Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Radio Baloney Live! News Review Hangout Stream

Transcript

Radio Baloney Live! News Review Hangout Stream · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Go fuck yourself.
• 0:03
  Speaker 2: Is that clear? I hope it is. All right, what
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: is it? It's Tuesday night. It must be the Tuesday
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: night Radio Bologna Live. I'm your host, Richie Bologna. And
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: of course, this is an early stream, six until about
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: 745 probably. And of course, like a genius... I scheduled
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: it for 7, and it doesn't matter because we're live
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: now anyway. But like a genius, I scheduled it for
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: 7 because I guess just habit and my brain. You
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: guys know about my brain. I told you about my brain, right?
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: I ain't got a good brain.
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: So not 7-6. Normally it's 7, but tonight I can't
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: do it. We have to go earlier. I've got to
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: be finished earlier tonight. So 6 until about 7.45. Thank
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: you very much, everybody. All right. Looks like we already
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: got Rosie in the chat and Izzy and JJ Ottawa
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: and Spambot. Good to see everybody. All right. Well, let's
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: get to the menu and see what we're going to
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: talk about tonight. Then we'll come back and dole out
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: some good karma and say hello to everybody in the chat.
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: And then we'll go back to these stories and do
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: them in detail. Take a look at the UK, the
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: dystopia that is the UK. Airstrip 1, it was called
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: in 1984. Maybe we should start calling it that. Communist
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: activists attempt to assault and intimidate young Bob on campus.
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: So the West is just full of commies, basically. Just
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: like at least cultural Marxists. You can't be graduating a
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: new class of Red Guard every single year from every
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: single educational institution and not end up with a bunch
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: of goddamn commies. A bunch of dirty, filthy, lying commies.
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: It's a problem. It's not funny. It's not funny. Here's
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: some police going to arrest somebody for social media posts.
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: We'll take a look at this. Yeah, that's unfortunate. What
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: do we got here? This is wild. This is from
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: Viva Fry here. I legit thought it was a skit
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: high school video project. It's 100% real. Just a crazy
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: dingbat Democrat here in the United States. So they got
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: those over there. Let's make this a little bigger. There
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: we go. And this person just.
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: And that's what I have to say about that.
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: Just right out of Central Casting. Ah, dearie, dearie me.
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: Here's something as well. Whistleblower. They were incentivized to qualify
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: illegals for long-term disability. To qualify illegals for Social Security
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: for life. So they were set for life and voting
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: Democrat forever. And Australia has got some new dystopian censorship legislation.
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: We're going to take a look at that. We're going
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: to look at just this interesting, you know, here's a
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: post from the food professor, you know, new, new, new
• 2:56
  Speaker 2: Nanos poll out. Nanos send that Globe and Mail actually.
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: 79% of Canadians support Canada negotiating associate membership with the EU.
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: I'm going to go over just some numbers, some charts
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: here and explain why it's probably a really bad idea.
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: And it's all stupid and just a fantasy world. And
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: then we have here, hold on one second. I'm going
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: to do some real quick. I got to update this
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: because I added a bunch of your guys' stuff in here.
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: All right. And then we got the last tab of
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: the evening, which is much stuff you guys sent in.
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: You degenerates sent in. Don't blame me. You guys sent it.
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: You guys sent it in. And again, it'll be a
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: bit of a shorter one tonight, about an hour and
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: 45 minutes. I wish we could go longer because I've
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: already had to miss some days this month. But what's
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: going on there? There we go. That's better. There we go.
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: That's better. Jiggly. Yeah. Anyway, so a bit of a
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: shorter one tonight, and that's okay. I'll probably use a
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: little break. Anybody watching over on Kik, become a follower now.
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: We're pretty new there, so we need people to follow us.
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: We're open after a year. We're going to have a
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: nice little audience just like we have over on Rumble.
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: So everybody knows that we're streaming on Rumble, Kik, Odyssey.
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: We started streaming on Odyssey as well. X and Locals.
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: Not on YouTube because they're censorious bastards over there. I
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: call it StalinTube. We're only doing an hour on Friday
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: nights over there now because there's so many problems with YouTube.
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: They don't like people accurately describing reality, as you all know.
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: But everybody knows that tonight we're streaming on Rumble, Kick, Odyssey, X,
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: and Locals. And when you like the stream, of course
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: you're going to get good karma. But when you're early,
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: you get extra good karma.
• 4:38
  Speaker 3: Extra.
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: And who's going to turn their back on that in
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: these troubled times? I certainly wouldn't. I heard about a
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: guy who did that. He fell off a cliff. Seriously.
• 4:46
  Speaker 2: Bad news.
• 4:48
  Speaker 4: All right.
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: Izzy got the first like.
• 4:52
  Speaker 5: Over on Rumble.
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: That's six good karmas right there. JJ Ottawa says stream
• 5:02
  Speaker 2: says starts at seven. I know because of my brain.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: My brain doesn't work right. And I said it at
• 5:06
  Speaker 2: the wrong time. It's six o'clock and we're streaming. How
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: could that even happen? Because my brain. Spambot got like
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: number two, five good karmas. And he voted earlier today,
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: got in line at 1045, didn't get out until after 1215.
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: 19 minutes, he says. So is that early voting on
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: the referendum? The Alberta independence referendum? Well, there's a bunch
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: of questions all in it, but that's one of them.
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: The referendum on whether or not to have a referendum
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: in Alberta. Let's see. Izzy says, oh, really? I like
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: the sounds of that. Good voter turnout then. I'm waiting
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: until Monday. So lots of people showed up.
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: Rural Alberta is 90% plus pro-independent, Spambot says. I strongly
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: suggest you hit an advance poll. Well, let's see. How
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: did you answer? Rosie, how you doing? Got like number three.
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: That's four good comments for Rosie right there. Everybody give
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: her a hand. Spambot says UCP rank and file. It's
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: the conservative party in Alberta, Daniel Smith. is between 70%
• 6:17
  Speaker 2: and 84% pro-independence. Interesting. Let's see. Let's see. All right. Well,
• 6:34
  Speaker 2: I guess that's it for the chat. I guess we
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: should just get into the news then. Let me have
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: some more rant juice, though. I might need some of that.
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: Hold on. Mmm, that's good ranch juice. All right. Let's
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: go to the UK. What the hell's going on there?
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: Here's Young Bob. So he's like a... Young Bob is...
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: That's not him there. Young Bob is a conservative activist
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: in the UK. He's 18, and he is dismayed that
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: the elites there, the managers of decline, have just sold
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: out his birthright. And he's going to fight to restore it.
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: Communist activists attempt to assault and intimidate young Bob on campus.
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: Zero critical thinking skills. This is very typical. They don't
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: have actual principles. They don't know why they believe the
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: things they believe. They just very smugly believe them. I mean,
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: believe is probably the wrong word. It's just they know
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: which way the wind is blowing within their own bubble.
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: They know what they're supposed to support. And that's all
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: that really matters. And this is a great example here
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: with this guy. Let's take a look.
• 7:47
  Speaker 6: Usually people who are typically shaking are trying to intimidate people,
• 7:50
  Speaker 6: but have never gone into physical confrontation in their life.
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: I noticed you've been staring. Do you want to have
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: a chat?
• 7:57
  Speaker 4: I know who you are.
• 7:58
  Speaker 3: I've seen you online.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Oh, no, no, no.
• 8:01
  Speaker 3: I'm just amazed.
• 8:02
  Speaker 6: Do you want to have a discussion?
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: No, no.
• 8:05
  Speaker 3: I'm just amazed at.
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: How old are you?
• 8:07
  Speaker 3: 18. 18. And you think you've got the life experience
• 8:11
  Speaker 3: to be able to tell.
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: women, that abortion should be completely banned.
• 8:17
  Speaker 7: Okay, so first of all, I want to go for
• 8:18
  Speaker 7: different things.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: You're mental, man.
• 8:20
  Speaker 3: I think you're mental if you're going to run away.
• 8:22
  Speaker 2: That's not an argument. So you're not old enough to
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: have an opinion. That's not actually an argument.
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: From a question that's been asked.
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: Are you okay?
• 8:32
  Speaker 7: Why are you being so close? Okay, so we can
• 8:38
  Speaker 7: talk like this, then I suppose. So I have several
• 8:41
  Speaker 7: women in my life, especially in a church or pro life.
• 8:43
  Speaker 6: So this argument that you need experience in order to
• 8:46
  Speaker 6: access your position is just not true and fallacious.
• 8:51
  Speaker 8: I'd actually say I know.
• 8:52
  Speaker 6: Women who are older than me, even people I know
• 8:54
  Speaker 6: who've been victims of rape gangs who keep their children
• 8:57
  Speaker 6: and disagree with abortion.
