that is significantly hotter,
- 10:40Speaker 2: or utilize a completely different solvent that interacts differently with
- 10:44Speaker 2: neutral molecules, Suddenly that hyperstability goes from being a bug
- 10:48Speaker 2: to a.
- 10:48Speaker 1: Feature that is fascinating.
- 10:50Speaker 2: It forces us to realize that the genetic code and
- 10:54Speaker 2: the solvent it floats in, they are an intimately coupled system.
- 10:57Speaker 1: They work together.
- 10:58Speaker 2: Yeah, if you change the code, you might need to
- 11:01Speaker 2: change the ocean.
- 11:02Speaker 1: Wow, which brings us perfectly to the second massive assumption.
- 11:06Speaker 1: We really need to dismantle right, the absolute necessity of
- 11:10Speaker 1: water right, because if we swap out the genetic software,
- 11:13Speaker 1: we have to look at swapping out the environmental hardware
- 11:16Speaker 1: we do, and when you look at alternative biochemistries, liquid
- 11:19Speaker 1: ammonia constantly comes up as the prime candidate to replace water.
- 11:23Speaker 2: It does. Ammonia chemically denoted as NH three. It's one
- 11:27Speaker 2: of the most rigorously studied theoretical solvents for alternative life.
- 11:31Speaker 1: Okay, so why ammonia.
- 11:33Speaker 2: Well, to understand why, we have to look at what
- 11:35Speaker 2: makes water so special on Earth first.
- 11:37Speaker 1: Okay.
- 11:38Speaker 2: Water is highly polar meaning one end of the molecule
- 11:41Speaker 2: has a slight positive charge and the other has a slight.
- 11:44Speaker 1: Negative charge, right like a magnet.
- 11:46Speaker 2: Exactly like a tiny magnet. And this polarity allows it
- 11:49Speaker 2: to surround and pull apart other molecules. It's a brilliant
- 11:52Speaker 2: solvent for the chemical reactions necessary for metabolism.
- 11:56Speaker 1: It just dissolves things really well.
- 11:58Speaker 2: Yeah, and it also forms hydrogen bonds, which gives it
- 12:01Speaker 2: a high heat capacity and allows it to remain liquid
- 12:04Speaker 2: over a really broad range of temperatures.
- 12:06Speaker 1: It's kind of like the ultimate chemical dance floor.
- 12:09Speaker 2: I love that analogy, right.
- 12:11Speaker 1: It lets all the complex organic molecules mingle, they bump
- 12:14Speaker 1: into each other, and they react without letting them fly
- 12:16Speaker 1: apart into a gas or just lock up into a.
- 12:19Speaker 2: Solid, and ammonia shares many of these exact same crucial properties.
- 12:24Speaker 2: Really yeah, like water, ammonia is a polar molecule, so
- 12:28Speaker 2: it can dissolve a wide array of organic compounds just
- 12:32Speaker 2: like water can.
- 12:33Speaker 1: Oh I didn't know that.
- 12:34Speaker 2: Yeah, And it also forms hydrogen bonds, although they are
- 12:37Speaker 2: a bit weaker than the hydrogen bonds in water, but
- 12:40Speaker 2: it can absolutely support the complex, intricate chemical reactions necessary
- 12:45Speaker 2: for a metabolic system. Okay. The fundamental difference lies in
- 12:48Speaker 2: the thermodynamic environment where ammonia operates as a liquid.
- 12:51Speaker 1: Wait, okay, this is where I need a reality check. Okay,
- 12:54Speaker 1: because we know ammonia primarily as a gas on Earth
- 12:57Speaker 1: or like dissolved into water for household cleaners, right, glass
- 13:00Speaker 1: clean Yeah. For pure ammonia to exist as a liquid,
- 13:03Speaker 1: the environment has to be freezing, very cold, like it
- 13:07Speaker 1: boils into a gas at around minus thirty three degree
- 13:09Speaker 1: celsius and freezes solid at around minus seventy seven degrees CELSIU.
- 13:13Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the window.
