Latest / UK Column Radio / No Smoke Without Fire 7- The Green King (Part 2)

Transcript

No Smoke Without Fire 7- The Green King (Part 2) · UK Column Radio

0:18
Good morning, welcome to episode two of No Smoke Without Fire, And I'm
0:25
here today with Debbie Evans, of course, and we're going to get stuck
0:30
into the subject of the royal family and King Charles in particular, to have
0:36
a look at some interesting material and to ask some fundamental questions about who he
0:41
is, what he believes in, and what he's trying to do with our
0:45
world, because viewers and listeners should be under no doubt that this king is
0:51
determined to change the whole world into his model. Debbie, welcome, Thank
0:58
you for joining me. Brian, great to be back. Well we shall
1:03
we just carry on and now light the fus yet again. We'll see what
1:07
we come up with this time. I think we should start that little fire
1:11
burning and seeing whether we can get some real interest from our viewers into who
1:15
exactly that there our king is and what he's what he's been up to.
1:21
And I think you're going to kick us off with the Vatican, Is that
1:23
right? Well? I was just going to sort of remind people where we
1:27
left off before before we actually shall I say, to segue us into a
1:34
video that we'll be showing in a minute before we reset everybody, So let's
1:40
reset everyone before we start. So, yeah, we finished on we were
1:44
looking at religion and how religion has changed, how our perception of the Church
1:49
of England, Catholicism, Seeks, Hindus have all become eco. So you've
1:56
got this word eco in front of them and the religions that people may think
2:02
that they are part of. And maybe they're going to church and they're giving
2:07
their offering in their collection tin. But where's that offering going Because the money
2:13
that's going into that offering box isn't going on the church roof, it's not
2:19
going on local causes, it's going into a central fund. So we were
2:23
looking very much at the industry faith as an industry, So we're looking at
2:29
eco Sikhs and Eco Hindus, but we didn't look at the pope. So
2:34
let's start off today with just looking at King Charles's association with the Pope.
2:40
And I think we've got an article from the Vatican News there which says UK
2:47
ambassador to Holy See foresees excellent relations under King Charles under please note that word
2:55
under King Charles the Third. So I don't know Brian, but King Charles
3:00
has been getting around both as Prince Charles and both as King Charles. And
3:06
of course we've got the loud datto see protect the Earth, a dignify humanity
3:12
coming straight from the Vatican with Pope France's appeal, I ask you, in
3:16
the name of God to defend Mother Earth, Pope Francis. It is pretty
3:23
extraordinary this stuff. We're doing a little bit of a recap here. But
3:30
remember that initially the role of the king or the queen of this country was
3:35
to uphold the faith, and that was the Christian faith, and that was
3:39
actually Protestant. I can't say it. That's an instant edit that Protestant,
3:46
that was the Protestant religion. And we've now got to the stage where King
3:52
Charles is simply saying that he's the defender of the faiths. And one of
3:58
the things that we got in too and in episode one was well, hang
4:02
on a minute, which faiths is he talking about and he seems to be
4:05
involved in all of them? Well, actually he said defender of faith,
4:11
so cas Lanche, I guess anything pretty much, And that leads us nicely
4:16
onto an article that I found in the Conversation which pretty much asks that question,
4:21
actually turning to faiths to shape the planet, how religions shape environmental movement
4:29
in Indonesia. But this isn't limited to Indonesia. This is turning to faith
4:35
as a new religion. And another article, of course that I brought up
4:40
that I thought was very interesting was James Lovelock. And James Lovelock is an
4:46
environmentalist and he has said environmentalism has now become a religion, and you know,
4:54
I agree, I actually agree this is the new religion Mother Earth,
4:59
Mother Earth, which should particularly get Christians worried about what's going on here.
5:06
We are turning to worship Mother Earth and making this point pretty strongly. If
5:13
you're a Christian you cannot support that. So is this king betraying people?
5:18
I believe he is in this. I've got to say I was a little
5:21
bit worried by that last picture. If we can just bring it back on
5:25
screen, let me explain. Have a look at this man, and he's
5:29
wearing a very fine gray sweater. There. I'll now bring myself back on
5:33
screen. We've almost got the same shirts on, so that's going to cause
5:36
controversy. But I forgot to apologize to the viewers at the start of this
5:42
that I came straight into the studio from walking the dog. Really so for
5:46
the first time in a long time, I haven't got a tie on.
5:49
That's no disrespect to you, Debbie and others. I don't really mind.
5:55
Sorry I digress, but I thought it was worth making a little bit of
5:59
a joke out that. But yeah, where are we going? Would it
6:01
be a good place? We're we're going to faith that the whole climate,
6:05
you know, the whole And again look at this next organization, Faith for
6:10
Climate. That just says it all, doesn't it. I mean, you
6:14
know the fact that we've got an organization this is all about connecting all of
6:19
faith for the environment, for the climate, I'd say pretty much says it
6:25
all. And there's you know, Brian, there's a lot of money in
6:28
faith, and there's a lot of money in environments and these sustainable goals,
6:33
and even the World Economic Forum. I mean, everyone has their fingers in
6:39
the pie. This is just an example from the World Economic Forum. It's
6:43
the World Bank, it's the United Nations, it's all of them. But
6:46
this is just an example. It says as part of its civil society communities.
