Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Dark Conclave and the Divine Decree (Matthew 26:3-5)

Transcript

The Dark Conclave and the Divine Decree (Matthew 26:3-5) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
So imagine you're watching a high stakes political thriller.
0:07
Oh, I love those. Right, the camera kind of brings
0:10
you into this smoky, dimly lit backroom.
0:14
Yeah, the classic movie setup. And the most influential men in
0:17
the nation are sitting there plotting an assassination.
0:19
They have the funding, they have the guards, and they have this
0:23
perfectly calculated timeline to pull the whole thing off without
0:27
a hitch. Spot on, and as a viewer you
0:30
were just led to believe that these men are the ones pulling
0:32
the strings. You assume they hold all the
0:34
cards well. Yeah, because that is how we
0:36
assume the world works. The guys in the shadows are in
0:39
charge. But what if the person they are
0:42
trying to assassinate is actually the one who wrote the
0:43
script they're reading from? That changes the entire genre of
0:47
the story. It really does.
0:49
What if every single move they make, thinking it is their own
0:52
brilliant strategy, was well ordained before they were even
0:55
born? I mean, that shifts it from a
0:57
political thriller to this staggering display of absolute
1:01
sovereignty. Welcome to Reform Thinking.
1:03
This is today's deep dive into the source material.
1:06
Glad to be here for this one. Today we are going to look at
1:08
the darkest religious and political conspiracy recorded in
1:12
human history. It is a heavy topic for sure.
1:14
Yeah, it is. We are turning our attention to
1:17
the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 26.
1:19
Specifically, we are looking at verses 3 through 5.
1:23
Which is the gathering of the Sanhedrin right?
1:25
Right, the highest council in Israel as they plot the death of
1:28
Jesus Christ. And, you know, this passage
1:30
establishes a massive theological paradox that really
1:34
confronts everything we assume about how the world functions.
1:37
How so? Well, we constantly see chaotic
1:40
global events, backroom political deals, institutional
1:44
corruption, and we naturally assume human autonomy is the
1:49
engine of history. Right.
1:50
We think the people making the decisions in the shadows are the
1:53
ones controlling the timeline. Yes, but the text we are
1:56
unpacking today shatters that illusion completely.
1:59
So the mission for this conversation is to examine how
2:01
the meticulous, highly calculated scheming of the
2:04
religious elite was totally overruled by a divine decree.
2:08
Which is such a comforting reality it.
2:10
Really is for you listening. If you've ever looked at the
2:13
cultural landscape and felt like, well, like the enemies of
2:16
truth have the upper hand, this will change your perspective.
2:19
Or if you feel like history is just spiraling out of control.
2:22
Right, this historical reality flips that completely upside
2:26
down. I mean, we're talking about
2:27
wicked men conspiring to murder the Incarnate Son of God.
2:33
The gravity of this text is just immense.
2:36
We are brought face to face with two simultaneous realities.
2:40
Break those down. On one hand, you have the
2:43
absolute meticulous sovereignty of God over the absolute darkest
2:47
of human conspiracies. I'm on the other.
2:49
Hand on the other hand, you have the total moral culpability of
2:53
the individuals carrying out that conspiracy.
2:55
Which is the tension we see throughout the New Testament.
2:57
Definitely the Apostle Peter preaches this specific tension
3:00
in Acts chapter 2, verse 23. I love that sermon.
3:03
Me too. He stands up and declares that
3:05
Jesus was delivered up according to the definite plan and
3:09
foreknowledge of God. But then in the very breath he
3:12
says that Jesus was crucified and killed by the hands of
3:16
lawless men. So to really understand the
3:18
sheer weight of this secret meeting in verse 3, we cannot
3:22
just jump straight into the courtyard with the conspirators.
3:25
No, that would miss the point entirely.
3:26
We have to understand the contrast of 2 completely
3:30
different timelines. Right, we need to look at what
3:31
happens immediately before this secret gathering.
3:34
The literary context here is everything isn't.
3:37
It it is the way the author Matthew arranges his material
3:40
dictates the meaning of the events.
3:42
So let's step back a few pages. Let's look at Matthew chapters
3:45
24 and 25. The Olivet Discourse, Yeah.
3:49
Jesus is sitting on the Mount of Olives with his disciples.
3:52
He is functioning as the Supreme Prophet.
3:55
And he gives this breathtaking exposition of future events.
