Latest / The Animal Advocate / When Cruelty Laws Collide With Inaccessible Vet Care: What Advocates Can Do

Transcript

When Cruelty Laws Collide With Inaccessible Vet Care: What Advocates Can Do · The Animal Advocate

• 0:00
  He knew something was very wrong. His dog was vomiting,
• 0:04
  getting weaker, and time just felt like it was slipping away.
• 0:09
  He rushed to the vet, paid for emergency surgery, and
• 0:12
  hoped that removing that avocado pit they found in his dog's
• 0:16
  stomach would fix the problem. But it didn't.
• 0:20
  His dog needed more diagnostics, maybe another surgery,
• 0:24
  and he had nothing left. No savings, no
• 0:27
  credit, no options. So
• 0:31
  he made a decision he never imagined he'd have to make. He
• 0:35
  surrendered his dog to the animal shelter in Philly because
• 0:38
  it was the only way he could think of to give him a chance to
• 0:42
  get the care that he needed. People assumed he must have not
• 0:46
  cared, that he hadn't done enough. But what they didn't
• 0:49
  see was that he had spent everything he had trying to
• 0:53
  save his dog. Surrendering wasn't neglect.
• 0:57
  It was what love looked like when resources ran out.
• 1:01
  And that's the tension that I want to talk about today.
• 1:05
  What do we do when the law requires necessary vet care,
• 1:09
  but a family has absolutely no way to provide it?
• 1:13
  It's emotional. It doesn't lend itself to easy answers.
• 1:17
  But I hope you'll stick around and think it through with me.
• 1:23
  Welcome to the Animal Advocate, where we arm animal
• 1:27
  lovers with the information and inspiration you need to become
• 1:31
  effective advocates. I'm your host, Penny Ellison,
• 1:34
  and I've taught animal law and advocacy at the University of Pennsylvania
• 1:38
  since 2006. If you've ever thought
• 1:42
  someone should do something about that, I'm here to guide you
• 1:46
  on your journey to being that someone. You can
• 1:49
  find us on the web@animaladvocacyacademy.com
• 1:54
  and that's where you'll find show notes and resources, and you can
• 1:57
  send us your comments on episodes and ideas for topics you'd like to
• 2:01
  hear on future shows. So, on to today's
• 2:05
  topic.
• 2:12
  This episode is going to be a little different. No Q and A, no
• 2:15
  be the Change segment at the end. Just me
• 2:19
  talking through something I've been wrestling with for years. More like a
• 2:23
  conversation over coffee or like you're sitting in on one of my classes.
• 2:27
  Because this topic comes up in nearly every discussion I have with my
• 2:31
  students about animal cruelty laws. What happens when
• 2:34
  the law requires care but the ability to provide that care
• 2:38
  simply doesn't exist? Where is the line between
• 2:42
  responsibility and impossibility? And
• 2:46
  how do we hold people accountable for the care their animals receive
• 2:50
  without punishing them for being poor? These are the
• 2:53
  questions that come up again and again in my work and the questions that
• 2:57
  have shaped how I think about fairness and Equity when it comes to pet
• 3:01
  ownership. Every time I teach cruelty laws, this tension
• 3:05
  comes up. And the more cases I've seen, the more
• 3:08
  complicated it becomes. But there are real lives
• 3:12
  on the line, human and animal, and we need to talk
• 3:16
  about it together so that we can find a better way.
• 3:19
  Cruelty statutes like Pennsylvania's say that failing to
• 3:23
  provide necessary vet care is a crime. And those laws are
• 3:27
  important. They protect animals from genuine abuse and
• 3:30
  neglect. I support them. I sit on the board of the Pennsylvania
• 3:34
  SPCA and we enforce them. I've seen countless
• 3:38
  cases where prosecution was absolutely the right response, and it
• 3:42
  was life saving. But there's another reality that sits right
• 3:45
  next to that one. There are families who love their pets
• 3:49
  deeply and still face barriers they can't overcome.
• 3:53
  Barriers that aren't about indifference, but about access,
• 3:57
  cost, geography, and the systems that shape
• 4:01
  daily life. When I think about these issues, I think back to
• 4:05
  a dog named Judge Fudge. It's been about 10
• 4:08
  years now, but I still think of him because his case changed
• 4:12
  how I see all of this. He came into the shelter looking
• 4:16
  terrible, thin, frail, clearly
• 4:20
  unwell. And people assumed the worst. They assumed his
• 4:24
  family had lied when they said they'd been feeding him regularly because they
• 4:27
  couldn't explain why he looked so emaciated. But the truth
• 4:31
  was very different. Judge Fudge had a medical
• 4:35
  condition that prevented him from absorbing protein his
• 4:38
  family had been feeding him. They simply couldn't afford
• 4:42
  the diagnostics that would have revealed his condition. They
• 4:46
  surrendered him because they cared, not because they didn't.
