Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Who do they think we are? | HBR Talk 294

Transcript

Who do they think we are? | HBR Talk 294 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk two ninety four. Who do they think
• 0:05
  we are? I think I might have used this title once before, but
• 0:09
  hope not. Anyway. If I did, it'll change so that we're not
• 0:13
  duplicating. But uh, or if I find that I did anyway. But
• 0:18
  that said, I'm your host Hannah Walen here with nonsense Annihilator Lauren Brooks and
• 0:23
  the Personification of perceptivity Mike Stevenson, and tonight we're going to look at an
• 0:27
  article that purports to answer that very question. But before we find out,
• 0:33
  we gotta do what we gotta do. As always, Honey Badger Radio dishes
• 0:37
  out Ace morgas board of thought provoking discussions and has experiences both recent and long
• 0:42
  past have demonstrated the provoked thoughts are fighting back. They've made it clear that
• 0:48
  for people like us relying on third party payment platforms like Patreon to fund our
• 0:53
  work is treading on thin ice or building our house in the path of a
• 0:57
  rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this, we strongly encourage our supporters to
• 1:03
  switch at least their support for us to feed the Badger dot Com the most
• 1:08
  stable way to help us out. If you wanna tip us directly instead of
• 1:12
  relying on any social media platforms tip jar. The link for that is feed
• 1:17
  the Badger dot com, Feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip.
• 1:22
  And as always, the same risk applies to our social media platforms, which
• 1:26
  is why you should further provoke the thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions
• 1:30
  on Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where you can find your way to all of
• 1:34
  our content, as well as a link to feed the Badger dot com in
• 1:37
  the drop down menu at the top of the page. So we are apparently
• 1:44
  all things Boogeyman. And when I first read this article, looking at you
• 1:49
  know, looking for things to discuss in the interim while I'm prepping for the
• 1:55
  next dive into the cesspool that is Michael flood Hi, I'm looking at this
• 2:01
  going I I you know, I used to my my dad used to have
• 2:07
  a joke about a plot device n PC character from from a cartoon that was
• 2:16
  ripped from a comic strip, a newspaper comic strip, or for for the
• 2:23
  Europeans, the Funnies that that you could do anything with it called the shmoo
• 2:30
  and in the original Little Abner Comics it wasn't quite if I understand right,
• 2:38
  It wasn't quite as versatile as as in the cartoon. The cartoon was called
• 2:42
  a New Schmoo and it only ran for like a year. And I've seen
• 2:46
  the opener a gazillion times, but not watched the not watched the cartoon much
• 2:54
  so. But you could turn it into anything. It was just this this
• 2:58
  uh weird character that was the substance was as light as air. And in
• 3:06
  the original comic strip, it would turn itself into food or it would produce
• 3:13
  food, and it created a crisis, an economic crisis that had to be
• 3:17
  solved because people could get food for free, so they wouldn't have to work
• 3:22
  for it, right, And so there was some social commentary about it and
• 3:25
  some political commentary about it for a long time. But in any case,
• 3:36
  it was it was a do all, be all, exist all thing,
• 3:40
  and we seem to be kind of that way, except it's difficult to man
• 3:46
  standpoint. It's difficult to think of it of a modern analog of that,
• 3:50
  because nowadays everything is a schmood. Everything can be whatever we say it is,
• 3:54
  because reality is whatever we say it is. Yeah, when I say
• 4:00
  we, I don't mean we I mean the Unparty, get it. Yeah,
• 4:04
  And it's a funny thing, is you know you once, once postmodernism
• 4:11
  took hold in the public sphere discussion, it became this thing that reality doesn't
• 4:18
  exist. I guarantee you reality exists. There are some concepts that are not
• 4:25
  They're immutable like you. You might be able to redefine, you know,
• 4:32
  trends, you might be able to redefine I don't know, uses of things
• 4:36
  that exist already and stuff. But you cannot change what something is by describing
• 4:44
  it differently. There's not a guarantee that you can do that. And I
• 4:48
  I really as as I've said before, you know, preface this with disclaimer,
• 4:55
  this is a joke, guys, don't do it. But if you
• 4:58
  really believe that you can change what things are by by redefining them, by
• 5:03
  changing how you describe them, I invite you to go to a top of
• 5:08
  a tall building and test that out with gravity, describe it in somewhat other
• 5:12
  way and uh, and then see what happens if you know, you throw
• 5:16
  something off or you know, try testing it with your own butt. Obviously,
• 5:23
  don't because you know what's going to happen, and you know what's going
• 5:27
  to happen, because actually describing something differently doesn't change what it is, whether
• 5:35
  it were, whether it were, But people will will happily accept any form
• 5:42
  of eugenic job and then go, well, this is what we say it
• 5:46
  is. We call it a but uh, it doesn't matter that it doesn't
• 5:53
  actually continate you against anything. We say it's a it's a complain. Therefore
• 5:58
  it is one. And we again would that it works so simple that everything
• 6:03
  is whatever we say it is. A lot of people will say if someone
• 6:09
  identifies as a woman, then they are a woman, that's all that matters.
• 6:14
  And if you say, well I disagree, they will say, well,
• 6:15
  you're a transphobe, and and the I the correct response to that is
• 6:21
  but I don't identify as a transphobe. You And then you'll find out that
• 6:29
  it's not everything. It's no, you are a transphobe because because because that's
• 6:33
  a literal description of what you're doing, you're a you're a transphobe. And
• 6:39
  well, how is a woman not a literal description of a physical thing?
• 6:45
  And it's yeah, it's it's it's it's not even that anything is what we
• 6:49
  say it is is that the abstract is concrete and the concrete is abstract,
• 6:55
  and it's even it's not even as simple as that. It's literally, reality
• 6:59
  is whatever we say it is. Who do I mean by we, I
• 7:02
  mean the uniparty? What do I mean by the uniparty? Well? Yeah,
• 7:06
  I have to be as deep into this bullshit as we are to figure
• 7:10
  that out. It's, you know, it's the powers to be, It's
• 7:13
  the elites, and the even left wing is a is A is a reductive
• 7:19
  description of it. It's that's why I keep calling it likeophobia, because that
• 7:25
  that that to me, seems to be the end of the road. It's
• 7:29
  whatever is familiar, we we will throw into the efa of of the of
• 7:34
  this gnostic postmodernism, and whatever is traditional we we will, we will throw
• 7:43
  every weapon we have at it to destroy it. Yep, let's let's get
• 7:47
  on with the article. I'm well, and I will point this out to
• 7:51
  case in point in regard to us being all things. Two people who consider
• 7:59
  themselves left wing and who consider right wing to be a synonym for, you
• 8:07
  know, the the army of the devil. The devil they don't like,
• 8:13
  not the one that they want to put altars to in courthouses, because you
• 8:18
  know, separation of church and state or whatever. But they, you know,
• 8:24
  they call us the pipeline to the right wing right. But if you
• 8:28
  talk to anti MRA right wingers, our detractors on the right, certain types
• 8:35
  of people who refer to themselves now as red pillars, but don't realize that
• 8:43
  the term was already in use and already had a connotation in regard to gender
• 8:48
  politics before they started. They they consider us leftists. And oddly enough,
• 8:58
  some pick up artists and dating coaches that you know have have the here's how
• 9:03
  to get girls grift call due process advocates feminists, which is hilarious given that
• 9:13
  most attacks on men's do process rights originated with feminist lobbying. So we've come
• 9:22
  fullc circle. We really are everything. We are everything to all people,
• 9:28
  but nothing that is real. We are omnipotent, we are We're such powerful.
• 9:39
  It's tempting to say that if the left and the right both disagree with
• 9:41
  you, that must mean that what you're what you're doing is correct, but
• 9:46
  no, you know, the left and the right both disagree with flat earthers,
• 9:50
  but they also both disagree with the RAS. It can mean you're you're
• 9:56
  in the right and it can't mean you're in the wrong. It's is.
• 10:00
  Nothing's quite as simple as that. You have to delve into the details of
• 10:03
  these things. And and that's and and that is when both sides of any
• 10:07
  of any given of any given binary will will straw man you into oblivion.
• 10:13
  Sorry, folks, nothing simple. You need to get into the weeds.
• 10:16
  You need to excavate rather than just put things in a museum. Although they
• 10:22
  do not call flat earthers a threat because everybody laughs at them, all right,
• 10:28
  they treat us like a threat. We scarey. But I had a
• 10:35
  Boogeyman book. Bo Uh yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna come out from under
• 10:41
  their beds in the middle of the night. And I'm not even getting out
• 10:46
  of my bed in the middle of the night. Oh I'm up in the
• 10:48
  middle of the night, man, I am that is when I am awake.
• 10:52
  But I can't do anything lately, so all right, So the article
• 10:58
  is titled MANI sphere madness, YouTube's anti feminist pipeline recruiting youth under the right
• 11:05
  wing. And I am gonna make fun of this, but I'm also gonna
• 11:09
  tell you why we had to take it seriously enough to h to actually do
• 11:13
  an episode on this. So when I saw this article and and this is
• 11:18
  out of it, this is I think an Indian publication, although the people
• 11:22
  who are involved in it are not all Indiana. Somewhere on here it had
• 11:28
  there about and it's not on the list now. It's not giving me the
• 11:31
  option to go to there about page now. But in there about page they
• 11:35
  listed that they were award winning in several ways, and at least one of
• 11:45
  their their writers is a Nobel Peace Prize winner or Nobel something else prize winner,
• 11:50
  and it might not have been the Peace Prize, but it was a
• 11:54
  Nobel Prize. And and so that tells you that these are establishment drones,
• 12:01
  not just some group of dumbasses with a blog. And this is a this
• 12:09
  is a nonprofit organization. It's not just a business. They have some sort
• 12:16
  of affiliation of government approval for this actual website because it's not just a dot
• 12:26
  com, it's a dot org, and not everybody gets to be a dot
• 12:31
  org. So while we are going to make fun of this and how wrong
• 12:37
  they've gotten things, just bear in mind this article is an establishment narrative,
• 12:45
  not just a bunch of dumbasses that don't know what they're talking about. It
• 12:50
  is a bunch of people who probably know damn well that what they're saying is
• 12:58
  not honest and not a valid presentation per se. And they're trying to promote
• 13:07
  this narrative for purpose. So I have some thoughts maybe about what that purpose
• 13:13
  might be. But let's go ahead and dive in. There we go,
• 13:22
  so you can see it and I can see it. It is hard to
• 13:26
  scroll through YouTube and not be bombarded with videos and recommendations that push a right
• 13:33
  wing agenda. I'm sorry, what how high are you? Like the first
• 13:39
  sentence, I knew that was how that was going to hit too, like
• 13:43
  maybe fifteen years ago before that, before they initiated the algorithm to destroy anything
• 13:50
  that looks vaguely right way, and especially anything that looks vaguely Mr fucking have
• 13:56
  you seen Vosh's channel. He admits that he's lying. He's he's fucking delighted
• 14:03
  about how much he lies. He's like, I will tell any lie.
• 14:05
  It takes to advanced socialism, and YouTube's like, well, let's shove him
• 14:09
  up the fucking front page and fucking contra points does one video a year?
• 14:16
  And he gets and yes, I will say he and he gets fucking millions
• 14:20
  of views despite the fact that he's talking obvious nonsense that anyone who isn't,
• 14:26
  who hasn't got their ostrich head buried in several layers of igneous rock, knows
• 14:31
  at this point that the YouTube pushes left wing content forward, no matter how
• 14:37
  obviously bullshit it is, and pulls any right wing content back. But I
• 14:41
  guess we can't prove it. So, yeah, conspiracy theorist, Yeah,
• 14:46
  I'm a conspiracy theorist. Yeah, I think. I think the higher ups
• 14:48
  at YouTube I'm very much biased in favor of the left wing. Can I
• 14:56
  prove it? No? But I could point at numbers and you'll just say,
• 14:58
  well, those numbers are things that just happen organically because the fuck you
• 15:03
  fuck all of you. I actually, uh, you know how when you
• 15:07
  go to your recommendations and stuff and just look at what comes up on the
• 15:13
  page, you know it's going to pick from your subscriptions and and then it's
• 15:18
  also going to offer you recommendations from outside of your prescriptions or for your subscriptions,
• 15:24
  and you as you use the site often enough, you know you'll get
• 15:33
  recommendations that are more and more tailored toward your viewing habits, except in the
• 15:37
  tab where it recommends news sources, and then then you get recommendations for videos
• 15:46
  from CNN and MSNBC and you know, the like if you're from the United
• 15:52
  States and probably places like the BBC and that if you're from the UK,
• 15:58
  and you know, probably left wing news sources in every country, and you
• 16:04
  don't see recommendations for any news sources that are not explicitly left wing, and
• 16:15
  then they're they're news store sources that are not explicitly establishment also don't show up.
• 16:22
  So I went through and you can actually click and tell YouTube to not
• 16:27
  recommend certain channels to you. And I did that with all of the explicitly
• 16:36
  left wing establishment news media to see if it would continue to recommend, you
• 16:42
  know, news media to me. And then it started recommending all Fox News,
• 16:48
  just Fox News, not anything else. There are dozens of things that
• 16:56
  could have been recommended, but only five News came up because Fox News is
• 17:03
  after all of this time, establishment right wing news, and so I asked
• 17:08
  it not to reparatively yeah, comparatively yeah to the left wing. And since
• 17:15
  they lost Tucker Carlson, they taken and die as well. We just left
• 17:19
  a Center, and I sure as fuck haven't even glanced at the channel since
• 17:25
  since they since they got rid of Tucker, because it who the fuck is
• 17:30
  left? Although if I'm in a bad mood, I will look up Shannon
• 17:33
  Bream just because she just has this sweet presentation. I don't have to have
• 17:38
  to listen to what she's saying. It's just like having the the the nice
• 17:44
  girl that you grew up with have a chat with you. So there you
• 17:48
  go. But she's She's probably the only person I think I'd watch, maybe
• 17:55
  Gutfeld if I was gonna, but I don't because he's funny fell smart ass,
• 18:00
  right, but I don't have I used to have the television on at
• 18:04
  night to keep track of time, and I don't do that anymore. I
• 18:07
  have an alarm and sorry for sniffling at you guys. My nose just went
• 18:15
  ballistic for no reason. So but in any case, yeah, I I
• 18:21
  really haven't paid much attention to what's on Fox News either. But what I
• 18:23
  did was I went through and told it not to recommend Fox News to me,
• 18:29
  and it it's still it, just it stopped recommending news. Like I
• 18:33
  had to look up other news channels. And like some of the videos on
• 18:40
  those news channels before I even started getting recommendations for them. Wow, and
• 18:45
  and it's I had to I had to go through and like I'll I find
• 18:49
  Newsmax kind of interesting. I don't really watch news presenters, news anchors giving
• 18:57
  the news, but some times I will watch. Sometimes I will watch,
• 19:04
  you know them at least because they're They're at least going to give me information
• 19:11
  that I'm not gonna get from some other news sources. But it's easier to
• 19:15
  read between the lines if you read the news and you don't have somebody fast
• 19:21
  talking it to you, you know. So, but yeah, it's part
• 19:26
  of it is is uh what's pushed to the front, which is definitely not
• 19:32
  not right wing stuff, but a large part of it is you know,
• 19:36
  once once I started doing that, it uh, you know, it changed
• 19:41
  what my recommendations were. And so for them to get bombarded with videos and
• 19:45
  recommendations that push a right wing agenda, they have to have been watching those
• 19:52
  videos on a regular and then eventually, like I watch when when I come
• 19:57
  home from work, if i I'm stressed, I will I listened to creepy
• 20:02
  pasta readers because there there are some creepy creepy pasta readers that have very soothing
• 20:08
  voices, and it puts me to sleep. I never get to hear the
• 20:12
  end of the stories. Yeah, well that one. A lot of this
• 20:18
  stuff that he talks about is already familiar to me, so that's no problem.