6:50
I always love that phrase because that's always coming bringing it back into George
6:56
Soros Territory, civil society, communities and across our centers. The World Economic
7:00
Forum engages roughly one hundred and twenty five religious leaders, faith based organization into
7:08
faith groups, multi faith networks, and experts of religion from over ten of
7:13
the world's major religions and spiritual traditions. And the Forum is going to launch
7:18
Faith in Action in January twenty twenty four, so we're right up to date
7:24
with this report, and it says that they'll be discussing the impact of religion
7:29
and spirituality towards public private cooperation in today's poly crisis and provide a roadmap for
7:36
transformative partnerships with business, government and philanthropic organizations. So there's no messing around
7:45
there. Would this be a good place to play that little video, the
7:47
first little video clip we've got, and that might set the scene for people,
7:53
probably quite deeply. Let's have a look. We have an incredible opportunity
8:01
to create entirely new sustainable industries, investing in nature as the true engine of
8:07
our economy. The current global crisis has disrupted every aspect of our lives,
8:16
but it has also presented us with an extraordinary opportunity, a chance to reset
8:22
and accelerate efforts to improve the state of our world. Changing our current trajectory
8:33
will require bold and imaginative action, together with determination and decisive leadership. In
8:41
order to secure our future and to prosper we need to evolve our economic model,
8:48
putting people and planets at the heart of global value creation. If there
8:54
is one critical lesson we have to learn from this, we need to put
9:01
nature at the heart of how we operate. We are on the verge of
9:05
catalytic breakthroughs that will alter our view of what is possible and profitable within the
9:15
framework of a sustainable future. We need nothing short of a paradigm shift,
9:20
one that inspires action at revolutionary levels and pace. We simply cannot waste any
9:31
more time. The only limit is our willingness to act, and the time
9:45
to act is now. Well, Debbie, I find that that video just
9:54
incredible, only because there's an wonderful pronunciation of all the things and the problems.
10:00
The fact that he's going for global value creation. I found that particularly
10:07
creepy. So we who's he talking about. He's talking about global elites,
10:13
very wealthy people. They are going to change the economic model of the world,
10:20
and what are they really talking about global value creation. I they're going
10:24
to scoop more money up from the planet. That's what's really going on here,
10:31
and they're going to do it fast. Yeah. I had a little
10:35
go at imitating the delivery of King Charles, but you might have thought that
10:39
was actually an audio breakdown, so apologies for that. But yeah, I
10:43
just don't get a comfortable feeling when this man's talking because he's not on this
10:48
planet. He's not in the real world for the average person in UK,
10:54
never mind in the third world. He has no concept of what it is
11:00
to live in a country like UK or the US and be short of money
11:05
and worrying about how you're going to feed yourself in a particular week. So
11:09
the the he's so pompous and the arrogance is breastaking. But this man is
11:18
going to change the whole world. No, he's going to create it.
11:22
This is this is where this is what's so interesting is that he's actually creating
11:28
a new world like he is. I mean, we'll come on to it
11:33
in a minute, but he seems to be the architect. And perhaps this
11:37
was why he was a prince in waiting for so long, because behind the
11:43
scenes you know, when the Queen's been taking the spoil when the queen,
11:45
when Queen Elizabeth was taking the spotlights and everyone was focusing on the queen,
11:52
Charles was always in the background, like the longest Air in Waiting, That's
11:54
all we ever heard. Diana came on the scene, and all the attention
12:01
was on Diana. But what was Charles doing in these fifty years as air
12:05
in waiting? What he was doing, I believe, I mean, I'm
12:07
throwing it out there for our audience because this is difficult for many people who
12:13
are staunch monarchists. But from where I'm sitting, I'm seeing his fifty years
12:20
as air in waiting and the attention being taken off him onto the women as
12:26
allowing him to create this monster, this beast, if you like, into
12:35
what we're seeing now. And now he's on the throne and he's been crowned.
12:39
Everything has to happen at pace, so everything's happening very very quickly.
12:46
And I agree with you, I think it's extremely dark. But I see
12:50
him, or I see him as seeing himself as a creator, not just
12:56
of Earth, and restoring Earth in to whatever he wants it for him,
13:01
for the elite for the noble, for the nobility, not for us,
13:05
not for we are plant life, we're slaves, We're not required, I
13:11
don't believe. And this is all to create a better world. Sounds a
13:16
bit like Michael Jackson sound song, doesn't it. But this is all to
13:20
create a better world for them, So I see him as a creator.
13:26
Yeah, that's very interesting. While you were describing that, my mind was
13:30
sort of drifting back to the setup of the Duchy of Cornwall, which is
13:35
absolutely classic. So hundreds of thousands of acres held for the hectares, actually
13:43
I think it's hundreds of thousands of hectares owned by the duchy, of which
13:50
he was the key beneficiary. Probably still is. But that ruling over Cornwall,
13:58
which you've described as being a very poor area, comparable some of the
14:03
poorest areas in eastern Europe. So you had a very poor area of UK
14:11
where he was that not only the land owner, but he owned property,
14:15
owned all sorts of rights, the fundus going out from the shoreline, All
14:20
of this he owned, and yet he lived in his privileged houses, living
14:26
his privileged, wealthy lifestyle, with money principally coming in effectively well from taxation.