- 13:14Speaker 1: So if an environment is that cold, wouldn't the kinetic
- 13:17Speaker 1: energy be so low that chemical reactions happen at a
- 13:21Speaker 1: like a glacial pace.
- 13:23Speaker 2: That is the big question.
- 13:24Speaker 1: Because the Erneus equation in chemistry basically says that as
- 13:28Speaker 1: temperature drops, reaction rates just plummet. They do, so how
- 13:32Speaker 1: could a complex organism possibly evolve or even just metabolize
- 13:37Speaker 1: before its local star dies out.
- 13:39Speaker 2: That is actually the most common critique of ammonia based life.
- 13:43Speaker 1: I mean, it makes sense, it.
- 13:44Speaker 2: Does, but it assumes that alien life would use the
- 13:47Speaker 2: exact same chemical pathways and enzymes that earth life uses.
- 13:51Speaker 2: Let's break down the physical chemistry here. It is absolutely
- 13:54Speaker 2: true that lower temperatures mean less ambient kinetic energy to
- 13:57Speaker 2: drive reactions. However, liquid emone has a significantly lower viscosity
- 14:02Speaker 2: than liquid.
- 14:03Speaker 1: Water, meaning it's thinner like, less sticky.
- 14:05Speaker 2: Considerably less viscous. So at cryogenic temperatures, molecules actually diffuse
- 14:11Speaker 2: and move through liquid ammonia much faster than they move
- 14:15Speaker 2: through water as water approaches its freezing point.
- 14:18Speaker 1: Oh wow, So.
- 14:19Speaker 2: Going back to your analogy, the dance floor is colder,
- 14:22Speaker 2: but the dancers are moving through a much thinner crowd,
- 14:25Speaker 2: so they can still meet up exactly. Furthermore, life doesn't
- 14:28Speaker 2: just rely on ambient heat to drive reactions anyway, It
- 14:31Speaker 2: relies on catalysts enzymes to lower the activation energy required
- 14:37Speaker 2: for a reaction to occur in the first place.
- 14:39Speaker 1: Okay, So an ammonia based organism wouldn't use our enzymes
- 14:44Speaker 1: none at all. It would have evolved a completely different
- 14:46Speaker 1: set of biological catalysts, specifically optimized to function at like
- 14:51Speaker 1: minus fifty degrees celsius exactly.
- 14:54Speaker 2: Their enzymes would be highly flexible, specifically designed to facilitate
- 14:57Speaker 2: reactions with very little thermal input.
- 15:00Speaker 1: That makes so much sense.
- 15:01Speaker 2: The metabolism would undoubtedly be slower than an Earth organism, yes,
- 15:04Speaker 2: but in a stable, persistently cold environment, time isn't necessarily
- 15:08Speaker 2: a constraint.
- 15:08Speaker 1: They have all the time in the world.
- 15:10Speaker 2: Right, and this radically expands the habitable real estate in
- 15:14Speaker 2: the universe.
- 15:14Speaker 1: Oh I bet?
- 15:15Speaker 2: I mean we routinely point our telescopes at moons far
- 15:18Speaker 2: out in our own solar system, like Saturn's moon Titan,
- 15:22Speaker 2: and we just dismiss them because their surface temperatures are
- 15:25Speaker 2: hundreds of degrees below zero.
- 15:26Speaker 1: We just write them off as dead ice balls.
- 15:29Speaker 2: Right, But Titan has a thick atmosphere, It has lakes
- 15:33Speaker 2: of liquid methane on its surface, and compelling evidence of
- 15:36Speaker 2: a vast subsurface ocean of water mixed with liquid ammonia.
- 15:41Speaker 1: If we go back to our construction analogy for a second,
- 15:44Speaker 1: it's like trying to build a house. Okay, if you've
- 15:46Speaker 1: only ever lived in a temperate forest, you build your
- 15:49Speaker 1: house out of wood and nails. Sure, that's our carbon
- 15:52Speaker 1: and water biology. You assume it. To build a house,
- 15:55Speaker 1: you need a forest. But if you travel to a
- 15:57Speaker 1: rocky desert where there are no trees, doesn't say well, houses.