• 20:22
  But I mean, like actual creepy pasta, not just not just old
• 20:29
  old stories about the strange, dark and mysterious things that have really happened,
• 20:34
  but like creepy pasta fiction, you know, like oh blind does that.
• 20:40
  He occasionally does a sorry about some paranormal shit and I'm like, yeah,
• 20:44
  it just makes me doubt all the other possibly true stories that well, it's
• 20:48
  interesting he'll do, but he won't do it as like there's creepy, there's
• 20:55
  creepy pasta, and then there's you know, like creepy pasta. There's you
• 20:59
  know, some of the reddit subreddits that people post in, you know,
• 21:06
  questions have you ever seen something you know, like a cryptid or whatever,
• 21:08
  and people will answer and tell their stories. But then there's there's a creepy
• 21:14
  pasta like in Reddit's no Sleep, where it's it's intended to you're The pretense
• 21:22
  is that it's a real and true story, but you know that it's not
• 21:26
  right and different things in there people have read. There's even this story series,
• 21:34
  and of course you know there's there's some Creepy Pasta that's been made into
• 21:41
  actual TV series, although not for regular television mostly, but yeah, so
• 21:49
  that that kind of thing, and I like to just nod off. And
• 21:55
  it's not like it's going to give me nightmares. I already have those,
• 21:57
  so uh nothing, and I've heard in creepy Pasta is all that scary because
• 22:03
  of that, it's it's actually kind of difficult to scare me with stuff like
• 22:07
  that. But in any case, because of this, because of that,
• 22:18
  when I open YouTube, half my feed is Creepy Pasta readers because I listen
• 22:25
  to that a lot. It's dominated by that, and you know, like
• 22:30
  the Reddit Question and Answer readers. God, I can't think of the guy's
• 22:33
  name now, it's really bad. But the Reddit Aliens channel like that guy
• 22:41
  also has a voice that can help you get to sleep. So he's actually
• 22:47
  about gen x age so probably experienced reading two Kids at Night reader. But
• 22:56
  in any case, that that's what controls your YouTube feed. So they're probably
• 23:02
  bitching about something they did to themselves, because uh, YouTube doesn't automatically promote
• 23:07
  that stuff. But if you go looking for it, and you look and
• 23:11
  look and continue to watch it and continue to seek it out and continue,
• 23:18
  you get more recommendations for it because YouTube is like, oh, this is
• 23:21
  what they like, so here have some more and this is similar these,
• 23:26
  this uses similar keywords in its descriptor. So here's some more of that.
• 23:30
  And so if they are constantly looking for things, that we should start putting
• 23:37
  right wing in our in our keywords because that might actually get people who hate
• 23:48
  watch right wing content to watch our stuff. But yeah, so she she
• 23:55
  goes on, I think it's whether it's here. I don't know. I
• 23:57
  can't tell by that name. It's really bad. I think it's a male.
• 24:02
  That's a male. I think you're right. So he he is making
• 24:04
  this claim that you know that you get bombarded, but he probably hate watches
• 24:11
  a lot of right wing content or a lot of content that he thinks of
• 24:15
  as right wing, and that that's an important distinction because they think it's right
• 24:21
  wing to argue for equal treatment under the law. If you're saying that men
• 24:26
  should receive it, So I mean that that that's kind of crazy. You're
• 24:33
  arguing for equal treatment under the law for women, okay, but if you're
• 24:37
  arguing for the same for men, you know, like say everything that that
• 24:41
  men are giving or women are given under the law men should also have.
• 24:45
  Then then your left wing somehow or your right wing somehow, some pigs of
• 24:52
  pigs on more equals some pigs on. Some animals are more equal than others.
• 24:56
  And it's the take. Sounds are more equal than balls. Yeah,
• 25:00
  and apparently they think we're bores. So this is something that a lot of
• 25:07
  people online have observed, he says, and right wing talking heads themselves have
• 25:14
  celebrated, and everybody, in my opinion, personally, it's me again,
• 25:18
  not the article that has said that is moron, because again, you only
• 25:27
  get that stuff promoted to you if you're already looking it up and watching it.
• 25:34
  I mean, has it ever dawned on this guy that or these people
• 25:40
  that maybe, uh, you know, all these people are flocking to the
• 25:44
  right wing is because your fucking ideas are insane and unpopular. No, no,
• 25:49
  no, it's it's it's us. We're wrong. We're the bad guys
• 25:53
  because you're you're you're the people who you want to be preaching to are now
• 25:59
  coming over to the dark side. Well, how about get a better message,
• 26:03
  assholes, stop doing the wrong thing, boogie the wrong think boogie man
• 26:07
  will will will not dark in your doorstep right, And how about you stop
• 26:14
  calling your fucking political opposition all racist and bigots and sexists and ship how about
• 26:19
  you actually take time to get to know them. Maybe that's why they don't
• 26:22
  want They don't want to be on your your fucking left wing, under your
• 26:27
  left wing, fucking umbrella of whatever the fuck flavor it is of the month
• 26:33
  that you feel like you have to celebrate today, you know, yeah,
• 26:37
  just get out of here. It's unpopular. I mean, come on,
• 26:41
  you can't. You can't blame a person for not liking your idea. But
• 26:47
  you saw the peoples you are are infected with phobias and you you are,
• 26:53
  you're infected. It's it's bad, bad. Yeah. Well they're their heads
• 26:57
  are full of holes and they're hope it's full of worms. I don't know
• 27:03
  care in the world about what these people think. It's just fuck you.
• 27:06
  But it's not even that there's more of a right wing calivity on the internet.
• 27:14
  It's just that it's disproportional to the mainstream media because people who are on
• 27:18
  board with with these left wing messages that are nothing but left wing are quite
• 27:25
  happy watching TV. And I know a lot of us terminally online people are
• 27:30
  sort of stuck in our bubble where we only listen to right wing things,
• 27:33
  and a lot of us forget how many people are out there still getting all
• 27:40
  their news from the television or from the newspapers, where all they get is
• 27:44
  this left wing message of everyone in our country is racist, everyone in our
• 27:48
  country is sexist, and everyone and all those other countries that are flooding into
• 27:51
  ours, they're the good people. Foreigners are great, and and anyone who
• 27:56
  anyone who's in favor of our own country is an evil, racist, tyrant
• 28:03
  and stuff. And yeah, let us not forget how many millions of people,
• 28:07
  if not the vast majority of people, are still just watching TV and
• 28:11
  they're perfectly fine with hearing these left wing messages that did the people who are
• 28:17
  sick of this stuff and start to doubt it, or just the people who
• 28:21
  go online because because they like having it's entertainment and news on demand, they're
• 28:30
  able to hear a wide variety of messages that aren't regulated by in Britain.
• 28:37
  It's Offcom did everything on TV. Every single TV channel is regulated by Offcom,
• 28:41
  and Offcom is regulated by the government, and the government hates the people
• 28:48
  it's supposed to be serving. That's inevitably what happens in every government. And
• 28:53
  it's regulated by feminists. Yeah, it's effeminism is another kind of ocophobia.
• 29:03
  It's the original kind of oophobiasm, as I've attempted to get across. So
• 29:10
  it's it's it's just that. Well, if anything, it's that the Internet
• 29:15
  is more occupied by centrists, are people who are looking for multiple sides of
• 29:21
  any given story, whereas the people who watch the TV and read the newspapers
• 29:26
  are accustomed only to the to the left side of any given agenda, and
• 29:30
  they think that is centrism. They get they get pushed to the left like
• 29:37
  that, like that meme where I stayed the same and the left went further
• 29:41
  and further left. Well, that's just because because mainstream media, let the
• 29:45
  TV and the newspapers have pushed them left and left, and when they're still
• 29:48
  under the delusion that they're in the center, no you're not. And you
• 29:52
  can see this because when you go on the Internet, you're able to to
• 29:56
  find any any kind of messaging you want, and they're in You're able to
• 30:03
  find anything to the right of Stalin. And so yeah, the people who
• 30:08
  work for the mainstream media are like, well, everything, everything on the
• 30:12
  internet is right wing everything. You can't find any left wing talking heads anywhere
• 30:18
  on the Internet. We need to crack down on the internet until we control
• 30:22
  everything. And they already do control almost everything on YouTube. They've been trying
• 30:27
  to recreate YouTube in the image of the mainstream media for years now, and
• 30:33
  they've succeeded, but it's never good enough. I was saying on Tuesday,
• 30:37
  the left wing will never take a win as a win. No matter how
• 30:41
  much how many wins they get, they will keep acting as though they're still
• 30:45
  losing. So they keep cracking down further and further on anyone who likes their
• 30:51
  own country or likes their own culture, and so it keeps getting worse and
• 30:56
  worse. Oh yeah, yeah. And what we end up seeing then is
• 31:03
  there's a there's this dialogue as if there is left wing, right wing and
• 31:11
  centrism, and if you're not centrist, you know you're you must be left
• 31:15
  or right. And if somebody doesn't like your opinion, whichever one they think
• 31:22
  they are, you must be on the other side. And then if they
• 31:25
  really don't like your opinion, you're an extremist. And it doesn't matter why
• 31:30
  they don't like your opinion. It doesn't matter if their opinion, you know
• 31:36
  that they would prefer you share instead of having your own is extreme in and
• 31:41
  of itself. They would You're still the expert extremist because it's their perspective,
• 31:47
  right, they are the main character. But I would I would argue that
• 31:52
  a lot of men's rights issues men's rights. I guess if you wanted to
• 31:59
  say we had an agenda, A lot of what we think about, talk
• 32:04
  about, and advocate for is more instead of leftism, rightism, or centrism,
• 32:13
  it's externalism. We look at this from the outside of all of it,
• 32:19
  and the correct solution isn't necessarily something in between what is advocated for by
• 32:25
  either the authoritarian left or the authoritarian right, or any anywhere along the spectrum
• 32:35
  of libertarianism. It's more, it's not necessarily above or below the fray,
• 32:43
  but just completely outside the sphere of politics. And it goes right back to
• 32:49
  the underlying question that all of your politics are based on what are the rights
• 32:57
  of the individual, what are the rights of the greater community as a unit,
• 33:05
  and how do we draw boundaries between those rights and the autonomy of the
• 33:10
  individual the authority of the community as a unit, which usually is wielded in
• 33:17
  the form of a state, a government. And how do we protect the
• 33:24
  individual from abuse by the greater numbers? In other words, how do we
• 33:30
  protect the individual from abuses by democracy, abuses by communism, or abuses by
• 33:40
  any other collective system. And when you look at it from the perspective of
• 33:50
  recognizing that's what we're talking about in politics, entirely, all politics boils down
• 33:58
  to that way or another. It stops being about whether you're male or female,
• 34:05
  whether you're black or white, whether you're up or down. You know,
• 34:10
  doesn't matter. Doesn't matter whether you have freckles, whether gingers have souls,
• 34:16
  whether you're chewing gum loses its flavor on the bedpost overnight. It matters
• 34:23
  whether you're human, and every individual Homo sapien, is human. Every human
• 34:36
  should have the same basic human rights. And from there you have to talk
• 34:40
  about the starting point, not equality of outcome, And it becomes a lot
• 34:46
  easier to understand that from the outside standpoint of that description, you know,
• 34:54
  people individually versus people collective, and where's the boundary and where's the autonomy?
• 35:04
  Where are the rights? Of course, it's hard for people to only look
• 35:10
  at it that way when they want a victim narrative and their basis for whether
• 35:16
  someone deserves consideration is whether or not they are a victim of their circumstances or
• 35:22
  a victim of their experiences, and you know, it becomes difficult. Then
• 35:29
  the issue becomes clouded, and you end up looking at equality of outcome and
• 35:36
  and coming up with excuses to infringe on this demographics starting point rights or that
• 35:45
  demographics starting point rights, because obviously, you know, victimhood versus the other
• 35:54
  concept, privilege. And that's where these guys get scared when they see someone
• 36:01
  like us talking about it from the standpoint of the individual right versus the collective
• 36:10
  right and recognizing that that you know, human beings deserve to be to be
• 36:21
  treated from their starting point, you know, equally, And they're going to
• 36:28
  be scared because if you, if you convince people, if you get people
• 36:35
  to understand that there isn't a demographic of human beings that deserves to be treated
• 36:42
  as less human, no matter what victimhood any other group claims, no matter
• 36:47
  whether you like them or not, no matter how alien their way of thinking
• 36:52
  might be to your demographics, way of thinking, and so on. Then
• 36:59
  all of a sudden, most of how these groups use government to infringe upon
• 37:05
  individual human rights becomes exposed as forms of abuse, and that destroys their whole
• 37:14
  grift. So they're they're terrified. I'm going to say it. I'm gonna
• 37:21
  say it. Even communists are humans who deserve to be heard. God,
• 37:25
  I throw up in my mouth just now, but I have to say it.
• 37:30
  I have to just just just for for the sake of the principle we're
• 37:34
  trying to get across. Yeah, going on though, So this this guy
• 37:43
  claims this is something a lot of people on line have observed. Uh and
• 37:45
  and like I said that, if they're, you know, observing this,
• 37:52
  they're observing it through confirmation bias. But the spread of right sentiments, he
• 38:00
  says, is not limited to video creators, but also exists in the wider
• 38:05
  YouTube community, something which can often be seen in comment sections. YouTube and
• 38:12
  social media in general have come under the glare for the kind of content that
• 38:17
  is recommended to users any effects that this has on offline or real world individuals
• 38:25
  and communities. I started off by talking about YouTube because it is the world's
• 38:30
  largest video hosting platform so far. I'm adding this so far obviously, and
• 38:37
  a place where people from a variety of backgrounds come together across many intersecting interests.
• 38:45
  It's pointing out the real world was put in scare quotes. I know.
• 38:50
  I think that's that's the real world. Yeah, the Internet's the real
• 38:54
  world. Now. Guys. Sorry, if you've been like going to where
• 39:00
  at a job in the physical realm where your body is sucks to be you?
• 39:07
  No, I do that every night. So there we go. And
• 39:15
  what bugs me about this description here is what's this guy doing. And he's
• 39:22
  not just complaining, He's not just describing a circumstance and lamenting it. He's
• 39:30
  lamenting that his political perspective does not have control over what he views as a
• 39:36
  large and influential platform. And he's complaining that the majority of people on that
• 39:44
  platform have different opinions than he has, right, and that shouldn't be allowed
• 39:52
  to stand in his view, and people shouldn't be allowed to talk like that,
• 39:55
  or if they do, nobody should hear them insane. Yeah, And
• 40:06
  here's where he's gonna sort of cement that I guess YouTube therefore has a very
• 40:14
  broad and generalized audience, and the dominance of reactionary content on the platform means
• 40:20
  that such views have the potential to reach even those who may not consider themselves
• 40:24
  actively political nor have much of an interest or knowledge about contentious social and political
• 40:30
  subjects of the day. People might hear your ideas, that's his fear.
• 40:37
  His fear is that people might hear ideas about men being human. What exactly
• 40:44
  does he think that YouTube is for. I mean, yes, people have
• 40:50
  ideas, they go to YouTube to express those ideas and maybe just maybe they
• 40:55
  might want some feedback from people. And that how it's supposed to. Why
• 41:00
  is he acting like this is some some kind of alien like, oh my
• 41:05
  god, look at what people are doing or what? But where do you
• 41:09
  live? What? Yeah, it's it's called YouTube for a reason. That's
• 41:15
  how it was advertised. It's not us doing this, it's you you.