• 8:59
  Speaker 3: So what you're saying is nonsense.
• 9:04
  Speaker 6: Yeah, because it's a fallacy to suggest that just because
• 9:08
  Speaker 6: I don't have a degree of experience, I don't have
• 9:10
  Speaker 6: access to the right opinion. And second of all, I
• 9:12
  Speaker 6: can speak to people who have experience who are even
• 9:15
  Speaker 6: women and who agree with my worldview.
• 9:17
  Speaker 7: Most of the prayer life movement, especially up in the States,
• 9:19
  Speaker 7: are Catholic women.
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: He's getting frustrated here because he said the progressive thing, right?
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: He said the right think thing, right? Which is just,
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: he's just, he's just, uh, For abortion. All abortion, all
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: the time. And he just made that clear. He said
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: the right-think thing. He accused him of not being old
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: enough to know what he's talking about. And that's it.
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: He's expressed that he's opposed to what young Bob is saying.
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: And that's all that's important. He hasn't thought through any
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: of this. He's not going to think any of it through.
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: He's getting frustrated because he's he's signaled that he has
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: the correct viewpoints and it's not just it's not being
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: just automatically accepted but that makes no difference to what
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: i'll just.
• 10:07
  Speaker 6: Say yeah you said that how can you as an
• 10:09
  Speaker 6: 18 year old go out and say abortion should be
• 10:11
  Speaker 6: given yeah and what did i say to that what
• 10:13
  Speaker 6: did i say that you know lots of women Yeah,
• 10:16
  Speaker 6: which means that if there are people, because I don't
• 10:17
  Speaker 6: believe that just.
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: Well, he didn't just say that he knows lots of women.
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: He said that he knows women that are opposed to
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: abortion as well, and women much older than him. That's
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: what he said. So the whole point of it is
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: that proving that this is a fallacious argument the man
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: is making.
• 10:34
  Speaker 6: Because you don't experience something, you can't speak on it.
• 10:37
  Speaker 8: So, for example, have you ever owned slaves?
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: No.
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: Do you think slavery is wrong?
• 10:43
  Speaker 8: No.
• 10:44
  Speaker 5: Yes.
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 10:45
  Speaker 7: How can you speak about slavery when you don't have
• 10:47
  Speaker 7: the experience of owning a slave to set from?
• 10:49
  Speaker 2: That's the weirdest, weirdest argument I've ever heard. I think
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: it's actually pretty apt, actually. But again, it doesn't matter.
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: I mean, he's already expressed that he has the correct view, right?
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: That's all that matters. He's not going to think it through.
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: He doesn't know why he believes what he believes. This
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: is what they have. Like, well, you're weird. You're wrong
• 11:11
  Speaker 2: or racist. He hasn't called him racist yet. So, hold
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: on a second. Did we miss a part of that?
• 11:23
  Speaker 6: And second of all, I can speak to people who
• 11:25
  Speaker 6: have experience who are even women and who agree with
• 11:27
  Speaker 6: my worldview.
• 11:28
  Speaker 7: Most of the prayer life movement, especially in the States.
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: Are Catholic women.
• 11:31
  Speaker 7: But that makes no difference to what I was just saying.
• 11:36
  Speaker 8: Yeah, you said that.
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we watched all of that. But again, this is
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: what you come up with. Anytime you have a conversation
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: with a leftist, this is what you're into. It's just
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: they don't really have anything. It's just you're wrong. you're
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: just wrong ad hominem attacks. Like you're too young. There's
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: just some flaw in you that causes you to be
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: unable to accept, you know, the, the received wisdom, right.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: Of BBC or CBC or CNN or whatever it is,
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: wherever you live. This is what they're fighting against in
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: the UK. This is what they're fighting against and what
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: everybody's fighting against across the Western world. Let's see, what's
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: this here? So Restore UK candidate gets hit in the face,
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: shut down, and drowned out from talking. This is by
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: Table Salt. So Reform UK is the only real conservative
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: party in the UK, led by Rupert Lowe, formerly of Reform,
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: and kicked out by Nigel Frosch, I think for being
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: too conservative. But anyway, discourse is gone. Debate is over.
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: All the left has is violence because their ideas are garbage.
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: They just don't have ideas. They just have this certainty
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: that they're on the right side of history, that they
• 12:57
  Speaker 2: say things that sound right in their bubble, therefore they
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: must be right. So lots of Englishmen here. We see
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: all these Englishmen that have a big problem with them.
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: Let's take a look.
• 13:10
  Speaker 6: They'd rather have a spectacle than actually talk.
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: Just a bunch of Englishmen.
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: Disagreeing, huh? All right. Kind of imagine it's like this
• 14:03
  Speaker 2: in the third world, huh? I wonder what happened in
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: the UK. I don't recall ever seeing scenes like this
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: coming out of the UK over a politician. Let's continue.
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: It's alright.
• 14:25
  Speaker 9: It's fine. It's fine. Keep it calm.
• 14:26
  Speaker 10: Keep it calm.
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: I know it's water up again.
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: Camera, microphones.
• 14:46
  Speaker 11: Well, violence.
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: Don't touch me.
• 14:48
  Speaker 10: Absolutely.
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: Back off, mate.
• 14:50
  Speaker 6: Or what?
• 14:50
  Speaker 10: Well, I'll... Is that a threat?
• 14:51
  Speaker 3: No, no, if you assault me, then yeah, it is, yeah.
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: Give me your phone. man it's they're in a state
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: they are in a state in the uk the same
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: people there have a real uphill battle i'm afraid What's
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: going on here? Owen Gregorian posted this. British police show
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: up to a woman's house because other people made derogatory
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: comments and memes using one of her posts.
• 15:41
  Speaker 6: Wow.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: Okay. Let's take a look. A policeman came around my
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: house this morning because of a post I didn't even
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: put up. Surely people must have better things to do. Well,
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: this is airstrip one here. So this is the Orwellianization,
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: I guess, of the UK or airstrip one. We.
• 16:01
  Speaker 10: The police.
• 16:01
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 16:02
  Speaker 10: All right. Essentially, we have received a complaint in regards to...
• 16:07
  Speaker 10: Lisa Tipper or Simon Edge, obviously. But the two gentlemen
• 16:13
  Speaker 10: that you've pictured and then ridiculed on your... How did
• 16:16
  Speaker 10: I ridicule?
• 16:17
  Speaker 4: Well, you basically put a picture of them on your
• 16:21
  Speaker 4: web page and then literally the comments.
• 16:24
  Speaker 5: That you're making.
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: So she ridiculed two men. That requires a police visit.
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: I didn't see that cop here. Well, this guy was
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: being assaulted and the tent torn down by a mob.
• 16:39
  Speaker 2: I didn't see him there. I guess he was too busy.
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: He was doing this. He was telling people that, visiting
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: people to, I guess, threaten them because they had ridiculed
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: somebody online, I guess. Well, let's continue.
• 16:54
  Speaker 5: Yep.
• 17:03
  Speaker 4: Do that I didn't do that I didn't do that
• 17:09
  Speaker 4: you just did you just said I did that I
• 17:13
  Speaker 4: didn't I didn't do that I don't know have a
• 17:16
  Speaker 4: look you're the one looking.
• 17:17
  Speaker 7: Essentially it's come.
• 17:19
  Speaker 10: Back it's not though you keep saying my web page
• 17:25
  Speaker 10: and that I did that and I didn't do it No,
• 17:28
  Speaker 10: it's not. It's not my webpage.
• 17:30
  Speaker 4: Okay, so you're saying you didn't take the picture.
• 17:32
  Speaker 10: I took the picture. I didn't put speech bubbles on it.
• 17:36
  Speaker 10: You just said that I did. I've got it on here.
• 17:40
  Speaker 10: I didn't do that.
• 17:42
  Speaker 7: Sorry?
• 17:42
  Speaker 10: I don't know who's done that. So why are you
• 17:47
  Speaker 10: coming to me?
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: It's really incredible. I mean, with the grooming gangs in England,
• 17:53
  Speaker 2: at least a quarter of a million young British girls groomed.
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: And that means, you know, sex trafficked, raped, worse, even worse.
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: But this is what they do. I mean, this is,
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: what is it, 12,000 arrests a year? Or 12,000 at
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: least visits from the police a year. 12,000 instances of
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: this a year in the UK. I mean, that's a
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: lot of police hours, right? Of just going around and
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: harassing people over time. Posting politically incorrect things. Things that
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: the government deems to be politically incorrect on the internet.
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: It's so backwards. It is so backwards. Their government hates them.
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: I think that's pretty much clear. All right. All right.
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: So that's it. Let's go back to the chat for
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: a second. All right. What are you guys talking about?