14:35
You know, I find it an obscene. Yeah, people don't you
14:39
know, people don't realize when they come to Cornwall for their holidays, when
14:43
they put money in the car park for the car park just to pay,
14:46
you know, just to pay to go on the beach, a percentage of
14:50
that goes directly to the Duchy. If anybody dies in Cornwall intestate without a
14:56
will, their property and their assets tomatically go to the Duchy. And I've
15:01
heard, you know, I've heard from people that have tried to start businesses,
15:07
even you know, eco businesses, wildlife businesses in places like Sillies,
15:13
the Sillies, and if it doesn't fit with the Duchy, and the Duchy
15:18
don't like it, you're kind of almost shunned, almost booted out. So
15:24
it can be a very dark place. And I've also heard from people that
15:26
work on dutchy Land that say, you know, you drive around Cornwall and
15:31
like everywhere else in the UK, you see loads of potholes in the road.
15:35
But when the Prince of Wales, as he was then the Prince of
15:39
Wales and as we now have Prince William and the Princess of Wales, when
15:43
they come to visit, apparently the potholes where they're traveling are immediately sort of
15:48
filled in temporarily for their journey, and then no money comes back into Cornwall.
15:56
They just take all of the money for their own public engagements. And
16:00
yet they're the Prince and Princess of Wales, but they take all their money
16:04
from the Duchy of Cornwall, and likewise the King of course his purse is
16:10
funded by the Duchy of Lancaster. Yeap. But I think one thing too,
16:15
that you were saying they're that kind of put an alarm bell in my
16:19
head, you know, after me saying that he's a creator, and then
16:22
what you were saying about him, think about the towns and the villages that
16:26
he's created and built, like Poundbury. I mean, perhaps will come on
16:30
about Poundbury on another no smoke, But he has been the literal architect not
16:37
just of the policy, not just of new laws, not just a new
16:41
way a reset, but he's also been the physical architect of villages, buildings,
16:48
all sorts of things. And he's been doing all of this behind the
16:51
scenes while nobody's really been taking much notice. Yeah, this is a very
16:56
interesting point, and I'm going to say that I have said publicly before but
17:03
said again, now I met the Queen in person. I met the Queen
17:12
in the Royal Navy. They had a fortieth Accession to the Throne celebration,
17:19
which was a dinner on board one of the aircraft carriers, and it was
17:22
a pretty unique event because every commanding officer, so every officer who was in
17:30
command of a ship at that time who could make it to the event,
17:38
attended and I was one of the people that went. And there was a
17:42
dinner. Of course, it was all very well organized. But after dinner
17:48
there was the opportunity to have a few words with the Queen. So I
17:52
was able to shake the gloved hand and speak to the Queen, and I
18:00
found it very, very interesting. I actually asked her a question. I
18:03
asked her whether she regarded the evening as work or pleasure. And she looked
18:10
at me and smiled, and she said, I regard tonight as pleasure.
18:15
And I said, and why is that And she said, well, because
18:21
here I'm amongst friends and I can relax. Now. At the time,
18:27
I didn't know all the things I know now, but I just took her
18:30
answer at face value. But it was very it was a very human answer,
18:36
and I'm going to say, when I shook the gloved hand and I'm
18:41
speaking to the Queen, I didn't pick up any bad vibes from her at
18:45
all. I do pick up bad vibes from people, but I didn't pick
18:51
up any bad vibes from the Queen, whatever that does or does not mean.
18:56
But I will also say that I've consistently picked up bad vibes from other
19:00
members of the royal family, and Charles is one. Prince Andrew was another,
19:07
so little anecdotal story, but I'm just going to say, yes,
19:10
this is an interesting concept that he spent ages in the wings, nobody really
19:15
paying attention to him, many of people thinking he was a bit of a
19:18
top and a little bit of an idiot in some ways. But my goodness,
19:23
what he's been building is that the time to actually just to interrupt you,
19:30
just very quickly with my own little anecdotal story. And I'll be very
19:33
brief because I think so many of the viewers have heard this before. But
19:37
I'm a sewer flood victim, right, I'm a flood victim. Floods,
19:41
environment, climate. You know, it's a bit of a concern when people
19:48
are getting flooded with sewage. I met the then Prince Charles. He came
19:52
down here and you know, we flooded the day after the Prince of where
19:57
Prince William were announced his engagement to Catherine. It was the day after the
20:03
engagement was announced that we were flooded and we were literally knee high in sewage.
20:10
And he came down here and he promised, as the Duke of Cornwall,
20:15
he promised to help us. And this is his area, this is
20:21
his area of expertise, this is his special interest floods, climate, environment.
20:26
He's not bothered with me. He's not bothered with all of my community
20:30
that were flooded. He's never been back. We've we've written to the to
20:36
the then Prince of Wales to say you came down, you visited us,
20:40
you said you'd help us. You've done nothing nothing, You've ignored us.
20:45
So you know, walk the walk, talk the talk. No, he
20:49
doesn't do either. It's tokenistic. The Royal family. They come down to
20:53
these disasters or natural disasters as they call them, whatever you want to call
21:00
them, and it's tokenistic. They're there to shake your hands, say that
21:03
they care, but they don't because off they go in their big black cars
21:07
back to the I actually wanted to say, if you want to know what
21:11
life is like living in Cornwall, come and speak to me and I'll introduce
21:15
you to a load more people that will tell you what it's like to live
21:19
in Cornwall and under the control of Cornwall Council. You know, it's very
21:26
different. So my experience of the then Prince Charles was at the time hopeful.
