Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Subjectivity and Objectivity philosophy 030724

Transcript

Subjectivity and Objectivity philosophy 030724 · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:05
And today we'll be talking about what we spoken before about object and subjectivity,
0:10
right, because we guess must seek to know that much better that it is
0:17
what is objective truth and subjective truth? Right? But sometimes you must understand
0:30
when you're speaking the difference between an object and the subject. Right, when
0:35
something is subjective, when something is objective? Right, what is this?
0:40
Okay, it's a subject of object I can't hold it, right, I
0:46
can't touch it. Right, we can't agree on it. Right. It's
0:50
an object because it got a name. Right, So the name is a
0:54
cop. Right. And if I if you're talking about a carp you can't
1:00
make me describe a car, right because it's defined a dictionary, right of
1:04
what a cop is? Right? And there are many types of cops.
1:08
Right, But the copy is a car, right, So that's objective.
1:12
Right. We can't agree that the cop is a cop. Prime. So
1:19
when people fight or quarry or argue, always seek to know they fight or
1:23
arguing over something that is subjective or over something that's objective. Intelligent people like
1:34
to argue about objectives. On Intelligent people fight about let me say it again,
1:44
Intelligent people like to argue about objectives subjectives. I'm sorry, subjectivities and
1:51
intelligent people like to fight about objective about objectivities or objectives. I'm using this
1:57
as if it's anonymous, but it's not to explain my point. For example,
2:02
if I tell you that this is what is this again? If I
2:07
say, no, this is not a cop, there's an apple? Can
2:08
we fight about it? Can you fight about it? I want to fight
2:15
about it? Correct, I can see a father note, yeah, it's
2:21
a cop, right, And it's a cop. It'd be stupid and silly
2:25
to be fighting somebody over that the cop is an apple. Right, It
2:30
makes no prime right right? So based on that saying, you suspend your
2:37
argument, right or just acknowledge what the person is saying, because I won't
2:39
fight right. Okay, maybe I'm wrong I think there's a cop. But
2:44
if it says an apple, who am I to charge? One? Might
2:47
to say? Now can move on? Does that make sense? And it's
2:55
it's the same thing I say, being truthful and telling a lie? Right,
3:00
We're going if someone is black and litering a lie. If somebody is
3:07
black and literaling a lie, there's not the fact on that person, right,
3:14
right, because the person knows that a lie? Right? Okay,
3:24
what is that over there? What is that those round things over there again?
3:30
So you said, Princess says balloon. Prince says balloon because it's a
3:36
balloon, right, So that's an objective. That's an object right now you
3:40
can hold on touch right? What is his name? And so can I
3:46
say that it's a pineapple? Why? Because I means it's a defamation of
3:53
that thing called balloon. Are you going to the dictionary? It defines where
3:58
the balloon is, right, and many types of balloon, But the balloon
4:00
is a badroom? Does that make sense? So that is an object and
4:04
that kind the objective truth to right. So if fighting with somebody, I
4:10
said it was a balloon, she said it was a Uh, she said
4:15
it was a pineapple. And I'll ask you that. Why were you're fighting
4:21
there? If you're fighting, it means you don't know the balloon is a
4:25
balldom. It means you don't know the difference between ball and pineapple. Yeah
4:30
you can. Can you please stop what you're doing, man, it's obstructing
4:33
what I'm doing about. You just started a lot. We were trying to
4:43
listen to the world we are talking too. Yeah, okay, I'm sorry
4:53
for the distraction. If somebody said, that's a balloon, can your phone?
5:01
Put your phone on the table? Place a very destructive. Don't make
5:09
your mind to be destructive. It's not hapful for you. Participate in what
5:14
they say. It's good for you. Okay, something can benefit you too.
5:26
What how does it when I look like today, Renie? What did
5:30
you say? What what I look like? Little cloudy? You said,
5:39
the way that looks ready? You said, the way that looks cloudy?
5:43
He said, what what come? Right? Right? And what might not
5:46
be right? Right? Is that is that object? Is that objective or
5:51
subjective? Is that an object or a subject object? Yeah? Because we
5:58
can't det on that subject right, h it's not established right understand? But
6:05
what weather is established? Right? Right? So it's object we want to
6:11
talk about the weather. We're talking about the weather, right, But the
6:14
way we're talking about the weather and what I see and what you see by
6:16
the subjective right, right? So you can neither be right or wrong,
6:20
or you can be right wrong. Does that make sense? We cannot fight
6:24
with subjectivities, as I admitt somebody that someone asks you, that's what I
6:30
like today? So subjectivity is open discussions, right, and you it means
6:35
it's near right or wrong. It's just to communicate. It means your projection
6:41
perception and perspective is different from my projection perception and perspective. So we can
6:46
disagree to agree, right, And so the weather it's cloud cloudy and rainy.
6:56
In subjectivities, you can put two together, right. You can put
7:00
it through together. Right. You can say, well, okay, I
7:04
think that you guys are saying that today it's rainy and cloudy. We can
7:10
put agree on that, right. You cannot therefore say that now today's just
7:15
rainie. Today it's not cloudy. A missag just want to fight, right.