- 16:01Speaker 2: Are impossible here, right, They just adapt.
- 16:03Speaker 1: They just use different materials. They use poured concrete and rebar.
- 16:07Speaker 2: The ammonia chemistry is the concrete and rebar exactly.
- 16:10Speaker 1: The construction process handles temperature entirely differently, the foundational materials
- 16:16Speaker 1: interact differently. The house might look, you know, brutalist and
- 16:19Speaker 1: totally alien compared to your little wooden cabin, but functionally, thermodynamically,
- 16:24Speaker 1: it is still a house. It still works, It provides shelter,
- 16:27Speaker 1: it maintains an internal environment. So an ammonia based cellular
- 16:32Speaker 1: structure might look completely foreign, utilizing X and a's or
- 16:36Speaker 1: molecules we haven't even named yet, but it's still performing
- 16:39Speaker 1: the fundamental functions of life and.
- 16:41Speaker 2: That functional perspective, it forces us to confront a deeply
- 16:45Speaker 2: unsettling possibility.
- 16:47Speaker 1: Uh oh, unsettling?
- 16:48Speaker 2: How well? If life can be built out of completely
- 16:51Speaker 2: different chemical materials optimize for environments we consider toxic or dead,
- 16:55Speaker 2: who is to say it has to be in a
- 16:57Speaker 2: distant moon. Oh what if alternive biochemistry is found a
- 17:01Speaker 2: niche right here on earth?
- 17:02Speaker 1: Oh man? This is the concept of the shadow biosphere.
- 17:05Speaker 1: It is, and it just sounds like a science fiction thriller.
- 17:08Speaker 2: It really does.
- 17:09Speaker 1: We are talking about the possibility that alternative, radically different
- 17:13Speaker 1: forms of life could be existing right next to us, like,
- 17:15Speaker 1: completely undetected.
- 17:17Speaker 2: It is a highly debated but logically sound hypothesis in
- 17:21Speaker 2: modern microbiology. Really yeah. And the premise is not that
- 17:26Speaker 2: giant alien monsters are hiding in deep cave.
- 17:30Speaker 1: Systems right, not mole people.
- 17:32Speaker 2: No, The premise is that microscopic life forms utilizing a
- 17:36Speaker 2: completely different chemical architecture could be ubiquitous in our environment,
- 17:41Speaker 2: but completely invisible to our scientific methodology.
- 17:44Speaker 1: Oh man. So when a Mars rover or even a
- 17:47Speaker 1: researcher in the Atacama Desert, you scoops up a soil
- 17:50Speaker 1: sample and runs it through a high tech sequencer. It's
- 17:53Speaker 1: essentially like a colorblind robot looking for a specific painting.
- 17:57Speaker 2: That is a perfect way to look at it.
- 17:58Speaker 1: It could be drilling right through authorizing dense colony of
- 18:01Speaker 1: non standard microbes and reporting the sample as sterile rock.
- 18:05Speaker 1: Just because it's only programmed to see Earth DNA.
- 18:08Speaker 2: The color bind robot is a highly accurate way to
- 18:10Speaker 2: visualize the exact problem we have. Wow, let's look at
- 18:14Speaker 2: the actual mechanism of how we detect microbial life. One
- 18:17Speaker 2: of our primary tools is PCR polymerase chain reaction, Right,
- 18:21Speaker 2: we heard.
- 18:22Speaker 1: A lot about that during COVID Exactly.
- 18:24Speaker 2: It's the same technology used in DNA testing and viral diagnostics,
- 18:28Speaker 2: and PCR works by using primers, which are basically short
- 18:32Speaker 2: specific sequences of standard DNA that are designed to bind
- 18:36Speaker 2: to the target organism's genetic code, allowing us to amplify
- 18:40Speaker 2: and read it.
- 18:41Speaker 1: But if the organism in the dirt doesn't use standard DNA, then.
- 18:45Speaker 2: The primers have absolutely nothing to bind to.
- 18:48Speaker 1: They just float past.