21:33
I was asleep then now No, he was never going to help us.
21:40
He's never interested in us. No, So Debbie, we can contrast
21:45
your comment there. Your criticism is very fair criticism. We can contrast it.
21:52
So we've got lack of interest in Cornwall and problems in Cornwall. Let's
21:56
get into what he really is interested in, which people does pay attention to,
22:02
and we're back on the World Economic Forum. Yeah, I mean,
22:07
you know that the Great Reset. Lots of people think it was Klaus Schwab
22:11
that announced the Great Reset, but actually it wasn't. It was Charles himself.
22:18
And there you've got the evidence a golden opportunity. His Royal Highness,
22:22
the Prince of Wales and other leaders on the Forum's Great Reset, and he
22:26
was the one that announced it prior to Klaus Schwab. We have a golden
22:33
opportunity to seize something good from this crisis. It's unprecedented shockwaves may well make
22:40
people more receptive to big visions of change and global crises like pandemics and climate
22:48
change, no no borders and highlight just how interdependent we are as one people
22:52
sharing one planet. Over the past month or so, despite the ongoing crisis,
23:02
I've been encouraged to see the growing calls for a green recovery. We
23:07
need only look to the United Nations, Secretary General to the IMF, the
23:12
EU, There's Petersburg Climate Dialogue, the Canadian government, the cop twenty six
23:18
universities network, and business. It is around the world to see this and
23:22
as we move from rescue to recovery. Therefore, we have a unique but
23:27
rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable
23:33
path. It is an opportunity we have never had before. I may never
23:38
have a game, so we must use all the leaders we have at our
23:41
disposal, knowing that each and every one of us has a vital role to
23:45
play. Everything I have tried to do an energy over the past fifty years
23:51
has been done with our children and grandchildren in mind. So I can only
23:56
encourage us all to think big an act. No, there you go,
24:02
and again we who is we? Our children and our grandchildren. He's talking
24:07
about the elites children. This is what just comes to me very strongly when
24:12
this man speaks. He's not talking about the ordinary hoipoloi out there. He's
24:18
talking about the elites. And to bring in that the International Monetary Fund and
24:25
global businesses are suddenly turning alltruistic and are going to do the best for family,
24:30
ordinary families in this country and worldwide, is just well, I could
24:37
say it's nonsense or it's pipe dream, but of course this man is dangerous
24:41
because he's got such immense wealth and power. He is making this stuff happen.
24:47
But he's worse than that. I mean, did you hear him?
24:49
This is rescue and recovery, I mean rescue. He's playing the rescuer.
24:56
Now, it's like he's the I mean we'll come on to a bit about
25:00
savior perhaps, but it's like I'm going to save the world rescue and recovery,
25:04
and we're going to do it dramatically. Now you know, it's this
25:10
whole who is he? Who does he think he is. Well, maybe
25:14
we'll come on to that in a minute, but you know, people think
25:18
that I don't know whether it's people's memories. But do you remember when Hong
25:22
Kong was handed over to China? For example, I had it in my
25:27
head and I asked my mother and my stepfather actually who handed China? Who
25:33
handed Hong Kong to China? And they both said Chris Patten. And then
25:37
I asked who was ambassador at the time, and I asked a lot of
25:38
other people and they all said the same. But it wasn't you know,
25:42
it was Prince Charles. The Queen sent Prince Charles on Britannia, where a
25:48
lot of business was done between public private partnership, and it was Prince Charles
25:53
that handed Hong Kong to China. It was Prince Charles that announced the Great
26:00
Reset. And do you remember the slogan after, you know, during the
26:04
pandemic, that build back better, which kind of goes into his recovery.
26:10
You know, I'm going to be the recoverer. And it was him.
26:12
It was Charles that coined that phrase build back better. It wasn't Claus Schwarb,
26:18
Boris Johnson or any of the other government leaders or nations leaders. It
26:26
was Charles back in twenty nineteen and he wrote a letter to Dominica. I
26:32
tried to highlight a little bit on the right there, Brian, but it
26:33
was he that coined the phrase back in two nineteen. It says, your
26:37
determination to quote build back better, unquote unquote and make Dominica the world's first
26:45
climate resilient nation serves as a remarkable example to others climate resilient nation. The
26:53
thought that's it's mind boggling to me because he demonstrates a mindset which is in
27:03
he's not on this Earth. He's in planets and u SI. But that
27:07
doesn't mean to say that, you know, what he's doing is not dangerous.
27:11
The more I read and he actually is he's not on this earth.