7:23
It means you want to impost, not in print, right, because
7:28
they want to talk about the philosophy of imprint men. As I call it
7:33
is an ability to use subjectivities not to create conflict, but to imprint your
7:43
ideas in the minds of artists through persuasion. Right debate. For example Princess
7:50
in the debate Club Right debate, people debate subjectivities. What do you think
7:59
about the natural? It's a subjectivity, right, I think that do not
8:03
to miss a good father. It's a good business man. He loves America
8:13
and he is a shore man. He likes the troops, he likes his
8:22
children, he likes to be president. You might you may disagree that makes
8:33
sense. You may disagreements that what I just said the man of a you're
8:37
thinking, right, because somebody who doesn't like don Not Trump, we do
8:43
not agree with what I say? Right? Should we find out about that?
8:46
Why? Yes? It's subject and subjectivity right. It means the person's
8:54
projection, perceptive and perspective. It's free, it's free to be different from
9:00
yours. Right, that's what I say. We disagree to agree, right,
9:03
because it's not a thing. Does that make sense? But the person
9:09
it's they're not Trump? Right. I cannot say don Trump is not Donut
9:15
Trump, right because mister Donutrump is a person and a name, right,
9:20
Dave, I said president do not Trump? You think about him? Right?
9:24
The word president is subjective, right because if you take away the president
9:28
used to be mister Trump, right, because the love of defying that way,
9:33
right? If you take away even the names this somebody right? Right?
9:39
So if you take away all the subjectivity, is what is left objectivity?
9:48
It means you, guys, I disagree or what's something that that thing
9:54
is true? What is the objectivity? If I talk about mister Trump.
10:01
What is the thing that its objectively true? Now? Correct? It's a
10:09
person. The president is today tomorrow will not be. You always be a
10:15
person. That makes sense. You don't understand how right, So you can
10:22
see that your name princess is subject We gave the name right, right.
10:26
You can't see that your name Prince Ferry is subjective. Right, you can
10:28
change it one day, can change it, you can. It's a name,
10:31
right. You see that you're a gender, that you're a girl.
10:33
Your boy is subjective. Right, It's just a name, right, But
10:37
the treasures are you're different. You got a different bowdies. You can make
10:41
up a man and a woman. They got different bodies. You can make
10:48
up right, m You can switch to call a man a woman, called
10:50
a woman a man, not the name. Well, change those stupid the
10:54
same people, right, that makes sense. You can call daddy mummy.
11:00
You can call mommy daddy, but I'll still be me. Right, one
11:05
must have a mummy, right, So the name change, but the person
11:09
is the same thing. Right, that makes sense. So it must be
11:13
every equality to peel off subjectivity from objectivities. For example, when you grow
11:22
up, even to face racism, sexism, bigitry and all those things that
11:26
what subjectivity is objectivities? Yeah, because it does not exist, right,
11:31
somebody made it up. That makes sense, So don't fight and die for
11:39
those things that people make up. That that people make up, right,
11:46
that's right. They always look deep into the person. Right, forget about
11:50
the color, the race, the height their looks. At the end of
11:56
the day, one thing is true. It's a person that makes sense.
12:01
So that's object chiefly true. That's what they call truth. Even that word
12:09
person is subjective right if you take away out what person, there is something
12:16
that you're talking about, right, that thing is objectively true, just like
12:22
the weather. Can you hold the weather? Can you touch it? Can
12:26
you hold the sun? Can you touch it? Can you hold the air
12:30
you breath? Can you touch it? Even though you cannot hold on touch
12:35
it? Is it objective or subjective? Correct? What do you think?
12:43
Because it exists? The sun exists him, you can just to call it
12:54
the sun. But there is something that you call the sun. Doesn't make
12:58
sense? That thing in this is objective truth. I think any service an
13:03
object that you can an object must not mean that something must hold on touched,
13:07
right, is not making sense. There is something that is out there
13:15
what about God? Objective? Objective or subjective? Just two things and a
13:24
lot of time? Is it objective or subjective? But it's both subjective objective?
13:33
You're right? Can you take time to think about it? Right?
13:35
Because God is subjective because you have not saying God, right, you have
13:43
not touched God. And God is subjective because you're just one thing that they're
13:46
talking about. Right. One people call God something else and then other people
13:52
cause something. So if two people are saying the same thing, calling something
13:56
differently means it's subjective, right, But it's one thing true that they're talking
14:00
about something right, that thing that the thing is God? Right, So
14:05
God is objectively true because people are talking about it, but the way they're
14:13
talking about it is subjective. That makes sense. It means they're talking about
14:16
something. The difference that they don't know. I tell you what that thing
14:22
is, but they're talking about that thing. So that thing in itself it's
14:28
true. You either talk about it or they don't talk about it. Or
14:35
what might be subjective is the way they believe about God. And the way
14:41
they talk about God doesn't make sense. If I said God is my cap
14:46
it means I'm talking about something that is God right, his car pride,
14:50
But God might not be a car pride. It just means that you like
14:56
your cop so much, right, because God is my bead, because I
15:00
like my bed so much right. But my bet it's oude right, came
15:05
from a tree and the factory right. You can see that is not objectively
15:11
God right, but you have given a God quality right, so that bed
15:16
ns been changed to a God right. But the bet is not God right,
15:22
So that changed not the way you see things is subjective right, but
15:26
it does not take away from that thing itself from being. Does that make
15:30
sense? Right? So humans can disagree about God. But just because they
15:37
are talking about God, it means that God exists, right, It means
15:41
that God is something right that exists right, that is right, But just
15:48
defend that they don't know what they're talking about, right, So they can
15:52
interpret that God based on their own intelligence right, based on their own traditions,
15:56
right, based on their own cultures right, and their own society is
16:00
right, and the knowledge of things right, the common sense right, that
16:06
science right, How the interpret reality right, how the interpreting subjectivity is right.