3:58
He. Does he predicts the destruction
4:00
of the Temple in Jerusalem, which actually happens decades
4:04
later in 70? AD right, and he describes the
4:08
tribulation, the rising of false Christs, the darkening of the
4:12
sun. And the return of the Son of Man
4:14
coming on the clouds of heaven. He concludes with the final
4:17
judgement of the nations right separating the sheep from the
4:20
goats. He is exerting absolute,
4:23
unfiltered authority over the future of the cosmos.
4:25
He speaks as the omniscient king.
4:27
I mean, he holds the entire span of human history and cosmic
4:31
judgement right in his hands. And then we hit Matthew 26
4:36
verses 1 and 2. The shift is jarring.
4:39
It is Jesus finishes all these sayings, and he makes this
4:46
staggering prediction to his disciples.
4:48
What does he? Say he says, you know that after
4:50
two days the Passover is coming and the Son of Man will be
4:54
delivered up to be crucified. The juxtaposition is striking.
4:57
Jesus calmly and resolutely declares the precise timing of
5:00
his death. He says it will happen after two
5:03
days. And he declares the precise
5:05
method. He says he will be crucified.
5:07
That specific detail just stops me in my tracks every time I
5:10
read it. Why is that?
5:11
Well, crucifixion was not a Jewish method of execution.
5:14
No, it was Roman. Right, the Jewish penalty for
5:16
blasphemy was stoning. Which they tried to do to him
5:19
multiple times earlier in the gospels.
5:21
Exactly. I mean spot on.
5:23
Jesus is predicting a Roman execution method initiated by
5:29
Jewish leaders who do not even possess the legal authority to
5:32
crucify anyone. It is incredible.
5:34
It is like a chess grandmaster calling mate in two before the
5:38
opponent even realizes the game has begun.
5:41
That is a great analogy. The Grandmaster looks at the
5:43
board, sees every piece, knows every hidden strategy the
5:47
opponent is formulating, and just casually announces the end
5:50
of the game. He dictates the terms of his own
5:53
sacrifice. He does, and right after Jesus
5:56
makes this precise prediction, verse 3 begins with a crucial
5:59
transition word. The word then.
6:01
Yes, then, the text reads. Then the chief priests and the
6:04
elders of the people gathered in the palace of the high priest.
6:07
The narrative camera pans away from the omniscient king
6:10
speaking openly in the daylight. And it cuts to the conspirators
6:14
hiding in the shadows. It is a brilliant literary move.
6:17
But let me ask you this doesn't this prior announcement from
6:20
Jesus reframe the plotting that happens in the very next?
6:22
Verse. Oh, absolutely.
6:23
Because if he already announced the outcome, you know, the day,
6:27
the holiday, the method of execution.
6:30
Are the conspirators just scrambling in the dark?
6:32
They are entirely in the dark. Jesus is not portrayed as a
6:36
tragic victim caught in a web of unforeseen circumstances.
6:39
The narrative arrangement is deliberate, then. 100%
6:42
deliberate. Jesus speaks first, the rulers
6:46
plot second. So the reader is meant to view
6:48
the conspiracy through the lens of the prior prediction.
6:51
Yes, Human Council always follows divine disclosure in
6:55
this narrative. The enemies of Christ imagine
6:58
they are initiating a plan. But the text places their scheme
7:02
directly under the declared purpose of God.
7:04
They think they are the directors of the play.
7:06
They think they wrote the script right.
7:08
But they are actors hitting their marks on a stage they do
7:11
not even realize was built by the very person they're trying
7:14
to destroy. That is the dynamic at play
7:17
here. If you were to isolate verses 3
7:19
through 5 from the preceding chapters, you might conclude
7:22
something completely different. You might think the religious
7:25
leaders were the masterminds of a brilliant coup.
7:28
Yeah, you might fall into the trap of viewing the cross as a
7:31
tragic accident of history. Like it was just a terrible
7:34
political misfortune for Jesus of Nazareth.
7:37
And, you know, some historical critical scholars actually
7:40
attempt to read the text that way by fragmenting the
7:42
narrative. Right.
7:43
Treating it like Jesus was just a misunderstood social
7:46
revolutionary who got on the wrong side of the ruling class.
7:50
But the literary context forbids that reading Matthew places the
7:55
Sanhedrin secret plot in the shadow of Jesus's open prophecy.
7:59
To demonstrate that the flow of thought is controlled by the
8:02
doctrine of divine Providence. Spot on.
8:05
This literary unit acts as a bridge.
8:08
A bridge from what to what? It transitions from Christ's
8:11
prophetic ministry on the Mount of Olives to his priestly
8:14
sacrificial work on the cross. So the thematic link is the
8:17
sovereignty of the King, who reigns even as he prepares to be
8:21
slaughtered. It sets the pace for the
8:22
relentless March toward Golgotha.
