Latest / The Mark Simone Show / Mark's 11am Monologue.

Transcript

Mark's 11am Monologue. · The Mark Simone Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Now the Mark Simone Show on seven ten woor Filling
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: in for Mark, here's Ken Rosatto. It's so nice to
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: be with you the day before Thanksgiving, Mark and join
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: in ice long weekend. Former New York City TV news
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: actor Ken Rosado in the seat. I feel very privileged
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: to be in this seat. I always feel like when
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: I get up from the seat, I kind of brush
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: it off from Mark to make sure it's back to
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: the way it was. For those who may or may
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: not remember, I'll remind you I was at Channel seven
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: here in New York doing the morning and noon show
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: there for about twenty years. A great time there, and
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: then prior to that, I was a Channel five. A
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: lot of people don't remember. I did Good Day Wake
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: Up for about a year and before I went to seven,
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: but it was also a lot of fun. I still
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: have friends there and these days I work at a
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: New Jersey based TV news channel. It's called on New
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: Jersey and you could stream it live or watch reruns
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: that we do at o NNJ dot COMNNJ dot com
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: little shameless plug for my chain, and it's a good
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: time there too. I run a food website too for
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: you foodies, called the food Dude. You can check it
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: out at the food dude dot Us. The food Dude
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: dot Us. A lot to talk about today. I'm sure
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: you've heard about the US District Judge Cameron McCowan Curry.
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: That's the radical leftist activist Biden appointee. Does that sound
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: negative on my part? Who threw out the James Comy
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: and Letitia James indictments. And of course Komy, he's so smug,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: He's so smug. But methinks James Comy is not going
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: to end up happy at the end, because even if
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: he doesn't get convicted of anything, I think the point
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: of the Justice Department's actions are to make it so
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: that James Comy spends so much money defending himself that
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: he will be bankrupt. And I think that's the point.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Does that sound malicious? Yes? Is it something the Democrats
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: have a PhD In doing it to Republicans over the years.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: Apps so frickin' loutely, And it's about they get a
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: little taste of their own medicine. Same thing with little
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: tissue James. You know she thinks she's off the hook,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: you know, Tish. Sorry, Tish, you sign allegedly signed all
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: these documents saying that you would have as your primary
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: residence your residence in Virginia when you are the attorney
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: general of the state of New York and must have
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: there's a residency requirement here. Than who are you lying to?
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Maybe you should leave the position of Attorney general in
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: New York, right because technically you're saying that Virginia's your
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: primary residence, so you should leave your position. That's what
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: you're saying. You lied to somebody, Either you lied on
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: your documents in Virginia or you lied to the people
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: of New York saying that this was your primary residence
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: when it wasn't. So one has to give. You can't
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: have both simultaneously. They're mutually exclusive. And of course her
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: argument was that the prosecutor her the judge in this
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: case who threw out the cases. The argument was the
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: prosecutor appointed by Trump was no longer legally in power
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: because it was a temporary an interim appointment by the
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: Justice Department, so the cases had to be thrown out. Well,
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: before you get too excited, the cases were dismissed in
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: a way called without prejudice. To explain that is, the
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: big professor at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley, listen up.
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: Poleticia James took a bit of a victory lap after
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: this decision, and I think she missed the two words
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: that followed dismissal, and it was dismissal without prejudice. So
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: the Trump administration, even if they lose on appeal, could
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: seek out a new indictment. This is not over for James,
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: or call me. The judge specifically said, I am not
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: going to grant your motion to dismiss with prejudice. I'm
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: going to allow them to cure this problem.
