Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / The Epstein Cover-Up Question: Congress Demands Answers From Pam Bondi

Transcript

The Epstein Cover-Up Question: Congress Demands Answers From Pam Bondi · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
0:03
Epstein Chronicles. When it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, there's a
0:07
lot of questions that remain unanswered. But I don't think
0:11
there's any question that we're witnessing one of the biggest
0:15
cover ups in the history of America. And the person
0:20
at the helmet that cover up is Pam Bondy. Now,
0:23
of course she gets her marching orders from Donald Trump,
0:27
but she doesn't have to follow his directions if she
0:29
doesn't want to. She's doing it willingly. She's doing it
0:33
because she cares more about protecting Donald Trump, the administration,
0:37
and the donors than she does about justice. And she's
0:41
brazen about it. It's not like she's, you know, being COI.
0:46
She showed up to that hearing ready to scrap, right,
0:50
had a hit list the whole thing out here, like
0:53
it's a battle. Rap lady. We're talking about thousands of
0:56
people who were abused and a whole last country who
1:00
is onto your bullshit and who is tired of being
1:03
lied to and deceived. And she gets up there with
1:06
so much contempt for the rest of us, right, Oh,
1:10
she'll couch it as I'm just being somebody who's strong
1:14
for the administration. But that's not your job. Your job
1:18
is to pursue justice wherever it leads, even if it
1:21
leads to the White House. That's your job. Your job,
1:26
Todd Blanche's job is not to protect the administration from embarrassment.
1:30
It's to follow the law and to do as Congress
1:33
instructs you. But of course Poumbondy and the rest of
1:38
the wild out of controlled knuckleheads that are running the DOJ,
1:42
they're doing whatever they want. So once again I ask you,
1:46
when is Congress going to step in and stop them?
1:51
Today we have an article from USA Today and the
1:53
headline it's up to Congress to disrupt paum BONDI is
1:56
Epstein cover up. This article was authored by Chris Brennan.
2:01
US Attorney General Pammondy and the Department of Justice have
2:04
been openly violating a federal law for two and a
2:07
half months to shield President Donald Trump from transparency in
2:11
the metastasizing Epstein file scandal. One hundred percent. And look,
2:18
let me say it again, I don't think that we've
2:22
seen the evidence that points to Donald Trump taking part
2:25
in this abuse, not concrete evidence, But I do think
2:29
that there was certainly enough of an allegation and strong
2:34
enough allegations for there to have been a real investigation
2:38
into those allegations made against Donald Trump. And the big
2:42
problem here is that that information, the three to zero two's,
2:46
and the corresponding documentation that go along with it, were
2:50
hidden from us. So that's a big problem, and it
2:54
leads people to ask the question, if there's nothing to see,
2:59
why are you hiding it? And that's why I'm telling
3:01
you that the cover up is going to be worse
3:03
than anything for all of these people that are involved,
3:06
mark my words. And now Bondi will get a second
3:10
chance at explaining herself in Congress, but based on her
3:14
last performance before the US House Judiciary Committee in February,
3:18
expect only more pathetic theatrics and zero acceptance of accountability.
3:23
At some point, that has to end. And you know
3:27
what's going to happen, right The next administration's gonna take
3:29
the reins, and then when their person gets up there
3:33
to be questioned, they're gonna have the same exact theatrics,
3:37
the same historiotics, and then the other side is going
3:40
to cry about that. But remember that you're cheering for
3:44
Pam Bondi and her bullshit, So that means that you're
3:48
approving it, right, So when it happens from the other side,
3:51
I don't want to hear shit, but you know you're
3:54
going to because that's the way it goes. If my
3:57
quote unquote teams doing it, it's okay. But if the
4:00
other side does it, time to throw a fit. Meanwhile,
4:04
those of us who haven't been ensorcelled by either side
4:08
are looking at both sides saying, you're ruining the country.