8:24
And it is not driven by the Sanhedrin schedule.
8:27
Not at all. It is driven by the redemptive
8:29
timetable of Almighty God. OK, so knowing that the board is
8:33
already set in God's favor, let's step inside the room with
8:36
the men who believe they are in charge.
8:38
Let's do it. Who are these people and why are
8:41
they operating with such intense fear?
8:43
Well, to grasp the theological weight of their plotting, we
8:46
have to reconstruct the historical and political
8:49
environment with care. So what is this setting?
8:52
The setting is the palatial courtyard of Joseph Caiaphas,
8:55
the high priest. This is a convening of the
8:57
Sanhedrin. Yes, the Sanhedrin was the
8:59
Supreme Council, the highest judicial and religious tribunal
9:04
of the Jewish people. It included the chief priests,
9:06
the elders of the people and the scribes.
9:09
And we need to set the scene geographically and
9:12
chronologically too. Right, we are in Jerusalem.
9:14
Yeah, and it is just prior to the feast of the Passover.
9:18
And we have to remember, Passover is not a quiet, private
9:21
family holiday. No, it is a massive national
9:24
covenantal festival. Families travelled from all over
9:26
the known world for this. To remember the blood of the
9:29
lamb, the judgement passing over Israel, the defeat of Pharaoh.
9:32
And their historical exodus from slavery in Egypt.
9:35
Which means the city was packed. Beyond packed historical
9:39
estimates from the Jewish historian Josephus, note that
9:42
the population of Jerusalem swelled astronomically during
9:45
this Pilgrim feast. What?
9:47
Kind of numbers are we talking about?
9:48
A city with a normal resident population of perhaps 50,000
9:53
would explode to accommodate potentially over a million
9:56
souls. Let's try to visualize that for
9:58
a second. 50,000 people jumping to over 1,000,000.
10:01
The logistics of that are just staggering.
10:04
Imagine the phobia in the narrow streets of ancient Jerusalem.
10:08
Right, the noise, the chanting, the singing of the Psalms.
10:11
And think about the sheer volume of animals, hundreds of
10:15
thousands of lambs, being brought into the city for
10:17
sacrifice. The temple courts would be
10:19
flowing with blood. The smell of roasting meat and
10:22
incense would blanket the entire city.
10:25
It is bursting at the seams. And underneath all of this
10:28
religious fervor is a volatile powder keg of nationalistic
10:32
zeal. Because they're celebrating
10:34
their liberation from a foreign oppressor, Egypt.
10:37
While currently living under the heavy boot of the Roman Empire.
10:40
That is the defining political tension of the era, isn't it?
10:43
It is the Romans were acutely aware of the potential for
10:47
insurrection during Passover. So what they do about it?
10:50
Well, conscious Pilot the Roman governor actually relocated his
10:54
headquarters during the feast. Where did he usually?
10:57
Live. He normally resided in Caesarea
10:59
Maritima. It was a beautiful coastal city
11:01
built by Herod the Great. Very comfortable, very
11:04
Romanized. But during Passover, Pilate
11:08
marched his troops up to Jerusalem.
11:10
Right. He positioned himself in the
11:12
Antonia Fortress, which directly overlooked the temple courts.
11:16
Specifically to maintain order and crush any uprising.
11:20
He moves his military muscle right into the heart of the
11:23
city. He is sitting up there watching
11:25
the crowds. So when the Sanhedrin expresses
11:28
fear of an uproar among the people, they aren't just worried
11:31
about a loud protest or losing their popularity on Twitter.
11:34
No, they're terrified of Roman steel.
11:36
It is the pragmatic fear of men who know that a riot would bring
11:40
the swift, brutal hammer of the Roman legions down upon their
11:43
heads. Rome had 0 tolerance for civil
11:46
unrest. Do they have historical
11:48
precedent for that fear? Oh, definitely.
11:51
Decades earlier, after the death of Herod the Great, a Passover
11:55
riot led to the slaughter of 3000 Jews in the Temple courts.
11:59
3000 Wow. Done by Arcalois, so the
12:03
Sanhedrin knows their history. A riot threatens their political
12:06
status, their wealth and their very lives.
12:08
Exactly. I mean, spot on.
12:11
So let's look at the actors themselves.
12:12
Let's look at Joseph Caiaphas. We hear the title High Priest,
12:16
and we might picture a wholly benevolent, spiritually grounded
12:20
leader. But the historical reality of
12:23
Caiaphas is quite different. How so?