• 41:19
  But they quickly sort of backtracks on that. No, not you just mean
• 41:25
  them by that, I mean us, just just just just not you,
• 41:30
  all right. Yeah, So he goes on, well, progressive left of
• 41:36
  center and left wing positions a socialist, Marxist, anarchist, et cetera.
• 41:42
  Uh, struggle. I bet he hasn't heard of anarcho capitalism because he wouldn't
• 41:45
  call that left wing struggle to reach the masses due to the accrude resistance of
• 41:52
  social norms. That's that's interesting. Ingrained edge cation and lack of resources,
• 42:00
  the well funded right wing propaganda machine can muscle its way to the top of
• 42:06
  algorithmic recommendations and insulate its potential recruits against discourses that advocate for changing the status
• 42:13
  quo, misdirecting them down a path which has often been labeled as a far
• 42:20
  right rabbit hole. So not rabbits either. Rabbits don't count as you No,
• 42:28
  But what did he just say there? He just said, my political
• 42:34
  ideas are the correct political ideas, and nobody's watching them, and I blame
• 42:40
  the algorithm for promoting the things that I hate watch and people will accept those
• 42:49
  ideas because they're stupid, and then they won't accept mine. That's basically his
• 42:55
  outlook. This is what we are dealing with when when you see these guys
• 43:04
  try to control like the the authoritarian, progressive, collectivist outlook, I guess
• 43:14
  you could say that the folks that basically want we race the boundary between the
• 43:19
  authority of the state and your personal autonomy, such that the state can override
• 43:25
  entirely your personal autonomy. But yeah, this is this is how they think.
• 43:32
  But you know what, Hannah, in a sense, he's he's not
• 43:35
  really wrong. I mean, if anyone with a brain comes in and watches,
• 43:39
  you know, content on this side of the aisle, Yeah, no
• 43:44
  they don't, they don't. I'm gonna listen to the bullshit that's coming out
• 43:49
  of your mouth, buddy. Yeah, but it's not a lot they're stupid.
• 43:52
  It's because when we describe, when we describe life experiences and the issues
• 44:00
  that are created by authoritarian micromanagement in law and policy, like social micromanagement,
• 44:10
  we're describing life experiences that people are familiar with because they're happening in their lives,
• 44:17
  right, And that is what scares these people. So, yeah,
• 44:24
  they're not. They're not scared, by the way, No, they're not.
• 44:29
  This article was as barely a month old. Now you'd you'd think they'd
• 44:35
  be talking about Rumble because because rumble is is rapidly growing in popularity, largely
• 44:43
  for the very reasons already outlined in this article. But they're not mentioning Rumble
• 44:47
  because they don't want to give it any traffic. They're still talking about They're
• 44:52
  still talking about YouTube as though it's ten years ago and it hadn't already been
• 44:58
  skewed massive and almost and controversially in favor of left wing feminist ideas. But
• 45:09
  they're still pushing on this because because they know YouTube is still orders of magnitude
• 45:15
  more popular than Rumble or or bitch You. They're never going to complain about
• 45:20
  Bitschu because they're very confident that that bitchu is still very much in in in
• 45:29
  the weeds of obscurity, so that they don't feel at all threatened by you
• 45:31
  by Bitchu. Yeah, and I think they're beginning to be threatened by Rumble,
• 45:38
  but they're still diverting all of that scare mongering on onto YouTube just just
• 45:45
  to make extra sure, just to just to push everyone further in the direction
• 45:50
  of of banning all right wing content or anything that's that's not extreme authoritarian left
• 46:00
  content from YouTube, because because they still haven't done it enough for all their
• 46:05
  efforts to marginalize and anyone who's at all in favor of men's rights or the
• 46:14
  rights of anyone that communists don't like. They're still kind of pushing to make
• 46:21
  YouTube even more communists than it already is. You know, yeah, yep,
• 46:30
  they what we're seeing. And I've noticed this, like I saw this
• 46:35
  early on in on reddit, actually saw this even going clear back to uh,
• 46:44
  I'm going to be I'm going to boomer for a minute here, going
• 46:45
  back to my space where you saw mostly it was just you know, people
• 46:54
  sending sending gift files to their friends, glittery gift files to their friends and
• 47:00
  stuff. But if you ever said anything political and you actually got a discussion
• 47:04
  going, you would notice that people of the collectivist the authoritarian collectivist ideologies would
• 47:15
  discuss politics as if their ideas were, uh, the correct way of thinking,
• 47:22
  and anybody who didn't agree with them was bad. And you know that
• 47:29
  you're bad. You have isms and phobias, You are our predatory, you
• 47:36
  are selfish, you know, and so on. How dare you not want
• 47:40
  to give up all of your autonomy for the greater good of people who don't
• 47:45
  want to work, you know, or or whatever. That's uh, that's
• 47:50
  that's selfish, very selfish of you. You should be doing work for you
• 47:53
  and them and you know so on, and but it didn't didn't even start
• 47:59
  there. And if you go back further to forums that existed prior to social
• 48:07
  media, bulletin board systems and the like, you know, different types of
• 48:14
  news nets and stuff, you would see the same thing happening in politics.
• 48:19
  And in fact, political discussion on message boards of different types was a lot
• 48:25
  of times discouraged because moderators could not control the slab fights and they would get
• 48:32
  mad that people were expressing political opinions they disagreed with and then getting bullied for
• 48:38
  it, and would you know, they would have to moderate the bullying,
• 48:44
  and if you answered back to the bullying, you got labeled the bully.
• 48:50
  You know, somebody would tell you to go not eat a bag of dicks,
• 48:53
  but go fuck yourself or something along those type those means, and you
• 49:00
  get you'd get go back and say, well, you're being very rude.
• 49:04
  What the heck is wrong with you? Can't you consider the issue? Or
• 49:07
  are you you know, three years old? And the moderator would come along
• 49:10
  and if you can't talk to this person without comparing them to a three year
• 49:15
  old, you know, like sorry, but they just responded to this group
• 49:19
  of people is as human as that group of people with you know, go
• 49:22
  go fuck yourself. I don't think that I'm wrong in comparing that to being
• 49:29
  a three year old, besides the fact that you you don't want three year
• 49:32
  old saying fuck. And even before then, you know, you go back
• 49:38
  to the old, pre pre world wide web dial up direct you know,
• 49:45
  direct dial where you you can only get on this bulletin board system if if
• 49:52
  you know the the address and and you actually have to type that in,
• 49:58
  you didn't have a web page to and those arguments were still the same.
• 50:04
  And I have never at any point in my life had an argument with a
• 50:12
  hardline leftist without being treated as if anything that I say is the evil,
• 50:22
  I am expressing the views of the devil. It's heresy and I should be
• 50:27
  burned at the stake, whether it's on a topic of women's issues, whether
• 50:32
  it's on the topic of religious issues, whether it's on the topic of individual
• 50:37
  rights and your right to bear arms, your speech rights, your due process
• 50:45
  rights, any of that. If their arguments are coming from the authoritarian collectivist
• 50:51
  standpoint, talking about individual rights is heresy, and I haven't had that with
• 51:00
  right wingers where you know, I talk about issues involving the right to not
• 51:07
  be responsible for somebody else's choices, and in particular the right of men to
• 51:13
  not be responsible for women's choices, the right of men to not just be
• 51:16
  beas of burden for society, but to actually be treated as human beings.
• 51:22
  You know, the right gets a little bit haiti about that because they think
• 51:27
  it challenges traditional norms and traditional norms in particular on which society is built.
• 51:36
  But they don't. They don't treat me like that. They do treat me
• 51:39
  like it's part of a greater collectivist political perspective. But they don't seem to
• 51:51
  have this idea that I'm evil for believing these things or have phobias or isms.
• 51:57
  It's it's more about, well, you just don't understand and the way
• 52:00
  things work. I do. But but it's like I said, it's not
• 52:07
  quite as. They don't treat me like the devil. They treat me at
• 52:12
  worst like a dumb ass. If that makes sense, Yeah, it does.
• 52:19
  And if only it were quite as simple as this division of individual and
• 52:25
  collective rights. I mean, these these same left wing goo goofballs will talk
• 52:30
  about the individual rights of the child, right to consent two all sorts of
• 52:37
  things like sexual activity or the individual right of the child to change their quote
• 52:46
  unquote gender. That's that's where they were. They will flip right to the
• 52:52
  other side and say no, the the individual rights of every child should be
• 52:57
  respected, even though it's clearly their feminist mother who is coercing them into changing
• 53:04
  their gender because it's trendy and and frankly because they get off on it sexually.
• 53:08
  That's the whole other subject. Yes, you have the individual right to
• 53:12
  do what they tell you to do and to to experience what they impose on
• 53:17
  you. That's actually kind of It's what's why the right calls them groomors,
• 53:25
  because it is gaslighting when you attribute agency where there is no agency and then
• 53:35
  claim the individual has the right or responsibility that goes along with that non existent
• 53:40
  agency that you have attributed. And even the idea of collectivism they only believe
• 53:46
  in beyond a certain threshold, because let's not forget, nationalism is a form
• 53:52
  of collectivism sure, and globalism is a is a greater form of collecttion toivism.
• 54:00
  Leftists are very much against nationalism as long as it's your own countries.
• 54:08
  Collectivism. They're perfectly fine with foreign nations having collect having a sense of collectivism
• 54:15
  as they invade your country. Oh yeah, and and they're very much the
• 54:20
  globalism is very much the form of collectivism that they will they will push to
• 54:27
  the expense of of everything else. So it's it really isn't as simple as
• 54:31
  as as right wing is is is individualistic and left wing is collectivistic. Now
• 54:37
  there's there's boundaries in both of these places. It's I think collectivism is is
• 54:47
  not without its merits. I think the furthest point at which collectivism is useful
• 54:55
  is nationalism. I have it having there's a sense of dare I say it
• 55:07
  identity that extends to the borders of your own country, And yes, that
• 55:13
  is collectivism. I'm absolutely in favor of individual individualism within that that collective.
• 55:21
  But as long as there is competition, this is the whole point of having
• 55:27
  individual countries. If you don't like the policies in place in your own country,
• 55:37
  then you should be free to move to a different country. This is
• 55:39
  the whole point of competition. If you don't like one thing, you can
• 55:44
  move on to another thing. So collectivism is collectivism is fine as long as
• 55:50
  you have options. Globalism is collectivism where you don't have any options, when
• 55:57
  this is one world government and you just have to live with it whether you
• 56:01
  like it or not. And that's the point at which I say no,
• 56:06
  No, the sad thing is we've run out of places to have the option
• 56:09
  of going out and making your own country with blackjacket hookers. But in any
• 56:17
  case, in terms of the whole collectivist and individualist thing, I would say
• 56:22
  I wouldn't even have a problem with collectivism if it wasn't authoritarian, right,
• 56:28
  And that's where globalism is the authoritarian form of collectivism. And when nationalism becomes
• 56:36
  authoritarian rather than the cohesion being based on cultural form of cultural cultural intimacy and
• 56:45
  cultural pride, then it becomes dangerous. Like if you have a culture that
• 56:52
  wants to show the world, look what we can give to the world and
• 56:55
  be in the world as as a a good in the world, that's that
• 57:02
  kind of national pride is is great. You know, look, look we
• 57:06
  can, we're we have this is a great place to be. Come here
• 57:09
  and and enjoy it, visit us, you know, spend your money here
• 57:14
  and and uh and so on, and you know, yes, we'll help
• 57:17
  when things are going wrong, and yes we'll because we're we're wealthy, because
• 57:22
  we've made a great place. Uh, that's that's good nationalism. That's healthy
• 57:27
  nationalism. Yes, we're proud of what we have built. Unhealthy is everybody
• 57:34
  else needs to be just like us, or you're all wrong. And uh,
• 57:37
  that gives us the right to send our tanks and our guns into your
• 57:42
  country and change your politics. And it doesn't matter whether it's we're doing it
• 57:50
  because we dislike your politics or because half half or more of your people have
• 57:54
  bagged us because they're being victimized by by by authoritarian right. It's just our
• 58:01
  right to do that. Like that, that's unhealthy nationalism. And unfortunately,
• 58:07
  at some point the United States flipped from we've created something we can be proud
• 58:12
  of to everybody has to be like us, or we're going to invade.
• 58:17
  And we're not even calling it invading. It's we're rescuing you. That's it.
• 58:23
  You know, you didn't know you were in distress, but we're going
• 58:27
  to rescue you anyway, and and that that is scary, you know.
• 58:35
  And unfortunately that really blurs the line between left and right wing because it was
• 58:42
  largely right wing ideals that were being used to convince the public that we hadn't
• 58:47
  flipped like that, that we were rescuing people in distress, and what we
• 58:53
  were doing in terms of military action in the world was always good and necessary
• 59:00
  and in the interest of the people of the United States, and it hasn't
• 59:05
  been for decades. So yeah, the lines can be very blurred, and
• 59:15
  of course it always seems to be at the expensive men. So he goes
• 59:21
  on to just start describing the actual manisphere. Right. One of the most
• 59:29
  common types of right wing and conservative content on YouTube promotes the agenda of the
• 59:37
  manisphere. Right, the manisphere has all one agenda. Now, guys,
• 59:44
  yes, pick up artists and migtab's, they're going to be looking at each
• 59:47
  other, going uh, dating coaches in mctow. Nope, anyway, a
• 59:55
  loose connection or a loose collection of related ideologies that are anti feminist and patriarchal
• 1:00:02
  at their core. The YouTube manisphere includes the following trends, and first in
• 1:00:10
  line is red pill culture, derived from a scene from the famous movie The
• 1:00:17
  Matrix. Red pill ideology posits waking up to the reality of gender relations and
• 1:00:23
  how they are unfavorably tilted against men. It plays upon the central plot device
• 1:00:30
  of the film, in which humans awaken from a simulated life into the reality
• 1:00:34
  of being plugged into the matrix. If I can, it's not concluding that
• 1:00:42
  some society is tilted against men. It's rejecting the long held, widespread notion
• 1:00:49
  that it's tilted against women. That's the blue the blue pill that we've been
• 1:00:53
  fed for the last couple of centuries, that the society is tilted against women.
• 1:01:00
  That's what the red pill means to me. It means it means undoing
• 1:01:05
  yourself of this notion that women are oppressed by men. And that doesn't mean
• 1:01:09
  men are oppressed by women. It just means women are not oppressed by men.
• 1:01:15
  But these black and white thinkers are rather these red and blue thinkers can't
• 1:01:20
  get their head around that because because they display this I would dere to call
• 1:01:29
  a conspiratorial mindset that if you don't believe in our conspiracy theory, then you
• 1:01:37
  can only possibly believe in the equal and opposite conspiracy theory. No, we
• 1:01:42
  just don't believe in your conspiracy theory. And yes it is a conspiracy theory.
• 1:01:46
  Every description I've ever heard from feminists of this idea that women are oppressed
• 1:01:53
  by men. They try to say, well, it's not that men are
• 1:02:00
  complicit in this oppression, is just that it's it's just that they're complicit in
• 1:02:07
  it. They every man, every woman. I'm not saying it's patriarchy,
• 1:02:12
  but it's patriarchy and we have to push it back in the other direction to
• 1:02:16
  make sure that they don't do this. And the end, of course,
• 1:02:21
  you have the because women are victims, it's okay to infringe upon what would
• 1:02:29
  normally be considered standard human rights if the people affected by that infringement are men,
• 1:02:37
  but we're not violating their rights because they have privilege. Like that's the
• 1:02:42
  logic. Yeah, I got to address this. Derek Workman says, this
• 1:02:46
  is confusing. Hannah. America became interventionalist, interventionist after World War Two.