16:11
There are viewpoints right, the world view right, their minds right,
16:18
the world view right. World view means how you see things in the world.
16:22
Right. Right, if you's stay in the cave and ask you what
16:29
if it's stay in the cave and ask you tell me about the cave,
16:32
tell me about the war. Let me say it again. If you're stay
16:36
in the cave, never been outside of your cave, and I ask you,
16:41
please stand there by a wall, what wall will you be talking about?
16:47
Yeah? The cave all right? Like my world is super big.
16:52
It's a nicer cave. Like nicer the cave. It's dark, it's like
16:56
that. It's blah blah blah. It's beautiful. I got some animals in
17:02
it, some insert in it. One is big. Yeah, you're like,
17:10
no, I don't think they live in a cave. Why you think
17:12
the person live in a cave? Because they got a bigger world view?
17:15
Right, you can see it's a cave. Right, So that cave story
17:19
is acknowledge. Right. If you are not knowledgeable, you live in a
17:23
cave. Right. The cave means that you're reduced to You are reduced to
17:29
your ignorance, right, you are reduced to what you know. Right,
17:33
So when you see the cave mind, it's a mind that cages itself with
17:37
it's ignorance, right, And so with that ignorance, that person will see
17:44
things based on their own projection, persition, and perspective. Right, So
17:48
the objectivities and subjectivities will be different. Right, But the things that are
17:53
objectively a subjectively describe exists, right, Those things themselves are true. Right.
18:02
It doesn't matter what those people are talking about, right. But the
18:04
method that they're talking about that thing is that talking about something, right.
18:08
But the way they're talking about things might be different. Right, So therefore
18:12
you can only need to fight with the way they're talking about it. Right.
18:15
Therefore, I don't need to trust somebody or die because the way they're
18:18
talking about it, right, it just means that they're talking about something differently
18:22
based on their own projection, perception, and perspective, right, based on
18:26
the intelligence the world view, right, and based on their limitations. Right.
18:33
The lens to the world is the human mind. Right. You see
18:37
to your mind, right, you think to your mind, right, to
18:41
your mind. Right, you breathe through your mind, right, you listen
18:47
through your mind? Right. Right. Objectivity and subjectivity subjective and object and
18:59
subject. The question becomes when it's an object a subject and when when it's
19:03
a subject an object. God, for example, can be a subject,
19:14
can be an object. That makes sense. It's a subject because you're talking
19:18
about God. You have not seen God. You think about our own way,
19:22
because for sure, I did not make disguise. I did not make
19:26
the rain right. Science can't explain it. Right, I did not make
19:30
you right, but just happened to give birth to you. Right. We're
19:34
just a process of your being. Right. Mom and dad meant did some
19:40
mom and Dad's stuff and then something happened. Is he let a cat here?
19:45
Right? When? When when you grow up? Right? And then
19:48
something happened and then science kind of explain it. At the end of the
19:52
day, the baby stays nine months in the belly, and the baby pops
19:56
itself up and the human being is here. That Prince why to jump in
20:03
there. That's Princeviller going okay, places, so that being can be a
20:15
subject and it can be an object. Kah kah mmm. So when we
20:33
talk about truth, that's what I call natural truth. If you plan is
20:44
it, it will grow right. You breathe air to live right, you
20:52
eat food to live right, and you need the sun to live right.
20:59
You need nature to live right. Nature exists with or without you. That's
21:07
not your truth. The sun is not here because of you. It's not
21:11
raining now because of you. Trees we grow, not because of you,
21:19
because in the DNA and genetics of molecule or atomic being or essence of that
21:26
thing that you don't know. Natural things grow, and that's natural things.
21:33
Some grow by seconds, some grow by minutes. Some we grow by hours
21:41
or days of weeks or years or the creates or centuries or whatever. I
21:48
said. Some will grow for one mile of year that book at the grand
21:52
Age. But natural things change changes like growth. That is true. That's
22:00
objective truth. But the subjectivity in that can be the way we say it.