12:25
The office of the high priest was established through the
12:27
lineage of Aaron, right? And it was meant to be a
12:30
lifetime appointment. But under Roman occupation, the
12:33
office had devolved into a political football.
12:35
Yes, the Roman prefects appointed and deposed high
12:38
priests at will to ensure compliance.
12:41
So Caiaphas was essentially a political appointee.
12:44
He was installed by the Roman prefect Valeria Gratis, who was
12:47
Pilot's predecessor. And he managed to hold on to
12:50
power for an unusually long time, didn't he?
12:52
Roughly 18 years, which strongly suggests he was highly skilled
12:56
at appeasing his Roman overlords and paying the necessary bribes.
13:01
So he owes his position, his wealth and his influence to
13:04
Rome. He answers to the occupiers, not
13:07
to God. Furthermore, Caiaphas was a
13:10
Sadducee. Let's define that for the
13:12
listener who were the Sadducees. The Sadducees were the
13:15
aristocratic elite. They were characterized by
13:17
theological liberalism. They rejected the oral
13:20
traditions of the Pharisees. Yes, accepting only the first 5
13:23
bucks of Moses. And they outright denied the
13:25
resurrection of the dead. And the existence of angels and
13:28
spirits. They were wealthy pragmatists
13:30
marked by extreme political compromise.
13:32
And in this council they are joined by their bitter
13:35
theological rivals, the Pharisees.
13:37
Which is crazy because the Pharisees and the Sadducees
13:39
hated each other. They disagreed on almost
13:41
everything. The Pharisees were populists,
13:44
strict legalists, and they believed fervently in the
13:47
resurrection. But they find common ground in
13:49
the courtyard of Caiaphas. They form this unholy alliance
13:52
united solely by their shared venomous hatred for Jesus
13:55
Christ. Because Jesus threatened the
13:58
theological system of the Pharisees.
14:00
And he threatened the political stability and temple revenue of
14:03
the Sadducees. So this sounds less like a holy
14:06
judicial gathering and more like a corrupt political spin room.
14:10
It really does. These are the highest religious
14:13
guardians in the nation. Why are they meeting in secret
14:16
at a private residence instead of conducting official business
14:20
in the temple chambers? That is the key question if.
14:22
They're the lawful authorities. Shouldn't they be in the Hall of
14:25
Hewn Stones where the Sanhedrin officially met?
14:28
That geographical detail highlights the illicit, off the
14:31
books nature of the gathering. It exposes the auto bankruptcy
14:35
of the religious establishment. They were the supposed guardians
14:38
of the Law of Moses, yet they were entirely lined to the Law
14:41
Giver standing in their midst. We can view this through the
14:44
lens of God's unfolding plan. Different periods of redemptive
14:48
history highlight different aspects of God's covenant
14:51
dealings with humanity. In this specific moment marks
14:54
the definitive catastrophic rejection of the promise Davidic
14:59
king by the official national leaders of Israel.
15:02
They are the wicked stewards of the vineyard, as Jesus described
15:05
in his parables, plotting to kill the air.
15:07
They prize their political survival over fidelity to God's
15:11
covenant. And these historical details
15:13
demonstrate the precise geopolitical pressures God
15:16
utilized. He used the brutal reality of
15:19
Roman occupation, the. Massive, chaotic Passover
15:22
crowds. And a thoroughly corrupt
15:24
priesthood. To ensure that his son would die
15:27
on the specified day in the specified manner prophesied
15:31
centuries before. So Caiaphas and the Pharisees
15:34
are terrified of the crowd. They know a riot means Roman
15:37
swords in the streets. But they are absolutely
15:39
desperate to kill Jesus. So how do you arrest the most
15:42
popular figure in Jerusalem without anyone noticing?
15:45
What was their actual tactical playbook?
15:48
This brings us to the actual text of verses 3 through 5.
15:51
The original Greek language gives us incredible insight into
15:54
their true motives, doesn't it? A careful exegesis of the Greek
15:57
text reveals the spiritual reality behind their plotting.
16:01
Let's dig into that. In verse 3 it says they gathered
16:04
together. The Greek verb used here is
16:07
synoptosm. Yes, this is a highly specific
16:12
chilling parallel. This exact verbal route is
16:15
employed in the Septuagint. Which is the ancient Greek
16:18
translation of the Old Testament scriptures.
16:20
Right. And it is used specifically in
16:22
Psalm 2. Psalm 2.