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Spambot got the first like on X. That's
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: an extra six. Your karma's right there. As he says, yeah,
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: you're pretty much wrong and evil for not believing what
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: I believe. Yes, that's what that, that's, that is what
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: these lip charts are always expressing. Import the third world
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: and you become the third world, Spambot says. Yes. Why
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: wouldn't you? What would be the mechanism by which you wouldn't?
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: So mass immigration flooding millions of people in, what would
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: be the mechanism that would prevent that exactly? Because you
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: can't integrate with mass migration numbers. It's impossible. So how
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: would you prevent the ideas from the third world? Because
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: that's really what it comes down to. I mean, the
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: third world is the third world because of the ideas
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: that exist there and the cultures that exist there. How
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: do you prevent that? Like, how do you integrate people
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: into different ideas? And when you're mass importing people, you
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: cannot do it. So those will become the new ideas
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: of your country. If you do this, and there is
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: literally no way that anything other than that could happen.
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: It just, how, somebody explain to me, how does that,
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: how will that not happen? Spambot says, Torontonians, Torontonians, Torontonians
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: have a telegram group to map where people have been
• 20:31
  Speaker 2: shitting in the streets. Well, that started in San Francisco.
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: That was the first place to get the street shit map.
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: So you know what, that street's to walk down. Good Lord.
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: Now Toronto's got it too, huh? Spambot says, Richie, there's
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: mounting evidence that the lost girls during the Autopen presidency
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: are trafficked by Islamic groups. Well, you know that the
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: I would assume it would be the cartels because they're
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: the ones who are actually trafficking them across the border.
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: Maybe there's Islamic groups involved as well. But I mean,
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: it's the cartels that are getting them across the border.
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: The rapes that are happening are happening by cartel members. Right.
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: So once they're into the states, are they handing them
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: off to Islamic groups? I don't know. Something to look into.
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: As he says, I'm sure Biden got a few for
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: his personal sniffing purposes. No, come on. Sniffing? Come on, no.
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: It's for the adrenochrome. All right. Let's see. So we're
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: streaming on Rumble. We're streaming on Kik, Odyssey, XN Locals.
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: Anybody watching on Kik right now? We are new there.
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: So follow us. Help build up the community there. Thank
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: you very much. What's going on? All right. And it's
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: slow tonight. It's very slow because we're early. We're normally
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: 7 o'clock. We're early. People don't know to show up.
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: What are you going to do?
• 22:09
  Speaker 8: All right.
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: Let's get to the next thing. What are we, 23
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: minutes into this? What time is it? 625? All right.
• 22:16
  Speaker 2: It's going to be a shorter stream tonight as well,
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: about an hour and 45. Viva Fry says, this is wild.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: I legit thought it was a skit high school video project.
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: It is 100% real. This is Jamie West, Democratic Party.
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: She's running for election for Fayette County, Fayette County Council,
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: District 4 in Indiana. I had to make sure she
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: did not have a neurological disorder that could account for
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: the slurred speech and insane rambling. She doesn't. Apparently not.
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: This is just a parasitization by the mind virus. Let's
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: take a look.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: And that's what I have to say about that. Okay.
• 23:03
  Speaker 12: And our last question of the night is, if elected,
• 23:05
  Speaker 12: what is one decision that you expect to make that
• 23:09
  Speaker 12: may be unpopular with some voters, but you believe ultimately
• 23:12
  Speaker 12: would be in the best interest of Fayette County?
• 23:17
  Speaker 11: I wouldn't raise your taxes. What is the one decision
• 23:22
  Speaker 11: that I would make?
• 23:24
  Speaker 6: Hmm.
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: Just so confidently retarded. They're all just so confidently smugly retarded.
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: It's amazing.
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: Repeat that again.
• 23:35
  Speaker 11: What is the one decision that I would make that
• 23:36
  Speaker 11: might not be popular?
• 23:37
  Speaker 8: Right.
• 23:38
  Speaker 12: That may be unpopular with some voters.
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: But is in the best interest of the county. Firing
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: all Republicans. I wouldn't let them.
• 23:50
  Speaker 9: I mean.
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: I don't even talk to him. I don't like him.
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: Fire at all Republicans. So she just hates everybody who
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: disagrees with her. She'd fire them all. I wonder if
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: she'd put him in a camp too, perhaps. Let's take
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: a look.
• 24:09
  Speaker 11: I mean, they voted against our own state representative voted
• 24:14
  Speaker 11: against her own party.
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: I mean, What do you want me to say? I
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: don't like being around them.
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is like, this is a Saturday night live.
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: This is like an SNL sketch. I don't like being
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: around them. This really, it looks like parody. This is
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: indistinguishable from parody. This is indistinguishable from parody. I've been
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: saying for years now that the left is trying to
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: kill like parody satire because you just can't tell the difference.
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: They're so batshit crazy. This is a great example.
• 24:50
  Speaker 11: Y'all did this to us. You all voted for us.
• 24:52
  Speaker 11: You made this happen. This ICE coming into our communities,
• 24:58
  Speaker 11: stealing people's jobs.
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: ICE coming into our communities and stealing people's jobs. What?
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: So ICE is going in and stealing the jobs of
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: illegal immigrants? Like they go in ICE agents, they come
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: out Uber drivers.
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: What?
• 25:18
  Speaker 2: This makes no sense.
• 25:21
  Speaker 11: I mean, I've been threatened so many times to my
• 25:27
  Speaker 11: face by.
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: MAGA, we'll call them, because there's Republicans.
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: So she just made a claim that she's been threatened
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: to her face so many times by MAGA. I'm not
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: believing that a bunch of MAGA came up and just
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: started threatening this woman. I don't believe that for a second.
• 25:50
  Speaker 11: Who actually get it. You know, there are good Republicans
• 25:55
  Speaker 11: out there. But then there's these MAGAs who are just
• 25:59
  Speaker 11: racist and.
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: Aren't very intelligent at all. Really?
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: Really? We have her word on that. They're not very
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: intelligent at all. So this is what happens when you're
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: not required to know why you believe things. When you're
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: in a bubble... Right. And nothing is ever explained. Nobody
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: has to ever explain anything. In fact, explaining is kind
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: of scary because you might say the wrong thing and
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: you might not be totally on the same ideological page
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: as the other insane people around you. And then you
• 26:32
  Speaker 2: get struggle session. So it's safer just to kind of
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: go with the thing that feels left wing. The except,
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: you know, the the orthodoxy and that never actually happens.
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: think about anything else so what's the orthodoxy just magus
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: racist just go with that what else don't you like
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: about them well they're racist anything else well they're not
• 26:54
  Speaker 2: very bright i heard that on tiktok as well uh
• 26:58
  Speaker 2: that's all they need i mean that's actually the just
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: the path of least resistance that's the safest thing for
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: these people they don't want you thinking about anything they
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: don't want to think about anything thinking is dangerous Something,
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: you know, some rogue neuron in the back of their
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: heads might all of a sudden spout something sensible for once.
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: And that's dangerous, because if she repeats it around the
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: other lunatics around here, again, they're going to struggle session
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: her immediately.
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: I'm just not believing any of this. And if that
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: did happen, what the hell was she doing?
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: I mean, She's not striking me as the most stable
• 27:42
  Speaker 2: person I've ever seen, as a paragon of psychological stability.
• 27:50
  Speaker 12: Well, that brings us to your opportunity to say just
• 27:54
  Speaker 12: a few last words to the voters.
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: A few last words. I'm looking forward to this.
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: We have guns, too. All right. Well, as a reminder.
• 28:07
  Speaker 2: What does that mean? Like, what does that mean exactly?
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: We have guns too. What, are you threatening ICE there?
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: You're going to attack ICE for enforcing federal law? It's just,
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: I mean, I understand. This is just one person, candidate
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: for county council district four. Okay, this is not like
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: the biggest political job in the world, right? It's not
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: that much responsibility. But still, but still, I do think
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: that this does represent the mindset of the left. I mean,
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: particularly idiotic and inarticulate, but basically it's the same. They're
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: all basically this. Pretty funny though. Let's see what's going
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: on here. Deep leaks. Holy crap. Whistleblower. So we've got
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: a whistleblower. talking about how they were incentivized to qualify
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: illegals for long-term disability, to qualify illegals for Social Security
• 29:09
  Speaker 2: for life. So they were set for life. I guess
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: that would make them permanent voters, Democrat voters, wouldn't it?
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: For life.
• 29:20
  Speaker 5: They wanted us to try to identify them in such
• 29:25
  Speaker 5: a way that they would qualify for long-term Social Security disability.
• 29:30
  Speaker 8: What?
• 29:31
  Speaker 5: Yeah. And long-term social security disability is for life.
• 29:35
  Speaker 7: Yeah.