- 18:49Speaker 2: Right. If a microbe in that soil sample uses a
- 18:52Speaker 2: peptide nucleic acid backbone like we talked about, or if
- 18:55Speaker 2: it utilizes a different set of base pairs like the
- 18:58Speaker 2: hot emoji DNA. The PCR process simply fails.
- 19:02Speaker 1: It just registers as zero.
- 19:04Speaker 2: The sequencer registers absolutely nothing. It just looks like chemical
- 19:06Speaker 2: noise or inert organic matter.
- 19:09Speaker 1: Okay, but what about just like putting it in a
- 19:11Speaker 1: peatrie edition seeing if it grows. We've been doing that
- 19:13Speaker 1: for over a century.
- 19:14Speaker 2: Culturing microbes presents the exact same bias. Unfortunately. Really yeah,
- 19:18Speaker 2: when we prepare an agar plate, we pack it with
- 19:20Speaker 2: the specific nutrients amino acids and sugars that earth life
- 19:23Speaker 2: consumes our food, right, and we incubate it at temperatures
- 19:27Speaker 2: earth life prefers. We only grow what eats our food.
- 19:31Speaker 1: That makes sense.
- 19:32Speaker 2: In fact, even among standard DNA based earth microbes, it
- 19:36Speaker 2: is estimated that we can only culture about one percent
- 19:38Speaker 2: of them in a lab.
- 19:40Speaker 1: One percent, just.
- 19:41Speaker 2: One percent, ninety nine percent of standard microbial life won't
- 19:45Speaker 2: even grow in our artificial conditions.
- 19:47Speaker 1: That is staggering.
- 19:48Speaker 2: It is now imagine trying to culture an organism that
- 19:51Speaker 2: relies on an entirely different set of amino acids, where
- 19:55Speaker 2: you know, requires a different chirality.
- 19:57Speaker 1: Okay, chirality. I've heard this word, the left handed versus
- 20:00Speaker 1: right handed molecules.
- 20:01Speaker 2: Yes, exactly. Many organic molecules exist in two forms that
- 20:05Speaker 2: are mirror images of each other, sort of like you're
- 20:07Speaker 2: left and right hands. Okay, and for reasons we still
- 20:10Speaker 2: don't fully understand, almost all known life on Earth exclusively
- 20:14Speaker 2: uses left handed amino acids to build proteins and right
- 20:18Speaker 2: handed sugars for DNA and metabolism.
- 20:20Speaker 1: Just completely one sided.
- 20:21Speaker 2: Yep. So if there were a shadow biosphere living in
- 20:24Speaker 2: the soil that simply swap that using right handed amino acids.
- 20:28Speaker 1: Or biological enzymes, couldn't even interact with.
- 20:30Speaker 2: It, not at all. Our proteases couldn't digest their proteins.
- 20:35Speaker 2: They would be biologically invisible to our metabolism, and our
- 20:38Speaker 2: assays would completely struggle to identify them as biological rather
- 20:42Speaker 2: than just you know, weird geological chemistry.
- 20:44Speaker 1: It is deeply humbling, it really is. I mean, we
- 20:47Speaker 1: are looking through a microscope with a filter fuse to
- 20:51Speaker 1: the lens, and the filter only lets the color red
- 20:54Speaker 1: pass through. Exactly, We look around the slide, we map
- 20:56Speaker 1: out all the red objects, and we declare we've discovered.
- 20:59Speaker 2: All look at all this red.
- 21:02Speaker 1: Right. Meanwhile, there is a sprawling complex ecosystem of blue
- 21:07Speaker 1: and green organisms thriving right there on the glass, and
- 21:10Speaker 1: we're just blissfully oblivious.
- 21:13Speaker 2: It fundamentally questions the very nature of our observation. Yeah, like,
- 21:17Speaker 2: how many anomalous chemical gradients have we measured in deep
- 21:20Speaker 2: rock fractures or strange isotopic ratios and ocean sediments that
- 21:24Speaker 2: we just wrote off as weird geology simply because we
- 21:27Speaker 2: couldn't sequence a standard DNA strand from the sample.
- 21:29Speaker 1: We probably throw away alien life constantly.