22:07
Right, Science sometimes becomes subjective because what science says to that about something
22:15
changes. But the thing did not change, But the knowledge of science change
22:22
because that knowledge, the knowledge that described that which is, is in itself
22:29
it's in itself subjective. The knowledge that described that which is is in the
22:34
self subjective. Right, what does that mean to youself subjective? The knowledge
22:45
that describes something is in the sub subjective, But the thing in the self
22:48
subjective, that's philosophical. I think I described this cop I said, what
22:59
is this? What is phone? Okay, describe it to me. A
23:07
phone listenant to call people, and the phone is a kind of the kind
23:17
of muh. The phone is meant to like buy stuff, is meant to
23:30
call people. It's meant to Okay, thank you, what is what is
23:41
this? And describe to me the phone is meant to take pictures, take
23:47
videos, call people, text people, and search things online, know about
23:53
them. Okay, So thank you. You can see the example about the
24:00
what I'm talking about. I hold this device, I ask you what is
24:03
this? You guys can not describe this phone to me? Describe his clean
24:10
can't see the case. He did not describe the fun to me because it's
24:15
subjective. You choose to think about the phone where you choose to think about
24:18
the phone. Does that makes sense? That's why I said that the way
24:22
you used to describe something that in the objective can tend not to be subjective.
24:26
The remix sense. So this is an object but you guys, you
24:29
guys gave subjective definition of what the phone is. There you guys want to
24:33
come too, Ay, give me the function of the phone. I know
24:37
what the phone is about, but that's what the phone is to you,
24:41
right, whatever ask the engineer that make the phone, you describe the phone
24:45
differently doesn't make sense, right, So as somebody that sells the phone,
24:51
the person might describe the phone differently, right, But what the straits that
24:53
they're talking about the object, right? And the object is the phone,
24:56
right, But they're using subject descript on the different in that phone. Right.
25:02
So the subjective definition of something in itself might be different from the object
25:07
itself. So the subjective definition has used to describe something might not be true,
25:17
but the object in itself is true. For example, that God,
25:22
the way people take to talk about God or describe God might not be true,
25:30
but God is true, right. And even that name God might not
25:34
be true because the name is given. But there is something that we give
25:40
that thing God's quality, right or God quality is right? But that thing
25:45
we do not know, right. But not knowing that thing doesn't mean that
25:48
that thing does not exist, right, And not knowing that they don't mean
25:52
that thing is not an objective truth. Right. What is subjective is that
25:56
you understand now that thing is limited, right, So you're scripture of that
26:00
thing is limited to your intelligence. Right. So therefore, if your intelligence
26:03
is limited on flawed you might make that object to be flawed. Right,
26:11
But the object is not flawing itself. Right, it's flawed because it makes
26:14
the object to be flawed. Right. That makes sense. Same like humans,
26:18
Right, A human being is a human being, but some humans might
26:25
describe humans differently. Right, And I said, Oh, the human being
26:30
is white, it's green, it's blue, it's ugly, does not look
26:33
good, it's bad. Oh it's black, it's beautiful, it's handsome,
26:47
or those descriptions. I'm just making it up right subjectively, right, There
26:52
is there is no There is no tarrets on what I just said. Right,
26:59
say what I'm saying, it does not it come from the word I
27:02
think. Right. And I can make a beautiful person look ugly by by
27:07
by saying the person is ugly, right. And I can make an ugly
27:11
person look beautiful by saying the person is beautiful. Right. I can make
27:15
a bad person look good by saying that the bad person is good, right.
27:19
And I can make a good person look bad by saying the good person
27:22
is bad. Right. Right, I can look at beautiful human being unsaid
27:29
because they are white than fear right, or that they are black dan fear
27:37
right, whether they're white that's superior, right, or that they're black dy'ing
27:41
feror right, or that they are green the inferior. But I'm using my
27:45
description to describe them, right, So my description is subjective, right,
27:52
and my description is not what that thing is. Right. By choosing to
27:56
describe that thing that way, right, it's because I wanted to see the
28:00
thing superior in fear right, it because I want to reward the thing or
28:03
punishing, right, because I want to hte the thing or like it.
28:07
Right, But I think it's the same right, right, But that defination
28:12
is subjective, right, And sometimes that's why the definitions you give to things
28:18
and the subjectivities you give to things should be suspect. It's subjectivity and suspect
28:25
that makes sense because it might not be true. Right, And I need
28:29
to think about my intentions, right, my intentions? Why am I discovering
28:34
nothing that way? Right? If I like something when I describe it good
28:41
or bad. If I hit something but I describe it good or bad,
28:49
that's my describing the good. Or by changing things for what it thing is,
28:53
that's the point. Right. Nothing s objective right, And I've given
28:59
this objective description and definition. Right, you should be suspect. Right,
29:06
it means should be suspicious about subjectivities. Right. You cannot take subjectivities to
29:11
the bank. It means that you may not be true. If you go
29:18
to the bank that it gives me money, it means you have money in
29:22
the bank. Right. Right. If you go to the bank that please
29:26
give me one thousand dollars, it means you have more than one thousand dollars
29:30
in the bank. Right. If you go to the bank that gives me
29:33
one billion dollars, the bank knows you got more than one bilond dollars in
29:37
the bank, right, Right, Because you cannot take away you don't half
29:41
right unless you're stealing right now, you pay a price for it, right,
29:45
because that was objectively true. Right. That's why people get punished for
29:48
they're wrong, right, because your polish for they're wrong, because that truth
29:52
is established. Right. We have I agreed that this is right. Right,
29:56
So if you break that right, you be punished. Right, because
30:00
there's something you break right that all of us are great to right society,
30:04
Their colored is such a contract line. By calling people names and using description
30:11
that is not proven, that's not fact, that's not science. To describe
30:15
people cannot be a measurement of regulating or governing society. Right, Right,
30:27
you get to say that it's basically wrong for a society to give people subjective
30:32
colors, right that I will call you green, I'll call you right.