• 29:35
  Speaker 5: So if they get identified and qualify for long-term social
• 29:38
  Speaker 5: security disability, they are as good as set up for
• 29:42
  Speaker 5: life for medical treatment.
• 29:43
  Speaker 8: That doesn't sound like a refugee to me. Just being honest.
• 29:45
  Speaker 8: That sounds like somebody who's planning on staying here. A
• 29:48
  Speaker 8: refugee stays until the problem's over and then goes home.
• 29:51
  Speaker 5: Well, that's right. And so, uh, They instructed us to
• 29:56
  Speaker 5: try to identify, to try to get the client, because
• 29:59
  Speaker 5: once they arrive here, they're now called clients.
• 30:03
  Speaker 8: They're called clients. Okay.
• 30:06
  Speaker 5: Because clients pay.
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: Sure.
• 30:08
  Speaker 8: Sure. I'm starting to see where this is leading.
• 30:11
  Speaker 5: So they told us that we needed to talk to
• 30:14
  Speaker 5: the client and ask them if they had any headaches,
• 30:19
  Speaker 5: recurring headaches, or any lower back problems.
• 30:21
  Speaker 6: Okay.
• 30:23
  Speaker 5: Excuse me. Anything that would qualify them for Social Security
• 30:27
  Speaker 5: long-term disability.
• 30:28
  Speaker 8: Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. So let me get this straight.
• 30:31
  Speaker 8: Part of the screening is supposed to be, are you sick, maimed, injured, whatever? Right.
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: No.
• 30:38
  Speaker 8: Okay, good. You can come in.
• 30:39
  Speaker 5: Yeah.
• 30:39
  Speaker 8: You get on the airplane. Are you sick, maimed, injured, whatever?
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: Good.
• 30:44
  Speaker 8: So we can give you disability.
• 30:45
  Speaker 5: Correct.
• 30:46
  Speaker 6: What?
• 30:46
  Speaker 12: Yes.
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: This is insanity.
• 30:48
  Speaker 5: Yes, it is insanity.
• 30:50
  Speaker 8: But in order to get Social Security disability.
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's always everything they want is insane, right? Well,
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: it feels like empathetic, so therefore it's good, right? Empathy
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: or something. Empathy. There's a couple of questions that they
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: just seem incapable of asking themselves. Why and what then?
• 31:10
  Speaker 2: Like what then is a pretty important one. Well, so
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: if we just like. bring people into the country, refugees, illegals, whatever,
• 31:19
  Speaker 2: and then just say, well, we're just going to pay
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: for you for life now. Well, what then, what could
• 31:23
  Speaker 2: be the, you know, down the road consequences of this,
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: of word getting around, say, but empathy and progressive and
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: nobody's illegal on stolen land or something and Gaza. Oh God, just,
• 31:39
  Speaker 2: it's all just madness. All just madness. It's just like an,
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: it's like, In the West, half of the population has
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: been completely infantilized. They've just been trained to think like seven-year-olds.
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: I'm going to go back here for a second because
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: you guys are talking about this crazy, crazy libtard dingbat.
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: Let's see. JJ Ottawa Rosie says she sounds wasted. Well,
• 32:16
  Speaker 2: I can't disagree with you there. Let's see. Spambot watched
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: it earlier today. Could not stop laughing. It is pretty crazy.
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: Izzy says, what the fuck? Get her to the hospital.
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: She's having a stroke. I think she might've already had
• 32:29
  Speaker 2: some strokes. Probably someone had an opinion she didn't like.
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: That's right. That's why she said we have guns too.
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: Let's see. She's lying and clearly wants a final solution
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: for conservatives. Uh, yeah, there's a lot of psychopathy happening
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: on the left these days. Uh, Okay. Let's get to
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: the next story, shall we? Let's go. So Australia. Australia
• 32:55
  Speaker 2: has a libtard government. Australia has a leftist government right now.
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: And of course, like all leftist governments, they're obsessed with
• 33:03
  Speaker 2: censoring everybody and controlling every aspect of everybody's life. Here's
• 33:08
  Speaker 2: Michael Schellenberger here, Institute of Public Affairs. This is by
• 33:11
  Speaker 2: far the worst censorship legislation we have seen in the West.
• 33:15
  Speaker 2: So let's take a look at this and then we'll
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: go actually look at the bill itself. So Michael Schellenberger here.
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: Let's take a look.
• 33:25
  Speaker 13: Hey, guys, it's Mike Schellenberger reporting to you live from
• 33:28
  Speaker 13: the Australian Parliament. I've been here with IPA meeting with senators,
• 33:31
  Speaker 13: meeting with members of parliament. This bill, I mean, I've
• 33:34
  Speaker 13: never seen anything like it. This is by far the
• 33:37
  Speaker 13: worst censorship legislation we have seen in the West. It
• 33:40
  Speaker 13: not only allows the government to essentially censor anything, the
• 33:43
  Speaker 13: criteria is may cause significant harm. Like that's literally like
• 33:47
  Speaker 13: which could be anything. And then the examples they give
• 33:49
  Speaker 13: is basically like violent crime. So they could censor the
• 33:52
  Speaker 13: Bondi massacre if they wanted to. But then here's the
• 33:55
  Speaker 13: craziest part. This bill allows the government to run an
• 33:58
  Speaker 13: unlimited number of fake social media accounts online. The government
• 34:02
  Speaker 13: can pretend to be ordinary citizens, either expressing support for
• 34:06
  Speaker 13: things or opposing certain things.
• 34:07
  Speaker 3: This bill in the name.
• 34:10
  Speaker 13: Of, you know, protecting the public would allow the government
• 34:13
  Speaker 13: to run offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people.
• 34:17
  Speaker 3: Crazy town.
• 34:18
  Speaker 13: Let's I, I strongly hope the Australian people rise up
• 34:22
  Speaker 13: against it. Hey guys, it's Mike.
• 34:25
  Speaker 2: So let's go to this bill. It's the, um, where
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: is it? Uh, Digital duty of care for Australia, developing
• 34:34
  Speaker 2: a duty of care framework for online services used by Australians.
• 34:38
  Speaker 2: So I just went through this before the stream and
• 34:41
  Speaker 2: just highlighted some points, some things I noticed. This document
• 34:46
  Speaker 2: sets out the approach the government is taking to establish
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: the duty of care framework that will apply to providers
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: of online services to Australians. And let's see, improving and
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: promoting online safety for Australians. That's what they always say,
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: isn't it? What is safety, though? What is safety in
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: this context? Usually it just means safety from ever having
• 35:08
  Speaker 2: reality accurately described to them. It seems to be. That's
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: the way it seems to work in Canada. Let's see.
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: So far as is reasonable. So the duty will require
• 35:21
  Speaker 2: all entities regulated by the act to maintain effective systems
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: and processes that so far as is reasonably practicable. So
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: when the government is using vague language like this, like reasonably, reasonably,
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: you need to worry about that. Provide a safe online
• 35:42
  Speaker 2: environment for all Australians. Well, what does that mean, though, exactly? And,
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: you know, obviously it's going to be vague. On purpose, obviously. Prevent, monitor,
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: appropriately address content and activity that is illegal or illegal.
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: Harmful to young people. Or, and of course, that's always
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: the Trojan horse, is that they're protecting young people, right?
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: That's always the same thing in Canada with Trudeau's censorship
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: bills and now Mark Carney. But weirdly, it just applies
• 36:15
  Speaker 2: to everybody. The censorship applies to everybody. But illegal or harmful.
• 36:22
  Speaker 2: So it's not just stuff that's illegal. It's stuff that's
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: harmful or somebody has deemed to be harmful. Maybe the
• 36:30
  Speaker 2: eSafety Commissioner we're going to get to. Let's see. So
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: this is going to apply to social media services, including
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: age-restricted social media platforms. So obviously, it's not just about
• 36:44
  Speaker 2: kids here, is it? This is really about everybody. They'll
• 36:47
  Speaker 2: say it's to protect the children. Who will think of
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: the children? It's not really about that. Let's see. Relevant
• 36:54
  Speaker 2: electronic services such as messaging apps. Don't like people talking
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: privately on messaging apps, obviously. Interactive online games. So your
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: games are about to all be ruined. And online dating services.
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: Online dating services? Designated internet services such as general websites
• 37:13
  Speaker 2: or apps. Many online pornography services. generative AI services, including
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: chatbots and image generators. If one thing, you start seeing
• 37:24
  Speaker 2: the scope of this and you start to realize, I
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: wonder if the Australian government really has the power to
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: force all of these international tech companies to bend to
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: their will. They're going to try, though. Hosting services, which
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: host data material provided by other online services. Internet service providers,
• 37:43
  Speaker 2: which connect users' devices to online services. They're really going
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: to town on this. Search engine services, which index and
• 37:51
  Speaker 2: recommend online services and resources in response to user queries.