27:15
He really isn't on this planet. As you're going to find out, you
27:18
know shortly, well take us on because you're going to have a look at
27:23
charities here and he's just touching really the tip of the iceberg. With the
27:29
faith and religions. We could go into a whole heat more. But let's
27:30
look at another nice, juicy funding stream for the sustainable goals, which is
27:38
to charities and you know, the Royal Family are in Trench there. They've
27:44
been embedded into charities for decades, you know, as being patron and here
27:48
you get charities founded. This has come from the Royal Family website. So
27:55
following his Majesty the King's accession the below charitable organizations which were fund by his
28:00
majesty as the Prince of Wales, you can see that the Prince's Trust is
28:03
going to become the King's Trust, so his all of his charitable work has
28:11
not disappeared, it's changed. And charity again means money, lots and lots
28:18
of money. And I'm sorry to sound so cynical, but this is where
28:25
a lot of the funding stream for the sustainable goals and the climate is coming
28:30
from charity. And we're now living in the era of giving. It's all
28:33
about money and it's not just well it's not actually just about money. Charities
28:38
are you take a bag of clothes down to your local charity shop. Perhaps
28:44
its age concern, perhaps it's cancer Research UK. Look who's funding cancer research
28:49
UK. I mean if you and I, Brian, if we opened a
28:53
shop in the middle of Plymouth and we said to all the public, can
28:57
you bring us your stuff that you don't want anymore. And oh, by
29:00
the way, can you come and staff the shop as well for nothing as
29:04
a volunteer. And oh, what we're going to do is we're going to
29:08
sell everything off, all your nice donations. We're going to get a nice,
29:12
rich fact profit from it, and we're going to go off and have
29:15
a holiday. We're going to go off and buy a nice house. We're
29:18
going to often go off and use it for us. And that's what we're
29:22
living in now. We're living in the age of giving, where you're not
29:25
just giving in a tin on the street, or you're not just giving to
29:29
your local brownie group or to a local jumble sale. You're giving to the
29:33
just giving pages. You're giving to global private partnership charities, quangos businesses.
29:41
What are they? Are they charities? I don't believe they're charities. They
29:45
seem more like quangos to me. But there's a lot of money in charity.
29:49
Yeah, I don't know what the figure is for UK, but I
29:52
remember when I was paying a lot of attention to what I call the political
29:57
charity common perm which still exists, but I was looking at their funding and
30:03
that got me looking into charitable funding in UK and I think the figure for
30:08
just the main charities was something about nine billion, and I'm talking a long
30:14
time ago with that figure, so it's huge. It is an industry.
30:18
It's not really charity. It's a charitable industry. And I noticed on the
30:23
King's Fund page there which we just had on screen, it's saying and of
30:30
course the King's Fund is in all these different countries. It's in the Asia,
30:34
Africa, Caribbean, Europe and the Middle East, and it goes on
30:38
to talk about New Zealand, Canada, etc. So this is worldwide stuff
30:47
that he set up and involved in. And of course what accountability is there
30:52
for these organizations? What accountability does the UK public have or does the worldwide
30:59
public have? It? Almost nothing, because he's a law and to himself
31:04
absolutely. And you know, if you've got if you're a charity and you've
31:08
got somebody like the King or the Prince and Princess of Wales or someone offering
31:14
to be your patron, the reason that you want them as your patron is
31:18
because it's going to get you money. It's all about money. But what
31:22
we've gone from, which is more little grassroots charities that are doing really good
31:29
work. And you know, I'm not decrying charity, because there are some
31:32
amazing grassroots charities that are doing incredible work, but they are relying on tiny
31:37
donations because they're being drowned out by these massive gray and I can only call
31:44
them quangos because that's what they are. Most of these charities are also attached
31:49
to the government. Many of them are funded. They're publicly funded. I
31:53
mean, my specialist area is autism. The National Autistic Society funded by the
32:00
Department of Education. So every taxpayer in the country, whether they like it
32:05
or not, is effectively donating to the National Autistic Society who own a lot
32:09
of property, a lot of assets. And you know, these charities are
32:15
not what we thought they were. Cancer UK cancer research, for example,
32:21
is funded by farmers, so King Charles who's getting money routing into the sustainable
32:28
goals which will come into in a minute. Routing money into the sustainable goals
32:31
is coming from charities which are being funded by the public twice through taxation and
32:39
through donation, and they're being funded by private public partnerships. So you can
32:45
see how big the charity industry is and the charity Commission. I mean,
32:52
maybe that's for another no smoke looking at the corruption going on within the Charities
32:57
Commission. So it's a big industry. It's almost an industrial scale industry charities.
33:04
Yeah, well, it absolutely is. I'm going to say, you're
33:08
mentioning problems with charities. Perhaps we'll mention a little charity that is doing good
33:15
work and that's the Shakaina Mission, and we've been giving them a little bit
33:21
of help locally by putting in some good quality used items. But I'm very
33:28
happy to say yes, of course, there are many very good charities doing
33:30
things and we're mentioning one there. So what about a four S and accounting
33:37
for sustainability where King Charles also got a finger in the pie, Well that's
33:44
his that is actually accounting for sustainability, is King Charles's he is, Oh
33:52
yeah, he's got his finger in a lot of pies. There. You
33:55
can see accountants can save the world. Celebrating his majesty the King as a
34:00
champion of sustainable finance. His private secretary is Sir Michael Pete, a fourth
34:07
generation accountant. That's the p and KPMG. That's one of the Big four,
34:13
you know, the Deloittes, KPMG and all of them Price Waterhouse.
34:17
So he is an accountant, and as an accountant, what I believe he's
34:22
been doing is auditing the planet, not just auditing us as his servants,
34:30
especially the ones in the Commonwealth. Commonwealth we come onto that another time.
34:37
I mean, this subject is huge, but he's been auditing the planet.
34:42
Every leaf, every branch, every flower, every animal, every insect,
34:47
it's every twig he's been auditing. And this is the Sustainable Markets Initiative,
34:53
which is King Charles's very own initiative. So here you go again. You
34:59
can see where that is dovetailing into Terrakarta, which brings us neatly onto Terrakarta.