30:36
If I see a green person, I'll give the green person good stuff.
30:42
If I see a blue person, I'll give the blue person bad stuff.
30:47
Would that be right? Because that person, whether the green or right,
30:52
has the persons right, they have one thing in common, right, that
30:56
person's right. So when you give them colors, is it rang Because just
31:02
as subjectivity is right, so it gets most very careful. Subjectivity is right.
31:07
Right, it's religion, it's subjectivity or objectivity, believing in something,
31:15
believing in something a subjective objectivity subjectivity? Good? What about you? Yeah?
31:23
Why is the subjectivity because? Yeah? Correct? So you therefore fight
31:32
those people that don't believe in it? Why not because you think it's their
31:40
choice? Correct, that's why the subjectivity? Yeah correct, That's why an
31:48
American constitution, you are free to believe in religion or not. If you're
31:56
free to believe in something or not right because that thing is not objective truth?
32:02
Right, But because you don't believe in something that before believe in you
32:07
had to prove of believing in it. Yeah, if you want to believe
32:10
in something, what will make society come against you? Go against you for
32:15
what you believe in. If you believe in something, I was certain not
32:22
like it, I was certain a like it. It's good question. If
32:42
you believe in something, when or why do you think that society might not
32:47
like what you believe in. If what you believe in is hurting orders,
32:57
right, you are free to believe in something subjectivities if only if it does
33:01
not hurt people. Right. If you believe in craziness, that's your business.
33:06
Right, Maybe to use your craziness to hurt people, those are real
33:09
people. Right. You cannot take your subjectivity to hurt the object. That
33:15
makes sense. You cannot take your subjectivities to hurt the object that goes against
33:22
the rules of acceptable subjectivities. That makes sense. You can choose to say
33:32
today's Wednesday. That's your belief, but everybody knows that today is not Wednesday.
33:38
Right, But if we choose to use, if we choose to use
33:47
that your belief that is flawed to hurt somebody, then that society will come
33:52
against you. Right, that makes sense. That's why religion have fait to
33:57
believe what I want to believe in, right, But you cannot use that
34:00
to other people, right. And you cannot use that to say your region
34:05
is the only way right, because how do you know your regions or religion.
34:09
It cannot be right going to come from that thinking. Right. You
34:14
have not seen that thing, right, and the thing is not said to
34:16
you. There's no objective truth to make you what you believe to be the
34:22
only thing right, because it's an idea, as you said, right,
34:25
it's your thought process, right, and you cannot fast it on people therefore
34:30
right right, because it's not objectively true. God is objectively true, but
34:39
the belief to God is not objectively it's subjective. Doesn't make sense, it's
34:44
objectively true. Right. We believe that there is something called God, who
34:47
might who might just not call it God. We believe that is something that
34:52
we don't know, And that's not so much good for us. Give us
34:57
this air to breathe, give us life, Make make give space in your
35:01
mother's Tell me for you to sit in there and grow. Give you the
35:07
nose just to break, the eyes to see, the ears to hear,
35:13
the mind to think, and the brain and es called to shield your brain.
35:19
That thing things I need to have bones right, you need to have
35:23
body and lean and they have any bone marbles in it. I think think
35:28
they need to have some nerves right, and organs and cells right. And
35:35
I think thinks that you need to have day and night. You walk within
35:38
the day and maybe you can sleep. Nothing makes you to think to leave
35:44
the survive. I think they don't. Now makes you to have two hands,
35:51
two legs, get you to be balanced the left brain and the right
35:57
brain. That thing gives you a conscience to think of what I'm doing is
36:01
wrong. Nothing guides you and teaches you to think, to create, to
36:09
inspire the deo ith. That thing gives you the inspiration of science to change
36:16
your world, to create the plan or the car, to create medicine.
36:23
That thing gives you the mind and intellect to go to space to connect the
36:28
dots. That thing gives you that essence of proportionality, measurement, and balance.
36:37
That thing gives your mind that infinity mind, that mind that can do
36:42
wonders, that mind that can do magic. That thing that's what I call
36:49
the greatest omni designer. It's something that might be that small or that big,
36:57
that make that which is is, since we don't know that the thing,
37:02
the first thing that made all things soon, since we can never see
37:07
the things that make all things, or the engineer at the beginning of all
37:10
things, since we might not develop the intelligence to know everything and do everything.
37:17
So that thing therefore is superior to us. That thing, it's true.
37:25
That thing, it's real. We might call it God, you might
37:32
call it whatever you call it, but I call it the greatest omni designer.
37:42
That's objective. I call it it's objective. Right, I give you
37:49
a name. Right, But if I don't give the name to that,
37:52
that or none of the known now, none of the known is still known.