• 37:55
  Speaker 2: App distribution services or app stores like the Apple App
• 38:00
  Speaker 2: Store and, you know, the Android one. the Google one,
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: which index and recommend apps for download to users. So, again,
• 38:06
  Speaker 2: they want to be able to decide which apps you
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: can use. Equipment, and it's not just, again, which ones
• 38:13
  Speaker 2: children can download, anybody, adults. Equipment and operating system services
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: such as phones, tablets, laptops, wearable devices, and the operating
• 38:24
  Speaker 2: systems that make them function. So I guess your smartwatch
• 38:28
  Speaker 2: needs to be censored now. It all starts to just
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: get more and more dystopian as you get into it,
• 38:34
  Speaker 2: doesn't it? Under the duty, the minister for communications, the minister,
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: or at the minister's direction, the e-safety commissioner, we're going
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: to get to her in a minute, will be given
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: the power to make binding rules for designating additional categories
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: and types of harm. Types of harm, which I'm sure
• 38:55
  Speaker 2: that's not going to be very broadly defined. specifying compliance
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: requirements for service providers or specified classes of services, blah, blah, blah.
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: But you see this stuff, and a lot of vague language,
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: types of harm, designating additional categories. So, you know, once
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: the bill goes through, I mean, they can just start
• 39:17
  Speaker 2: adding on more and more types of harm that they
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: don't like, which will surely be anybody accurately describing reality
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: on the internet. That'll be the harm they're talking about.
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Oh, yeah, they're not fans of systems that
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: allow anonymous or pseudonymous accounts, so they want to be
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: able to find you quickly if you did a wrong
• 39:40
  Speaker 2: think online. So, yeah.
• 39:45
  Speaker 5: Oh, hold on.
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: Let's see. What's this? Harms to mental and physical well-being,
• 39:49
  Speaker 2: including threats to harm or kill, or attacks based on
• 39:52
  Speaker 2: a person or group of people's protected characteristics, such as sex, gender,
• 39:57
  Speaker 2: sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability, age, or religion. So they
• 40:01
  Speaker 2: throw in the, you know, threats to harm or kill
• 40:04
  Speaker 2: or whatever, but then it's just attacks. Well, obviously this
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: will be online attacks, whatever attacks means. I'm going to
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: guess it's going to be just criticism, maybe criticism of
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: immigration policies, say. Yeah, so it all just starts to
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: feel more and more like they're not trying to protect children.
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: They're trying to protect themselves and their ideology. The act
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: should amend to empower the regulator to use enforceable undertakings.
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: or issue remedial direction to services in relation to all
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: relevant penalty provisions to seek to bring them back into compliance.
• 40:42
  Speaker 2: Enforceable undertakings. That's all ominous. It empowers the regulator to
• 40:50
  Speaker 2: use these enforceable undertakings. So, yeah, I mean, that's just
• 40:54
  Speaker 2: me going through it fairly quickly right before the stream.
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: Here's some criticism. This is from ABC News in Australia.
• 41:03
  Speaker 2: Opposition leader Angus Taylor described the bill as unacceptable in
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: its current form because it's providing a blank check for
• 41:11
  Speaker 2: political censorship to the minister and the government. Meanwhile, Pauline Hanson,
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: leader of the One Nation Party, their conservative party in Australia,
• 41:21
  Speaker 2: called the bill Orwellian machinery that will be used to
• 41:25
  Speaker 2: enact government censorship. Well, it seems like it's kind of
• 41:30
  Speaker 2: designed for that, right? So they're They're saying that this
• 41:34
  Speaker 2: is to protect the children, but then it kind of
• 41:37
  Speaker 2: just applies to everything, like literally everything, including your smartwatch
• 41:41
  Speaker 2: for some reason.
• 41:43
  Speaker 8: Huh.
• 41:47
  Speaker 2: I think that we have a little bit more here.
• 41:50
  Speaker 2: I think we had another clip from Michael Schellenberger. Hold
• 41:57
  Speaker 2: on a second. Yeah, here's another one. Let's take a look.
• 42:00
  Speaker 2: Michael Schellenberger. Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian
• 42:03
  Speaker 2: parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for
• 42:06
  Speaker 2: the governing party. They told us that the government needed
• 42:09
  Speaker 2: more power to censor things like the upcoming U S
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: execution of Nadal Hassan. Why would they need to execute that? Like,
• 42:17
  Speaker 2: why do adults need to be protected from, uh, seeing
• 42:22
  Speaker 2: a stream of a terrorist who killed 13 people, including
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: a pregnant woman, why do they need to be protected
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: from seeing that? Odd, isn't it?
• 42:33
  Speaker 5: Odd.
• 42:36
  Speaker 2: When I asked why they needed to censor that video,
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: by governments? Wow. Wow. Or no, they said, copycat killings
• 42:48
  Speaker 2: like of a backpacker several decades, several decades ago. So
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: under that logic, I pointed out the government should censor
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed
• 42:59
  Speaker 2: 15 people. Now, well, but they want to do that, right?
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: Because that's bad for their immigration policies. The Bondi massacre
• 43:06
  Speaker 2: was not good. That was not good publicity for their,
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: you know, globalist immigration policy. So of course they want
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: to censor stuff like that. If you want to know
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: what this bill is really for, well, I think we
• 43:19
  Speaker 2: could probably say that's going to be one of them, right?
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: That's going to be one of them. If they're going
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: to censor the live stream of an Islamic terrorist being
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: executed in the United States, I think they might be
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: interested in banning stuff like that as well. Let's take
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: a look.
• 43:37
  Speaker 14: Hey, guys, it's Mike Schellenberger reporting to you live from
• 43:40
  Speaker 14: the Australian Parliament. We just got out of a meeting
• 43:44
  Speaker 14: with representatives of the governing party for the government.
• 43:47
  Speaker 3: I don't want to say exactly who, but with two representatives.
• 43:50
  Speaker 3: And it was wild. I mean, first of all, they
• 43:53
  Speaker 3: had no.
• 43:53
  Speaker 14: Idea that the bill would allow the government to run
• 43:56
  Speaker 14: offensive fake accounts attacking their political opponents on social media.
• 44:01
  Speaker 2: No idea.
• 44:02
  Speaker 3: They said, like, why do you need this bill?
• 44:06
  Speaker 14: And they said, well, we want to do it to
• 44:07
  Speaker 14: prevent things like the execution of this guy in the
• 44:10
  Speaker 14: United States that's going to be broadcast. And then I said,
• 44:13
  Speaker 14: what are you worried about exactly? And they said, well,
• 44:15
  Speaker 14: we're worried about like copycat killers. And I was like,
• 44:18
  Speaker 14: is there an example of that? And they said, yeah,
• 44:20
  Speaker 14: these backpackers were, you know, copycat killers. And I was like,
• 44:23
  Speaker 14: but under that logic, then it would allow the government
• 44:27
  Speaker 14: under this law to censor the Bondi Massacre. Americans say Bondi,
• 44:31
  Speaker 14: but now they say the Bondi Massacre. This is where
• 44:34
  Speaker 14: I think 15 people were murdered brutally at a beach
• 44:38
  Speaker 14: attended by mostly Jewish people. And they sort of hemmed
• 44:41
  Speaker 14: and hawed and they said, oh, well, but that would
• 44:43
  Speaker 14: be like a news event.
• 44:44
  Speaker 3: And I was like, but your bill allows you to
• 44:46
  Speaker 3: censor news.
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: But how is the execution of the Islamic terrorist from
• 44:54
  Speaker 2: Fort Hood, how is that not a news event, though?
• 44:56
  Speaker 2: That is a news event. They don't have principles. They
• 44:59
  Speaker 2: just want power. They just want to be able to censor.
• 45:02
  Speaker 2: They want to be able to shut up the people
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: that disagree with them, because again, they don't have an argument.
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: They've got nothing. They've just got what feels progressive.
• 45:11
  Speaker 3: He responds to it.
• 45:13
  Speaker 14: And then I said, I was like, if you're worried
• 45:14
  Speaker 14: about copycat killings, then why are you worried about like
• 45:17
  Speaker 14: an execution?
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: You should be more worried about like the Bondi massacre.
• 45:20
  Speaker 14: I mean, the bottom line you guys is that this
• 45:23
  Speaker 14: gives the government to censor violent crime, like anything that
• 45:27
  Speaker 14: they think could contribute to, you know, what they call
• 45:29
  Speaker 14: significant harm. That means that this bill would allow the
• 45:33
  Speaker 14: government to censor something like the Bondi massacre. I mean,
• 45:36
  Speaker 14: it's mind-blowing. And then when I point it out, I go,
• 45:38
  Speaker 14: would you guys really like to have this in the
• 45:41
  Speaker 14: hands of your opponents? What would you think if your
• 45:44
  Speaker 14: political opponents had this? They could run offensive fake account
• 45:48
  Speaker 14: bot campaigns against you.