35:07
So the Natural Capital Investment Alliance is what this one is. Was created
35:13
by the Prince of Wales through the Sustainable Markets Initiative with Climate Asset Management Lombard
35:20
Odia. This was all launched in twenty twenty one at the One Planet's Summit
35:25
Nature Restoring the Planet. In the opening statement of that one, it's talking
35:31
about one hundred and twenty five trillion annually. Nature's contribution to the global economy
35:38
is estimated to be worth more than one hundred and twenty five trillion annually.
35:45
And that might appear to be a sort of innocuous sentence in the first instance,
35:50
well, yeah, this is what the value of nature in producing food
35:54
or trees or whatever the crop is. But actually what they're doing is an
36:00
audit to value everything in order that these elites can actually make even more profit
36:08
off the things that nature is actually giving to mankind for free. The world
36:15
is largely there to feed mankind and support mankind for free. But every organization
36:23
that King Charles is playing around with is clearly there to make a profit of
36:30
what the world provides for free. And this is why I find to suggest
36:36
that accountants can save the world. What an obscene claim. It's like saying
36:42
bankers can save the world. Well, what the bankers actually do nothing but
36:47
apart from manipulate money, the great majority of which has been created out of
36:52
nothing for their benefit. I mean, when you pull this thing apart bit
36:58
by bit, we've got a king who is actually talking madness? Is it
37:02
the madness of King Joles? The third? Wasn't that a film? I
37:07
think it was of a previous region. I think it ought to be a
37:13
film. I mean, you know, I look at this whole sustainable accountancy,
37:20
auditing, and I can see in the bigger in the bigger picture that
37:24
from my perspective, what he's done is he's he's got people to count what's
37:30
on the planet. He's got a vision of what he wants the planet to
37:36
be, which doesn't include us, by the way, but he's got a
37:38
vision of what the planet needs to be. So he's used all this information
37:43
and these people to give him the information the data on what he needs to
37:47
change. So what he needs to create. Let's get rid of the old
37:52
model. So this is what we need to get rid of. We've got
37:54
too many. We've got too many I don't know, human beings under over
38:00
the age of fifty, for example. We've got too many disabled people.
38:07
We've got too many. I mean, just just think of some vermin.
38:10
You know, we don't want them. We don't want this particular they're trying
38:15
to create a planet for them. Take it back to the World Economic Forum.
38:20
You will own nothing, you you will own nothing. They didn't say
38:24
we will own nothing, did they? Oh no, it was all about
38:29
you. Yeah. It's absolutely hidden in plain sight. And I'm curious to
38:39
see what happens with the audience. You know what they would be saying,
38:43
what they will be saying to themselves as they watch and listen to this,
38:46
and they start thinking about what we're really pulling apart here. But it's vast,
38:52
but it's very nasty. So we've got a picture of the great man
38:57
standing next to a very fine tree. Vinson has taught me well and so
39:01
have you, Brian, over the years. Go to original sources and this
39:07
is the Royal Family website and this is what they're saying about our king with
39:12
regards to sustainability. So you know, what we're trying to do is just
39:16
show people signposts. We're not saying to anybody, you know, trust us,
39:22
this is what's happening. We're saying, Look, this is what we're
39:23
seeing. It is difficult. It's going to be difficult for a lot of
39:28
people to swallow any of this. But when you start unpicking it, and
39:31
when you start following the red flags, which is all we're giving you to
39:36
follow, you start to see the bigger picture. And the sustainability agenda is
39:43
very much it appears to be very much King Charles's agenda. Yeah, and
39:49
you've got another one here, of course, building a sustainable future and what
39:53
does it say for more than five decades is Manjester, King Charles the Third
39:58
has been a champion for the fight against climate change and biodiversity loss. Assumption
40:04
there straight away that climate change is real. He obviously thinks it is,
40:07
and that's a dangerous starting point. But then it says the Sustainable Markets Initiative
40:15
was launched by his Majesty King Charles the Third when he was Prince of Wales
40:19
in twenty twenty at the World Economic Forums annual meeting in Davos. And this
40:24
is one of your key points, isn't it, Debbie, That it's not
40:28
that this man is being told to do something or he's getting on board with
40:34
another agenda. He's actually right there at the forefront driving stuff. And then
40:44
he's acting as a facilitator for all the global corporations and the World Economic Forum
40:50
and any other quasi political economic group in order to unfold what is essentially the
41:00
plan for sustainable development in the world under Agender twenty thirty by the UN.
41:07
Yeah, and what you said there was very you know, was very evident.