16:23
Why do the nation's rage and the people's plot in vain?
16:27
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take
16:31
counsel together against the Lord and against His anointed.
16:34
Yes, the phrase the rulers were gathered together uses that same
16:38
Greek word synoptizon. So Matthew deliberately echoes
16:42
the Psalms to demonstrate that this clandestine meeting in a
16:45
wealthy courtyard is the monumental fulfillment of
16:48
prophetic rebellion. They are acting out the very
16:51
Psalm they had memorized since childhood.
16:52
They are the rulers taking counsel against the Lord's
16:55
anointed. The irony is staggering.
16:57
They view themselves as the defenders of the faith.
16:59
But the text identifies them as the raging, rebellious Pagan
17:02
kings. They are fulfilling ancient
17:04
prophecy while actively attempting to destroy the
17:07
prophet. And their method is detailed in
17:09
verse 4. They plotted to arrest Jesus by
17:11
stealth or deceit. The.
17:13
Greek noun here is dolos. Dolos.
17:16
What does that mean in the ancient context?
17:19
In ancient Near Eastern and Greco Roman literature, dolos
17:22
carries a very specific connotation.
17:25
It frequently referred to a bait, a trap or a snare used by
17:29
hunters to catch wild animals. It implies cunning, treachery
17:32
and camouflage. A hunter snare that is such a
17:35
vivid. Picture a hunter doesn't stand
17:37
in the open and challenge the animal.
17:38
No. A hunter hides the trap under
17:41
leaves. He uses bait.
17:42
He strikes when the animal is unaware.
17:45
Matthew could have used a generic term for capture or sea,
17:50
but he selected a word dripping with malice and deception.
17:53
This word choice strips away any remaining veneer of judicial
17:56
legitimacy from the Sanhedrin. They are not acting as impartial
18:00
judges upholding the sacred law. They are predators laying a
18:03
snare. It exposes A glaring hypocrisy.
18:07
They are terrified of breaking Roman law by inciting a riot,
18:10
but they are completely fine with breaking God's law by
18:13
committing murder. If they are the lawful
18:14
authorities, if their case is solid, why do they have to use
18:17
Hunter's bait? Right.
18:19
Why not hold a public trial in the daylight?
18:21
Because righteous causes do not require deceit.
18:24
When institutions reject the truth, they inevitably turn to
18:28
procedural abuse, manipulation and secrecy.
18:32
If their case against Jesus were righteous, they could proceed
18:36
openly in the temple courts. But truth is not their friend.
18:39
Deception becomes their instrument of murder.
18:42
This reveals the moral logic of hardened unbelief.
18:45
Sin rarely announces itself by saying I hate God and I want to
18:50
destroy righteousness. No.
18:51
It cloaks itself in pragmatism. It says this situation is
18:54
dangerous and it must be managed carefully for the greater good.
18:56
This must be managed carefully. That is the language of a public
19:00
relations firm, not a holy priesthood.
19:02
And that brings us to their final pragmatic conclusion in
19:05
verse 5. They say not during the feast,
19:08
lest there be an uproar among the people.
19:10
The Greek word for uproar is thoribose.
19:12
Thoribose What kind of uproarose that?
19:15
Thoribose indicates a tumultuous riot, a chaotic, violent tumult.
19:19
Their fear of the crowd is palpable.
19:21
They fear man more than they fear God.
19:23
The massive crowd functions as a temporary restraint on their
19:26
timeline, not a moral instructor for their conscious.
19:29
They do not pause and say let us not shed innocent blood, let us
19:34
review the evidence. It's simply say let us avoid
19:36
public unrest so Rome doesn't intervene.
19:39
Their conscience is governed entirely by political
19:42
consequence. They are perfectly fine with the
19:44
murder, they just need the timing to be convenient.
19:47
They want to wait until the million plus pilgrims pack up
19:50
their tents and go home. They want the quiet alleys.
19:53
They want to avoid the spotlight.
19:55
And this brings us to the most staggering reality of this
19:58
historical event. This is where the tension
20:00
reaches its absolute peak. The Sanhedrin makes their final
20:04
bulletproof ruling not during the feast.
20:08
These are the most powerful men in the nation.
20:09
They have the financial resources, they command the
20:11
temple guards, they have the political connections with
20:14
Pilot. They decree a delay.
20:16
But anyone who knows even a basic outline of history knows
20:20
that Jesus died precisely during the feast.
20:22
He was crucified on Friday of Passover week.
20:25
How does their bulletproof plan fail so spectacularly?