• 1:02:52
  There is one thing we can still say about it that we should all be
• 1:02:57
  proud of Americans. America's entry into World War One was interventionist. Like there
• 1:03:07
  was barely any there was barely any truth to the reasons that they gave for
• 1:03:16
  entering, not that the events didn't happen, but that they were actually a
• 1:03:22
  reason for us to good war and the conditions that created. World War Two
• 1:03:30
  would not have existed had it not been for the imbalance upon which the punitive
• 1:03:38
  Treaty after World War One was. It was created that you know, that
• 1:03:47
  treaty. Really, World War One was not as good guy bad guy imbalanced
• 1:03:57
  as that treaty made it out to be and made made Germany out to be,
• 1:04:01
  And as a result, that created sympathies and resentments and economic circumstances that
• 1:04:09
  that really screwed the whole system, screwed everything up, and as a result,
• 1:04:15
  people actually were vulnerable to the ideas of the Nazis. And so it's
• 1:04:25
  when we when we say America became interventionist after World War Two for good reasons,
• 1:04:31
  it's kind of like I'd have to make the Batman comparison again. For
• 1:04:41
  for reasons we thought were good, or our nation thought were good, our
• 1:04:45
  people thought were good, our politicians thought were good. We created our own
• 1:04:49
  enemies, and pretty much everything that's happened since then, and in terms of
• 1:04:55
  World War has been a result of the conditions created by the entry of the
• 1:05:03
  United States into World War One and the subsequent maneuverings that took place around World
• 1:05:14
  War Two, where the fighting was what deals were made, who was defeated,
• 1:05:19
  and what the result of that defeat was, and so on, not
• 1:05:25
  just in terms of Germany, but throughout all of Europe. Like, if
• 1:05:32
  you really want to be fair about it, we pretended to go in and
• 1:05:39
  save as the good guys or at least the people who were on the side
• 1:05:45
  that didn't do things we called attacks in World War One, but actually what
• 1:05:50
  we did was go fuck Europe in the ass. That's like, I really
• 1:05:57
  don't have a good opinion of this, I suppose, but of the United
• 1:06:03
  States has gone on throughout the entire twentieth century and into the twenty first century.
• 1:06:11
  We don't have the hindsight of what would have happened in World War One
• 1:06:14
  if America didn't get involved, because it was looking like it was a war
• 1:06:20
  that was going to go on forever, because it was never a war based
• 1:06:25
  on an invasion. Was it was a war based on European nations, Europe
• 1:06:30
  that were much larger than they are now, and just it's sort of getting
• 1:06:38
  paranoid about each other and like I once said, settling their disputes by building
• 1:06:45
  a trench across the east border of France and throwing men into it. For
• 1:06:50
  as long as they could, and there's no telling how long it would have
• 1:06:54
  gone on for If America didn't didn't come in and save the day, as
• 1:07:00
  they would have called it, maybe it would have been and I would There
• 1:07:05
  was a there's a book about Woodrow Wilson and his the folly of his decision
• 1:07:14
  making and how it affected world politics. Since that probably everybody should read.
• 1:07:20
  Uh and off the top of my head, I can't think of the name
• 1:07:24
  Wilson's War. How Woodrow Wilson something or another is the title of it.
• 1:07:28
  It's not. There's a movie called Wilson's War that came out around the same
• 1:07:33
  time that I learned about this book that dominated searches online when it was looking
• 1:07:39
  for this book, So you at least have to if you're going to search
• 1:07:44
  for it, type in Wilson's War Colin how Wilson and the rest of it
• 1:07:48
  will come up. But the writer argues that World War One was already winding
• 1:07:58
  down when the U centered because the nations that were fighting it were running out
• 1:08:03
  of the money that they needed to to continue the war, and they didn't
• 1:08:11
  have like they were running out of the support of the public. They were
• 1:08:16
  running out of people willing to fight and and a lot of men were getting
• 1:08:23
  killed. And that's see, that's the other thing. Europe does have a
• 1:08:28
  very long standing history of nations bickering over borders in, bickering over resources,
• 1:08:36
  bickering over ideological differences, and going to war and lots of men being forced
• 1:08:44
  into war and then they get killed. A lot of them get killed.
• 1:08:48
  And it's it's not just Europe, every nation on every continent, every tribe
• 1:08:55
  that's been human history, like throughout human history. Three uh, political leaders,
• 1:09:01
  whether they have been of a dictator nature or of a trying to be
• 1:09:10
  benevolent benevolent nature, uh, or at least trying to pretend to be benevolent,
• 1:09:15
  they've all done this. It's not uh, it's not something that just
• 1:09:25
  was invented in the twentieth century. It's just and and it's the United States
• 1:09:30
  isn't the only nation that's ever been intervened interventionalist either. It's just uh,
• 1:09:35
  you know, we are at a point in political dialogue. And no,
• 1:09:45
  uh name that I can't pronounce j F F R y H don to heaviny.
• 1:09:50
  Is that Jeffrey, like like from the the Jeffrey that Bill caused by
• 1:09:58
  Jeffrey Comedy Sketch. No, not Charlie Wilson's War. It's It's Wilson's War
• 1:10:03
  and it's about Woodrow Wilson. It is not Charlie Wilson's War. That's the
• 1:10:08
  one that dominated the searches when I was looking for the book. But but
• 1:10:14
  yeah, it's we are at a point now where we know better, We
• 1:10:18
  understand the public understands that when these narratives get promoted to us as to why
• 1:10:27
  another war is necessary, that that we're being lied to, right, We're
• 1:10:34
  being conned. And that's something that that should change the interventionism of the United
• 1:10:43
  States. That should change the outlook on the last century of warfare and the
• 1:10:50
  future of international politics. And we'll see if it does. It may be
• 1:10:59
  that there may be some very serious growing pains in the next generation. But
• 1:11:04
  I don't know if I'm struggling to think of any war that ended because both
• 1:11:13
  sides were like, ah, we've killed so many men and we have no
• 1:11:16
  resolution. Let's just let's just call a ceasefire and not have this war anymore.
• 1:11:21
  I don't it. It doesn't seem to have happened ever, that there's
• 1:11:28
  not there's never been anything stopping any nation from just continuing to throw men into
• 1:11:32
  into that war like every new generation of men, because the nations don't care
• 1:11:41
  how many men they throw into the It's it's like what I was saying,
• 1:11:46
  they because we don't know what would have happened if if the war wasn't resolved,
• 1:11:53
  Maybe they would have kept throwing men into the meat grinder for another hundred
• 1:11:57
  years. They might do that in Ukraine if they could, if they could
• 1:12:01
  fund it, and yeah, well and if if they can conscript enough British
• 1:12:08
  and American men into the war. Yell continues. What's stopping them from just
• 1:12:15
  throwing every man in the Western world into the into this trench warfare or whatever
• 1:12:23
  it is. Now maybe maybe they'll keep doing that because at this point there's
• 1:12:27
  no one to come in and there's no equivalent of Wilson's Army to throw in
• 1:12:32
  and and put an end to this. Obviously, it didn't work in the
• 1:12:35
  First World War because because when that happened in the First World War, Germany
• 1:12:42
  got fucked over in the Treaty of Versailles and and and that didn't stop them
• 1:12:46
  from from being scorned warmongers and lo and behold a Second World War happened thirty
• 1:12:58
  years later or roughly, and yeah, it's I guess we'll never know.
• 1:13:04
  And it's largely it was because warfare became a very different beast at the beginning
• 1:13:13
  of the of the nineteen hundreds because of the because we had aircraft and tanks,
• 1:13:19
  yeah, and and and trans warfare. And I guess I you might
• 1:13:26
  be able to predict a similar thing from what's happening in the current war on
• 1:13:30
  on the on the east boundary of of what we currently call Europe and mm
• 1:13:36
  hm and yeah, the reason it's so hard to stop these wars is because
• 1:13:45
  it's very difficult to convince the country not to just throw men into the meat
• 1:13:48
  grinder. And I guess this is this is why we do what we do.
• 1:13:53
  Yeah, maybe maybe there wouldn't be so many if there wasn't this constant
• 1:13:59
  incentive to just throw men into the meat grinder because men don't have to yeah,
• 1:14:05
  exactly. And it's one of the reasons why authoritarians are terrify terrified of
• 1:14:12
  us actually, because if society decides that it's not okay to just throw men
• 1:14:15
  into the meat grinder like that, they lose a huge level of power right,
• 1:14:21
  that the power to to start violent conflicts with other nations and to interfere
• 1:14:30
  in other nations. Politics is one of the greatest revenue streams for for the
• 1:14:38
  elites. It's they they a lot of their deals, like the things that
• 1:14:43
  have made the Nancy Pelosis of the world insanely wealthy, are revolve around the
• 1:14:53
  regulation of your access to things and the government paying for things in order to
• 1:15:00
  fuel those conflicts. So basically, conflict with you and conflict with other countries,
• 1:15:06
  and both of those involve throwing men into the meat grinder one way or
• 1:15:11
  another. And of course, if we kill the idea that it's just okay
• 1:15:17
  to throw men into the meat grinder, we kill those revenue streams. And
• 1:15:24
  then people cannot make themselves insanely rich by gaining political office where in the levels
• 1:15:31
  of politics where the politicians have control over the regulation of your access to things
• 1:15:39
  and the payment for things that are used in war, and then they won't
• 1:15:45
  be able to invest in things that they have regulated or paid for, and
• 1:15:53
  they won't be able to make money that way. It's an interesting and rather
• 1:16:00
  disgusting situation and system uh, and it's it's being challenged in the United States
• 1:16:09
  right now. But I don't know how successful that challenge is going to be
• 1:16:12
  because it's being challenged in among the people that are guilty of it by by
• 1:16:17
  a handful of people who are newbies in that system. So we'll see what
• 1:16:23
  happens to them. But as we go on, So red pill culture,
• 1:16:28
  that's that's the description of red pill culture. Right. Then then they go
• 1:16:31
  on, that's all they're going to say about red pill culture. He's he's
• 1:16:35
  only going to say that it plays upon that plot device, and uh that
• 1:16:42
  we think that that gender relations are unfavorably tilted against men. The next thing
• 1:16:49
  is the Sigma cult. The Sigma cult is something I never heard of until
• 1:16:56
  feminists told me about it, Right, I didn't. I knew that there
• 1:16:59
  was discussion about human beings as a species that has some similarity to I can't
• 1:17:12
  think of the term as far as as far as I know. It's a
• 1:17:17
  push Yeah, it's a pushback against the idea this binary of alpha males and
• 1:17:24
  beta base right right, So so some people went, well, I'm neither
• 1:17:29
  alpha nor beta. I I'm a fucking capricorn. Is the term? Well,
• 1:17:38
  this is this is comparable to zodiac signs in a way because it's just
• 1:17:42
  invented. It doesn't matter that's invented around the stars or invented around some other
• 1:17:46
  things. No, I'm not alpha or beta or zeta. I'm this other
• 1:17:51
  thing. I'm I'm I'm better than you. I'm better than both sides of
• 1:17:56
  this I'm gonna And even if it does describe a literal thing, it's really
• 1:18:01
  not helpful because it just fees into identity politics where identities are really not important.
• 1:18:10
  But yeah, you go on real quick. For for people who are
• 1:18:13
  confused about the wilsons War thing. Eric Brenner said in Chat, Yes,
• 1:18:17
  the book that Hannah is mentioning is Wilson's War how Woodrow Wilson's Great Blunder led
• 1:18:21
  to Hitler Stall Lennon Stalin in World War Two. And that is correct.
• 1:18:26
  That's the book I'm talking about, and it is one that everybody should.
• 1:18:30
  Even if you don't read the whole book, read the opening summary and you'll
• 1:18:35
  get the gist of what I'm talking about. But yeah, in terms of
• 1:18:40
  this this idea of being a cult thing, it's it's feminists that sort of
• 1:18:45
  describe it this way. I don't think that there's actually a cult around this
• 1:18:49
  because I had heard a little discussion here and there of MRIs and other men's
• 1:18:57
  issues commentators just describing male and female behavior in terms of pac mentality versus herd
• 1:19:03
  mentality, and and comparing us to different types of animals in in the rest
• 1:19:11
  of the animal world predators versus herd animals, prey animals, different types of
• 1:19:18
  like canines versus primates, and so on. And it's all it's all about,
• 1:19:27
  I think, evolutionary psychology and how it has influenced culture, and it's
• 1:19:33
  it's all stuff that when you talk about that stuff, you take it all
• 1:19:36
  with a grain of salt, based on the idea that human beings, all
• 1:19:44
  of our our instinct and all of our I don't know, all of our
• 1:19:49
  our animalistic traits are confounded by our sapiens. And having having that as allows
• 1:20:00
  us to evaluate, analyze, and reject impulses, and the ability to evaluate,
• 1:20:10
  analyze, and reject impulses determines you know more about us than what our
• 1:20:17
  impulses themselves do. But there are it's offensive to people of the victim ideology
• 1:20:30
  mindset that you're not slave to your impulses, because if you're not slave to
• 1:20:35
  your impulses. Everything they do that harms other people for selfish reasons is willful
• 1:20:45
  and they're culpable for it, and that would be for them the ultimate horror.
• 1:20:49
  Right, So, Sigma male cult, and he says the Sigma male
• 1:20:59
  is supposed to who is a supposed upgrade from the discredited notion of an alpha
• 1:21:04
  male. This imagined male archtype is stoic, contemptuous of women, an immune
• 1:21:12
  to their corrupting influence, physically strong, rich, and a lone wolf figure
• 1:21:16
  with a click of close confidants. This arc type has been inscribed onto figures
• 1:21:25
  from cinema like Christian Bale in his role as Patrick Bateman and Bruce Wayne Silly
• 1:21:31
  and Murphy Peaky Blinders, which I still want to see and haven't yet,
• 1:21:36
  and Oppenheimer, which I also still want to see and haven't yet, Toby
• 1:21:41
  McGuire as Bully McGuire in Spider Man three, and more. The Sigma esthetic
• 1:21:47
  is reinforced by certain set pieces of music and visual effects that add up to
• 1:21:53
  performances of unbothered masochism and charismatic masculinity. So I'm gathering that the Sigma male
• 1:22:03
  cult narrative is an objection to action heroes. Is that? Because uh,
• 1:22:11
  like, I've run into maybe one guy and in all of Twitter, in
• 1:22:15
  all of my men's issues discussion, I've run into one guy that even remotely
• 1:22:24
  remotely resembles this. And I wouldn't say that it's really that fitting. He
• 1:22:30
  doesn't. He's an asshole. But you know, mister dating coach doesn't quite
• 1:22:38
  fit this either, like this is this. I wouldn't apply this description to
• 1:22:44
  him exactly. Just you know, I could see a feminist doing it,
• 1:22:53
  because you know, I kind of know how they think. But is there
• 1:22:58
  is there anything like this? Really? Are there? Is there a group
• 1:23:01
  of men actually basing their ideas about masculinity on action heroes, and and they
• 1:23:10
  really mean it? I think there. I think they're referring to make Tows
• 1:23:16
  and some men who think they can get off the grid and in some instances
• 1:23:25
  as possible for a man to just go into the woods and build his own
• 1:23:29
  shelter out of trees and stuff. And this is the archetype that a lot
• 1:23:34
  of migtowers like to imagine, and the vast majority of them are not capable
• 1:23:40
  of doing it. They just like to fantasize that they that they can get
• 1:23:44
  off the grid, and and they've entirely off the land, and for the
• 1:23:48
  most part they can't. They just they just they just mock everyone who's not
• 1:23:57
  even trying to do that, even though they're not even to do that either.