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: So this means the Justice Department can refile the charges
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: if they want to ensure Comy and James, if they
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: want to ensure those charges will be refiled. Keep gloating,
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: keep besmirching the Trump administration, you will guarantee or be
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: guaranteed that you will be back in court very soon.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: The Trump administration apparently will first appeal the act of
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: as judge's decision to the Fourth US Circuit Court of
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, which used to be considered kind
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: of a conservative court, but in recent years because of
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: Biden packing the courts with left wing extremists, on purpose.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: It's not so much. It's more to the left. But
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: you know, the people who are in those districts who
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: would be on the grand jury, they tend to still
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: be a little right of center. So we'll see what
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: happens if it gets to that point. Seven ten wo
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: R The Voice of New York. It's Ken Rosanto in
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: for Mark and New Jersey lawmakers also have been busy.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: They've been talking about all sorts of stuff. They want
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: to ban ice agents and other law enforcement who interact
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: with the public from wearing masks or disguises. There's a
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: bill that they introduced. It would allow undercover officers those
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: wearing shields that don't cover their faces or medical masks,
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: but they cannot wear something that specifically covers their masks.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: It covers their faces rather not revealing their identities to
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: people on the street. And violators would face fines of
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: up to one thousand dollars and could get up to
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: six months in jail. But apparently they have not seen
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: something called the Constitution and the supremacy clause. So allow
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: me to read what the supremacy clause is. It's Article six,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: paragraph two of the US Constitution. It says quote, a
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: state or municipality cannot pass a law that interferes with
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: the execution of federal law or the duties of federal agents.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: So maybe the good state senators in New Jersey and
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: maybe they missed that day in school and our later
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: in this hour, in our next half hour, we will
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: speak with Congressional candidate Billy Prempa. He is a Republican
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: running for Congress in New Jersey's ninth congressional district, and
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: we'll talk to him about the foolishness of states or
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: local municipalities trying to pass what are obviously just symbolic
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: laws that cannot be enforced. And also in New Jersey,
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: funding for beach replenishment was eliminated in the fiscal twenty
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: twenty five federal budget, and that could spell trouble for
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: the New Jersey Sure only four of the twelve required
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: federal spending bills passed. The bill that would fund the
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: Army Corps of Engineers is now under continuing resolution thanks
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: to the Democrats. Without federal dollars, many New Jersey beach
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: towns are going to have to self fund erosion control
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: or look for another solution. Well, some local officials are
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: even looking into new erosion control systems that would be
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: less expensive, including offshore sand filled barriers. That's what they
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: do down in Florida, by the way, because if they
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: had to replenish the sand after every storm, they'd have
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: been bankrupt decades ago. So look to states like Florida,
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: Texas or even other countries where they're constantly figuring a
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: way to preserve their sand. So now question is, with
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: the Continuing Resolution still providing funding at last year's level,
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: why does New Jersey need so much more money in
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: this year's budget? I mean, seriously, how much more expensive
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: is it to preserve your shore this year versus last
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: Did the Army Corps engineers like jack up their prices?
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: You know, we didn't have a big event like Superstorm Sandy.
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: So why do you think it's going to be so
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: much more money this year to replenish your shoreline. It's
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: because democrats in a state like New Jersey are always
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: looking for more money, more money, more money, more money.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: In their mindset, just can't get enough. It's his money,
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: money money, and it's about taking it from you and
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: giving it to me. If the state of New Jersey
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: wasn't wasting billions upon billions of dollars to pay for
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: the nine hundred thousand plus illegal aliens that we currently
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: know of, let alone the countless more that we and
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: I say week as I live in New Jersey. Not
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: counting the countless more that we don't know of, New
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: Jersey would have tons of extra money without having to
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: raise taxes. It's liberals in New Jersey who simply do
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: not put two and two together, nor do they care
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: to do so. To realize that if you want lower
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: electric rates, less congestion on highways, teachers who could take
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: better care of your child because there would be fewer
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: students per classroom, not to mention lower crime, stop voting
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Democrat in order to change the state's sanctuary status so
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: as not to permit this huge number of illegal aliens.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: And this is not an anti immigrant sentiment because my
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: family are immigrants. This is an anti illegal immigrant sentiment,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: So stop conflating all immigrants with illegal immigrants. If the
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: immigrants were here illegally, they'd be paying taxes, they would
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: have Social Security numbers, they would be contributing members of society. Okay,
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: we would have kids that we could account for in
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: schools and with the additional local taxes the parents would
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: be paying. We could build more schools and hire more teachers,
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: but under the current federal law, we have to educate
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: every student who comes in, whether legal or not. If
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: they don't speak English, we have to hire teachers who
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: can speak multiple languages, and that costs even more. Plus
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: we have to provide two to three meals a day
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: at public schools for all students, including the children of
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: the illegal migrants, under the law. Liberals love to use
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: the word sustainable. Sustainable, Well, look, it is simply not
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: sustainable in the state of New Jersey when ten percent
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: of the current population is illegal. Think about that. How
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: staggering is that a ten one in ten people in
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: the state of New Jersey that we know of, that's
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: an absolute fact that we know of, is an illegal alien.
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: That is the approximate number, probably more than that. At
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: what point do we say enough is enough? You just
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: can't have an open door and let anybody in and
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: expect that it's not going to have a negative, deleterious
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: impact on our community. Do we stop when it's fifty
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: percent of illegal aliens? It's ridiculous. We literally have handed over
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: our nation to anybody who wanted it for the t taking.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: And you could thank the Democrats and the Biden administration
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: for the last four years for doing that to us.
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: That's exactly the legacy of Joe Biden and the Democrats.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: But yet they get rewarded for it because you have
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: liberal Democrats especially and I might let me let me
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: single out some groups tends to be white liberal women
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: who are like thirty thirty five and under. They specifically
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: they're like the largest group of hardcore Democrats who will
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: never vote anything else. I know you're going to say,
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: I'm a Republican kid, I read it.