20:29
It demonstrates the complete futility of human wisdom when it
20:33
attempts to oppose divine sovereignty.
20:35
The Sanhedrin's pragmatic wisdom clashes violently with God's
20:39
eternal decree. God the Father ordained from
20:42
eternity past that the Son would be the true Passover lamb.
20:46
The fulfillment of the Exodus type.
20:48
Exodus chapter 12. Yes, God commanded Israel in
20:52
Egypt to take an unblemished lamb, slaughter it, and apply
20:56
its blood to the doorposts. When the Angel of Death swept
20:59
through Egypt, the judgement would pass over any house
21:03
covered by the blood. That entire historical event was
21:06
a shadow pointing forward to the ultimate reality of Christ.
21:09
The eternal decree of the Triune God dictated that the true
21:13
Passover Lamb had to be slain precisely during the feast.
21:16
He had to bleed at the very hour the literal lambs were being
21:19
sacrificed in the temple courts by the thousands.
21:22
So the timelines are in total conflict.
21:24
The Sanhedrin officially decrees not during the feast.
21:27
God decrees during the feast. If the Sanhedrin had their way,
21:31
Jesus would have been arrested and killed weeks later in the
21:34
middle of a random Tuesday. The prophetic symbolism would
21:37
have been lost. The fulfillment of the Exodus
21:39
lamb would have been broken. So God sovereignly thwarted the
21:43
meticulous plans of the Sanhedrin.
21:45
And how did he accomplish this? He used the wicked betrayal of
21:49
one of Jesus's own disciples, Judas Iscariot, to force their
21:53
hand. Judas just a few verses later,
21:56
he goes to the chief priests and asks, What will you give me if I
21:59
deliver him over to you? And they pay him 30 pieces of
22:03
silver. God utilized an act of
22:05
unspeakable treachery to compel the religious leaders to arrest
22:09
and crucify Christ on the exact day required by the divine
22:12
timetable. Judas offered them the
22:14
logistical solution to their fear.
22:16
He offered to hand Jesus over quietly, away from the crowds at
22:20
night in the Garden of Gethsemane.
22:21
It accelerated their timeline against their own initial.
22:24
Ruling their decision to delay was overruled by God's timeline.
22:28
Wait, hold on, I am struggling with the math here.
22:30
Let's lay it out. This is a classic theological
22:32
dilemma. If God arranged the timeline
22:34
perfectly and he used Judas to force their hand so that the
22:38
crucifixion happened exactly on Passover.
22:40
How can God then hold Caiaphas and the priests guilty of
22:43
murder? Isn't Caiaphas just an actor
22:45
reading a script God handed him? If God predestined the event,
22:49
how can the human beings involved be blamed?
22:52
That is the central question this text forces us to answer.
22:55
We must break down the concept of compatibilism.
22:59
Let's define that clearly for the listener compatibilism.
23:02
Compatibilism is the biblical reality that God's absolute
23:05
sovereignty and human moral responsibility are completely
23:09
compatible. They are not at odds.
23:11
God's sovereignly decreed the crucifixion.
23:14
We see this plainly in Acts 4, verses 27 and 28.
23:17
Which states that Herod, Pontius Pilate, the Gentiles, and the
23:21
peoples of Israel were gathered together to do whatever God's
23:24
hand and God's plan had predestined to take place.
23:28
Yet, and this is the crucial distinction, God does not coerce
23:32
the will of the creatures. What do?
23:33
You mean by coerce? They aren't robots with their
23:35
strings being pulled. No, not at all.
23:36
Coercion implies forcing someone to do something against their
23:39
deepest desires. God did not force Caiaphas to
23:42
hate Jesus. God did not force Judas to love
23:45
money. The conspirators are fully
23:48
morally culpable because they acted entirely according to
23:51
their own wicked desires. They wanted to kill him.
23:54
They chose to use deceit dolos. They plotted freely.
23:57
No one forced them to lay a snare.
23:59
So their choices are real and their choices have consequences,
24:02
but their choices are operating within a boundary established by
24:05
God. Yes, the brilliant theologian
24:08
Jonathan Edwards explained this so well.
24:10
He said that human beings always choose according to their
24:12
greatest inclination at the moment of choice.
24:16
Caiaphas chose, according to his greatest inclination, political
24:20
survival and hatred of Christ. He is entirely culpable for his
24:24
murderous deceit. Meanwhile, God is entirely holy
24:28
in His ordaining of the event for the salvation of His people.
24:31
God governs evil, acts toward holy ends without ever
24:35
committing evil or excusing the evil of the creature.