• 1:24:01
  Now, the tough thing about getting off the grid is that the grid
• 1:24:03
  will chase you down and exactly and in the United States, for instance,
• 1:24:10
  there are municipalities and states where getting off the grid is outlawed. You if,
• 1:24:16
  for instance, if you own a home and it's not fitted with hookups
• 1:24:25
  for for utilities. You maybe have a wind turbine that that serves your house,
• 1:24:33
  and you don't use so many appliances and devices that you need more electricity
• 1:24:41
  than it produces. And uh, you heat with some sort of you know,
• 1:24:45
  whether it's wood or coal or whatever. But you don't. You don't
• 1:24:49
  use electricity, you don't have a gas line coming in, you don't.
• 1:24:55
  You don't use municipal water. You get your water from a on your land
• 1:25:00
  and you filter it yourself. They will come after you and condemn your home
• 1:25:04
  and take it and they will not compensate you because it's your fault for failing
• 1:25:13
  to live the way they think you should. And there are municipalities and states
• 1:25:18
  with laws that allow them to do this. You know, you have to
• 1:25:23
  be dependent and you have to pay for these things, or you're the bad
• 1:25:28
  guy. It's not every state, it's not every municipality, obviously, but
• 1:25:33
  because I know in Arizona there are people that go and live like on the
• 1:25:38
  edge of the desert in adobe huts and with no electricity and so on.
• 1:25:44
  But but yeah, this is a real thing, a real issue, and
• 1:25:49
  there's actually news stories about people who have been prosecuted for this or threatened with
• 1:25:56
  eviction from their own homes for this. You can you can find them easily
• 1:26:01
  with searches in Google. Because the people who are doing the eviction are proud
• 1:26:10
  of what they're doing. They think they're doing the right thing, and they
• 1:26:13
  treat people who go off to grid like they're nuts. Right, they're they're
• 1:26:17
  dangerous to themselves and others, and and something must be done about these crazy
• 1:26:23
  fuckers that don't do what they're told and don't live the way that they're expected
• 1:26:28
  to live. You'll notice there's no female equivalent of this, dare I say
• 1:26:33
  male power fantasy. Even even the most extreme version of the female power fantasy
• 1:26:43
  is to get the government to give them everything they want, even without men
• 1:26:47
  contributing to that system. That's right. The extreme female power fantasy is calm
• 1:26:56
  unism. And they think it's gonna and they think it's going to work,
• 1:27:00
  and we keep trying to tell them it's not going to work, and they
• 1:27:02
  accuse us of being a Sigma male cult when we tell them it's not going
• 1:27:06
  to work. Real power, real female power has never been tried. Uh,
• 1:27:16
  that's the whole thing is quite quite sad, And honestly, I really
• 1:27:24
  don't think there's a last action hero cult. So that's but but they're probably
• 1:27:30
  viewing it that way based on it might be the going off the grid thing.
• 1:27:33
  It might just be because there is the among traditionalists there is sort of
• 1:27:43
  a backlash against the feminism's cry more narrative, which you know, they are
• 1:27:51
  right to backlash against that, because feminists want men to cry without a purpose.
• 1:28:00
  Men don't do things without a purpose. It doesn't that's just not how
• 1:28:04
  men work like There's a whole subreddit for this description of how women don't work
• 1:28:12
  like that. But women, if you tell the men don't work like that,
• 1:28:15
  they get upset. They don't understand, and you know, if men
• 1:28:19
  don't work like women, if men need there to be a reason, or
• 1:28:26
  if men need something to be more dramatically impacting to them than it needs to
• 1:28:32
  be to a woman in order to elicit tears, or tears aren't the way
• 1:28:39
  a man expresses his pain, you know, then women assume he's doing it
• 1:28:45
  wrong. So that's but that backlash among traditionalists sort of has the like the
• 1:28:58
  gigachad meme and everything. A lot of it is tongue in cheek really,
• 1:29:04
  and feminists don't have a sense of humor, so they don't understand that.
• 1:29:11
  For what it's worth, I've cried for no particular reason many times in my
• 1:29:15
  life, and I want and I don't want sympathy for that. I'm just
• 1:29:19
  saying, it's it is something that happens, but it's it's something that I've
• 1:29:26
  never assumed I would get sympathy for. So it's it's it's something I do
• 1:29:30
  by myself at home or in public toilets, and it's like, why why
• 1:29:34
  the hell am I doing this? Yeah, at least that's the way.
• 1:29:38
  When I have that happen to me, I'm like, why whereeness come from?
• 1:29:42
  Uh? You know why? Why? Why? Is this happening?
• 1:29:45
  But I don't know. Maybe not everybody does that either, But the idea
• 1:29:51
  of men not crying, that that this is just something that men never do.
• 1:29:58
  It's I learned that it was okay to cry about things that were not
• 1:30:05
  injurious to me when I was watching Et in theaters when it was a brand
• 1:30:12
  new movie, and there's this this scene, you know, where they're They're
• 1:30:17
  in all of the plastic you know, around they're all sectioned off and everything,
• 1:30:24
  and there's the traumatic ET death scene, and and and the ET death
• 1:30:30
  scene concludes with everybody being all down and Elliott is heartbroken and all this other
• 1:30:39
  stuff, and then you see the flowers bloom and you realize ET's not dead,
• 1:30:48
  and everything gets all emotional. And I was like trying to hold back
• 1:30:55
  tears in that moment because it's an emotionally overwhelming point in the movie. And
• 1:31:00
  we're like, God, you know, this is embarrassing. Why am I
• 1:31:03
  crying about this? It's not happening to me. And I glanced up.
• 1:31:09
  I hope my dad's not noticing, you know, because I'm being all whiny
• 1:31:13
  like a little kid, and tears are just streaming down his face and I
• 1:31:20
  was like, you're allowed to have tears for compassion. Okay, It's like
• 1:31:26
  Hannah's little brain was fried for a minute there, Like I get told not
• 1:31:30
  to cry about things that are not a big deal, and this is a
• 1:31:32
  movie, it's not a big deal. But you know, you're allowed to
• 1:31:36
  be emotionally overwhelmed by information that is emotionally overwhelming, right, And it doesn't
• 1:31:43
  matter whether you're male or female. To be stoic in that moment would be
• 1:31:48
  abnormal and unusual, right. The guy that's sitting in the theater grinning,
• 1:31:55
  you know, or the woman that's giggling about it, like their express it
• 1:32:00
  differently, but they're still expressing it. The person that's stonefaced, though you
• 1:32:05
  might you might be scared of that person, but you shouldn't be scared of
• 1:32:13
  different ways of expressing it, you know. And and there were different reactions
• 1:32:18
  in the theater that day. I still remember, like part of the reason
• 1:32:21
  I was embarrassed about crying was because there were some people who covered for tears
• 1:32:27
  by giggling. So yeah, yes, men men do cry. Feminists lie
• 1:32:35
  about that, just like they lie about everything else. They just don't like
• 1:32:39
  it when men men's tears are not in service to women, Like that story
• 1:32:49
  was about a boy and his buddy, you know, from outer space,
• 1:32:54
  who happened to also be I'm always presumed anyway male, always referred to him
• 1:33:00
  as a he. But going on, we have anti feminism here is don't
• 1:33:08
  don't Manisphere ideologies are predicated on male supremacy, which makes feminism their arch nemesis.
• 1:33:19
  This makes it sound like a comic book serious that would insinuate that feminism
• 1:33:26
  is female supremacy. Nah do we get to do? We get to make
• 1:33:35
  costumes? I don't really look good in tights though, you know, I
• 1:33:39
  don't know if I want to do that. I can my costume just be
• 1:33:44
  cargo pants because I like having pockets. Yes, there we go, cargo
• 1:33:49
  pants and a baggy T shirt. I am the anti feminist. Frequent points
• 1:33:59
  of attack our gender equality, women's refusal of traditional gender roles like caregiving and
• 1:34:05
  homemaking, and the insistence on sexual and reproductive autonomy autonomy guys, So women
• 1:34:16
  don't understand the formula for autonomy. And I say this as a woman because
• 1:34:21
  I learned it later in life than I would have if I had grown up
• 1:34:27
  as a boy instead of growing up as a girl, And that was with
• 1:34:30
  my dad making far more effort, and I think most people make with girls
• 1:34:36
  to get that across. Right. Autonomy isn't just having the right and the
• 1:34:45
  power to make your own decisions right. It is having the the responsibility to
• 1:34:58
  consider and be mindful of the impact of those decisions, and being culpable for
• 1:35:04
  the outcome of those decisions, even when it is bad. It isn't just
• 1:35:14
  having the right to hit the tether ball in the backyard. It is being
• 1:35:18
  responsible for looking around to make sure that nobody is standing on the other side
• 1:35:24
  of the pole waiting to get hit in the head by the ball that you
• 1:35:27
  just hit. Right, that's autonomy. It means the control over yourself and
• 1:35:36
  it comes with responsibility to exercise that control with personal accountability. The buck stops
• 1:35:46
  with you. That's autonomy. So when feminists talk about autonomy, they are
• 1:35:55
  only talking about the rights. They are not talking about the responsibilities that go
• 1:36:00
  along with it. And I don't know, I don't know if it's purely
• 1:36:12
  intellectual or partly biological. Purely intellectual would be the culture influencing women to the
• 1:36:24
  degree that even the best of dads is only going to get them so far.
• 1:36:30
  And if they do not on their own strive for true autonomy and not
• 1:36:35
  just feminist quote scare quotes autonomy, they're going to go similarly as I did,
• 1:36:45
  through a period of not getting it before they get it. And so
• 1:36:51
  like, if you're raising girls like it's and I always say my dad,
• 1:36:57
  my mom worked on this with me too important to get them to understand that
• 1:37:02
  when they are deciding on a course of action, their obligation is to consider
• 1:37:09
  not just how it's going to affect them, but how it's going to affect
• 1:37:13
  the people around them. My story on that with my mom is we had
• 1:37:19
  a walnut tree in the backyard. Walnut trees, this is black walnuts.
• 1:37:25
  They're basically the weeds of trees. Like lots of different trees will grow,
• 1:37:30
  you know, over large areas from having their seeds scattered around by the wind
• 1:37:39
  or by animals and stuff, but walnut trees seem to be at least black
• 1:37:44
  walnut trees seem to be better at it than a lot of other trees.
• 1:37:47
  And if you're in an area where there are squirrels, their seeds get buried
• 1:37:53
  because they have you know, inside the hole that's the size of a baseball,
• 1:38:00
  there is an actual nut, and you know, if you don't harvest
• 1:38:04
  them yourself, the squirrels will, and they will, they will bury them
• 1:38:10
  all over your yard, and then you end up with little walnut tree sprouts
• 1:38:15
  and they make the ground around them acidic, so a lot of other things
• 1:38:19
  can't grow in that ground. And we had one in the backyard that because
• 1:38:27
  of where it was, it didn't get as big as it could have gotten.
• 1:38:30
  So the branches weren't very thick. And even though it's a hardwood,
• 1:38:34
  if the branches aren't, you know, very thick, like we're talking less
• 1:38:39
  than two inch diameter branches. A lot of the branches, it's you're still
• 1:38:45
  going to break it if you weigh very much right. And I was a
• 1:38:47
  prolific tree climber. The tree didn't even have to have lower branches for me
• 1:38:53
  to get up it. The black walnut tree bark is the ridges on it
• 1:38:59
  are real thick, and they have grooves in them that are thick enough,
• 1:39:02
  wide enough deep enough for a little kid's fingers to get in. And you
• 1:39:06
  can get finger holds and toe holds and climb that very easily. And I
• 1:39:12
  had to be told not to climb that tree right, because I was too
• 1:39:17
  big and my weight would break the branches and I might get up fairly high
• 1:39:21
  in the tree and then fall. And that was what my mom was worried
• 1:39:26
  about. There were other issues, and I discovered that when I disobeyed her
• 1:39:30
  and I climbed way up high in that tree and I stepped on a branch
• 1:39:36
  that wasn't big enough and broke it and it fell down, and it had
• 1:39:44
  walnuts on it that were ready to drop, and they did, and one
• 1:39:49
  of them just bounced at exactly the correct angle off of another branch to go
• 1:39:57
  through the bathroom window of the neighbor's house and break it, like completely out.
• 1:40:01
  There was not any glass left in the pane. It was terrible.
• 1:40:05
  And you know, my mom heard that. She's in the kitchen, she
• 1:40:10
  looks out the window, sees me up in the tree. Knew exactly what
• 1:40:14
  happened. You could see from the look on my face. I knew I
• 1:40:16
  was busted, right, And you know, I'm like hurriedly climbing down and
• 1:40:23
  I get down there and she comes outside, like, you know, what
• 1:40:28
  were you doing? Made me admit it? You know it's up in the
• 1:40:31
  walnut tree. Are you supposed to be in the walnut tree. No,
• 1:40:36
  you know, like it was not. I didn't get a lecture. I
• 1:40:42
  was dragged kicking and screaming internally through the logic of this outcome is your fault.
• 1:40:54
  You did what you were told not to do. You didn't consider the
• 1:40:57
  possible outcomes, and here's the result. And of course mister Layman came out
• 1:41:02
  of his house and sees me looking like, I'm like this little Ramona Quimby
• 1:41:11
  looking little girl, and he tried to be conciliatory because he adored all the
• 1:41:15
  kids in the neighborhood. And my mom was like, oh, no,
• 1:41:19
  this is you cannot interfere here. So she came up with the punishment of
• 1:41:27
  in order to hammer home the fact that I was culpable for breaking that window
• 1:41:31
  and that it was my fault. I did injury to the neighbor by violating
• 1:41:36
  a rule that was made to prevent me from causing this type of an outcome
• 1:41:43
  or from getting hurt or whatever. I had to do extra chores on top
• 1:41:46
  of my regular chores every day after school for a period of time until I
• 1:41:53
  had earned at the minimum wage, which was much smaller back then, was
• 1:41:58
  like two dollars in something an hour. I don't think it was a full
• 1:42:01
  three dollars an hour at that point. It was three eighty five when I
• 1:42:04
  was in high school, but in any case, at the minimum wage to
• 1:42:12
  pay the cost of replacing that window. And it was me. That was
• 1:42:18
  how Mom showed me, you know, the the full impact of my actions.
• 1:42:25
  And it was just similar to what happens in civil court when you do
• 1:42:29
  damage to somebody's property and the judge says we have to pay to replace that
• 1:42:32
  right, only for a little kid. It just seemed like, you know,
• 1:42:41
  the world, the end of the world. I'm not gonna have any
• 1:42:43
  free time for months and months and months. It wasn't quite that long,
• 1:42:47
  but uh and and it did give me some understanding. You know, my
• 1:42:53
  dad was the same way. When I would get hurt doing stupid shit.