37:58
Right because the unknone of the unknown is unknown does not mean that don't
38:02
know of the unknown. It's not none, and it doesn't mean that the
38:07
unknown of the unknown cannot be known. Must beak like a philosopher. Yeah,
38:17
yeah, I am philosopher. Prince is rae mm hmm. I think
38:25
you're bank okay, Benjamin. He's a great philosopher writer. Thank you.
38:35
Is one of the founding fathers. I love it. It's a business man
38:42
too. You are so princess as a fashion company brand that you are and
38:51
you are a designer and artists and a philosopher. Chris, I'm so blessed
38:59
of your guys. I hope every time I am tried. My goal is
39:02
inspire you guys to be great humans and to know much about the mind,
39:08
and to be able to separate objectivity from subjectivities. If you don't understand the
39:14
difference between these two, you tend to fight in society for local reason.
39:17
You tend to hurry yourself or others. People are afraid to think what they
39:22
can think. Godness are subjectivities and use your thinking to do good. Right
39:28
when you're a free to think, you use your free thinking to do harm.
39:31
Society cannot accept that God. There's something called the social contract that will
39:37
accepted that seems we are an understead of nature. We all of us can
39:43
agree to our can't agree to disagree, and we can't agree on the fact
39:47
not to disagree. That will live in a society dowly the rule of law
39:52
right. We need governance, we need leadership, we need order, and
40:02
we need freedom and resources and opportunities in order to prosper. And that if
40:10
you're subjective in your debate or argument, it should be to learn something to
40:16
bring for a new idea. Now what science does. Science takes subjectivities and
40:23
take them to their lab and makes them to become objectivities. Science is a
40:30
way that can transform subjectivities into objectivities. It takes a good heart, a
40:42
good mind, and a good humor. The world is destroyed by subjectivities name
40:51
calling, misinformation, disinformation, propagander right discrimination, racism, sexism, pigotry,
41:00
anti semitism, or the phobias that leads to crueties, the humanization,
41:07
demonization, and nepotism, inustices on fairness. All this creates poverty, creates
41:20
cruety, creates underdevelopment, and bring the worst in humans. If humans are
41:28
given the freedom to think of our open mind, our open heart, and
41:34
have open hands, they can create positive subjectivities and use positive subjectivities to create
41:42
positive objects. If we hold it this truth to be self evident, that's
41:53
an established truth that all of us can disagree to agree that humans are persons
42:01
and upon their persons should be given freedom, and their freedom should be the
42:08
freedom of agency, autonomy of control of themselves, of their mind, body
42:14
and soula environment, and what they do. Giving them that autonomy gives them
42:20
responsibilities and obligations and expectations and if they do abuse their responsibility, the obligations
42:28
and expectations. A civilized society with the rule of law that is fair and
42:34
just, have the systems of justice and law enforcement to make humans abide and
42:42
conform to the rules and ordinances on norms of civilized society. Of thinking is
42:54
a way of pain. For the human being to be free in itself,
43:01
the human being in itself must be an object that is supposed to be free.
43:10
It can be that human being is something that you can see and touch,
43:14
it can fail. That's the biological information about a being. It's a
43:21
thing that you can touch, ahle, smell, that you can apply your
43:25
senses upon. That's an objective part of the human being that you cannot discriminate
43:30
open. You cannot deny the being of an object that is real. That's
43:38
where crutists come about. Crutists come about refusing that which is true and switching
43:49
or reversing that which is objectively true to be subjectively untrue. See Racism and
43:57
Bakertry comes when you deny the human being. It's humanness, that's the right
44:02
word. If you defuel that a human being is not a being, then
44:07
you give that being. Now subjective applications to dehumanize and din a greater being
44:15
for you, therefore, to undermine that being and subjugate and oppressed that being,
44:22
or the name of exploitation, that's all that's all about. So the
44:30
law of society started what I call the natural saying, the natural saying the
44:38
woman is an object, it's a being, it's a thing that you can
44:42
say in nature, all untouched, a woman is a woman. All the
44:45
humans come from a woman. But because of patriarchy and major reanism, they
44:52
refused the womanliness of a woman and gave a woman's subjectivities. Roman is less
45:00
a human belonged to me, that this human cannot be. That they called
45:06
sexism. They take away the naturality, the natural truth of that being as
45:14
a human being, and give it subjectivities in order to discriminate. Same with
45:19
racism. The being that you can seek an holand touch and see the way
45:23
they look racist what I call colorists to make the word to be right,
45:32
colorisms of racism. They took away that naturality, that natural truth of that
45:39
person or that being, of being a human, and gave it subjectivities.
45:46
Subjectivities most sometimes are not true, and it uses subjectivities to abuse and discriminate
45:53
upon that human being accord that the natural say, then that is what I
46:00
call the human saying hate. You cannot see a human being because of the
46:07
way, because of their naturality and hate or dislike them. But to hate
46:13
or dislike human being because of their race or gender that you have falsely given.