- 21:32Speaker 2: It's very possible our certainty about the boundaries of the
- 21:35Speaker 2: biological world is entirely conditioned by the limitations of our tools.
- 21:40Speaker 1: So okay, if life can be synthesized with an alternative
- 21:44Speaker 1: genetic ladder in a lab, and if it can use
- 21:46Speaker 1: entirely different solvents like liquid ammonia on a freezing moon,
- 21:51Speaker 1: and if it can potentially hide right here in the
- 21:53Speaker 1: dirt outside our houses, completely devoid a familiar chemistry, the
- 21:58Speaker 1: definition of the word life essentially breaks down, crumbles right
- 22:02Speaker 1: the definition we all memorized in high school biology. You
- 22:05Speaker 1: know that life is a carbon based, water dependent system
- 22:08Speaker 1: utilizing nucleic acids. It's just too small to contain the
- 22:12Speaker 1: actual physics of the universe.
- 22:13Speaker 2: It's way too narrow.
- 22:14Speaker 1: We have to redefine the concept from the ground.
- 22:17Speaker 2: We do, and this leads us to the ultimate synthesis
- 22:20Speaker 2: of all these fields. Ok, when you strip away the
- 22:23Speaker 2: rigid requirement for DNA, and when you remove the necessity
- 22:27Speaker 2: of liquid water, when you just stop obsessing over the
- 22:30Speaker 2: specific carbon molecules, what is the irreducible core that remains.
- 22:34Speaker 1: The essence of it?
- 22:35Speaker 2: Right? What is the fundamental difference between a living system
- 22:39Speaker 2: and a complex but dead chemical reaction.
- 22:42Speaker 1: It transitions from being a chemistry problem into something that
- 22:45Speaker 1: sounds more like computer science or like theoretical physics.
- 22:49Speaker 2: It actually bridges all of those disciplines. The physicist Erwin Schrodinger, oh.
- 22:53Speaker 1: The cat guy.
- 22:54Speaker 2: The cat guy, Yes, Yes, famous for his quantum mechanics work,
- 22:57Speaker 2: he actually tackled this exact question in the nineteen forties.
- 23:00Speaker 1: Really, I didn't know he did. Biology, he did.
- 23:03Speaker 2: He noted that the defining feature of a living system
- 23:06Speaker 2: is its ability to maintain its own internal organization against
- 23:09Speaker 2: the natural tendency of the universe to decay and to
- 23:12Speaker 2: chaos entropy.
- 23:13Speaker 1: Entropy the second law thermo dynamics basically says everything eventually
- 23:17Speaker 1: breaks down and spreads out like hot coffee cools down,
- 23:20Speaker 1: mountains of road, sells decay.
- 23:22Speaker 2: Exactly, everything trends toward disorder. But life is a localized
- 23:26Speaker 2: reversal of that process, and it fikes back, It fights back.
- 23:29Speaker 2: It is a system that actively draws an energy from
- 23:32Speaker 2: its environment to maintain its complex structure, and crucially, it
- 23:36Speaker 2: passes the instructions for that structural organization onto the next generation.
- 23:40Speaker 1: Wow.
- 23:41Speaker 2: So, at its most fundamental, irreducible level, life is not
- 23:45Speaker 2: a specific chemical. Life is a pattern of information that
- 23:49Speaker 2: is actively attempting to copy itself.
- 23:52Speaker 1: It's an instruction manual that builds a machine, and the
- 23:54Speaker 1: machine's primary purpose is just to harvest energy to build
- 23:58Speaker 1: another instruction manual.
- 24:00Speaker 2: Beautifully put, and once you view life through the lens
- 24:03Speaker 2: of information processing and replication, the physical materials it is
- 24:07Speaker 2: made of become entirely secondary.
- 24:09Speaker 1: They just don't matter as much.
- 24:10Speaker 2: Right. The specific molecules, whether that is the naturally occurring
- 24:14Speaker 2: DNA in our bodies or the synthetic X and A
- 24:17Speaker 2: is built in a lab, or whether the system is
- 24:19Speaker 2: suspended in warm liquid water or cryogenic liquid ammonia, all
- 24:23Speaker 2: of that.