4:11
Stop your bullshit. It's time to come to the middle
4:14
and have some discussions. But no, let's just dig those
4:18
bunkers deeper. It's all hell attire some honestly, and it's
4:22
exactly what these people want. Still, something is shifted since
4:27
Bondi rolled into that February eleventh House hearing with pre printed,
4:31
dim witted insults for the Democrats who wanted to know
4:34
why so many documents from the Epstein files, especially ones
4:38
naming Trump, have been withheld from public release or deleted
4:42
from the DOJ's website soon after being released. Hold up,
4:45
are these the same Democrats that just voted for us
4:48
not to see the hush fund? You know, the one
4:50
that other buddies used to pay off accusers who accused them.
4:55
Talk about hypocrisy, and this is what I mean. It's
4:58
both sides playing politics, trying to throw some red meat
5:02
to their base, and it's all getting very, very tiresome.
5:06
And at some point the adults need to step up
5:09
and take the reins back. The problem is we don't
5:13
have any adults left in the room, just a bunch
5:15
of wanna be influencers plan politics. Republicans largely Backbondie after
5:21
her last hearing, even after the Attorney General inadvertently revealed
5:24
that her department was secretly tracking what members of Congress
5:28
searched for when given private access to unredacted Epstein files.
5:32
Oh I'm pretty sure they're searching everybody. So if you
5:36
access those files, they're probably logging it. Oh what you
5:40
think that's above them? I don't remember who we're dealing
5:44
with here. People that would actually try and glaze over
5:48
what Jeffrey Epstein did. They're capable of anything. Now. Five
5:55
Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee joined
5:59
all of the Democrats on March fourth to vote twenty
6:02
four to nineteen to subpoenal Bondi to explain why she
6:05
has been instrumental in orchestrating the White House's cover up
6:09
of the Epstein files. Well, let's be very clear, Okay,
6:13
She's just doing what she's told to do. The person
6:16
at the head of this whole entire cover up is
6:19
Donald Trump. He's the one giving all the orders. He's
6:22
the one telling these people what they should and shouldn't do.
6:26
And in my opinion, the buck should stop with him. Now.
6:30
Of course Pam Bondi should go. There's no doubt about it.
6:33
She's not capable of doing this job. Where all those
6:37
arrests for, you know, the election. I thought the election
6:39
was stolen. What happened to that? I thought Letitia James
6:42
was going to prison and James Gomi and everybody else
6:46
anybody in prison. How those prosecutions going. But the good
6:50
news is the Dow was over fifty for a minute.
6:55
US Representative Nancy Mace, a Republican from South Carolina who
6:59
was pushed for the release of the Epstein files, said
7:01
in a social media post, the committee wants to know
7:04
why the DOJ is more focused on shielding the powerful
7:07
than delivering justice. Pretty simple, her boss told her to.
7:12
I mean, are they really that dense. They don't understand
7:15
what's going on here. We know the answer to that.
7:18
They know what's going on, but they're playing politics. Notice
7:22
none of them talk about the NPA or getting rid
7:24
of it. Instead they focus on this shit. And I
7:28
got to tell you it's all performative. What's going to
7:30
happen to Bondi anyway? Even if she perjures herself again,
7:34
nobody's going to do anything, not like she's going to
7:36
be sanctioned, not like anyone's going to step up to
7:39
the table and do their job from an oversight standpoint,
7:43
So what's it even matter? It looks like Bondi will
7:48
finally face some tough questions from members of her own
7:51
political party about she has botched the release of the
7:54
Epstein files and that's long overdue. Well, I would say so,
7:59
but I have my doubt if the Republicans are going
8:01
to hold her accountable. They haven't done so yet, but
8:04
they're going to now. And frankly, as terrible as Christy
8:08
Nome is at her job, Pam Bondy is just as bad.
8:14
I mean, you're going to get rid of Christine Ome,
8:16
you might as well get rid of Pam Bondy. Right.
8:18
Let them both go and be part of the Shield
8:20
of Americas, whatever the fuck that is. And speaking of
8:24
the Shield of Americas, how much does that cost in me?