41:10
You said the five decades, which is the fifty years that we were
41:14
talking about, where Charles has been heir to the throne. This is this
41:19
longest air in waiting thing. But if you go back and maybe on the
41:22
next no smoke, we'll look in a little bit more detail the investiture,
41:28
because things started to really start. It was almost like he was being groomed
41:32
at night. Between nineteen sixty nine and nineteen seventy. Nineteen sixty nine,
41:37
We've got to remember that Charles was one of the is one of the only
41:43
members of the royal family that's been invested as Prince of Wales. Not all
41:46
of prince not all the Princes of Wales are invested, like Prince William hasn't
41:53
been invested as Prince of Wales, but Charles was. And looking back at
41:59
the investment and seeing some of the symbology perhaps and some of the ceremonials,
42:05
then people might get more clues as to what's gone on. But you know,
42:10
people think that Klaus Schwab is the head of the Great reset, the
42:15
pope is the head of the Roman Catholic Church. However, they all seem
42:21
or appear to me anyway, to report directly to Charles. Everybody seems to
42:29
be under As we look in one of the previous slides. Everyone seems to
42:35
be under Charles, so there are many people advising him. There have been
42:40
many people, in my opinion, grooming him for what we are seeing now
42:47
because since the queen died and he was crowned, things have been happening very
42:52
quickly. Wouldn't you agree they've been happening very quickly. I mean so quickly
42:58
it's almost breathtaking. You wake up in the morning and you wonder what is
43:01
going to hit the headlines next. Yeah, I totally agree with that,
43:06
And of course there's haste in the words that come out of his mouth and
43:12
the World Economic Forum's mouth, claud Schwab wherever you want to go, because
43:16
they're all now saying time is short, and they're also admitting that their plans
43:22
in some areas are not work. Their sustainability plans are not up to the
43:28
point which they'd hope to get to in twenty twenty four, and they're saying,
43:32
yep, we've got to push, We've got to accelerate this program.
43:37
So it's constantly concerned from him and others that the plan is not unfolding fast
43:43
enough and therefore stuff's getting rushed through. Completely agree with that. But it
43:49
exactly. I mean, there's so much of this, Brian, And I
43:52
mean I know that you're looking at the clock, and I'm looking at the
43:54
clock because this is such a big subject and there's going to be another cup
44:00
of no smokes on what we've uncovered and discovered and what we want to share
44:05
with our audience so that you can go and have a look at it for
44:07
yourself. But maybe now is timely to stop before we embark on Terra Carta,
44:14
perhaps because that's the next segment. If you like, that's where we're
44:19
leading onto. Let's give a little sneaky preview of Terra Carta. Okay,
44:25
well, let's give a little sneaky preview of Terrakarta. We all remember Magna
44:29
carta, right, everybody's heard of magna carta. The rights of the person
44:34
come above everything else. Not anymore, No Terra Carta is. Well,
44:39
I'll tell you what, Brian, if you show up the next slide,
44:43
I'll let you read out the little preview from the mouth of King Charles on
44:49
Terrakata. He said, this is former Prince of Wales. But he said
44:52
the Terra Carta offers the basis of a recovery plan that puts nature, people,
44:59
and planet at the heart of global value creation, one that will harness
45:04
the precious, irreplaceable power of nature combined with the transformative innovation and resources of
45:12
the private sector. And I had to smile a bit as I got to
45:15
the end, because there we are. Don't worry, those nice profit making
45:20
global companies are going to come to the rescue and they're going to look after
45:23
mankind. Not no, exactly exactly that. I mean, you know,
45:30
Terrakata goes in. There's more to say about Terrakata. It gets more complicated
45:37
because where we've reported on Terrakata and we'll get onto Astrakata. So if anybody's
45:42
shouting at the screen going don't forget Astrakata, we haven't forgot an Astracata because
45:45
he's king of the Earth, king of Terrakata, king of the Earth.
45:50
I'll show the crests in a while. But he's also king of the universe.
45:52
But perhaps we'll come onto that in the next segment, because it is
45:59
completely extraordinary. It's just extraordinary. Yeah. Well, we've got a little
46:06
bit of video clip which we thought we'd share a little bit of video in
46:10
a clip we thought we'd share with our audience which gives us another little insight
46:15
into King Charles at work. Shall we play that and see how we got
46:21
on? Well, there you have it. I don't know what country that
47:36
little episode where they were for that obviously it was say right, yeah so
47:44
and I I think I'll do a little bit of work to inform myself.
47:49
But I don't know exactly what the dance regime was about or what the words
47:52
were that they were singing. But again we've we've got him absolutely immersed in
47:59
another culture. And I'm going to come back to your point that when it
48:04
comes to the UK and what he's actually doing on the ground in UK,
48:07
we're just not seeing it. No, I mean would you but but I
48:13
mean take yourself back. Would you have seen the Queen do that? Would
48:16
you know? Is the answer to that. And for everybody that comes to
48:21
Cornwall, that's what your donations are going to. And when I say donations,
48:28
they're mandatory because when you put your money in your car park or when
48:30
you pay for goods locally, you have to remember that part of that goes
48:37
to the Duchy of Cornwall, and the Duchy of Cornwall was funding him to
48:40
do that. Yeah, it's amazing it's our money that's paying for this,
48:45
and yet our country is failing, failing. Well, I'm going to disagree.
48:52
I'm going to disagree with you on that because I've challenged quite a few
48:55
people on Twitter or x exit now is when they say, you know that
49:01
the country's failing, the country's falling apart, and I say, no,
49:05
no, no, it's because it's deliberate that the chaos is deliberately created.