- 24:23Speaker 1: Is just the hardware, the physical chassis. The hardware is interchangeable.
- 24:27Speaker 1: The local environment just dictates which hardware is most thermodynamically stable. Yes,
- 24:32Speaker 1: so like water and standard DNA happen to be the
- 24:35Speaker 1: optimal hardware for Earth's specific temperature and atmospheric pressure exactly,
- 24:39Speaker 1: But ammonia and a completely different synthetic polymer might be
- 24:43Speaker 1: the optimal hardware for the subsurface oceans of Titan.
- 24:46Speaker 2: You've got it.
- 24:46Speaker 1: But the software, the underlying logic of the system, you know,
- 24:50Speaker 1: the organized transfer of information, the selective adaptation to the environment.
- 24:55Speaker 1: That is what actually constitutes the phenomenon of life.
- 24:58Speaker 2: It elegantly un tether's biology from chemistry. I love that
- 25:03Speaker 2: because chemistry is merely the medium. The information is the message.
- 25:07Speaker 2: If a localized system can store complex data, undergo variation
- 25:12Speaker 2: or mutation, and selectively replicate the data that best survives
- 25:16Speaker 2: the environmental pressures, then it fulfills the ultimate definition of life,
- 25:20Speaker 2: regardless of its chemical composition.
- 25:22Speaker 1: Grounding this concept completely shifts how you view the world.
- 25:26Speaker 2: It really does.
- 25:26Speaker 1: Think about a song, right, Your favorite piece of music
- 25:29Speaker 1: can be pressed into the physical vinyl grooves of a record.
- 25:32Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, or it can.
- 25:33Speaker 1: Be magnetically encoded onto the tape of a cassette. It
- 25:36Speaker 1: can be translated into digital ones and zeros, beamed through
- 25:39Speaker 1: the air and streamed on your smartphone. Or it could
- 25:43Speaker 1: just be performed live acoustically by a musician playing a
- 25:46Speaker 1: wooden guitar. Right the vinyl, the magnetic tape, the digital code,
- 25:50Speaker 1: the physical wood of the guitar. Those are the chemistries.
- 25:54Speaker 1: Those are the different genetic systems and solvents. The physical
- 25:58Speaker 1: medium completely changes in every scenario, but the melody, the
- 26:03Speaker 1: specific arrangement of notes, the pattern of information that makes
- 26:08Speaker 1: that song recognizable, that remains exactly the same across all
- 26:13Speaker 1: of those mediums.
- 26:14Speaker 2: The song is the phenomenon of life exactly, and carbon
- 26:18Speaker 2: based water biology is simply the vinyl record version.
- 26:21Speaker 1: It's just one way to play it, right.
- 26:23Speaker 2: And to say that life can only exist as DNA
- 26:26Speaker 2: and water is as intellectually limiting as saying that a
- 26:30Speaker 2: song can only exist if it is played on a
- 26:32Speaker 2: vinyl record.
- 26:33Speaker 1: It's absurd when you put it like that.
- 26:34Speaker 2: It is. It fundamentally confuses the storage medium with the
- 26:37Speaker 2: information itself.
- 26:38Speaker 1: And once you stop looking exclusively for the vinyl record,
- 26:41Speaker 1: you start listening for the melody, you start.
- 26:42Speaker 2: Looking for the signatures of complex information processes.
- 26:45Speaker 1: Right.
- 26:46Speaker 2: This is exactly why the search for life is undergoing
- 26:48Speaker 2: a radical transformation. Right now.
- 26:50Speaker 1: We're changing how we look we have to.
- 26:52Speaker 2: We are moving away from purely chemical essays and exploring
- 26:55Speaker 2: what we call agnostic biosignatures.
- 26:58Speaker 1: Agnostic biosignatures meaning they don't care what the chemistry is exactly.
- 27:03Speaker 2: Instead of just looking for specific molecules, we are looking
- 27:06Speaker 2: for anomalous complexity. We look for chemical gradients in an
- 27:11Speaker 2: environment that shouldn't exist unless something is actively maintaining.