• 1:42:57
  And I like, when I say I would get hurt stupid shed I don't
• 1:43:00
  mean like stub your toe and you know you're now it's bleeding because you ripped
• 1:43:05
  the toenail. I mean I stuck my foot in hot coals and got third
• 1:43:09
  degree burns because I wanted to see if they were still hot. Like that
• 1:43:14
  kind of stupid shit. I reached for a power line at one point because
• 1:43:17
  I thought it was a phone line and it arcd and hit me and knocked
• 1:43:23
  me out of the tree. My parents didn't know about that one, but
• 1:43:25
  there were a lot of things like that. I almost backed off of an
• 1:43:29
  eighty foot cliff at Hawking Hills because I was trying to take a picture of
• 1:43:32
  the mountain side of the mountain, like I was that kid. Now,
• 1:43:38
  my dad got his arm around my waist after I've put my first foot off
• 1:43:45
  the edge of the cliff into the air. So yeah, Mangotka wants to
• 1:43:50
  know I'm still alive. Well, I credit my dad for that one,
• 1:43:54
  because I would have fallen right. There would have been no uh no HBr
• 1:44:00
  talk with Hannah Walen because there wouldn't have been a Hannah Walen. I never
• 1:44:05
  would have gotten old enough to get married. I think I was eight years
• 1:44:10
  old when I did that one. So uh But you know when I when
• 1:44:15
  I got the third degree burns on my foot, once I got medical medical
• 1:44:19
  treatment and we you know, had established I'm okay, you know, like
• 1:44:25
  it hurts, It's gonna hurt for a while and that really sucks. But
• 1:44:29
  I'm not going to die from this, you know. My my My lecture
• 1:44:33
  was, you're not going to do that again? What'd you do wrong?
• 1:44:35
  You didn't think about what could happen if I do if I do this right?
• 1:44:40
  And every single time when I was, you know, caught almost killing
• 1:44:44
  myself by accident doing something stupid, the consideration of what what could happen if
• 1:44:49
  I do this was communicated back to me. Again, very important, and
• 1:44:57
  a lot of that came from dad. A lot of that came from my
• 1:45:02
  dad. You know, my mom demonstrated it as well, but Dad was
• 1:45:08
  the one that put it into words. If you don't start thinking before you
• 1:45:13
  act, you are going to die. Like most people don't have to be
• 1:45:17
  told that as a child, I did, and I was because I had
• 1:45:23
  my dad there. So yeah, yeah, mangaka, it's not hit points.
• 1:45:33
  He inflated my luck stat I everybody like you know, gives their dad
• 1:45:40
  that little trophy that says best dad ever on Father's Day and they're all wrong
• 1:45:45
  because I had the best dad. But and I had the best mom too,
• 1:45:51
  So it's it's important. Like the whole anti feminism seeks to isolate and
• 1:45:58
  contain dissenting women while setting up traditional and anti modern women as legitimate representatives.
• 1:46:03
  Blah blah blah, like there are benefits to traditional gender roles, caregiving,
• 1:46:12
  homemaking, and the idea of autonomy. Like I said, women don't understand
• 1:46:19
  autonomy because they refuse to accept accountability. And it's one of the reasons why
• 1:46:29
  women have been so quick to accept the elimination of dads from the family.
• 1:46:36
  And the real reason that feminists hate anti feminists is because we don't accept that
• 1:46:48
  this feminism seeks to isolate and contain dissenting women and while setting up traditional and
• 1:46:54
  anti modern women is legitimate representatives exclusively deserving of male validation. So I thought
• 1:47:03
  male validation was a bad thing if you're a feminist. Uh well, Jesus,
• 1:47:15
  apparently now it's it's a commodity. Male male validation is a commodity.
• 1:47:21
  Is that? Is that what I'm seeing here, because that's what it looks
• 1:47:26
  like. Another prominent trend is to undercut the intellectual underpinnings of feminism by claiming
• 1:47:35
  to debunk well established women's issues such as denial of justice for sexual violent survivors,
• 1:47:43
  the gender pay gap, negative representation, and popular culture and others.
• 1:47:49
  You know, as if I didn't need another excuse to just completely ignore everything
• 1:47:54
  he said. He brings up the fucking pay gap. Shut up guy.
• 1:48:00
  Intellectual underpinnings of feminism? Where where at? I love this claiming to debunk
• 1:48:09
  you know, after you know, we we investigate, right, we go
• 1:48:13
  through and we find out what is the pathway between zero evidence and the claim
• 1:48:19
  that this is true. It should take a pathway through evidence and logic and
• 1:48:27
  reason. But a lot of times there's nothing. Yeah, it's just what
• 1:48:33
  they're wrong, and you're stupid if you like them. Yeah, ideological writing,
• 1:48:41
  they're well established women issues, don't you see, they've been They've been
• 1:48:45
  well established as part of the establishment by the establishment. Right, Lots of
• 1:48:50
  things have been well established shortly before being debunked. Beats hmm. Yeah.
• 1:49:01
  It was once well established that when a woman got up it got upset,
• 1:49:05
  it was because her uterus was traveling around in her body. Well established,
• 1:49:13
  guys, You can't question it because it's well established. There was there was
• 1:49:17
  a male equivalent to that, but it was if a guy masturbated, it
• 1:49:27
  made him weak. You know. For some reason, that one hasn't entirely
• 1:49:30
  been debunked like it's been debunked, but it's still being proliferated. People are
• 1:49:40
  still saying it, and people are still making money saying it. People are
• 1:49:45
  still condemning male masturbation and treating female masturbation like it's sent from a gift sent
• 1:49:51
  from God. Kind of funny. So there you go. But yeah,
• 1:49:58
  well established women's issues, niel of justice for sexual violence survivors, the gender
• 1:50:02
  pay gap, which was my introduction to the accountability gap, and UH,
• 1:50:09
  negative representation in popular culture, which you know, basically is that women just
• 1:50:15
  don't like feminists just don't like the way women are represented in popular culture.
• 1:50:21
  Now we get in fucking everything. Now we get to US Men's rights activism
• 1:50:31
  MRA is to genuine women struggles. What All Lives Matter or Blue Lives Matter
• 1:50:39
  is to the black liberation movement. Well, no, I'll give you that.
• 1:50:45
  No, no, it actually is, because it's it's not it's not
• 1:50:49
  just your favorite ship that matters, it's all the ship as well. What
• 1:50:54
  you can't say that, yes you are infected with this and phobias or what
• 1:51:03
  e w s which I don't know what that is is to the reservation policy,
• 1:51:09
  but I'm assuming that's in reference to UH Indian culture because this this I
• 1:51:15
  think this writer is out of India. It attempts to paint men as you
• 1:51:20
  know. I need to look this up before we go. Okay, I
• 1:51:24
  assume the E is equal in deuro World series. Now, uh I can't.
• 1:51:33
  I can't find anything through Google, which is no surprise. Okay,
• 1:51:39
  So I searched e w S versus reservation policy and the first article that comes
• 1:51:47
  up is why e w S reservation defeats the purpose of reservation. Uh A
• 1:51:55
  reservation on the basis of economic economic disadvantage can only be justified if the provision
• 1:52:00
  or policy attempts to eliminate ingrained types of I'm assuming they're going to have intersectional
• 1:52:10
  victim narratives extreme white supremacists, says Richard Bierre. Yeah. Probably, that's
• 1:52:17
  as good a guess as anything I can come up with that'll do. I
• 1:52:20
  honestly, yeah, I don't know what he EWS actually stands for, but
• 1:52:28
  yeah, the Parliament of India enacted the Constitution one hundred and third Amendment Act
• 1:52:33
  twenty nineteen, enabling the state to make reservations for economically weaker section economically weaker
• 1:52:44
  sections, that's what it is in matters of higher education and public employment on
• 1:52:47
  the basis of economic criteria alone. So guessing because that's English, but it's
• 1:52:55
  not English that that American speaks. So I'm like, I'm assuming that this
• 1:53:05
  is like like, uh, ship, I can't think of the government agency
• 1:53:17
  I would have I would have guessed that, but it's it's the E I
• 1:53:20
  basically would I would have guessed that that W means women's just like so it's
• 1:53:26
  probably equal women's services. Economically economically weaker sections, yeah, yeah, basically,
• 1:53:36
  but it's the Equal Opportunity Commission basically is what we have in the United
• 1:53:44
  States, and the economically weaker sections under Equal Opportunity Commission, policy would be
• 1:53:55
  based on ethnic background and his historical victimhood that is attributed to all people who
• 1:54:02
  are not white, and as if there were never any poor white people.
• 1:54:09
  And gender, because apparently being female makes you poor automatically. So that's I
• 1:54:18
  am guessing. This is probably complicated by the social system, the caste system,
• 1:54:33
  and of course any other type of like social divisions, religious beliefs,
• 1:54:41
  tribe type beliefs, or associations. But it's pretty much the same thing.
• 1:54:46
  It's an Equal Opportunity Commission and they're probably mad because economic disadvantage was added in
• 1:54:57
  addition to other considerations. That would be my guess anyway, So mr it
• 1:55:08
  attempts to paint men as victims of power structures and justify the consolidation of male
• 1:55:14
  power as self defense. So the first half of that, we're not describing
• 1:55:21
  things in terms of victim and non victim with with regard to power structures.
• 1:55:30
  Boo, what would you call it? If a system created by the intersection
• 1:55:40
  of law, policy, and UH cultural standards engages in discrimination against a demographic
• 1:55:48
  group, would that be a victim of a power structure? Would would you
• 1:55:55
  say if the group is systematically discriminated against, if the group is systematically disadvantaged
• 1:56:03
  in areas where human needs are considered or no, because like men have all
• 1:56:14
  the power, ye, therefore they cannot be victims of power structures. So
• 1:56:19
  essentially feminists feminists use this kind of language to not address things like, you
• 1:56:29
  know, if you look at the entire homes homeless population, and you look
• 1:56:33
  at the entire system in place to assist homeless people in finding shelter, gaining
• 1:56:43
  food, clothing, getting jobs, maybe getting out of their situation, going
• 1:56:46
  to drug rehab, alcohol rehabing, things like that women are prioritized when seventy
• 1:56:53
  five percent of homeless people are male. And on top of that, women
• 1:57:01
  are prioritized to the degree that while seventy five percent of homeless people are male,
• 1:57:09
  ninety five percent of unsheltered homeless people are male. And you know,
• 1:57:19
  part of it is is that women do have a tendency to be more compliant
• 1:57:25
  with programs, assistance programs. So if you tell someone, well, you
• 1:57:30
  can't stay in the shelter unless you agree to go to alcohol rehab because you're
• 1:57:33
  drunk, a woman will agree to go to alcohol rehab before a man will
• 1:57:40
  in a lot of instances. And then you also have a woman can be
• 1:57:45
  mentally ill and violent and aggressive and still be considered less dangerous than a man
• 1:57:56
  who is mentally ill and behaving in an unusual manner that is not violent or
• 1:58:00
  aggressive, like talking to himself under his breath constantly, And I've actually witnessed
• 1:58:08
  that, or just crying in a public place, yeah than other than a
• 1:58:15
  toilet. Yeah, yeah, people will like cross the street to get away
• 1:58:20
  from a man who's crying in public. But uh, but I have actually
• 1:58:28
  seen women who appear to be homeless publicly selling their wares and uh and and
• 1:58:36
  actually getting aggressive with people who turn them down or get in their way,
• 1:58:43
  and and actually doing property damage get treated with kid gloves by the same people
• 1:58:54
  in the same week who called police and had a homeless guy removed from from
• 1:59:01
  property because the fact that he was talking to himself under his breath consistently for
• 1:59:10
  several minutes scared them, Like tearing tearing off the mirror on a truck doesn't
• 1:59:21
  scare anybody if a woman does it, But just muttering under your breath is
• 1:59:28
  scary when a man does it. M being being unbased and approaching people to
• 1:59:36
  solicit from them and getting very demanding about it is scary only when a man
• 1:59:44
  does it, right. When a woman does it, it's deserving no sympathy
• 1:59:47
  and compassion. We got to find somebody to help this woman. But yeah,
• 1:59:55
  so yeah, but that's not that's not men being victims of a power
• 2:00:00
  structure or anything, right because they got privilege. Mm hmm, so Jesus
• 2:00:11
  yeah, and consolidating male power. So for example, m ras respond to
• 2:00:16
  ye, they're they're consolidating him out in the street because they're all fucking homeless.
• 2:00:24
  That's where they're consolidating their power. For example, he says m ras
• 2:00:30
  respond to legitimate calls for criminalizing marital rape by attempting to foil it with the
• 2:00:36
  bogie of false rape or dowry cases, or cynically bringing up cases of men
• 2:00:42
  being raped by women while ignoring facts of sexual violence committed by men against other
• 2:00:47
  men, by police and militaries, like the the guy had to throw everything
• 2:00:54
  in there that he possibly could, because you know reasons. But we've we
• 2:01:00
  talked about, we have talked about a great deal actually about sexual violence committed
• 2:01:06
  against men, both by other men and by women, violence committed by police
• 2:01:12
  and militaries towards men. The fact that rape of men is used as a
• 2:01:16
  weapon of war in in in the Congo, for instance, has been quite
• 2:01:24
  discussed, and and also the dancing Boys of Afghanistan, which has not so
• 2:01:32
  much a weapon of war as just a bizarre by everybody else's standards, in
• 2:01:40
  predatory pastime. But in terms of marital rape, the thing that I point
• 2:01:46
  out when feminists bring that up to me is they're all worried about exceptions in
• 2:01:59
  merit or in rape law, for for within a marriage, but they have
• 2:02:03
  extended rape law to include instances where consent isn't explicit. Right, they've actually
• 2:02:15
  worked to make it a crime for a woman to, you know, a
• 2:02:23
  guy's crime for a woman to regret their sexual encounter and then later say,
• 2:02:29
  well, he didn't explicitly get my consent and I didn't mean it when I
• 2:02:33
  did all those things with him. And it's one thing to say that that
• 2:02:42
  it should be a criminal act, regardless of whether you're married or not,
• 2:02:48
  when someone violently holds another person down or beats them up in order to dominate
• 2:02:57
  them and get what they want from them. Whether it's compliance in the kitchen,
• 2:03:00
  whether it's uh, you know, demand to raise from your boss,
• 2:03:03
  whether it's give me money for this or that, whether it's sex, whether
• 2:03:08
  it's drugs, doesn't matter. Right, that's fair as long as it goes
• 2:03:12
  both ways. That neither men nor women are allowed to do this to each
• 2:03:17
  other. And it's fair to criminalizeh surreptitiously drugging someone to get what you want.
• 2:03:29
  It's fair to criminalize coercive, genuinely coercive, like meaning with threat of
• 2:03:39
  violence or threat of making someone homeless, right, threat of withholding access to
• 2:03:44
  one's kids, where that threat is credible, whether whether the man or the
• 2:03:49
  woman does it. Those are fair, but rape law also includes sex when
• 2:03:59
  you're too drunk to consent where you know, or sex when the state would
• 2:04:06
  not allow you to consent because you're impaired mentally. So basically, feminist marital
• 2:04:18
  rape exceptional elimination would criminalize old people in nursing homes for having continuing to have
• 2:04:30
  the same sexual relations they've had throughout their entire marriage after they both start becoming
• 2:04:36
  a little senile, right, And it would criminalize couples who are married and
• 2:04:45
  who you know have some level of standing consent, but have sex on maybe
• 2:04:53
  New Year's Eve after they've been drinking at a party, come home and have
• 2:04:58
  sex like they like they do all the time when they're sober. And it's
• 2:05:02
  a very different thing when someone has a pattern of sexual activity together and they
• 2:05:09
  continue that in those circumstances versus hookups at at college gatherings where you know,
• 2:05:19
  somebody takes advantage of a person's less sober state, where they can tell that
• 2:05:27
  the other individual wouldn't be able to refuse if they wanted to, right,
• 2:05:32
  So don't I don't agree with feminists on just blanket criminalizing the idea. You
• 2:05:44
  know, I do agree that rape law shouldn't have a marital exception if rape
• 2:05:50
  law was written in a reasonable manner. But if you're going to have a
• 2:05:55
  marital exception, the exception to the marital exception needs to allow for people to
• 2:06:02
  continue their normal sexual relations in a trusting relationship, regardless of other people's opinion
• 2:06:13
  on their mental state, because that's bullshit. I hope there's not an age
• 2:06:19
  limit for when you're allowed to continue to love your partner. That would really
• 2:06:25
  suck. Like, sorry, you're over sixty five, your marriage is expired
• 2:06:30
  now? Like what really? You know? And it's it's one thing to
• 2:06:36
  criminalize taking away somebody's ability to refuse when refusal as a possibility in a likelihood.