46:20
It takes a human to hate another human. So you need to give
46:23
that human being subjectivities about that human being. That if the boe are short
46:29
hetism, discriminate, don't like them. If people are tall hetism, give
46:36
them privileges. If humans are fat aracism, discriminate against them. And if
46:43
humans are say, give them all the best their life can give. Or
46:47
even man humans are all agism, discriminate against them because they are all not
46:53
their fault. Everything I'm saying, he is not the fault of the human
46:58
It's just natural truth. Where they use naturality or objectivity for subjectivities, and
47:06
they twisted to get the societies that we have today at war with itself,
47:12
killing itself, refusing humans or what humans are, refusing natural truth for what
47:17
it is. We live in a society now govern by natural truth, governed
47:24
by subjective constructive fallacies, saturing which you're live in. It's not about truth.
47:36
It's about objective truth or natural truth or scientific truth. Subjectivities. We're
47:45
going to telling you hear people that you think are very intelligent. Better,
47:51
don't describe humans based on their naturalities. The're talking about white, green,
47:55
colored, blue, black. You run away from facing the natural truth of
48:04
the being. Because if you face the natural reality of the being, decide
48:09
to be okay, things would be what they are now, which is subjective
48:15
subjective now, which is Objective's subjective now, which can only be subjective and
48:22
objective. It's what humans call God. That's what I call the greatest greatest
48:28
community designer to this class objectivity and subjectivity. Learn a subject and an object
48:40
a purpose. If I to know this, GIRs can be good humans.
48:45
If somebody tell you that you're ugly? Is that an objectivity or subjectivity?
48:52
Will you fight for that? Or you hurry yourself for that? Will you
48:55
be angry by that because the person said that you are angry? To make
48:59
your angry? Right? But if you know it's a subjective, all you
49:01
do she thank you, thank you, I'm ugly, got your a word,
49:07
right, I'll make the word to become true. Right. So many
49:10
say, oh, you're way pretty. What do you say, thank you?
49:15
Because you might not be pretty. It doesn't matter. I've got the
49:16
word pretty and it's subjective. But one thing is true. You're you.
49:22
But humans cannot describe you based on the way they feel. That's on their
49:25
intelligence, based on their good intentions about intentions right and should not be should
49:32
not disturb you because that's just who they are. That's why you need to
49:36
know who you are in the first place. Know who you are, like
49:39
you, trust you, happy to be with you, sick to be with
49:44
you, be proud of who you are. That's true. Don't let subjectivities
49:52
from others define who you are. When I make it to feel insufficient,
49:57
make you feel inadequate and insecured. And once you're insufficient, in adequate and
50:01
secure, you're going to start fighting for iniquity and inequalities and inferiorities. It
50:10
comes in when you don't believe in yourself when you take subjectivities to be true.
50:16
Always be quick to decipher and to separate subjectivities from what objectivities. If
50:24
you're short and I say you're short, will you be angry because why is
50:32
that your own being short? That's the point. But if I tell her,
50:37
oh, you're short after you're ugly? Is that true? Does it
50:44
matter if you're short or all? See doubt? What is that you're ugly?
50:47
It's me saying it right? It's subjective? Right? Is that nice?
50:52
Is that meant to make you feel happy? Is that coming from a
50:54
good person? Should you care about that? If you care about me?
51:00
To make bad person wins? Right? Right? Somebody call you black or
51:04
green or white? Shouldn't matter? Do you care about that? What's you
51:08
care about yourself? Right? Because that person uses the black or white to
51:13
eat that pun issue or do something with the world you ride, it's denying
51:16
you. Right. When you call somebody white, it means you don't believe
51:20
the person is right. The person is a natural thing. Right. We
51:24
choose to see that thing like an object, right, an artificial description.
51:28
Right, called somebody black, that person is right. It's just not to
51:34
respect that being right. You use to color an artificial subjective color. Right
51:38
for you to use that color and my nipulators people right to make them fight
51:43
themselves. Right, only see people fighting themselves, black and white fighting themselves.
51:49
You're like, well, I look at you're not black? You know
51:50
wh Why are you guys fighting because sometimes society will make it so that will
51:58
make you think that subjectivity is a true and objectivities are not true. Messid
52:05
to make you think that subjective truth is true, of which is not an
52:08
objective truth. It's not true of which it is. Society makes you think
52:14
that you're white, not that you're just the person. And you've been fighting
52:19
for white instead of fighting for your person hurt. That's crazy, right,
52:23
So that to make you think that you're black when you're a person, I'll
52:30
make yourself of fighting for your person who to be fighting for black. That's
52:34
a trick, right, where you're fighting for black and white. It's not
52:37
a thing right, it's medal. Right. It means it's a trick not
52:42
to fight about yourself. Right, because the person is a person, that
52:45
all persons are the same person's right. So if you're fighting about the person,
52:49
all of us were fighting for the same thing, right, and society
52:52
will be better. Right. But the person that wanting you to fight and
52:54
die or no wind or not sucist. Right, So they make a think
52:59
that you are a subjective an objective. They may put things that are white
53:06
and they prelif it when they are black. And actually belive it, and
53:10
they fight for it, and they die for it, they go to war
53:14
for it, and they destroy themselves on sualization for it. And you get
53:20
to wonder, I'm on this planet? Am I an alien? I can
53:27
never fight in for colors? That's not true. That's a deficient. That's
53:31
subjective and objective. And look into the mirror. Don't they see themselves?