24:38
That is a massive concept. God is not reacting to the free
24:41
will decisions of Caiaphas. He is not sitting in heaven,
24:44
wringing his hands, scrambling to fix a broken plan because
24:48
human beings messed it up. This text crushes theological
24:51
systems that attempt to diminish God's sovereignty.
24:53
Take open theism, for instance. Open theism argues that God does
24:57
not know the future free choices of human beings.
25:00
It portrays God as reacting to human events as they unfold,
25:04
adapting His plan on the fly. But Jesus predicts the exact day
25:08
and the exact method before the Council even formalizes their
25:12
plot. God is clearly not reacting.
25:15
Precisely. It also pushes past the
25:17
boundaries of Arminianism. Arminianism suggests that God
25:20
simply looks down the corridors of time, sees what free human
25:24
beings will choose to do, and then bases His plan on their
25:27
foreseen actions. But this text shows God actively
25:30
over ruling their foreseen actions.
25:32
They chose not during the feast. God ordained during the feast,
25:36
and He brought it to pass by governing the betrayal of Judas.
25:39
God is sovereignly orchestrating history so that the wicked
25:42
freely choose the very actions that fulfill His divine decree.
25:46
It is like the story of Joseph in the book of Genesis.
25:48
Oh. That is a great example.
25:50
Joseph's brothers are jealous of him.
25:52
They hate him. They.
25:53
Freely choose to throw him in a pit and sell him into slavery in
25:56
Egypt. They are.
25:57
Absolutely guilty of human trafficking and betrayal.
25:59
But decades later, Joseph saves millions of people from
26:02
starvation, including his own brothers.
26:04
And he looks at them and says, you meant evil against me, but
26:09
God meant it for good to bring it about, that many people
26:12
should be kept alive. That is the perfect biblical
26:15
parallel. Notice the language.
26:17
Joseph does not say you did evil and then God figured out a way
26:20
to use it. He says God meant it.
26:23
The same action had two intentions.
26:26
The brothers intended evil. God intended good.
26:29
In Matthew 26, the darkest, most powerful religious conspiracy in
26:33
history was nothing more than a mechanism utilized by God to
26:37
accomplish the redemption of the world.
26:39
The cross was not an accident. God did not just defeat evil
26:43
after it happened. He overruled evil in the very
26:46
act by which evil attempted to triumph.
26:48
That brings us to the application for the modern
26:50
hearer, because this isn't just an ancient history lesson about
26:53
Roman politics and Jewish festivals.
26:55
This historical and theological reality carries a critical
26:58
warning and a massive comfort for the listener today.
27:00
We must apply these truths directly to modern institutions,
27:04
the fear of man and the doctrine of Providence.
27:06
Let's begin with the warning. The text aggressively confronts
27:09
the idol of pragmatism. Pragmatism, the philosophy that
27:13
whatever works, whatever gets the desired result or avoids the
27:17
most pain, is the right course of action.
27:19
The Sinhugen's decision, not during the feast lest there be
27:23
an uproar, was driven entirely by a fear of man and a desire to
27:28
manage outcomes through human wisdom.
27:30
This tragically mirrors modern religious and corporate
27:33
institutions. It is the modern boardroom.
27:36
You can picture the executives sitting around a sleek
27:38
conference table. They're looking at the data,
27:41
looking at the polling numbers, monitoring the social media
27:44
sentiment. The question they ask is not
27:46
what is the truth? The question is, how will this
27:49
play with the public? Will this cause an uproar?
27:52
Are we sometimes more worried about optics and managing
27:55
outcomes than simply obeying the truth?
27:57
We see this clearly in movements that prioritize cultural
28:01
palatability over fidelity to truth.
28:03
Leaders who alter their message, avoid difficult truths or manage
28:07
optics simply to avoid a cultural backlash are walking in
28:11
the footsteps of Caiaphas. The warning is that false
28:13
religion and compromise leadership always depend on
28:16
manipulation, secrecy and calculated timing.
28:19
When leaders to measure their success by crowd management
28:22
rather than faithfulness, they were sitting in that courtyard.
28:25
That is a sharp critique, managing the crowd instead of
28:28
leading them. You might have the title, the
28:30
corner office, the massive budget and the religious robes,
28:35
but if you were using deceit and stealth to avoid public
28:38
backlash, you are operating in the shadows of unbelief.
28:42
But alongside that stern warning, there is immense
28:45
comfort here for the listener. Yes, for the believer facing an
28:49
anti Christian culture, this text offers a massive foundation
28:53
of peace. Let's unpack that.
