Latest / Best of Business / Matt James: Pegasus Residents' Group president on the rejection of proposal to fast-track the rezoning of the town's golf course
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talk ZB. Follow
- 0:12Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcast now on iHeartRadio Now.
- 0:16Speaker 2: Pegasus, the Pegasus Residence Group has welcomed the news that
- 0:19Speaker 2: Wolfbrook's fast track application for the development of the golf
- 0:22Speaker 2: course has been declined. The Minister Chris Bishop said today
- 0:25Speaker 2: that Wolfbrook's application should go through the RMA rather than
- 0:28Speaker 2: the fast track process.
- 0:29Speaker 3: They it would be better to go through a normal
- 0:31Speaker 3: RMA process and not use fast track. So that's over
- 0:35Speaker 3: to the applicants. My role is actually a relatively limited one,
- 0:39Speaker 3: which is to receive the application via the agency. You
- 0:42Speaker 3: make an assessment and then it's either a YA or
- 0:44Speaker 3: an A in terms of the referral, and I've declined it.
- 0:47Speaker 2: Matt James is the president of the Pegas's Residence Group
- 0:50Speaker 2: and he's with us now home.
- 0:51Speaker 4: Matt, good afternoon.
- 0:54Speaker 2: Have you celebrated this.
- 0:56Speaker 4: Oh yes, it's fair to say cautiously, but we have
- 0:59Speaker 4: celebrated for sure.
- 1:00Speaker 2: The cautious celebration look like is that like a shandy yawn?
- 1:03Speaker 2: What is it?
- 1:04Speaker 4: Yeah? I guess so? Really, yeah, it's like half and half.
- 1:07Speaker 2: When did you find out?
- 1:09Speaker 4: I got a phone call about half past five last night.
- 1:13Speaker 2: Actually, yeah, okay, that's interesting. How did the person who
- 1:16Speaker 2: told you, like, how did this get out?
- 1:19Speaker 4: It was? I was actually informed by our local national MP,
- 1:23Speaker 4: Matt Doosey. He was the first person who called me,
- 1:28Speaker 4: and then a few other people ran quite quickly after
- 1:31Speaker 4: that too.
- 1:31Speaker 2: So yeah, good. I was asking because we got a
- 1:34Speaker 2: text at about five to six saying is it true
- 1:36Speaker 2: that this has happened? And it took us about half
- 1:37Speaker 2: an hour to establish it, Like nobody's actually made a
- 1:39Speaker 2: song and dance of it. It sort of filtered out, didn't it. Anyway?
- 1:42Speaker 2: Do you know why it is that the minister declined this?
- 1:47Speaker 4: We don't And this is an interesting thing. As you
- 1:49Speaker 4: say in your build up, there is no clarity. I
- 1:53Speaker 4: have suspicion, but it's a purely a personal opinion. And
- 1:57Speaker 4: one key thing for fast Track is you need to
- 1:59Speaker 4: be able to demonstrate national significance and regional economic benefit
- 2:04Speaker 4: and I don't think a development of this nature would
- 2:07Speaker 4: have done that. But I don't know why.
- 2:12Speaker 2: You guys have heaps of houses down there already.
- 2:15Speaker 4: Well yeah, at the end of the day, the local
- 2:17Speaker 4: district council, I only just did the thirty year district
- 2:20Speaker 4: plan last year. They'd already baked in seventeen thousand sections
- 2:25Speaker 4: already there is no further need, so you know, this
- 2:30Speaker 4: would have been additional capacity that just doesn't need it,
- 2:35Speaker 4: and it's planned elsewhere and has gone through consultation to derive.
- 2:38Speaker 2: Where do you reckon that they may have had a
- 2:41Speaker 2: bitter chance if they hadn't been so aggressive in their
- 2:43Speaker 2: tactics the developer.
- 2:47Speaker 4: It's an interesting one, isn't it. I'm not sure. I'd
- 2:50Speaker 4: like to think that the merits of its decline would
- 2:53Speaker 4: stand in their own right. They certainly haven't endeared themselves
- 2:57Speaker 4: to us. I guess technically they've done nothing wrong, but yeah,
- 3:02Speaker 4: it's yeah, I'd like to think it would stand, and
- 3:05Speaker 4: you know, the decline would have stood in its own right.
- 3:08Speaker 3: Yeah.
- 3:09Speaker 2: They can obviously reapply, can't they. Do you think they will?
- 3:13Speaker 4: You? Yeah, I mean that's our caution. I guess that's
- 3:16Speaker 4: why we've been very caution at the moment. It's hard
- 3:20Speaker 4: to know that there is no appeal as such. It
- 3:23Speaker 4: is a complete reapplication. So with that is the full
- 3:27Speaker 4: fees and all the documentation that goes with that, And
- 3:30Speaker 4: I guess you have to ask the question if I
- 3:32Speaker 4: was them, is unless they get the clarity of why
- 3:34Speaker 4: they didn't get through the first time around, why would
- 3:36Speaker 4: you do it? So assuming they do get that clarity
- 3:40Speaker 4: at some level, then they might have a second crack.
- 3:45Speaker 2: The old fast track process has taken a bit of
- 3:46Speaker 2: a hammering in terms of public reception in the last
- 3:49Speaker 2: few weeks. I suppose has this restored your faith in it?
- 3:54Speaker 4: It has. We've never had an issue with fast Track
- 3:57Speaker 4: as it was intended, and you hear many people echo
- 4:00Speaker 4: that sentiment fast track was for big infrastructure projects, you know, roading,
- 4:05Speaker 4: housing or hospital sorry our plans and things like that.
- 4:09Speaker 4: It was never meant for residential development. It's the fact
- 4:12Speaker 4: that developers have found this loophole of its back door
- 4:16Speaker 4: to progress out of sequence planning and override and minimize
- 4:24Speaker 4: the voice of those actually impacted by that change.
- 4:27Speaker 2: All right, listen, Matt, I really appreciate your time very much.
- 4:29Speaker 2: You go, and they have the second half of your
- 4:32Speaker 2: Shandy has Matt James, Pigasus Residence Group Group President.
- 4:36Speaker 1: For more from News Talks b listen live on air
- 4:39Speaker 1: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you
- 4:42Speaker 1: go with our podcast on iHeartRadio