• 45:50
  Speaker 3: They could censor like all the stuff you care about.
• 45:53
  Speaker 3: And it was clear they had never thought of it.
• 45:55
  Speaker 14: And they got like mad at the idea that I
• 45:58
  Speaker 14: was suggesting that like their opponents might do something bad
• 46:01
  Speaker 14: to them with it.
• 46:01
  Speaker 3: I mean, it was wild. It was wild, like clearly.
• 46:06
  Speaker 3: And then here's the final straw.
• 46:07
  Speaker 14: One of the staffers at the end, he just goes, well,
• 46:10
  Speaker 14: we don't.
• 46:11
  Speaker 3: Want to debate this with you. We're supporting the bill.
• 46:14
  Speaker 3: It was like, wow.
• 46:15
  Speaker 14: It was like, I felt like I was in like
• 46:17
  Speaker 14: Soviet Russia and it was like, They had no interest
• 46:21
  Speaker 14: in actually hearing. I mean, we had told them things
• 46:23
  Speaker 14: they didn't know. And they wanted us to know that
• 46:25
  Speaker 14: they just really didn't care. And they're going to support
• 46:28
  Speaker 14: this legislation, this legislation, even though they had no idea
• 46:31
  Speaker 14: what it would do. And when we pointed out that
• 46:33
  Speaker 14: would have allowed them to sense like allow the government
• 46:35
  Speaker 14: to censor them or censor like important events like the
• 46:38
  Speaker 14: Bondi massacre.
• 46:39
  Speaker 3: They didn't care. I mean, I got to say, guys,
• 46:42
  Speaker 3: I've never seen anything like this.
• 46:44
  Speaker 14: This is the craziest, most totalitarian piece of censorship legislation
• 46:48
  Speaker 14: ever introduced in the West.
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: Well, it's not surprising that they just ended up getting
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: mad when he was asking them questions, because on the left,
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: the modern left, there's no profit in thinking anything through.
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: First order thinking is the rule. You do what feels
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: left wing and what will reap the most power. That's it.
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: If you start thinking things through, well, then they become complicated. Right.
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: And then if you start steel manning your opponent, things
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: start getting complicated. They're more, you know, it starts getting confusing.
• 47:22
  Speaker 2: And then you start asking uncomfortable questions. And then the
• 47:25
  Speaker 2: people around you put you through a fucking struggle session
• 47:27
  Speaker 2: because they're all a bunch of leftist lunatics. So there's
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: no profit in thinking things through and, you know, second order,
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: third order thinking. It's just, no, this thing right now,
• 47:38
  Speaker 2: this feels left wing right now. This feels progressive, therefore
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: morally right. Right now, I'm not going to think about it.
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: Thinking about it hurts my head, and it gets me
• 47:46
  Speaker 2: in trouble with all my friends. So, no. In fact,
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: I think we should be censoring you. Yeah, it's everywhere
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: in the world that the mind virus takes over. It's
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: the same thing. It's just dysfunction. I want to show
• 48:06
  Speaker 2: you something here. Let's see. So, the eSafety Commissioner. is
• 48:13
  Speaker 2: a big part is a big authority in this new bill.
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: We'll have a lot of authority. Uh, if the bill
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: passes liberal Senator, uh, Maria Kovacic has just revealed Australia's
• 48:24
  Speaker 2: East safety commissioner makes her own policies and rules without
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: review of parliament, a bit authoritarian there. Let's take a look.
• 48:34
  Speaker 15: The East safety commissioners dual role in developing regular.
• 48:37
  Speaker 2: And again, the East safety commissioner is the person who
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: will be using this to, uh, take away everybody's freedom
• 48:43
  Speaker 2: of speech.
• 48:45
  Speaker 15: And enforcing her own policies is unique. But the concentration
• 48:51
  Speaker 15: of this authority is now raising concerns which may require
• 48:55
  Speaker 15: greater scrutiny, for example, through this parliament. We must ensure,
• 49:01
  Speaker 15: and this must always be the case with legislation and
• 49:05
  Speaker 15: with delegated legislation, that the operations of bodies do not
• 49:10
  Speaker 15: stray away from the intent of the Parliament when it
• 49:14
  Speaker 15: was first established. Let's be clear, the eSafety Commission is
• 49:20
  Speaker 15: not an elected position. Their decisions do not come before
• 49:24
  Speaker 15: the Parliament.
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: So, unelected bureaucrat with a lot of power over people
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: who never had a chance to not vote for her.
• 49:34
  Speaker 15: And for us to scrutinise. The remit of the eSafety
• 49:39
  Speaker 15: Commissioner without adequate safeguards is getting out of hand and
• 49:45
  Speaker 15: we must pause to consider this. Ensuring every adult logs
• 49:50
  Speaker 15: into an account to browse the internet is taking the
• 49:54
  Speaker 15: eSafety Commissioner's power to a new level which must be
• 49:59
  Speaker 15: debated and scrutinised further.
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: Is he says, don't worry, Canada will one-up what Australia
• 50:07
  Speaker 2: is doing. Well, Trudeau already tried to do that with,
• 50:10
  Speaker 2: was it Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, which is
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: being resurrected by Carney, by the way. But that had
• 50:18
  Speaker 2: pre-crime in it. So a judge could sentence you to
• 50:21
  Speaker 2: a year of house arrest and constant monitoring, monitoring your
• 50:25
  Speaker 2: blood to make sure you're not taking any of the
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: wrong things into your system, blocking you from the intranet.
• 50:33
  Speaker 2: Not because you've done anything, but because they think you
• 50:35
  Speaker 2: might do something. I do a hate on the Internet.
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: So thank God that didn't go through. But I'm sure
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: Carney wants to bring that back in again. That would
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: have been even worse than this. Let's see. Australia's e-safety commissioner,
• 50:48
  Speaker 2: Julie Inman Grant, is trying to censor the global Internet again.
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: This time she's demanding extra move a post by a
• 50:56
  Speaker 2: Belgian nationalist, Dries van Rensselaer. Langenhove about the racist murder
• 51:02
  Speaker 2: of Irina Zarutska in the US. So that's an inconvenient
• 51:07
  Speaker 2: story for leftists. So you have to censor it. People
• 51:11
  Speaker 2: like this have to censor it. Australia's censorship chief demands
• 51:15
  Speaker 2: extra move. Irina Zarutska posed by Belgian nationalist Let's see.
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: Australia's e-safety censorship commissioner, or commissar, we should say, Julie
• 51:25
  Speaker 2: Inman Grant, has featured none other than herself in the
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: latest taxpayer-funded propaganda on banning social media for under-16s, because
• 51:35
  Speaker 2: nothing makes more sense than an American citizen telling Australia... Yeah,
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: so she's an American there. And that's just one part
• 51:43
  Speaker 2: of the censorship agenda.
• 51:46
  Speaker 11: And.
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: Of course, they want to make sure that young people
• 51:50
  Speaker 2: aren't getting anything but the official orthodox views that the
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: government wants them to. Let's see. What do we have here?
• 52:06
  Speaker 2: New World Order. For social media accounts by Australia's Julie
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: Inman Grant, the eSafety Commissioner ignores Australian judge and continues
• 52:15
  Speaker 2: action against users in Europe. What is she? Why is she? Like,
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: why on earth would she be having continuing actions against Europeans? Like,
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: it's not enough for them to censor people in just
• 52:28
  Speaker 2: in one country. They have to censor the entire world.
• 52:31
  Speaker 2: Human Spective posted this. What's going on here?
• 52:36
  Speaker 9: We are there as a safety net or a backstop
• 52:38
  Speaker 9: to help remediate that harm.
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: Thank you.
• 52:41
  Speaker 16: Your remarks included this comment, quote, there are lots of
• 52:44
  Speaker 16: different tools in the toolbox we'll be using, end of quote.
• 52:47
  Speaker 16: What are those tools? Under what explicit power do you
• 52:50
  Speaker 16: possess them? And who supervises how.
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: You use them?
• 52:53
  Speaker 9: Well, all our powers are designated under the Online Safety Act.
• 52:56
  Speaker 9: We have a range of complaints schemes that deal with
• 52:59
  Speaker 9: youth-based cyberbullying, image-based abuse, adult cyber abuse, and the online
• 53:05
  Speaker 9: content scheme. And then we have systems and process powers
• 53:08
  Speaker 9: under the basic online safety expectations. And we have now
• 53:12
  Speaker 9: six codes registered and two standards that we're working on.
• 53:15
  Speaker 9: So those are the primary tools.