• 2:06:46
  It's another thing when you're accusing someone of contravening someone's right or ability to
• 2:06:54
  refuse when actually there was no likelihood of refusal and no likely to regret.
• 2:07:04
  I was I was about to say, maybe they'll make it illegal old men
• 2:07:09
  to marry young women on on the on the grounds that that old man,
• 2:07:15
  that old man is abusing that young woman in some way, But that that
• 2:07:20
  would take away a young woman's right to marry an old man for whatever reason
• 2:07:28
  she might have. That's that's never going to happen, because the overall agenda
• 2:07:36
  is is for wealth to red to be re distributed from rich men to less
• 2:07:45
  rich women. And yeah, that's that's never going to be made illegal.
• 2:07:49
  They're just it's it's just going to keep happening while we continue calling it men
• 2:07:54
  exploiting women, no matter how much it might resemble women exploiting men. Yeah.
• 2:08:01
  Yeah, And then see that's the thing when you see it's interesting when
• 2:08:05
  you see an older man with a younger woman, the older man is treated
• 2:08:11
  as a predator for the younger woman's naivety, but when you see an older
• 2:08:16
  woman with a younger man, the younger man is treated as a predator for
• 2:08:20
  the older woman's senility. Right, the men can do no right and the
• 2:08:26
  women can do no wrong. As for the bogie of false rape, India,
• 2:08:33
  I will remind you has a false rape allegation rate that is confirmed to
• 2:08:41
  be at least as high as sixty five percent of rape allegations and could be
• 2:08:46
  as high as eighty five percent. Stounding. Yeah, so a maximum of
• 2:08:56
  one in four rape allegations might be valid, and it may be as low
• 2:09:03
  as it may be confirmed to be as low as fifteen percent, So one
• 2:09:11
  and a half in one hundred, no, one and a half in ten,
• 2:09:16
  sorry, one fifteen and one hundred might might be might be true,
• 2:09:24
  right, And the actual study on which that was that was done in Delhi,
• 2:09:33
  which is a huge population center, so it's not not exactly And then
• 2:09:41
  you know, rape allegations in Delhi aren't as frequent as people would imagine in
• 2:09:50
  the West. But the study was done on allegations reported to pull in Delhi
• 2:10:01
  during during a six month period, and during just that six month period that
• 2:10:07
  was there were so many false allegations. A lot of the allegations were parents
• 2:10:13
  claiming that their daughter was a rape victim because they didn't like the man that
• 2:10:18
  she eloped with. And a lot of them were women claiming to have been
• 2:10:28
  victims of rape because they had sex with a man and then he didn't marry
• 2:10:31
  them. There's a lot of stereotypes that people would throw out about far away
• 2:10:39
  countries, and you hear this from a lot of grossly uneducated Westerners talking about
• 2:10:46
  India. Sah India is such a misogynoust country. They hate women over there
• 2:10:52
  because they think it's just like any other Muslim country. And and yeah,
• 2:10:56
  let's let's not get into the discussion of how Muslim countries that's that's not necessarily
• 2:11:03
  true either. But India, India is not to be included in such things
• 2:11:09
  that, yes, there are Muslims in India, but it's mostly a Hindu
• 2:11:11
  nation with with with this whole other different set of of of paradigms. And
• 2:11:20
  almost none of these, frankly xenophobic stereotypes are true about any given country.
• 2:11:26
  But the stereotype that is generally true is cities tend to be more left wing
• 2:11:35
  than the country in almost any country you could possibly name, because when when
• 2:11:43
  people conglomerate into large populations, the value of human life lowers, and the
• 2:11:50
  first lives to have their value lowered are men. Because to some degree that
• 2:11:56
  appears, Sorry, Peter, right, but it appears to be human nature
• 2:12:01
  to divert to kind of centrism whenever there's a density of population. I do
• 2:12:09
  take issue with that because it's not just Peter. I'm also on board with
• 2:12:13
  his observations that but this isn't evolutionary, it's not genetic, and it's not
• 2:12:22
  a human instinct. Generally speaking, wherever there's a population density that the people
• 2:12:31
  of that area are more likely to to to devalue humans in general. And
• 2:12:43
  the people they're more likely to devalue first are the males and that, and
• 2:12:50
  that's why you'll notice, whether it's India or the Middle East or the West
• 2:12:54
  or the Far East or whatever, the section of the population they devalue first
• 2:13:01
  is males and that, and that's why you'll find there's the same discrepancy between
• 2:13:07
  rural India and urban India, or rural England, and and and and and
• 2:13:13
  urban England. It's it's always the men they devalue first, and that that's
• 2:13:20
  why it's always always what you see first. And and so then, even
• 2:13:26
  even while they're they're rinsing the men of those areas for everything they're worth,
• 2:13:31
  they continue to proclaim that the these are the areas in which the women are
• 2:13:39
  most oppressed. Well, well, they'll claim, I guess, well,
• 2:13:43
  I guess they'll claim that the country, uh, the out in the sticks
• 2:13:48
  is the area where women are most oppressed. But they but meanwhile, they'll
• 2:13:54
  put most of their effort into rinsing the men in the urban areas of all
• 2:14:01
  and everything they've earned, because because they know that they already have that ship
• 2:14:07
  in the bag, so so they'll they'll look further and further out into the
• 2:14:11
  rest of the country to to to rinse the men of those areas of and
• 2:14:20
  it's and it's always this this backward idea of they they they they know that
• 2:14:26
  some urban areas are the worst possible places to live in every possible way,
• 2:14:35
  except when it comes to these gender issues. They they know that crime is
• 2:14:41
  higher in urban areas, they know that that debauchery of any kind is higher
• 2:14:48
  in urban areas, But when it comes to gender issues, they'll say,
• 2:14:52
  oh, well, all of this stuff is worse except gender issues. It's
• 2:14:56
  it's it's out in the country where women have so we need to expand,
• 2:15:01
  to expand these policies we have in urban areas out in the rest of the
• 2:15:07
  country. And that's why it keeps happening. And that's I don't, I
• 2:15:13
  don't, I don't know where to take it from there, But that's it
• 2:15:18
  seems to be the case. A lot of it comes from a degree of
• 2:15:22
  dysfunction that has occurred, Like if you look at the manifestation of guynes centrism,
• 2:15:31
  where the concept of guyaness centrism is a dominant focus on women's interests right
• 2:15:37
  women's welfare. If you look at historical like in prehistorical context, you're going
• 2:15:46
  to see more of a focus on preserving reproductive capacity and preserving fertility, not
• 2:15:58
  preserving women for the sake of being women. Not protecting women for the sake
• 2:16:01
  of protecting women. It's for the sake of protecting children, for the sake
• 2:16:07
  of family cohesion, for the sake of maintaining the safe haven for the family,
• 2:16:16
  like the home as a safe place in general, and not so much
• 2:16:20
  that being female automatically makes someone more valuable as a human being, and as
• 2:16:28
  a result of that you had more functional standards that could be considered guynocentric.
• 2:16:37
  That if a woman is pregnant, there may be some reasons to create exceptions
• 2:16:43
  for the expectations that are normally imposed on adults in terms of resource gathering,
• 2:16:50
  maintenance usage, transportation, stories and all that. Even in tribal situations,
• 2:16:56
  even in the context of like prehistoric tribal situations when where the women of those
• 2:17:03
  tribes were physically stronger than you know rowers are today male rowers are today,
• 2:17:13
  where the women of those tribes had a thicker bone structure than modern men do.
• 2:17:22
  And because you still have vulnerability during pregnancy and when the child is very
• 2:17:30
  young, uh you know, then then yeah, you get you get some
• 2:17:33
  lenience. Right, But today we have this situation of law and policy that
• 2:17:41
  to no one's actual welfare advantage, no one's actual improvement of their well being.
• 2:17:50
  We have this dominant focus on women's interests as described by women's political advocates
• 2:18:00
  who are self appointed and who grift on the concept of advocating for women,
• 2:18:07
  And so we've lost the concept of accountability where women are concerned. Women are
• 2:18:13
  not facing the same level of expectation that women once faced. Women have become
• 2:18:20
  increasingly neiotonous over time and both in terms of their physical appearance and their behavior,
• 2:18:28
  and it creates the impression that it's just natural to treat women this way
• 2:18:35
  and to expect women to be somehow less adult than men in everything about them.
• 2:18:45
  But if that was the case, it would have always been that way.
• 2:18:50
  We wouldn't have evolved over time, or devolved, in my opinion,
• 2:18:56
  over time to this sniveling, wimpy, thoughtless, solipsistic, whiny set of
• 2:19:05
  assholes that that you see in the majority of modern women, and I mean
• 2:19:13
  even women one hundred years ago were stronger of character and less guynocentric than they
• 2:19:22
  are today. Right, there was some accountability for falsely accusing someone. There
• 2:19:30
  was some accountability for just being being dishonest, being a drain on your community,
• 2:19:39
  being a shrew, even if it wasn't to the degree of like prehistory.
• 2:19:46
  Right, Like, we're we're talking a huge change over time, and
• 2:19:56
  it's one that I think is cultural and the ship. The catalyst, the
• 2:20:03
  fulcrum of the shift was the switch from perceived guynocentrism that was really about protecting
• 2:20:15
  and preserving families, protecting and preserving children's welfare, and keeping the home as
• 2:20:22
  a safe haven, to somehow women just automatically being more important than men,
• 2:20:31
  more valued than men because they're women. Like, that's unnatural. There's not
• 2:20:37
  a cause for that. There's not a evolutionary advantage to that. It's just
• 2:20:46
  prejudice. So, but not the only guy here, Huh. If we
• 2:21:01
  go fast enough, can we finish this article in one stream? We might
• 2:21:05
  be able to how much is left here? No, I think what we'll
• 2:21:11
  do is the next one is homophobia and transphobia. So I don't want to
• 2:21:20
  even get into that discussion. It's nine to twenty two. I don't want
• 2:21:24
  to get into that discussion until the start of the next show. We will
• 2:21:30
  maybe recap and do a little bit more discussion about men's rights activism per se,
• 2:21:33
  because that's us specifically. But in terms of Guiness centrism, I guess
• 2:21:41
  my final word on that is, I think what people are thinking of as
• 2:21:46
  natural Guinness centrism as a misnomer, and what actually is ginos centrism, Like
• 2:21:56
  strictly focusing on women's interests in welfare because they're women and not for any other
• 2:22:03
  reason, you know, Like that's that's not natural, and we could overcome
• 2:22:11
  it, but it's gonna take a lot of huh, growing pains. But
• 2:22:16
  anyway, I'm gonna get into our super Chows, not our Superchows. Yeah,
• 2:22:22
  our Superchows, okay, and then I will go to the super Chats
• 2:22:26
  and I don't know if we I think we have a we do have one
• 2:22:31
  rumble rant as well, so, but our Superchows start. Let's see with
• 2:22:37
  Mere de g who gave us five dollars and said HBr talked two ninety four
• 2:22:41
  honey for the Badgers, and then Richard Beer gave us five dollars and said,
• 2:22:46
  who are we? We are the chafe to divert attention away from the
• 2:22:48
  real puppet masters pulling the strings the catriarchy. Oh yeah, that's the other
• 2:22:56
  part of my YouTube feed. My YouTube feed is really weird. You'll see
• 2:23:01
  some creepy pasta reader's story with a terrifying looking title, and like right next
• 2:23:07
  to it is this this pet groomer channel called the Girl with the Dogs.
• 2:23:16
  Because there's cute puppies and cats and stuff that are on that and it,
• 2:23:22
  and they behave very badly. They're their animals don't do well with having somebody
• 2:23:28
  give them a shower and a blow dry and combing their hair. Some of
• 2:23:31
  them are just they're not traumatized. They just object and until they get to
• 2:23:39
  the point where they're actually clean and combed and happy and they get treats and
• 2:23:43
  stuff. So very very puppy puppies and kittens are only cute as long as
• 2:23:50
  they have dry, fluffy hair. You haven't seen a wet cat. It's
• 2:23:54
  almost as bad as seeing a shaved cat. It's not a cat, it's
• 2:23:58
  a fucking demon. For I know, it's cute when you give the kittens
• 2:24:03
  their first little bath. That's cute, that that's adorable. Give me a
• 2:24:09
  kitten when I when I lived up north of where I am now, and
• 2:24:15
  the kitten was too young to be taken away from its mother, and I
• 2:24:20
  didn't realize it until I got home with her and she couldn't eat, and
• 2:24:26
  I had to go out and get kitten formula, and I almost took her
• 2:24:30
  back. And then I thought, you know what, that lady's just gonna
• 2:24:33
  give this kitten to somebody else, and they might, like, they might
• 2:24:39
  not know what to do, because you you can't just like feed your kitten
• 2:24:43
  and go to bed for eight hours. That cat has to eat every hour.
• 2:24:48
  So I spent a couple of days feeding bottle feeding this kitten and weaning
• 2:24:56
  this kitten. I say a couple of days, I mean in like a
• 2:24:58
  week, weaning this kitten from from kitten formula to formula soaked kitten chow,
• 2:25:09
  and then eventually gave the kitten, you know, kitten kitten food, which
• 2:25:16
  is different, differently formulated than adult cat food and so on, and so
• 2:25:22
  this kitten didn't learn everything that cats usually learned from their mothers. And I
• 2:25:28
  thought the bathing instinct was just an instinct like that, they just knew that.
• 2:25:31
  Nope, she smelled so bad after a few days, like you would
• 2:25:37
  not believe. Well, we had another cat in the house at that time,
• 2:25:41
  a rescue. Some asshole had declawed this cat and then dumped it in,
• 2:25:48
  you know, just out in in the city. And so he was
• 2:25:54
  found by by the guy that I was living with at the time. He
• 2:25:58
  was found and by him and taken in and they took he took care of
• 2:26:03
  him. And he wasn't fully grown either until at the time that he was
• 2:26:07
  found. Like people are assholes to animals, I swear. Uh. And
• 2:26:13
  and so this cat had no front claws. He was just he was pretty
• 2:26:22
  well defenseless. But he was bigger and stronger than the kitten. And he
• 2:26:26
  decided the kittens stank, and he chased her down and pinned her and bathed
• 2:26:33
  her. And uh then, like he's he had to sit on her to
• 2:26:39
  hold her still. So he bathed her her face and her head, and
• 2:26:43
  then he turned around and sat on her head and bathed the rest of her
• 2:26:48
  and wouldn't let me near. He did still have teeth, and uh so
• 2:26:52
  finally, you know, he gets up off of her head, and he
• 2:26:54
  sniffs her over and he gets to her head and he gets this expression on
• 2:26:58
  his face like smell like ass, you know. So he bathed her head
• 2:27:03
  again, and just just from that, like she looked like a drowned rat.