28:55
How does a story about a murderous conspiracy bring
28:58
peace? Think about the believers in the
29:01
1st century who initially read Matthew's Gospel.
29:03
They were facing excommunication from the synagogues.
29:06
Ostracization from their family. And brutal persecution from the
29:09
very same religious authorities depicted plotting in this
29:12
passage. Matthew intended to produce an
29:15
overwhelming sense of awe and comfort regarding the absolute
29:18
sovereignty of Christ over his enemies.
29:20
Because if God can take the darkest, most treacherous
29:24
conspiracy in human history, the murder of his perfect Son, and
29:28
use it as the very mechanism to redeem the world.
29:32
Then he exercises absolute control over the machinations of
29:35
enemies today. You may look at the culture and
29:38
feel as though the enemies of truth are firmly holding the
29:41
timeline. Legislation has passed, cultural
29:44
mandates are enforced, believers are marginalized and
29:47
institutions seem hopelessly corrupt.
29:49
But look closely at Matthew 26. The most powerful, educated and
29:54
well funded men in Israel conspired in secret.
29:57
They utilized all their resources.
29:59
And the result of their brilliant, wicked scheming was
30:01
exactly what God had predestined to occur for the salvation of
30:05
His people. They thought they were building
30:06
a gallows to hang their enemy, but they were actually building
30:09
the altar that would provide the sacrifice to save the world.
30:12
True security is not found in manipulating circumstances.
30:15
It is not found in hiding behind religious formalism, titles or
30:19
political alliances. True security is found in union
30:21
with the Sovereign Christ, who willingly stepped into the snare
30:24
to purchase redemption. Jesus knew the trap was there.
30:28
He announced it. Yeah, and he walked directly
30:30
into it. Not because he was outsmarted by
30:33
Caiaphas, but because he was perfectly obedient to the
30:37
Father's decree. He was the king who conquered
30:40
not by avoiding the trap of death, but by passing straight
30:43
through it and breaking it open from the inside.
30:45
And that is the ultimate comfort.
30:47
The doctrine of Providence is not a soft, abstract concept for
30:50
comfortable days. It is a fortress for dark hours.
30:54
Enemies may plan, conspire and lay their snares, but God
30:58
reigns. No enemy, no institution, and no
31:01
conspiracy can move one inch beyond divine permission.
31:04
We are coming to the end of our conversation.
31:06
Let's summarize the sheer futility of human wisdom when it
31:10
attempts to outmaneuver divine sovereignty.
31:12
We started by talking about a high stakes political thriller.
31:15
We like to think we see clearly who is in charge.
31:18
We look at the politicians, the influencers, the high priests of
31:21
our culture and we assume they hold the timeline.
31:24
But this historical account shows us the deeper reality.
31:27
The invisible hand of God governs every detail.
31:30
The Sanhedrin's council was real and their malice was genuine,
31:34
but it was not the final word. Their sin was voluntary, but it
31:38
was not victorious. Before we sign off, I want to
31:41
leave you, the listener, with a final provocative thought.
31:44
Some of The Chew on that builds on everything we have discussed.
31:48
Think about the unnamed people in the Passover crowd.
31:51
The million plus pilgrims crammed into the streets of
31:54
Jerusalem. Yes, the religious elite delayed
31:57
their murderous plot solely because they were afraid of
32:00
those people. They were terrified of an
32:02
uproar. Yet the crowd was completely
32:04
unaware they were being used as a pragmatic variable in a cosmic
32:08
chess match. They were just going about their
32:10
festival, buying their lambs, singing their Psalms, arguing
32:14
with vendors. They had no idea their presence
32:16
was the very thing the Sanhedrin was trying to manage and
32:18
calculate around. The crowd as an unwitting
32:21
restraint on the timeline of evil.
32:24
How often are the crowds of our own era, public opinion, The
32:28
social media masses, The shifting tides of consumer
32:31
trends unwittingly shaping the moral compromises of powerful
32:35
leaders? Next time you see leaders acting
32:37
out of fear of the crowd, altering their message, or
32:40
hiding in the shadows to avoid an uproar, ask yourself who is
32:44
really pulling the strings. Are the leaders controlling the
32:46
crowd? Is the crowd controlling the
32:48
leaders, or is there a sovereign God orchestrating the entire
32:52
timeline to accomplish His holy will?
32:54
When the political thriller of history looks chaotic, remember
32:58
who actually wrote the script. Thank you for joining us on this
33:01
deep dive. We will see you next time on
33:03
Reformed Thinking.