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: Thank you.
• 53:17
  Speaker 16: Who supervises how you use them?
• 53:20
  Speaker 9: We are there as a safety net.
• 53:22
  Speaker 2: Who supervises you? Got the exact same notification and 20-page
• 53:32
  Speaker 2: letter for one of my posts about Irina Zarutska's murder.
• 53:36
  Speaker 2: So that's Eva Vlardingerbroek, who is a conservative from the Netherlands,
• 53:42
  Speaker 2: who we've shown on this channel before. The Australian East
• 53:45
  Speaker 2: Safety Commissioner threatened to fine X $ 825, 000 for each day
• 53:50
  Speaker 2: the post would remain up. So it's now no longer
• 53:53
  Speaker 2: visible in Australia. To summarize that for you, Australians are
• 53:57
  Speaker 2: paying taxes... So bureaucrats, unelected bureaucrats, can censor posts from
• 54:02
  Speaker 2: European activists talking about the murder of a Ukrainian woman,
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: talking about the murder of a Ukrainian woman in America.
• 54:11
  Speaker 2: So I wonder if people like this are going to
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: abuse their power. I wonder. I kind of feel like
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: they will. I'm going out on a limb here. I'm
• 54:20
  Speaker 2: going to say yes. That's exactly what's going to happen.
• 54:24
  Speaker 2: All right, let's go back to the chat. What's going
• 54:26
  Speaker 2: on now? Anybody who's watching on Rumble right now, if
• 54:29
  Speaker 2: you've not been in the chat yet, please go in
• 54:32
  Speaker 2: the chat and become the best kind of person that
• 54:33
  Speaker 2: there is, which is a unique chatter. Because if you
• 54:35
  Speaker 2: do that and I get another 45 people become unique
• 54:39
  Speaker 2: chatters to say something once in the chat, just once
• 54:43
  Speaker 2: for the entire month, just got to do it once. Hi,
• 54:45
  Speaker 2: thumbs up, whatever random letters. Don't give a shit. Just
• 54:48
  Speaker 2: say something. Once you become the best kind of person,
• 54:50
  Speaker 2: there is a unique chatter. And then I get to
• 54:53
  Speaker 2: stay in the rumble creator program and continue to reap
• 54:56
  Speaker 2: in the meager pittance that I make every year or
• 55:01
  Speaker 2: every month from being in the creator program. So please
• 55:04
  Speaker 2: do that now. And I noticed that there was somebody.
• 55:07
  Speaker 2: Val Hallux, how you doing? Thank you so much. And
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: Val Hallux just became a unique chatter, which everybody knows
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: is the best kind of person that there is. Thank
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: you so much. Free good karma for you. I've said
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: it before. Val Hallux, pillar of Western civilization, salt of
• 55:24
  Speaker 2: the earth. Just decent. Just a decent, decent salt of
• 55:28
  Speaker 2: the earth human being that we all admire. Thank you
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: so much. Now, other people go in and become unique chatters,
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: and I will praise you as well. All right? So
• 55:38
  Speaker 2: just do it now. Let's see. Chicago Steak Company had what?
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: Let's go. Let's go right now. All right, folks. Cooler nights,
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: a hot grill, and a steakhouse dinner without leaving home.
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: That sounds like a good way to spend an evening.
• 55:56
  Speaker 2: Way better than hanging out with a bunch of goddamn dirty, lying,
• 56:00
  Speaker 2: filthy communists. And Chicago Steakhouse Company. Chicago Steak Company is
• 56:07
  Speaker 2: our sponsor, folks, and they make it easy to put
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: that dinner together with hand-selected, slowly aged, and cut steaks.
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: Right now, use code COOLDOWN, COOLDOWN, on a qualifying order
• 56:19
  Speaker 2: of $ 199 or more, and you'll get three pounds of
• 56:24
  Speaker 2: premium Angus filet mignon steak tips. Come on, people. Signature
• 56:29
  Speaker 2: steak seasoning, free standard shipping, and a $ 25 account credit.
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: Come on, that's a $ 240 in extras, folks. Come on.
• 56:40
  Speaker 2: So pick your steaks, get a few people around the table,
• 56:44
  Speaker 2: and keep the grill going for a few more evenings
• 56:47
  Speaker 2: outside as the weather cools down. Those extra steak tips
• 56:52
  Speaker 2: give you another dinner to look forward to as well.
• 56:55
  Speaker 2: which is awesome, that's my favorite part, follow the link
• 56:58
  Speaker 2: to Chicago Steak Company and enter COOLDOWN at checkout. That's C-O-O-L-D-O-W-N, C-O-O-L-D-O-W-N,
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: unqualifying orders of $ 199 or more. Come on, people, you
• 57:11
  Speaker 2: know what to do. Holy macaroni. I massacred that one.
• 57:26
  Speaker 2: And it's a beautiful ad. It's a beautiful ad copy. And,
• 57:28
  Speaker 2: of course, I really believe in Chicago Steak Company. It's
• 57:31
  Speaker 2: an awesome company. I encourage everybody to go there immediately
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: and get your steaks and your steak tips and filet
• 57:36
  Speaker 2: mignon and all that stuff. And what a deal it is.
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: But I massacred it. Oh, man, oh, man, oh, man, oh, man.
• 57:42
  Speaker 2: It's like I'd never read an ad before in my life.
• 57:46
  Speaker 2: I feel bad. I apologize to the company. I apologize
• 57:49
  Speaker 2: to all of you. I apologize to Rumble. I apologize
• 57:52
  Speaker 2: to Kick and Odyssey and X and Locals who all
• 57:54
  Speaker 2: had to hear me massacre that ad as well. My apologies, people.
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: I promise I will do better next time. And next
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: time you will feel the power of Chicago State Company
• 58:05
  Speaker 2: flowing through your veins. Izzy says, dead internet theory is
• 58:11
  Speaker 2: looking more and more true every day. Having government agents
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: likely running multiple bots to spread propaganda will only make
• 58:19
  Speaker 2: it worse. Yeah, well, a lot of, I mean, what
• 58:24
  Speaker 2: is the percentage? I mean, I've seen some stats where
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: it's like 60% of accounts online are bots. Seems like
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: a lot of, a good tell usually is that if
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: there's like a name and then a long string of
• 58:37
  Speaker 2: random numbers behind it, that's a good tell. Izzy says, yeah,
• 58:45
  Speaker 2: Canada is feeling like communist China. Well, Carney loves China.
• 58:49
  Speaker 2: He wants to make Canada as much like China as possible.
• 58:54
  Speaker 2: That's a link to the Tucker Carlson report. Izzy says,
• 58:57
  Speaker 2: should we do a link monkey right now? Let's do
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: a link monkey. Let's go. Copy that sucker. All right.
• 59:01
  Speaker 2: We're going to take a look at Izzy's link here
• 59:04
  Speaker 2: and see what he's, this better be good. Izzy This
• 59:07
  Speaker 2: better be good. I'm warning you right now. All right,
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: let's do a link monkey. Link monkey! And then we'll
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: paste that sucker in. This better be good, Izzy, or
• 59:19
  Speaker 2: you're dead meat. Let's see. Following Ukrainian strikes on Russia
• 59:24
  Speaker 2: data centers, I've been seeing something about this. Matt Tardio.
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: following Ukrainian strikes on Russian data centers. I saw something
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: about this earlier and I was going to talk about it.
• 59:35
  Speaker 2: I just didn't have time, but maybe later on in
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: the week, Tucker Carlson's views dropped 71%. He's been saying
• 59:45
  Speaker 2: some crazy shit. I mean, the first sign for me,
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: I guess, was when he had that historian on to
• 59:52
  Speaker 2: say that like Winston Churchill was actually the bad guy
• 59:55
  Speaker 2: and World War II. Winston Churchill was responsible for World
• 59:59
  Speaker 2: War II, which is insane and silly, and he wasn't
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 2: even prime minister when World War II started. Let's see.
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: Douglas MacGregor's views dropped 62%. Douglas MacGregor is, I think,
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: a smart guy. I've watched quite a lot of his
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 2: stuff on Ukraine. At this point, I can say that
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 2: most of what he said about Ukraine has not really happened.
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 2: It's not that he's wrong. It's just all going a
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 2: lot slower. than I was led to believe by watching
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 2: his analysis of it. But very, very, I think he's
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 2: become very, very anti-Trump, very, very kind of anti-America in
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: a lot of ways. I'm not saying he's not patriotic,
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 2: but he seems to have become a little bit deranged.
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: TCN views dropped 34%. So this is since the, uh, before, uh,
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 2: September 30th, October 6th, after October 8th to 12th partial.