• 4:50
  Stories like this remind me how dramatically access
• 4:54
  shapes outcomes. In one zip code, a vet is
• 4:57
  five minutes away, and urgent care is open late.
• 5:01
  In another zip code, no vets are taking new clients.
• 5:05
  Transportation is unreliable, there are no low cost
• 5:09
  options, and even a modest estimate is out of reach.
• 5:13
  The law doesn't recognize these differences, but
• 5:17
  in practice, they determine everything. When
• 5:21
  necessary, vet care is legally required. But
• 5:24
  financially unreachable, lower income families end
• 5:28
  up with an impossible take on criminal
• 5:32
  risk or step away from pet ownership
• 5:35
  altogether. Neither is humane, neither
• 5:39
  reflects our values, and neither acknowledges what we
• 5:43
  know about the human animal bond. Because for millions of
• 5:46
  people, a pet isn't a luxury. A pet is
• 5:50
  stability, comfort, connection.
• 5:54
  The research is overwhelming. Pets reduce chronic
• 5:58
  stress, improve physical health, support mental
• 6:02
  wellness, and deepen empathy. Children
• 6:05
  with pets show more confidence. Older adults
• 6:09
  feel less isolated. Veterans with PTSD see
• 6:13
  measurable improvements. People facing chronic
• 6:17
  illness, unstable housing, or food insecurity
• 6:21
  often say their pet is the one steady grounding presence they
• 6:24
  have. So when we Say, even
• 6:27
  indirectly, if you can't afford an unexpected
• 6:31
  $1,500 vet bill, you shouldn't have a pet. We're
• 6:35
  saying that companionship, comfort, and emotional support
• 6:39
  are privileges reserved only for people with disposable income.
• 6:43
  That isn't a world I want to live in. And it isn't the world any
• 6:47
  of us should accept. Not at a moment when shelters are
• 6:50
  overwhelmed, animals are being euthanized for space,
• 6:53
  and we desperately need people of all income levels to
• 6:57
  adopt and keep pets in their homes.
• 7:01
  So the question becomes, what does fairness look like when the
• 7:04
  law requires necessary vet care? Because
• 7:08
  fairness can't just mean everybody has the same obligation.
• 7:12
  Fairness has to mean that everyone has a real way to meet
• 7:16
  it. Right now, cruelty laws center on
• 7:19
  enforcement, whether someone knowingly or recklessly failed to
• 7:23
  provide necessary care. But they don't distinguish between
• 7:27
  refusal and inability. Now, in my
• 7:31
  experience, officers in the field try to bridge that gap
• 7:35
  by giving people time, sharing information,
• 7:39
  connecting them with resources where they exist. But in many
• 7:43
  communities, there are no resources. Veterinary
• 7:46
  deserts exist nationwide. Low cost clinics are
• 7:50
  scarce. Transportation is a huge barrier.
• 7:53
  Mobile services are limited. Telehealth is restricted in
• 7:57
  most states. And all of this mirrors the same inequities that
• 8:01
  shape human health care. Communities without reliable
• 8:05
  medical care for people almost always lack medical care
• 8:08
  for animals. It's the same forces at
• 8:12
  disinvestment, poverty, unstable housing,
• 8:16
  lack of transportation, and a shortage of providers.
• 8:20
  Human well being and animal well being rise
• 8:24
  and fall together. And this is why judgment,
• 8:28
  especially quick judgment, almost always misses the truth.
• 8:32
  When an animal shows up underweight or untreated,
• 8:36
  people assume the worst. But the family behind that
• 8:39
  animal may have exhausted every option. They may
• 8:43
  have tried harder than anyone realizes. They
• 8:47
  may have been juggling their own medical crises or, or calling
• 8:51
  every clinic within 50 miles, or trying to borrow money from
• 8:54
  relatives, or simply drowning in circumstances none of
• 8:58
  us can see from the outside. I know every surrender isn't
• 9:02
  this way. But by the time some families get to that
• 9:05
  shelter door, they've already fought harder than anyone will
• 9:09
  ever know. What they need isn't condemnation,
• 9:13
  it's help. And that brings me to the heart of, of what I want
• 9:17
  to say today. If we truly believe animals
• 9:21
  deserve necessary veterinary care, then subsidized
• 9:24
  veterinary services are not optional,
• 9:28
  they're essential. I always make the case for subsidized spay
• 9:31
  neuter because we know it reduces shelter intake, and that
• 9:35
  alone accomplishes a lot. But it's not enough.
• 9:39
  There's a broader equity argument, too. Basic
• 9:43
  veterinary care needs to be more accessible. Not just spay
• 9:47
  neuter, but vaccines, diagnostics, urgent
• 9:50
  care, preventive visits. And legislators
• 9:54
  should care about this because it's not just about the animals.