49:12
It's not a sort of accidental. People have changed and they don't know how
49:15
to do things properly in this in this country anymore. No, that's not
49:19
what's happening. What's happening is that we've got people destroying the whole culture and
49:24
history and morality and infrastructure of this country. That's a planned action, the
49:30
destruction, and then we are seeing the effects and people say the country is
49:35
broken. It is broken, but the portant point is that it's been deliberately
49:39
It has been deliberately broken. And then the other bit that came into my
49:44
head while I saw him bopping with his sword. I don't know whether bopping
49:47
is that that's probably a little bit it. I understand bopping, Okay,
49:54
bopping is for us older is bopping is probably a bit of discos. Yeah,
50:00
so there was the Great Man having a little bit of disco stuff with
50:05
a couple of swords, as you do. And you said you wouldn't see
50:08
the Queen doing that, and I knew exactly what you meant, because the
50:13
one thing about Queen Elizabeth was that everywhere she was, you've got a sense
50:17
of decorum. And yeah, she was aloof but she had something. He's
50:27
there bopping on the floor with his swords. But of course, the great
50:31
downfall of the Royal family for me, all these people, the occupancy of
50:37
our royal family at the moment by this team. That occurred for me was
50:43
Sans Frontier, when the Rural Family got involved in those horrible games that were
50:50
designed to get people used to the idea that in Europe all the countries were
50:54
great friends, and so they set up challenges between and there were various games
51:01
and competitions and points and you could play a joker. And of course in
51:07
one of those additions, the rural family the youngsters got involved, so Prince
51:14
Charles, Prince Andrew were there. Fergie i think, was involved as well,
51:19
and I can remember watching that particular edition with my family my parents,
51:24
and my father said, yes, it's amusing, but there's something not quite
51:30
right about it, And I think he was picking up on the fact that
51:36
actually the royal family was being made a monkey of by destroying you know,
51:42
the status, the appropriate status that they had and the respect from people in
51:46
this country. So whether they knew what was happening to them or not,
51:52
I don't know, but for me, yeah, those Pan European Games Ofisseans
51:58
Frontier was a big down fall point for this royal family. I got a
52:02
question before we finish here, Debbie. My question for you is do you
52:08
how do you view the royalty? I mean, are you happy with the
52:13
concept of nation states and a royal family? Do you feel comfortable with that?
52:19
But you might say we've got the wrong people in the position at the
52:22
moment. How do you see it? Do you know? My family have
52:29
always been traditional monarchists, and my mother always used to take me to London
52:35
to see the Queen, and now I see them in a completely different light.
52:42
So now I'm I guess i'd be called I'm not a monarchist, but
52:46
then I'm not a Republican either, because I'm not sure that i'd want a
52:51
president you know, I look around in other nations and I think, well,
52:54
neither neither of these these systems appear to be to be working, and
53:00
both seem to end up in tyranny and turmoil and chaos. So the answer,
53:08
I don't have the answer, and I don't think I can support either
53:14
camp. At the moment, I seem to be politically homeless. I seem
53:16
to be like, what's going on. Everything's broken down? And when you
53:22
said, you know, the country's broken down, I agree, But then
53:24
that was the plan build back better. You can't build back better unless you
53:29
destroy everything first. So that's what they're doing now, dismantling, destroying everything
53:35
that we know in order to build back better. But president Royal family,
53:40
I don't want any of them to be quite honest, definitely not the Royal
53:45
Family. They're not. They're not. We could go back into the maybe
53:49
we need Alex Thompson here to go back into the genealogy of the of the
53:54
British family and the constitution, because clearly we've been light all along, all
54:00
along, we've been lied to on everything and the monarchy. The monarchy I
54:06
don't believe is the show piece that it's meant to be because a lot of
54:10
people look at the monarchy and think they're there because they're doing a great job
54:15
for the UK. Everybody knows the royal family. They bring in a lot
54:17
of money, a lot of interest, a lot of tourism. I don't
54:21
see it like that anymore. I see it as the other way around.
54:24
As they've used us, They've used all of us, they've hoodwinked all of
54:30
us, they've deceived all of us. They're duplicitous, they're not. They
54:35
don't care for their subjects, not in not through my eyes. They have
54:39
absolute disdain for us. They don't care at all about us, and they've
54:45
proved it. So for me, I'm afraid I'm not on the royal bandwagon
54:52
anymore. No. Well, well, you've been very honest in you know,
54:55
saying why you think this position is that I believe in a nation state
55:02
that's functioning properly, there is I believe there's absolutely a place for a monarchy
55:08
and this he I was going to use the word to execute a wrong expression
55:15
where the royalty is concerned, carried out properly. This could give people so
55:21
much because because it's it's confidence, it could be confidence in the leadership,
55:28
its respect, it's an identity. There's a lot of cultural, historic and
55:34
constitutional issues which a good royal family could actually work. Wonders if they were
55:39
really standing up for their nation state and protecting their people. So my brain
55:46
says to me, it's not actually a constitutional monarchy problem. It's it's the
55:53
lot who have crept into position at the moment, and I think pretenders.
56:00
They're pretend. Yeah, I'd agree they're not. They're not real. They've
56:05
they've been they've been put that. They are complete pretenders. They're not there
56:09
to serve us at all. We are there to serve to serve them as
56:15
the king. At the coronation, he wanted us all to pledge allegiance to
56:20
him, all of us. Yeah. Well, okay, that's a good
56:24
setting to end number two of No Smoke Without Fire. And for the next
56:31
edition we'll we'll cover the Terra Carta and the Astra Carta, and then we'll
56:37
also have a look at the coronation and we'll we're going to be asking a
56:42
lot of questions, so we'll end there. Debbie, thanks very much for
56:46
joining me. Actually, I've enjoyed a relaxed delivery today, So maybe for
56:52
the next edition, I won't be wearing a tie either. We'll see how
56:58
it goes. But thanks for joining me. It's been great, it's been
57:00
a pleasure. Thank you for inviting me. Okay, bye bye bye bye