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: So we know there's a lot of, of course there's
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 2: going to be bots. Of course, there's going to be
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: influence campaigns. So countries have been trying to, you know,
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 2: doing psyops literally forever, right? We have computers. Now you
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 2: have AIs and you can have AI bots doing it. Now, uh,
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 2: of course they've always been doing it. There's always been,
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 2: you know, like Russian active measures, you know, Soviet active
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: measures going on. Um, The United States has always been
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: doing the same thing. The Canadian government, everybody has done
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 2: it to some extent, right? But why wouldn't you use
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 2: a bunch of bots? If it's effective, why wouldn't you?
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: So obviously, there's a large number of bots out there,
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 2: which are just parts of different, varying, competing psyops. What's
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 2: this here? This just came up. What's going on here?
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 10: All right.
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 2: Let's go back here again. What else are you guys
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 2: talking about? The Australian news is shocking, Rosie says. Rosie
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 2: is correct. Family birthday tonight. Extra people here. Have a
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 2: nice time, Rosie. Let's see. Now, I've seen that whole
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 2: I don't know anything about this. I need to go
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 2: in and take a look, but something, a Russian data
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 2: center or bot farm or something being bombed. But I'd
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 2: seen a couple of things. I think they're blaming like
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 2: drops on everything on that so far. So I need
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 2: to get into it. We'll probably look at it later
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: on this week, but I need to spend an hour
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 2: or two looking into it. Let's see. All right. All right.
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: Let's move on then. So what are we, seven? We
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: got about 40 minutes left. So we did that. We
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: did this. We did this. What's going on here? Food
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 2: Professor posted this. According to Nanos Research this morning, 79%
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: of Canadians support Canada negotiating associate membership with the EU.
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: even though not a single person can explain what that entails.
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: Fascinating world we live in. Well, the reason that nobody
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 2: can explain what it entails is because it's not a
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: real category. It's a made-up category within which, you know,
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 2: it's a made-up category that will be inhabited with whatever
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 2: the ulterior motives of Ursula von der Leyen and Mark
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: Carney are. But it's not a real thing. It's something
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 2: that's been made up. So yet nobody really, nobody actually knows.
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: I mean, here's Nanos poll, Globe and Mail and Nanos.
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: I believe this is the same poll. Let's see. Canada's
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: international trade priorities. Now, this will be terrifying when you
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: find out what Canadians are thinking. Thinking about Canada's international
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: trade strategy, which of the following should be Canada's top
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: priority over the next five years? Unfortunately, I mean, this
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 2: does describe, this explains the polling in Canada right now,
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 2: Carney's approval numbers. 41% think the priority for Canada should
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: be the European Union on trade. This is because they
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: have no idea about trade, about Canada's trade, where Canada's
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 2: exporting to and what the prospects are, what the European
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: Union is like. Is it very protectionist? I think it
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: actually is. Let's see, United States, only one in five Canadians, 20%,
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: one in five Canadians think that the United States should
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: be Canada's top priority over the next five years in
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: terms of trade. That's a really bad sign for the
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 2: future of Canada, that one in five, only one in five,
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 2: 20% think it should be the United States, 41% think
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: it should be the European Union. uh canada for one
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 2: thing if canada did become actually become a full member
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 2: of the eu that would just be a suicide pact
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 2: and then everything below that uh associate membership or whatever
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 2: is just you know maybe not a suicide pact but
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: uh i don't know what's less than suicide just.
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 8: A uh.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: I don't know. God damn it, my brain. I need
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 2: more coffee. Hold on a second. Full membership of the
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 2: European Union would be a suicide pact, and everything underneath
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: that would just be degrees less, but not healthy. There's
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 2: nothing healthy there. Not if people are imagining that somehow
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 2: that's going to replace trade from the United States. It
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: certainly is not. Let me show you something. Top destinations
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 2: for Canadian merchandise exports. Well, there's the United States, $ 562 billion.
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: Next up, United Kingdom, $ 46. 7 billion. Next up, European Union, $ 42. 8 billion.
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: So to put this into perspective... To put this into perspective,
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: this $ 42. 8 billion, the LNG Canada Phase 2 project, LNG
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 2: project in Kitimat, that's a $ 33 billion project. All of
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 2: our exports to the EU are $ 42 billion. So even
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: if we doubled that, and that would be great. If
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: we could do that, it'd be great. We're not going
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 2: to do that. That's an impossible ask. But even if
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 2: we did, it's still nothing. That is not going to
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 2: save Canada. We need to preserve as much of this
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: as possible, the U.S. stuff, because guess what? We're right
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 2: next door. We're right next door with all those handy
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: roads and railways and stuff right there. It's really easy
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 2: to get stuff there. And on one side, there's a
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 2: giant ocean. On the other side, there's another giant ocean.
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: And in the north, there's a frozen wasteland. So to
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 2: sell to other places, we have to ship it thousands
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: of miles, whatever it is. Now, the European Union would
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 2: love to get more of our energy, that's for sure,
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 2: but that's pretty much it. Like Dan Aykroyd with his
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 2: Crystal Skull Vodka Company, who's just on the news on
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: American news, talking about how he's going to have to
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 2: shut it down because the U.S. retaliated for Canada banning
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 2: American booze off the shelves by just banning Canadian booze.
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 2: And it turns out that The United States buys way
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: more Canadian booze than we buy American booze in Canada.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 2: So the EU is not going to run to Dan
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 2: Aykroyd's rescue on that because they don't want his vodka.
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 2: They don't want anything made in a factory in Canada.
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 2: What they want is energy. So this is a fantasy.
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 2: It's a totally wasted attention. It's wasted hopes, right? Hold
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: on a second. Where was that? There it is. So
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 2: 41% of Canadians think that that should be the priority
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: over the next five years. So there's not much really
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: to gain there with the European Union. It's certainly not
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 2: going to offset trade that is lost to the United States.
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: It's actually insane. It's insanely stupid. There's that China, by
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 2: the way, with $ 35 billion in fourth place. for Canadian exports.
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: Carney loves them too. He loves these two, European Union
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: and China. Neither of these is going to save Canada.
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: They'll take advantage of Canada. They'll use Canada as a
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 2: bargaining chip against the United States to get better terms
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 2: for themselves. It's just depressing. When will we get responsible leadership?
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 2: With polling like this, Never? Not now. Anyway, not for
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 2: a while. All right. By the way, United States versus
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: European Union at GDP used to be kind of pretty
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 2: much parallel there. And yeah, the United States is now
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: just taking off and leaving the EU far, far behind.
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 2: So maybe not the best guys to hit your wagon to,
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: the rotting, the crumbling edifice that is the EU. All right.
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 2: All right. All right, all right. Let's get back to
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: the chat. Let's get back to the chat. Hold on
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: a second. Did anything exciting happening? Something beautiful has happened
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 2: in the chat. I am seeing right here. I can't
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: believe my eyes. I'm looking. I'm pinching myself. Am I dreaming?
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 2: Am I dreaming? Am I awake? I'm awake. Apparently, I'm awake.
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: PenguinHunter63 has raided the stream, people. PenguinHunter has raided the stream.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: What kind of person would rate our stream? I mean,
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: what a beautiful, beautiful, I mean, so human. It's such
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: a human act, isn't it? Such a perfect human act.
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 2: So much empathy. The lefties say they got empathy. They
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: got empathy like this. They don't got empathy like Penguin Hunter,
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: I'm telling you right now. Only the best person ever
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 2: would rate this channel. And I'm going to prove it
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: right now. Best person ever. Let's go. And all I'm
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 2: saying is that anybody who hasn't rated the stream on
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: Rumble is human garbage. That's all I'm saying. Best person ever.
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 2: How many can there be?
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: There can be only one.
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: Sorry about smashing your windows, Penguin Hunter. That always happens
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: when people become the best person ever. There can be
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 2: only one. Thanks, Penguin Hunter. Everybody go over and subscribe
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: to Penguin Hunter right now, right this second. Don't leave
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: it a second longer than you need to. Go over
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: there and do it right now. Come on, people. Let's go.
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 2: Let's just go. Get over there right now. I know
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 2: you want to do it, and you're not going to
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: regret it, and you're going to love it, and you're
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: going to thank me afterwards. So go. All right.
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 4: Dr.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: Phil, how you doing?
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 5: Good.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 2: What's going on? Rosie says, comparing this chart with the
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: last one you showed is the perfect illustration of stupid.
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: You're not talking about me. Let's see. No, it's Canada.
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: It's Canada. Let's see. Izzy says, 1% for India, but
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 2: that seems to be Cardi's priority. Well, you know, if
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: we can just ship him a couple of more... crates
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 2: of maple syrup. That'll save it. That'll save Canada. Let's see.
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: Rosie asked, did I miss the steak ad? Was there
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 2: enough commie hate? Well, there was commie hate.