53:37
Don't they say, I'm look in the mirror that they don't see in the
53:40
black and the white. They just have a mirror, right, And they're
53:45
not blind, right when they look into the mirror. Now, I'm not
53:46
white, right, I'm not black, right, I'm not the color they
53:52
call me. I'm I'm right, I'm just a colorless pain. Right.
53:58
It takes so many color to de find a human being? Why? Because
54:00
that's why it can You can chose the human beings a multicolored being in human
54:04
meaning, it's a colorless been, right, Bob, right, Right?
54:07
You cannot say human beings a one colored being, right, because that cannot
54:09
be true, right, because the human mas got so many colors on them
54:13
their body. Right. But this is this is objective reasoning that I'm reasoning.
54:20
I'm reasoning from the fundamental fact of natural truth. But most humans don't
54:25
have this intellect of natural reasoning of natural truth. It's been taken away and
54:32
replaced by the pseudoscience of subjective truth. You know that people even took science
54:40
the cause todo science today. You know science that people think that they're black
54:45
and white. No joke, that's a kidding, a surprise, right,
54:52
this is a white dress. A way science of convinced bother than black and
54:55
white decided to talk of black and white society right to accept that whitey so
55:07
put that black is the way you were studying is because I don't like all
55:12
this garbage to the brain line. But they used that in order to distribute
55:17
good and wealth. So they deliberately lie about science because they want to use
55:24
science to discriminate and cheat other people. Right to discriminate other people, to
55:31
discriminate against other people, and lie that science justify that. Right, isn't
55:37
a white person, then a black person, isn't a red person, is
55:43
an a yellow person? But you're gonna go out in society and sepport and
55:46
another. I am white, I am black, I am red, I
55:55
am yellow, I am colored? Or talk about white people, black people,
56:04
colored people, yellow people, red people like you're wondering, what are
56:09
they talking about? Multi colored will be right right if you call it,
56:20
call it? Can say humans are all colored people, right, that'll be
56:22
right right. But here there is the humans I got? Is it particular
56:27
groups? I call it? You get to ask the question if particular groups
56:31
are colored? Are your colorless? What color are you? Then? If
56:37
you have your color, miss your color? Correct it? What again?
56:47
Correct it? May that person doesn't believe in myself. He just said a
56:50
little girl, I'm happy you got that objective truth exactly. Subjectivities and objectivities
57:00
don't fall for subjectivities don't be saved. What is that a TV? What
57:07
is on the TV? Yeah? Is it artwork? Subjective? For objective?
57:13
Why is it art work? Subjectives? Artwork subjective? That's some way
57:21
we say, because you can it's the athlete. It's subjective because the artwork
57:30
may look at something and it's your choice to say what's looks like? You
57:35
can say anything it looks like. It just matters on your intelligence and how
57:39
smart you are. Many people may have different opinions. Maybe a person may
57:46
not may disagree on what the person said, but it may still be correct.
57:51
But the person but it's still right. Correct. So the artwork,
57:55
for example, is abstract, right, it's subjectively too, right with the
58:00
human being under the mind is abstract right. But the human being itslf is
58:04
not subjective. Right, it's an object, it's a thing, right,
58:06
you can't see right, So there's subjectativity. The human beings a mind right,
58:13
the human being it's a real person, right, and the mind too
58:16
right, And their mind might be subjective. Right. But if the human
58:21
being said, I use to call myself white, I just to call myself
58:24
black. That's the choice, right, I might accept it or not accepted,
58:30
right, because I know they are not black or white line right.
58:34
But because they used to call themselves black and white, they cannot therefore false
58:37
wather. They cannot that first, they cannot force that on me, right,
58:40
because I don't I'm not that. I don't want to be called that,
58:44
right. I don't see myself that black and white or green or anything.
58:46
Right. I see myself like a person right, right, like an
58:52
intelligent human being. Right, the human being with a mind right, want
58:55
to create, right to think for itself, right to work, right,
59:00
to be positive, right, and the positive on the country be right.
59:05
That's what humans are right now, I'm just an experience, right, I
59:07
can know that experience. Right, I'm just a mind right, And don't
59:12
define with me, right, define what I do right? Right? Don't
59:16
deny me as you're saying by imposing a color on me? Right? Is
59:21
that fair? Is it fair to deny the being of the being an imperson
59:24
native cycle? Or is it fair to deny the objective reality of the being?
59:30
Or objective natural with the being an impulsive subjective to scripture of the being?
59:36
That be fair? And with the pins I don't want to be discribed
59:38
that we keep describing a thing like that? Will you prefer to refuse the
59:42
naturality of a being? I give you the beins and force identity. I
59:45
use that false identity to discriminate against that being? Would that be nice?
59:51
Whether I be fair? Would I be charked? Would I be right but
59:55
not acceptable? Would I be civilized? Will you mean that you're a good
1:00:00
person or bad person? A good person? You do good things right?
1:00:06
Persons said the good people? But doing bad things right? Subjectivity, objectivity