8:29
US Representative Thomas Massey, a Republican from Kentucky who co
8:32
sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, was the only member
8:36
of his party who challenged the Attorney General in the
8:38
February eleventh hearing. Massy later mock Bondi's performance on social
8:43
media and then did news interviews to criticize her. And now,
8:47
of course they're coming at Massy hard. A whole bunch
8:50
of people with Arab or Islamic last names donated to
8:54
Massy and they're trying to make it out like it's
8:58
Hesbela who who is donating to Massi, or like Hamas
9:02
showed up in mass No pun intended to give Massi
9:06
some money. But the truth is it's citizens who gave
9:09
him this money, who happened to be Arabic or happen
9:12
to be Muslim, who agree with what Massi's doing and
9:17
what's wrong with that, But they're not entitled to do
9:19
the same thing. They can't donate money because they're a
9:22
different religion or something. I don't get it. What's the
9:25
beef here, especially as they rake in a bunch of
9:28
foreign money of their own. So I don't understand the
9:31
criticism when it comes to that, especially because it's private
9:35
citizens who are donating the money. Now, if the country
9:38
of Katar was donating money to Thomas Massey, you better
9:41
believe I'd have some questions. But when you have private
9:45
citizens doing it, people should mind their business. Worry about
9:48
your own bag, worry about your own money, worry about
9:51
who you're donating to, worry about what you're doing. Probably
9:55
a good idea. Bondi made herself an easy target for critics,
10:01
and that hearing. Her testimony was all about defending Trump
10:04
well dodging questions about the Epstein files. At one point,
10:08
she declared that the Dow Jones Industrial average is over
10:11
fifty thousand right now, and that's what we should be
10:13
talking about at a hearing about Epstein. Let's talk about
10:17
the Dow. Nah, there's no cover up here. You have
10:21
to be head all the way in the sand to
10:24
not see that there is a cover up here, that
10:26
there's been a cover up here and there continues to
10:28
be one. And unless we force the issue, that shit's
10:31
going to continue. The Dow Jones is now below forty
10:35
eight thousand. By Bondi's logic, if you dare to call
10:38
it that, we're now free again to talk about the
10:41
Epstein files. Well, isn't that nice? The Pambondi rules, the
10:46
rule of the Dow will call it. If it's over
10:48
fifty thousand, hush, hush, we can only talk about the Dow,
10:51
nothing else. But if it's under fifty thousand, we'll all
10:55
bet her off. Is this lady insane? Like? Seriously, what
11:00
is wrong with her? The Epstein Files Transparency Act was
11:04
passed in the House and Senate in November, with all
11:07
Democrats in support and just one Republican voting against it.
11:12
That was four hundred and twenty seven to one, and Trump,
11:15
who desperately tried to defeat the legislation, reluctantly signed it
11:19
into law while insisting the files were some sort of hoax,
11:23
a show of disrespect to the women who accused Epstein
11:26
of abuse and are still calling for justice. And that's
11:29
one of the biggest problems. When this dude came out
11:32
and called it a hoax and called people traders, he
11:35
declared war and the independence out there they were listening,
11:40
and that's why he's losing all that support. With independence. Now,
11:43
of course, with the war popping off, that's going to
11:46
get some people rallied around them. There's no doubt that's
11:49
what war does, right, People rally around the flag, rally
11:52
around their country, and they want to win the war.
11:54
I get it, But me personally, I'm not getting thrown
11:58
off the scent. I'm going to continue talking about this,
12:02
continued demanding transparency, continued demanding justice, just like I have
12:07
been for the last seven years. And guess what, when
12:10
the hostilities with Iran finally come to an end, and
12:14
they will, this story's still going to be there. It's
12:17
not going anywhere. The law set a December nineteenth deadline
12:21
for the DOJ toor release the documents compiled during investigations
12:25
into Trump's former friend, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein,
12:28
who died in federal prison in twenty nineteen during Trump's
12:32
first term while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. The
12:36
files also cover the crimes a convicted sex trafficker, Gallaine Maxwell,
12:41
Epstein's longtime accomplice, who is now serving a twenty year
12:44
prison sentence. While Trump openly muses about pardoning her bro
12:48
That would just be one of the worst decisions in
12:52
the history of worst decisions. Imagine pardoning Glaine Maxwell. Good God.