• 2:27:07
  But now she smelled like dirty kitten and cat spit. So I went
• 2:27:15
  to give her a bath in the in the kitchener in the bathroom sink,
• 2:27:18
  and I drew the water and I made sure it was slightly, you know,
• 2:27:24
  warmer than you know, what I would do for a human, because
• 2:27:28
  cats have a higher temperature, but not Bernie warm, like I could put
• 2:27:33
  my hands in it and it was all right. I go to bathe the
• 2:27:35
  cat in it, and she panicked and ran up my sleeve. Next thing
• 2:27:41
  that happened, she gets caught in between my t shirt and my turtleneck and
• 2:27:48
  both of which were tucked into my pants, and just did laps around my
• 2:27:52
  midsection. So by the time I get the cat out of my shirt and
• 2:28:00
  get her calm down and get myself calmed down, and everything, I looked
• 2:28:03
  like I had been flaying myself for religious purposes. Like it was bad.
• 2:28:09
  I had scratches up and down my back. I had scratches all on my
• 2:28:13
  sides. They went all the way around my middle. It just looked like
• 2:28:16
  I had been, you know, self abusing for you know, the suffering,
• 2:28:22
  you know that you do if you're trying to get get closer to God
• 2:28:26
  through suffering. It's again after that. It's weird how people find kittens and
• 2:28:33
  puppies cute, but if they have no hair, they're a lot less cute,
• 2:28:39
  whereas people find human babies cute. But if those human babies are covered
• 2:28:43
  in hair, then then they like fucking wear wolves and they're less cute.
• 2:28:48
  I can't I can't find the consistency in this all that thing's cute position.
• 2:28:54
  The only consistency is my position. No one of these things are cute.
• 2:29:01
  Fuck all of them. Burn them in a fire. Personally, I think
• 2:29:03
  there's no such thing as an ugly baby. I have not. I have
• 2:29:09
  not running. People have sent me pictures to prove me wrong, and I'm
• 2:29:11
  like, oh, it's a baby, so yeah, to me, there's
• 2:29:18
  no such thing as an ugly baby. Maybe maybe a baby shark. No,
• 2:29:22
  No, I've seen baby sharks. They're not They're not scary like full
• 2:29:26
  sized sharks are. Anyway, sir, Richard also gave us five dollars in
• 2:29:31
  said attempt doesn't attempting to change reality by way of definition require that the new
• 2:29:37
  definition be in canted in Latin, And doesn't trying to change gravity require the
• 2:29:41
  straddling of a brooms something along those lines. Trying to challenge gravity requires physics.
• 2:29:52
  You have to understand what to burn and how to position the part of
• 2:29:58
  the machine that the flaming hot air is going to shoot out of, and
• 2:30:03
  and don't stand behind that because it sucks. But let's see, we also
• 2:30:11
  had a rumble rant from nobafan twenty one. Does the author realize that there's
• 2:30:18
  a trend of women being picky and many of them choose the bad boys that
• 2:30:22
  have toxic and very masculine traits, or does the author just blame capitalism for
• 2:30:26
  it? Oh, I've been told that's a false stereotype of women. I
• 2:30:33
  don't understand women. But the guy that told me that does just just just
• 2:30:43
  let that sink in for a minute. Well, yeah, this inc is
• 2:30:52
  in. Albert Nader Retro gave us five dollars Canadian and said World War One
• 2:30:58
  went from twenty eight July nineteen fourteen to eleven November, the US declared war
• 2:31:07
  on nineteen eighteen December seventh, nineteen seventeen. I think there was some copy
• 2:31:16
  pasting done here. I think you're saying November eleven, nineteen eighteen, and
• 2:31:20
  the US declared war on December seventh, nineteen seventeen. You maybe had men
• 2:31:26
  in action for six to eight months after training, yes, but a lot
• 2:31:31
  of them still ended up dead. The amount of time they spent in action
• 2:31:39
  versus what what the implications were afterward really doesn't matter. If they came in
• 2:31:46
  and instantly ended the war in three days, it's still had. It's the
• 2:31:52
  outcome, not the course of action that you like. Men in the United
• 2:31:58
  States essentially were scooped up and men were drafted in the United States quite a
• 2:32:03
  while before war was declared. They knew they were going to declare war.
• 2:32:09
  Before the events that were used as excuses to get involved in the war.
• 2:32:16
  They were already drafting men in preparation and looking for an excuse. And then
• 2:32:26
  so from the time the US declared war, they already had sent men over
• 2:32:31
  there. They were already sending men over And that's been a pattern throughout the
• 2:32:37
  entire twentieth century, and part of the twenty first century so far. Albert
• 2:32:43
  Ada Retro gave us another five dollars Canadian and said, that's supposed to be
• 2:32:46
  November eleven, twenty eighteen. Yep, that's okay. A German was threatening
• 2:32:52
  an alliance with Mexico to invade, as I've read at that time, that
• 2:32:56
  was a threat, I would say, not sufficient to go attack Germany.
• 2:33:03
  Like the solution to a threat coming from our southern border is really simple.
• 2:33:11
  Oh you you If they had taken seriously a threat that we were going to
• 2:33:18
  get invaded by Mexico during World War One, all they would have had to
• 2:33:26
  do was man the border between the United States and Mexico and they would have
• 2:33:33
  been able to repel any invasion. I don't even think it's arguable that that
• 2:33:46
  that that Mexico would have been able to hit us at sea significantly or or
• 2:33:54
  by air. And I don't think that Germany would have been able to do
• 2:33:58
  it either. Like we were not under a threat that merited sending troops overseas
• 2:34:07
  at all. And anyone who feels like comparing the Ukraine will not take a
• 2:34:16
  look yeah yeah, because this is it. It's it's they've got a formula
• 2:34:22
  our political factions have a formula, right that they trump up these they ramp
• 2:34:33
  up these perceived threats, they engage in honestly like a pro wrestler esque monologues
• 2:34:46
  at each other, you know, like it's almost like going back to the
• 2:34:52
  eighties and and watching watching it when it was the World Wrestling Federation that WWF
• 2:35:01
  and not World Wrestling Entertainment after the one environmentalist group sued them, and and
• 2:35:11
  watching them monologue at each other about how they're going to destroy each other and
• 2:35:15
  how each other or the bad guy, even though there's an obvious good guy
• 2:35:20
  and an obvious bad guy in the wrestling situation. But then then you get
• 2:35:28
  no diplomacy out of that, right, because the politicians are ranting at each
• 2:35:31
  other and threatening each other, and the next thing you know, somebody is
• 2:35:37
  investing in another corporation that makes weapons of war or performs services for the military,
• 2:35:46
  and and they're voting to send our troops over to some foreign country to
• 2:35:52
  get killed fighting over some concept that doesn't necessarily translate into threats to the uni
• 2:36:00
  United States at all, and interfere in some other countries political conflicts. So
• 2:36:07
  but yeah, in terms of World War One, no if there was a
• 2:36:11
  threat from Mexico, the solution would have been to man the border between the
• 2:36:18
  United States and Mexicos around the United States so that we couldn't get attacked by
• 2:36:26
  Mexico. Like, that's that. That's simple enough, isn't it. You
• 2:36:31
  know, there weren't even nuclear bombs. There weren't even long range missiles that
• 2:36:37
  that could even remotely threaten us. A lot of the technology of war that
• 2:36:43
  exists today was invented to fight the world wars that the United States involved itself
• 2:36:48
  in. Yeah, the Cold War wouldn't have happened if we had not entered
• 2:36:58
  World War One. Of course, once we developed air based war and war
• 2:37:09
  that was mitigated by having nukes and stuff, Well, we'll never have the
• 2:37:15
  same kind of war ever again. But now we can have millions upon millions
• 2:37:18
  of fighting aged men crossing the border, facilitated by the regime in charge.
• 2:37:28
  And now people are like, well, they're not invaders, they're immigrants.
• 2:37:31
  Yes, I know they look like invaders, but we don't call them invaders.
• 2:37:37
  We call them immigrants. So we can't invoke that rule we have about
• 2:37:43
  what we do when there's an invasion at the southern border, because We don't
• 2:37:46
  call them invaders. We call them immigrants. And you can't just invoke that
• 2:37:50
  law just because you call them invaders because we don't call them invaders, we
• 2:37:56
  call them immigrants. And by the way, the federal government will go to
• 2:37:58
  war with your state if you try to do it yourself instead of relying on
• 2:38:05
  us to not do it. But yeah, I like God blessed Texas that
• 2:38:16
  I wish that the rest of the states the United States had balls half the
• 2:38:22
  size of Texas. A lot of them do many Red states? Actually,
• 2:38:31
  yeah, a lot of them. A lot of the governors at least signed
• 2:38:35
  in support of Texas. I was glad to see that. And yeah,
• 2:38:39
  I'm going to do the doomer thing and say, yeah, this might be
• 2:38:43
  yet another sigh of where they're just waiting to get as much footage as they
• 2:38:48
  can. Oh yeah, and that they can, you know, restrict to
• 2:38:52
  just the footage they want so they can say, look, Texas and all
• 2:38:56
  these red states defying federal rules, this is an insurrection. Yeah, it
• 2:39:05
  could very well be another another Jay sick Ja sixth style. Well, yeah,
• 2:39:16
  sigh up, I sigh up. That involves ground troops. That's going
• 2:39:22
  to be Yeah, I don't. I don't even know the extremities to which
• 2:39:26
  I can describe, how how this is possibly a trap, a tarp into
• 2:39:33
  which you're all falling. So yeah, I'm going to predict the worst and
• 2:39:39
  then and then say I told you and but say I told you so when
• 2:39:45
  the worst possible thing happens. But be prepared for the worst possible thing happening
• 2:39:50
  the bike expect the administration to wag the dog here I don't know about.
• 2:39:56
  Don't forget. The Biden regime has all of the mainstream media outlets in the
• 2:40:03
  palm of the hand, and and and they're gonna they're gonna push everything they
• 2:40:07
  can through those through those outlets. Yeah, that's that's basically what that was,
• 2:40:13
  uh, a conspiracy among all of the major news outlets to promote the
• 2:40:22
  idea of a war that wasn't really happening, uh in some foreign area.
• 2:40:26
  And if I remember right in the movie, it was so bad that they
• 2:40:30
  made a place up for the war to be happening in because people were just
• 2:40:33
  so ignorant that they didn't realize it. I don't obviously they're not gonna make
• 2:40:39
  up a location in Texas, but I do expect and they don't even need
• 2:40:45
  to hire actors to do it now because they can. They can actually deep
• 2:40:48
  fake it if they want to, and they don't have to have like the
• 2:40:52
  whole idea of crisis. Actors can just go by the wayside. But but
• 2:40:56
  yeah, I expect a lot of fakery and in response to the situation,
• 2:41:05
  and yeah, they're probably going to use it to say we shouldn't have an
• 2:41:11
  election this year because there's such an emergency at the southern bonner. Well,
• 2:41:16
  that's exactly the same thing that the Democrats predicted Trump would do. It might
• 2:41:20
  be might might that be projection on their part if that happens, and when
• 2:41:26
  it does, they accuse their enemy of doing what they themselves intend to do.
• 2:41:31
  I don't know if the States would allow that. I don't know if
• 2:41:35
  how much of the US military has been compromised by by the mind virus.
• 2:41:43
  I don't you know what might happen. It could be anything from a completely
• 2:41:52
  you know, not with a bang but a whimper peaceful quote unquote peaceful like
• 2:41:58
  no no no physical fighting per se, a takeover or they you know,
• 2:42:05
  this could end up being like a civil war, like it would be really
• 2:42:13
  difficult to predict that nobody is going to fight back. There are too many
• 2:42:20
  people online sounding off about it, and whatever happens if you're going to predict
• 2:42:28
  all that, my prediction is that a lot of men are going to get
• 2:42:33
  themselves killed trying to stop it, and a lot of men are going to
• 2:42:35
  get themselves killed trying to enforce it. And you know, both both sides
• 2:42:41
  will point the finger at each other as the reason why they all died,
• 2:42:46
  and then we'll talk about the two to ten percent of deaths that were women,
• 2:42:54
  like they're the only ones that mattered, not us we but society.
• 2:43:03
  But in the meantime, I guess we'll have to just watch. They may
• 2:43:07
  just you know, there's the possibility that they own the election system and they
• 2:43:13
  don't have to do that. There's also the possibility that they realize they've stretched
• 2:43:24
  their hand a little too far, a bit off, a little more than
• 2:43:26
  they can chew in terms of fooling people, and they'll allow, you know,
• 2:43:33
  the election to be fair for once. But you know, there's also
• 2:43:41
  the possibility of having a seventy five degree day in the middle of December due
• 2:43:46
  to bizarre circumstances happening very rare thing. Once in a while, it happens,
• 2:43:52
  but it's not something that you would ever want to count on. Richard
• 2:43:56
  Beier gave us five dollars. Super Chick said it is only being seen as
• 2:44:03
  a problem because the migrants are now competing for the entitlement gibbs with those who
• 2:44:07
  believe that such gibbs are their ergo given right. That's a good inside inside
• 2:44:16
  joke. I have seen articles to that effect a few decades ago too.
• 2:44:22
  The wagon dog scenario was created to cover up a sexual scandal in the executive
• 2:44:26
  branch. Well that's because there had been one recently, or well, I
• 2:44:33
  mean there's always a sexual scandal in the DC, Like holy shit. You
• 2:44:43
  know, we learned in I think twenty sixteen, the current year plus one,
• 2:44:48
  that the United States Capital, the United States federal government had a slush
• 2:44:56
  fund to pay off employees in uh the Capitol Building who were alleging sexual misconduct
• 2:45:05
  by our legislators. Like literally had to cover up slush fund for sexual misconduct
• 2:45:16
  in Washington. And nobody, nobody batter than I because there was so much
• 2:45:22
  other stuff going on. Yeah, so disgusting. It it shouldn't be surprising,
• 2:45:31
  and it's really kind of not. Yeah, everybody wants the Epstein list.
• 2:45:35
  You know, as far as the Epstein client list goes. It's not
• 2:45:39
  that I don't want to know, but fuck I want the list of the
• 2:45:45
  people who's who who used that slush fund to cover their their asses after after
• 2:45:52
  sexually harassing or otherwise engaging in sexual misconduct with employees and in DC mm hmm.
• 2:46:00
  I want the CIA to admit that they killed John Kennedy so that they
• 2:46:03
  can be held account Oh, why they already did and they have accountability,
• 2:46:07
  No, they don't have that. Washington is allergic to accountability. But that
• 2:46:15
  is all the super chats. That is all the super chows. That is
• 2:46:20
  the wrong window. Damn it. Okay, that is all the rumble rants.
• 2:46:24
  Nope, there is one more occupation. Forty two gave us twenty dollars
• 2:46:28
  and said no comment, just feeding the badger. Thank you uh for the
• 2:46:33
  rumble rant and the twenty dollars, and thank everyone who commented and sent us
• 2:46:41
  funds. Also thanks to everyone for listening. This has been a this is
• 2:46:46
  a weird sausage and I honestly wasn't it sure if this article would be fodder
• 2:46:54
  for a whole show and it's actually going to be for you know, it's
• 2:46:58
  going to take us at le to to get through it. But so thanks
• 2:47:05
  to my two co hosts also for sticking out the long sausage, and thanks
• 2:47:09
  to everybody who works in the background make HBr talk happen. Good Night all,
• 2:47:15
  good night yea.