- 27:14Speaker 1: Them, like someone's swimming upstream exactly.
- 27:17Speaker 2: We look for localized decreases in entropy. We are trying
- 27:20Speaker 2: to build instruments that can detect the behavior of life,
- 27:23Speaker 2: regardless of the substrate it is running on.
- 27:26Speaker 1: Man, we've covered an incredible amount of ground today, We
- 27:29Speaker 1: really have. We started by staring down the glass of
- 27:32Speaker 1: water and the double helix. You know, the two things
- 27:34Speaker 1: we assumed were the absolute non negotiable requirements for biology
- 27:39Speaker 1: the earthos right, and we systematically dismantled that fixed formula
- 27:44Speaker 1: by looking at how synthetic biologists are literally rewriting the
- 27:47Speaker 1: genetic alphabet, building stable functional molecules with synthetic bases and
- 27:52Speaker 1: peptide backbone, right, the X.
- 27:53Speaker 2: And as and the hotch emogidna.
- 27:55Speaker 1: Yeah. And then we challenge the necessity of water by
- 27:58Speaker 1: exploring the thermodynamic rea liquid ammonia.
- 28:01Speaker 2: Which is still so crazy to think about.
- 28:03Speaker 1: I know, demonstrating how a lower viscosity and different enzymatic
- 28:06Speaker 1: kinetics could support complex metabolic reactions and environments we previously
- 28:11Speaker 1: just dismissed as too cold for biology.
- 28:13Speaker 2: And then we confronted the massive blind spots in our
- 28:16Speaker 2: own scientific methodology.
- 28:17Speaker 1: Right the colorblind robots.
- 28:18Speaker 2: Realizing that tools like PCR and AGAR cultures are so
- 28:23Speaker 2: heavily biased toward Earth's specific chemistry that an entire shadow
- 28:28Speaker 2: biosphere of alternative life could be thriving in the soil
- 28:32Speaker 2: beneath our feet, chemically invisible to our current technology, which is.
- 28:36Speaker 1: Just terrifying and awesome at the same time.
- 28:39Speaker 2: It really is.
- 28:39Speaker 1: And we culminated with the realization that life is not
- 28:42Speaker 1: defined by the atoms it uses, but by the organization
- 28:45Speaker 1: of those atoms, the pattern. It is a localized pocket
- 28:48Speaker 1: of negative entropy. It is information actively maintaining and copying
- 28:52Speaker 1: itself across whatever chemical hardware the local environment happens to provide.
- 28:57Speaker 2: It completely shatters the boundaries of what is possible.
- 29:00Speaker 1: It really does. It challenges us to look at the
- 29:02Speaker 1: universe not as a vast empty void dotted with a
- 29:06Speaker 1: few rare miraculous oasis of carbon and water, but as
- 29:10Speaker 1: this boundless landscape of potential mediums, where the complex pattern
- 29:15Speaker 1: of life might be unfolding in ways we haven't even
- 29:17Speaker 1: developed the capacity to understand yet.
- 29:19Speaker 2: It's beautiful, it is.
- 29:21Speaker 1: And so I want to leave you with one final
- 29:24Speaker 1: lingering thought to chew on as you go about your day. Okay,
- 29:27Speaker 1: if life is fundamentally just this pattern of information and replication,
- 29:31Speaker 1: completely untethered from any specific chemical formula, we recognize where
- 29:36Speaker 1: else might these invisible patterns be operating right now?
- 29:39Speaker 2: Wow?
- 29:40Speaker 1: Could the universe actually be teeming with information trying to
- 29:43Speaker 1: copy itself in ways that fall completely outside our current
- 29:46Speaker 1: scientific framework. The next time you look out your window
- 29:49Speaker 1: at the clouds, at a rock phase, or even just
- 29:52Speaker 1: down at the soil in your garden, I want you
- 29:53Speaker 1: to wonder what unseen patterns, what invisible, radically different melodies,
- 29:58Speaker 1: might be quietly rep locating in the shadows right in
- 30:01Speaker 1: front of you,