12:59
The law call for tans parency, But the DOJ has
13:02
released only about half the six million documents in the
13:06
Epstein files, and Bondi insisted in a February letter to Congress,
13:10
just three days after her disastrous Judiciary Committee stunt, that
13:14
all the Epstein files had been released. Clearly, the job
13:19
is not done if the only job is protecting Trump,
13:22
and I honestly have no idea how you can look
13:24
at this is anything but that at this point, protecting
13:29
Trump and the people that donated to Trump and the
13:31
people around them. Media outlets for weeks have been scrutinizing
13:35
the Epstein files as they trickled out in batches well
13:39
passed the December nineteenth deadline. Some documents that mentioned or
13:43
picture Trump vanished from the DOJ website after journalists viewed them.
13:48
And if you don't think that they're logging us as well,
13:50
you're crazy. They are. I wouldn't be surprised if they're
13:53
making a database. On February twenty sixth, the Justice Department
13:58
said that it would investigate whether it improperly withheld or
14:02
deleted files, including FBI interviewed summaries of a woman who
14:06
told agents in twenty nineteen that Trump had sexually assaulted
14:10
her when she was a minor. The Wall Street Journal
14:14
on March third reported that the DOJ had withheld more
14:18
than four forty thousand documents from the Epstein files, including
14:22
that woman's unverified allegations against Trump. A spokesperson told the
14:27
journal that forty seven thousand, six hundred and thirty five
14:30
files were taken offline and that the department was conducting
14:34
a review. Another review. Huh. I guess all that time
14:37
you had previously with all those lawyers wasn't good enough,
14:41
or is it? You guys just missed it and you
14:44
had to go back and reevaluate. God forbid. President Trump
14:47
is embarrassed. And just to be clear, I'm not saying
14:51
that those allegations are true. I don't know what I
14:54
am telling you, and what I'm confident about is that
14:57
no real investigation took place. My beef, and I know
15:01
I sound like a broken record at this point, but
15:03
time for special counsel. The Department of Justice on March
15:08
fifth told USA Today that it was restoring about fifty
15:11
thousand documents that had been removed from its website. After
15:15
media scrutiny drew attention to the matter. On March six,
15:19
DOJ released FBI interviews with a woman whose accusations the
15:23
White House called completely baseless and look they might be.
15:28
Can we have a real investigation? Though? Is that too
15:30
much to ask? God forbid? What if it was your daughter?
15:36
Let's date the obvious point here. A government agency credibly
15:39
accused of running a cover up to protect the president
15:42
can't credibly review the behavior of the people accused of
15:45
running the cover up, point blank period. Bondi proved that recently, when,
15:51
in response to a growing tide of ethics complaints file
15:53
with the state Bar Association against DOJ lawyers, she proposed
15:57
a way to stall independent investigation into that behavior. She
16:02
offered a new federal regulation that would suspend bar association
16:05
probes until the DOJ first investigated a complaint, with no
16:09
timeline for how long that could take. The DOJ of
16:13
the cover up, baby, they never met a cover up
16:16
they didn't like, especially if that means it's going to
16:20
protect Donald Trump and his buddies. You see the theme
16:22
here Bondie's not in the justice business. She's in the
16:25
cover up business. And if protecting Trump requires tossing a
16:29
childish tantrroom in Congress or using government regulation to hide
16:33
bad behavior, that's exactly what she's going to do. And
16:37
that's exactly what the House Oversight Committee members, Republicans and
16:41
Democrats should question her about, plow through her theatrics to
16:46
disrupt her cover ups. Well, I hope, so, I really
16:49
hope they do, but I don't have any faith in it.
16:52
The Democrats are going to play politics and the Republicans
16:55
are going to play cover and the rest of us, well,
16:59
we're just gonna get played. All of the information that
17:02
goes with this episode can be found in the description box.