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: No.
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: But when in terms of groups and painting a broad
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: brush there, that group seems to be like unapologetically Democrat,
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: you cannot even bring it up with that group. For
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: whatever reason, I think a lot of brainwashing in school
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: and on social media has to do with that. Seven
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: ten wo r the Voice of New York Ken Rosatto
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: in for Mark the phone lines are open eight hundred
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: three two one zero seven ten. Hey. There was a
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: New Rutgers University led climate study trying to ski the
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: dickens out of people into thinking New Jersey could see
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: up to a three point eight foot sea level rise
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: by the year twenty one hundred under current carbon emission.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: By the way, whenever I do liberal talk, I'm going
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: to add a lisp. I have that prerogative. That number
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: could rise to four point five feet if ice sheet
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: melt accelerates. I'll tell you what. Let's give cows broccoli
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: to eat, and their farts will cause the oceans to
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: rise a bazillion feet. I mean, scientists warned. Can I
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: say farts?
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: Oh?
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: Okay, Mark doesn't say farts, does he? Okay, let's say flatulence.
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, so rewind the tape. Is okay, good, So
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: we'll say flatchelo. Okay, replace the word farts with flatulence.
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: Good science has warned that flood risk is increasing rapidly
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: across the state, particularly for coastal and tidal river communities.
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: That's the quote they gave us from Rutgers. Now, it
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: should be mentioned that many environmental studies make these scary
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: predictions that can never be proven. Rush Limbay used to
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: talk about this, God Rest your soul, Rush, because by
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: the time this would come true, you and I are
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: going to be dead. Twenty one hundred. That's the year
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: twenty one hundred. Let's see I'll be one hundred and
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: how many years old. Not, so why don't we all
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: get together in seventy five years and see if it
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: was true. Every prediction these liberals, environmentalists, they've all made.
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: It has not come to pass, none of it. It
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: should also be mentioned, by the way, the organizations that
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: finance studies like this one at Rutgers only finance studies
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: that set out to prove sea levels arising and the
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: cause is human negligence. You do not get the financing
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: unless that is the premise. So in others, if I say, well,
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: I'll take a look at whether humans have an influence
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: on the environment and sea levels rising, you don't get
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: the money. So an organization like Rutgers says, okay, we're
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: going to set out to prove this is so, now
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: they get one hundred million dollar just making up the
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: number one hundred million. Now they get one hundred million.
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: They go out and they could finance whatever classes and
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: they could run these studies. But you have to have
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: that as the premis. So you start out on a
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: liberal premise. So just to qualify that's what you have
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: to say. It's unbelievable. Nowhere in the equation is whether
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: sea levels are actually rising? Are humans impacting sea levels?
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: Is carbon emission? Because these leftist radical scientists environmentalists are
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: convinced that humans are causing too much carbon to be
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: emitted and that the excess carbon is raising temperatures, and
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: the temperatures are melting polarized caps, and the polarized caps
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: melting or causing sea levels to rise. So they start
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: off with that foregone conclusion. Then they ask scientists and
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: collegists to reinforce their crackpot theories that can't be proven
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: by giving them lots of money they get from environmentalists,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: wacko donors, and liberal government entities. Now, there are a
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: lot of scientists who don't believe those theories at all.
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: They believe climate is changing, but they don't believe humans
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: have a significant impact. Maybe a tiny one, but not
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: much because the climate has been changing way for humans
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: came and way after humans are going to be gone.
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: Climate has always changed. Just look at history, and there
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: is a way to do that by taking ice core samples,
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: et cetera. The Earth has gotten warmer, then it's gotten colder,
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: then it's gotten warmer, then it's gotten colder. Greenland perfect example.
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: The name Greenland is called greenland because it used to
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: be green. Now it's ice covered. So yes, there is
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: climate change, but humans didn't cause it because it turned
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: icy way before we had carbon emissions like this. There's
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: documentation all about it, but we could talk about that
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: on and on and on. Just don't take what the
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: liberals are saying seriously and always take these studies with
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: a grain of salt. Seven ten w R The Voice
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: of New York Mark taking a nice long weekend today,
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: Ken Rozotto filling and taken calls at eight hundred and
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: three to two one zero seven ten. Whatever you want
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: to talk about, politics, even Thanksgiving recipes, anything, and coming
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: up later in the show, we'll talk with New Jersey
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: Republican congressional candidate Billy Preppa about the Garden State's new
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: bill to make it illegal for ice agents to wear masks.
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: It's eleven twenty one wires what you're listening to, and
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: we're coming right back