• 9:58
  It's about stronger communities. Subsidized veterinary
• 10:01
  access keeps pets in homes and reduces shelter
• 10:05
  overcrowding. And it also supports seniors,
• 10:09
  veterans and people with disabilities. It improves mental and
• 10:12
  physical health for residents. It prevents cruelty cases rooted in
• 10:16
  poverty, not malice. And it aligns with human
• 10:20
  health strategies that they already invest in. So this isn't a
• 10:23
  leap. It's a logical next step.
• 10:27
  Supporting families is one of the most effective ways to prevent animal
• 10:30
  suffering. Long before law enforcement enters the picture.
• 10:34
  Nonprofits are trying to fill this gap, but they can't meet the need
• 10:38
  alone, and they shouldn't have to. This isn't
• 10:42
  just a private burden, it's a community responsibility.
• 10:46
  Look, government already invests in animal control and sheltering.
• 10:50
  Just imagine if even a fraction of those dollars went towards
• 10:53
  keeping animals out of shelters in the first place. Now
• 10:57
  some shelters do this, but many don't have the funds to.
• 11:01
  And government and private funders have roles here.
• 11:05
  Foundations can pilot community clinics, support vouchers,
• 11:09
  expand mobile services, and demonstrate the outcomes
• 11:13
  that then justify public investment. Honestly, I
• 11:17
  think funding veterinary access is smarter than focusing on transporting
• 11:21
  animals from overcrowded shelters to emptier ones, like a
• 11:24
  lot of private funders do. Transport addresses the
• 11:28
  symptom. Veterinary access addresses the cause
• 11:32
  by keeping pets in homes. Here's what I hope you
• 11:36
  take away from today's episode. First, lead
• 11:40
  with compassion. When you see a surrender or an animal who
• 11:43
  arrives in poor condition, just pause.
• 11:47
  You don't know the barriers that family faced. Sometimes
• 11:51
  surrendering is the most loving decision they could make. And
• 11:54
  second, use your voice with lawmakers and funders.
• 11:59
  You knew I was going to say that. There are so many ways
• 12:02
  to close the gap. Public funding for low income vet
• 12:06
  care. Supporting vet school clinics.
• 12:09
  Creating tax incentives. Providing mobile
• 12:13
  services. Legalizing veterinary telehealth so that
• 12:17
  veterinarians can serve people in veterinary deserts.
• 12:21
  Expanding the scope of practice for trained vet techs.
• 12:25
  Creating a volunteer transport network to get people to vets.
• 12:30
  Integrating services through programs like Meals on Wheels or
• 12:33
  food pantries. These aren't handouts,
• 12:37
  they're smart humane policy.
• 12:42
  Last month I took my own dog, Kona, in for a checkup and routine
• 12:45
  vaccines. She's healthy. Nothing complicated.
• 12:49
  But when I paid the bill, I really thought about families
• 12:53
  who love their pets every bit as much as I do and they simply
• 12:57
  can't absorb those costs. I thought about that man
• 13:01
  whose dog swallowed the avocado pit. And I thought about the
• 13:04
  family who fed Judge Fudge every day and watched
• 13:08
  him decline with no answers. They weren't
• 13:11
  neglectful. They ran into barriers bigger than they were,
• 13:15
  and they did the best they could. So we can choose judgment,
• 13:19
  or we can choose compassion and fight for systems that give every
• 13:23
  family a fair chance to provide the care their pets need.
• 13:28
  And this is just the beginning of this conversation. This intersection,
• 13:31
  animal law, access to care, poverty and
• 13:35
  fairness is one we'll keep returning to on this podcast
• 13:39
  because it shapes so much about animal welfare today.
• 13:43
  Thanks for listening.
• 13:47
  That's it for today. The Animal Advocate Podcast is brought
• 13:51
  to you by the Animal Advocacy Academy. You can find
• 13:55
  episodes and show
• 13:56
  notes@animaladvocacyacademy.com
• 13:59
  along with a link to our Facebook and LinkedIn pages where we
• 14:03
  discuss our podcasts, and we'd love to discuss your thoughts and
• 14:06
  experiences there. If you're interested in learning more about
• 14:10
  protecting animals, subscribe to the show so you get every
• 14:13
  episode when it comes out. If you have any questions on
• 14:17
  this. Or any other topic related to animal. Law, email
• 14:21
  them to podcastnimaladvocacyacademy.com
• 14:25
  and we'll make sure to get them answered. We'll either email you back
• 14:29
  or feature. Them in a few episode, or both.
• 14:32
  And remember, compassion is great, but
• 14:36
  compassionate action is infinitely better. Until
• 14:39
  next week, Live with Compassion.